开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Y-acc-2 or y-acc-3 cables for ldg 200 pro II

ALAN BLACKWELL
 

Wher can I purchase the above cables. ?They do not seen to be available


Re: AT-600PRO Autotuner and Yaesu FT-847

 

Keep in mind that newer LDG tuners now have the radio tune feature disabled.? My AT1000 came in that way, my AT600 still has the feature.? When I spoke to LDG over the phone, he said people were running their radios remotely and burning them up.? I guess they weren't re-tuning once they moved off frequency.


On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 1:08 PM Phil Laird via <lairdpg=[email protected]> wrote:
Good points Ron, just an add: ?If you are going through an amplifier, you probably want to leave the tuner in semi automatic mode and monitor SWR more closely.? You would not want that tuner to auto transmit and key the amplifier when high SWR is present.? Best to put it in Standby then tune. ?

Wouldn't it be great if we never had to deal with SWR?? Guess that is a pipe dream. ? 73

Phil Laird, WI5O

On Feb 7, 2023, at 12:53, KK2DOG in NY via <kk2dog=[email protected]> wrote:

?
Thanks Ron. Having it connected to a 706MK2G spoiled me!


? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Mike KK2DOG
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Watertown, NY??
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? FN24?


On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 10:15:16 AM EST, Ron Wright via <lt_wright_flg=[email protected]> wrote:


Although it is good to have the LDG tuner work from a rig with a tune command, but the LDG tuners can operate in automatic where when they see RF and SWR above 1.5:1 they automatically tune.? So only the RF cables need to be connected for them to work.

I prefer the command cable be connected, but if that is not an option just letting the tuner tune on it's own will work.? Just put the rig in RTTY or other CW cont? xmt mode and let the tuner do it's thing.

73, ron, n9ee/r

Ron Wright, N9EE/R
Hernando Co ARES EC
Spring Hill, Florida also n9ee55@...


On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 01:01:12 AM EST, KK2DOG in NY via <kk2dog=[email protected]> wrote:


Does anyone know if these two are compatible and if so, what interface cable do I need?


Re: AT-600PRO Autotuner and Yaesu FT-847

 

开云体育

No SWR to deal with?? No, not impossible. ?But maybe not practical.

I think of it in terms of what I tell people about QRP.? Cute little RADIOS connected to cute little ANTENNAS don’t log many cute little CONTACTS. ?LOW-POWER // SMALL-ANTENNA // MANY CONTACTS.? You can pick two.? You can’t have all three.

So if you want to run power and not worry about SWR, there are some antenna designs that might allow that.? Essentially, you could connect into a big dummy-load and never worry about SWR.? I’ve seen people make a dipole using a big 50-Ω resistor across the end of the coax and a piece of wire off either end of the resistor.? Good SWR.? Broad-banded too.? But not a lot of contacts.

I haven’t owned an amplifier in 10 years.? I’ve been running a radio with 200 watts output, and it has been satisfactory.? But that radio is getting old, I’m looking at better….. but better is only 100-watts.? So I imagine I’ll be shopping for an amplifier in the near future.

?

?

?

Vy73? –? Mike? –? KD5KC – WRFF851 –? El Paso – Texas? –? DM61rt.?

SOTA W5T-Texas Association Manager.

?

The canyons are calling, colorful and deep.? But I have promises to keep.

And miles to go still in my Jeep...?? And miles to go still in my Jeep...

?

?

ADVENTURE:? The respectful pursuit of trouble.??

An EXIT is really an ENTRANCE to someplace new.?

It isn’t an ADVENTURE until something goes wrong!

?

.

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Phil Laird via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2023 12:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ldgelectronics] AT-600PRO Autotuner and Yaesu FT-847

?

Good points Ron, just an add: ?If you are going through an amplifier, you probably want to leave the tuner in semi automatic mode and monitor SWR more closely. ?You would not want that tuner to auto transmit and key the amplifier when high SWR is present. ?Best to put it in Standby then tune. ?

?

Wouldn't it be great if we never had to deal with SWR? ?Guess that is a pipe dream. ? 73

Phil Laird, WI5O



On Feb 7, 2023, at 12:53, KK2DOG in NY via groups.io <kk2dog@...> wrote:

?

Thanks Ron. Having it connected to a 706MK2G spoiled me!

?

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Mike KK2DOG

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Watertown, NY??

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? FN24?

?

?

On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 10:15:16 AM EST, Ron Wright via groups.io <lt_wright_flg@...> wrote:

?

?

Although it is good to have the LDG tuner work from a rig with a tune command, but the LDG tuners can operate in automatic where when they see RF and SWR above 1.5:1 they automatically tune.? So only the RF cables need to be connected for them to work.

?

I prefer the command cable be connected, but if that is not an option just letting the tuner tune on it's own will work.? Just put the rig in RTTY or other CW cont? xmt mode and let the tuner do it's thing.

?

73, ron, n9ee/r

Ron Wright, N9EE/R

Hernando Co ARES EC

Spring Hill, Florida also n9ee55@...

?

?

On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 01:01:12 AM EST, KK2DOG in NY via groups.io <kk2dog@...> wrote:

?

?

Does anyone know if these two are compatible and if so, what interface cable do I need?


Re: AT-600PRO Autotuner and Yaesu FT-847

 

开云体育

Good points Ron, just an add: ?If you are going through an amplifier, you probably want to leave the tuner in semi automatic mode and monitor SWR more closely. ?You would not want that tuner to auto transmit and key the amplifier when high SWR is present. ?Best to put it in Standby then tune. ?

Wouldn't it be great if we never had to deal with SWR? ?Guess that is a pipe dream. ? 73

Phil Laird, WI5O

On Feb 7, 2023, at 12:53, KK2DOG in NY via groups.io <kk2dog@...> wrote:

?
Thanks Ron. Having it connected to a 706MK2G spoiled me!


? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Mike KK2DOG
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Watertown, NY??
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? FN24?


On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 10:15:16 AM EST, Ron Wright via groups.io <lt_wright_flg@...> wrote:


Although it is good to have the LDG tuner work from a rig with a tune command, but the LDG tuners can operate in automatic where when they see RF and SWR above 1.5:1 they automatically tune.? So only the RF cables need to be connected for them to work.

I prefer the command cable be connected, but if that is not an option just letting the tuner tune on it's own will work.? Just put the rig in RTTY or other CW cont? xmt mode and let the tuner do it's thing.

73, ron, n9ee/r

Ron Wright, N9EE/R
Hernando Co ARES EC
Spring Hill, Florida also n9ee55@...


On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 01:01:12 AM EST, KK2DOG in NY via groups.io <kk2dog@...> wrote:


Does anyone know if these two are compatible and if so, what interface cable do I need?


Re: Z-817

Joe Fehrenbacher
 

Thank you Susan for your reply. This clears up some questions I had.

73
Joe



Get
On Feb 12, 2023, at 10:46, N0YWB <n0ywb1@...> wrote:

The "PC" port on the back of the Z-817H passes through serial commands? received on the "Radio" port,
to a linear amplifier capable of responding to a?
subset of the Yaesu CAT serial commands, such as the Tokyo Hi-Power HL=45B.??
Refer to the Z-817H Operation Manual ??
For the CAT commands, Refer to the CAT System Programming section of the FT-817 Operating Manual?
?
There is no specific PC software for the Z-817. There are many logging and PC digital modes applications that support Yaesu CAT commands for frequency control and band switching.?
? $13 Yeasu 8 Pin ACC mini-DIN CAT PC USB cable ?

?


Re: Z-817

 

The "PC" port on the back of the Z-817H passes through serial commands?received on the "Radio" port,
to a linear amplifier capable of responding to a?
subset of the Yaesu CAT serial commands, such as the Tokyo Hi-Power HL=45B.??
Refer to the Z-817H Operation Manual ??
For the CAT commands, Refer to the CAT System Programming section of the FT-817 Operating Manual?
?
There is no specific PC software for the Z-817. There are many logging and PC digital modes applications that support Yaesu CAT commands for frequency control and band switching.?
?$13 Yeasu 8 Pin ACC mini-DIN CAT PC USB cable ?

?


Z-817

 

I've read the manual about the computer port but I'm still not clear on how to use this feature.

I have an FT-818 and a Z-817.

Can anyone clarify its use and recommend appropriate software?

73
Joe





Get


Re: Problem with FT-897 & AT-897+

 

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:42 PM, Dennis wrote:
Dennis
Dennis, Not sure if this helps, I made a YouTube video covering the Yaesu FT897 no cat/linear control for FC30 or LDG AT897 ATU, CAT socket pin missing the 13.8v due too on board fuse F1001 blown, 3.15A.


sorry about sound level in the video, You will have to turn your volume up,?


Re: Problem with FT-897 & AT-897+

 

I'm sorry but had you read & understood the first message in this thread, as well as the repeated, an redundant, conditions in subsequent messages you could have saved yourself a great deal of time and trouble.

Over and over again it was stated that there was no fault with any cable(two different factory cables tried). These same cables worked fine with the YT100-FT897-FT859, and AT897-FT859. In addition I repeated that all settings were checked, rechecked, and checked again, and all are in accordance with the instruction manuals(Yes, that's ManualS, I have more than one). These settings must have been correct, and the cables not at fault, or none above would have been true. As such, this all demonstrates that the CAT is working, so I see no purpose in trying to use a PC though the CAT port, IT WORKS!

The question was specific to the AT-897+ as seen in the subject line, so your paragraph on the non-plus simply confused the issue.

Then finally, I more than once detailed how TWO YT-100 tuners work fine with these TWO FT-897, as well as TWO FT-857. AND that the subject AT-897 worked perfectly with TWO FT-857's, but refused to even be recognized by the same TWO FT-897's.

So, given that all the above information has already been posted more than once, how is it that your addition to the thread helped?

Again, I'm sorry you worked so hard, but nothing was presented that assisted in this dilemma.

I'll delete this thread so as to prevent any further wast of bandwidth.

Dennis Starks
KB?SFP


On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 04:47:26 PM CST, Geert Jan de Groot <pe1hzg@...> wrote:


On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 05:47 PM, Dennis wrote:
Yes, the detailed operation of the LDG tuner & the FT-897 was good, but contributed nothing to original thread, nor did the battery information.
Dennis, I? am a bit annoyed. I spent time looking at manuals and schematic diagrams to provide you an answer.
I asked:
  • Does the CAT port work to a PC?
  • Does the CAT port still work if the PC connection is via the tuner?
  • Verify that the cable fully seats in the CAT connector on the FT897 - there is an issue here
  • The settings of menu setting 19 and 20.
Without this info we can't help. And it's a bit short to say "it didn't contribute"

Geert Jan


Re: Problem with FT-897 & AT-897+

 

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 05:47 PM, Dennis wrote:
Yes, the detailed operation of the LDG tuner & the FT-897 was good, but contributed nothing to original thread, nor did the battery information.
Dennis, I? am a bit annoyed. I spent time looking at manuals and schematic diagrams to provide you an answer.
I asked:
  • Does the CAT port work to a PC?
  • Does the CAT port still work if the PC connection is via the tuner?
  • Verify that the cable fully seats in the CAT connector on the FT897 - there is an issue here
  • The settings of menu setting 19 and 20.
Without this info we can't help. And it's a bit short to say "it didn't contribute"

Geert Jan


Re: Problem with FT-897 & AT-897+

 

开云体育

Thanks for the well-written details, Geert.

And, since we're talking FT-897s, the stock Yaesu FNB-78 NiMH 4.5 AH batteries are still available from Gigaparts at $144.95 for the pair.

73,

Kent
K9ZTV



On 2/9/2023 11:03 PM, Geert Jan de Groot wrote:
The AT897 and the AT897plus work in a different way.

The AT897 needs three connections: RF antenna to the 897, the CAT connector (which is only used to get power for the tuner from the radio), and an "OTT" cable that connects via a "Y-ACC" cable to the ACC connector on the radio. When you start a tune cycle, it uses the OTT / Y-ACC cable to trigger the FT897 to generate a carrier.
Again, operation of the tuner is via the OTT cable, the CAT cable is only used to get power to the tuner.

The AT897plus works differently. It needs only two connectors: RF antenna to the 897 and the CAT connector. There is no OTT / Y-ACC cable or connector, no connection to the ACC plug on the radio. The CAT connection is used to make the tuner talk to the radio, to make it change mode, read out the frequency and trigger the radio to create a carrier. That is all done via communication over the CAT connector, which the non-plus does not do. Important: THE AT897plus NEEDS THE CAT COMMUNICATION TO FUNCTION.

There are a number of reasons why the 897plus may not work: the CAT interface may be set to a different baudrate (CAT RATE, option 19). The CAT/LIN/TUN setting may be wrong (option 20), it needs to be set to CAT. The cable may not make full contact because it can't be fully inserted because the connector sleeve is too thick (believe me, I had this problem on my 817 tuner). And perhaps the CAT port is broken on your FT897 radio.

Do you have a CAT interface to your PC, to program radio channels? Does it work on your FT897 barefoot? Does the CAT communication still work if connected via the tuner?

Note that the default, standard do-it-yourself plug for the CAT connector is too thick and won't properly mate the CAT mini-DIN connector on the FT897. I had to cut part of the sleeve to make that work for a CAT PC interface. And these days, I don't use the standard DIY plug, I bought some Kycon? KMDAX-8P connectors which are a bit of an attitude adjuster if you need to assemble them w/o instruction manual, but which are thinner and don't interfere with the casing of the radio.

One of the things the AT897 (non-plus) does is that it just triggers a carrier on the radio. If the radio is set to 100W, then the tuning process is done with 100W. On my FT897, what I have done, is I wired the OTT / ACC plug (the TX REQ signal that the tuner uses), via a 1N4148 diode to the signal that indicates that the 897 is operating from battery. Grounding this pin (the 857 has the same, it is the "brown wire") causes the radio to switch to battery mode, it shows a little battery on the display *and it reduces RF power to 20W*. Because of this, the tuning process now happens on 20W instead of 100W, better for the finals, better for the tuner. If I press the TUNE button on the AT897 (non-plus) tuner, the battery indicator lights up, the radio switches to 20W and does the tune thing. After tune, the signal is removed and the radio switches back (potentially to 100W).
This trick is not required on the AT897plus tuner because one of the things it does, via the CAT connector, is reduce the RF power; that is something the AT897 (non-plus) cannot do because it doesn't use the CAT port to talk.

I'd be interested in your results.

73, Geert Jan PE1HZG



Virus-free.


Re: Problem with FT-897 & AT-897+

 

The AT897 and the AT897plus work in a different way.

The AT897 needs three connections: RF antenna to the 897, the CAT connector (which is only used to get power for the tuner from the radio), and an "OTT" cable that connects via a "Y-ACC" cable to the ACC connector on the radio. When you start a tune cycle, it uses the OTT / Y-ACC cable to trigger the FT897 to generate a carrier.
Again, operation of the tuner is via the OTT cable, the CAT cable is only used to get power to the tuner.

The AT897plus works differently. It needs only two connectors: RF antenna to the 897 and the CAT connector. There is no OTT / Y-ACC cable or connector, no connection to the ACC plug on the radio. The CAT connection is used to make the tuner talk to the radio, to make it change mode, read out the frequency and trigger the radio to create a carrier. That is all done via communication over the CAT connector, which the non-plus does not do. Important: THE AT897plus NEEDS THE CAT COMMUNICATION TO FUNCTION.

There are a number of reasons why the 897plus may not work: the CAT interface may be set to a different baudrate (CAT RATE, option 19). The CAT/LIN/TUN setting may be wrong (option 20), it needs to be set to CAT. The cable may not make full contact because it can't be fully inserted because the connector sleeve is too thick (believe me, I had this problem on my 817 tuner). And perhaps the CAT port is broken on your FT897 radio.

Do you have a CAT interface to your PC, to program radio channels? Does it work on your FT897 barefoot? Does the CAT communication still work if connected via the tuner?

Note that the default, standard do-it-yourself plug for the CAT connector is too thick and won't properly mate the CAT mini-DIN connector on the FT897. I had to cut part of the sleeve to make that work for a CAT PC interface. And these days, I don't use the standard DIY plug, I bought some Kycon? KMDAX-8P connectors which are a bit of an attitude adjuster if you need to assemble them w/o instruction manual, but which are thinner and don't interfere with the casing of the radio.

One of the things the AT897 (non-plus) does is that it just triggers a carrier on the radio. If the radio is set to 100W, then the tuning process is done with 100W. On my FT897, what I have done, is I wired the OTT / ACC plug (the TX REQ signal that the tuner uses), via a 1N4148 diode to the signal that indicates that the 897 is operating from battery. Grounding this pin (the 857 has the same, it is the "brown wire") causes the radio to switch to battery mode, it shows a little battery on the display *and it reduces RF power to 20W*. Because of this, the tuning process now happens on 20W instead of 100W, better for the finals, better for the tuner. If I press the TUNE button on the AT897 (non-plus) tuner, the battery indicator lights up, the radio switches to 20W and does the tune thing. After tune, the signal is removed and the radio switches back (potentially to 100W).
This trick is not required on the AT897plus tuner because one of the things it does, via the CAT connector, is reduce the RF power; that is something the AT897 (non-plus) cannot do because it doesn't use the CAT port to talk.

I'd be interested in your results.

73, Geert Jan PE1HZG


Re: RU-9:1 Unun Burnt up Replacement

 

I would decrease power on FT8 to about 70-80 watts unless you have a more substantial 9:1 unun. Check SWR frequently. That way you might preserve the radio finals longer too. Have fun with FT8! 73 de WI5O


Re: AT-600PRO Autotuner and Yaesu FT-847

 

Thanks Ron. Having it connected to a 706MK2G spoiled me!


? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Mike KK2DOG
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Watertown, NY??
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? FN24?


On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 10:15:16 AM EST, Ron Wright via groups.io <lt_wright_flg@...> wrote:


Although it is good to have the LDG tuner work from a rig with a tune command, but the LDG tuners can operate in automatic where when they see RF and SWR above 1.5:1 they automatically tune.? So only the RF cables need to be connected for them to work.

I prefer the command cable be connected, but if that is not an option just letting the tuner tune on it's own will work.? Just put the rig in RTTY or other CW cont? xmt mode and let the tuner do it's thing.

73, ron, n9ee/r

Ron Wright, N9EE/R
Hernando Co ARES EC
Spring Hill, Florida also n9ee55@...


On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 01:01:12 AM EST, KK2DOG in NY via groups.io <kk2dog@...> wrote:


Does anyone know if these two are compatible and if so, what interface cable do I need?


Re: AT-600PRO Autotuner and Yaesu FT-847

 

Although it is good to have the LDG tuner work from a rig with a tune command, but the LDG tuners can operate in automatic where when they see RF and SWR above 1.5:1 they automatically tune.? So only the RF cables need to be connected for them to work.

I prefer the command cable be connected, but if that is not an option just letting the tuner tune on it's own will work.? Just put the rig in RTTY or other CW cont? xmt mode and let the tuner do it's thing.

73, ron, n9ee/r

Ron Wright, N9EE/R
Hernando Co ARES EC
Spring Hill, Florida also n9ee55@...


On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 01:01:12 AM EST, KK2DOG in NY via groups.io <kk2dog@...> wrote:


Does anyone know if these two are compatible and if so, what interface cable do I need?


AT-600PRO Autotuner and Yaesu FT-847

 

Does anyone know if these two are compatible and if so, what interface cable do I need?


Re: Problem with FT-897 & AT-897+

 

开云体育

From the AT-897 Plus manual:

"The 8-pin CAT interface connector is Kycon Connector part number KMDAX-8P, available from http://www.mouser.com/ as Mouser part number 806-KMDAX-8P. ? Pinning for this cable is one-to-one, straight through; all 8 signals are used."

Page 16 shows the pin-out as described above, one-to-one, straight through.

73,
Kent
K9ZTV

On Feb 6, 2023, at 8:16 PM, Ron Wright via groups.io <lt_wright_flg@...> wrote:

?
One issue with LDG tuners and Yaesu rigs is on some of the tuners the control cable switches the tip and inter ring connections.? They cross at the connector.? tip of one goes to inter ring of the other and the inter ring at the rig goes to the tip at the tuner.

73, ron, n9ee/r

Ron Wright, N9EE/R
Hernando Co ARES EC
Spring Hill, Florida also n9ee55@...


On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 08:52:51 PM EST, Kent Trimble, K9ZTV <k9ztv@...> wrote:


Dennis ...

If MENU 19 in the FT-897D is set to 4800 bps, and MENU 20 is set to CAT (not TUNER), then the problem probably lies with the cable.

Are you using the original DIN-8 cable supplied by LDG with the tuner? ?Make sure the pins aren't bent, the connections are fully seated, and the cable isn't damaged.

73,
Kent
K9ZTV




On Feb 6, 2023, at 5:54 PM, Dennis via groups.io <spike.dennis@...> wrote:

?
I have two FT-857's, two FT-897's, two LDG YT-100, and one AT-897+.
The AT-897+ refuses to work with either of the FT-897's. They do not recognize each other at all. On the other hand, it works fine with both of the FT-857's.?

To further confuse things, the YT-100's both work fine with the FT-897's! I have checked, and re-checked all the settings.

So what's going on that the AT-897+ refuses to work with the FT-897's?

I have searched this groups message archives and have found nothing. I've been to LDG's webs site and it appear to have been stagnant for months(none of it's links, are pages, come up. I've also message LDG's support email but have received no response. Is the company still in business?

Dennis Starks
Military-Radio-Guy
KB?SFP


Re: Problem with FT-897 & AT-897+

 

I used two different cables, and as I think I noted, the YT-100 works perfectly with the 897, and the AT-897 works perfectly with the FT-857. The AT-397 just will not work with the FT-897.

Cables are not an issue and all settings are? what the manual says they should be.

Dennis Starks
Military-Radio-Guy
KB?SFP


On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 07:52:51 PM CST, Kent Trimble, K9ZTV <k9ztv@...> wrote:


Dennis ...

If MENU 19 in the FT-897D is set to 4800 bps, and MENU 20 is set to CAT (not TUNER), then the problem probably lies with the cable.

Are you using the original DIN-8 cable supplied by LDG with the tuner? ?Make sure the pins aren't bent, the connections are fully seated, and the cable isn't damaged.

73,
Kent
K9ZTV




On Feb 6, 2023, at 5:54 PM, Dennis via groups.io <spike.dennis@...> wrote:

?
I have two FT-857's, two FT-897's, two LDG YT-100, and one AT-897+.
The AT-897+ refuses to work with either of the FT-897's. They do not recognize each other at all. On the other hand, it works fine with both of the FT-857's.?

To further confuse things, the YT-100's both work fine with the FT-897's! I have checked, and re-checked all the settings.

So what's going on that the AT-897+ refuses to work with the FT-897's?

I have searched this groups message archives and have found nothing. I've been to LDG's webs site and it appear to have been stagnant for months(none of it's links, are pages, come up. I've also message LDG's support email but have received no response. Is the company still in business?

Dennis Starks
Military-Radio-Guy
KB?SFP


Re: Problem with FT-897 & AT-897+

 

One issue with LDG tuners and Yaesu rigs is on some of the tuners the control cable switches the tip and inter ring connections.? They cross at the connector.? tip of one goes to inter ring of the other and the inter ring at the rig goes to the tip at the tuner.

73, ron, n9ee/r

Ron Wright, N9EE/R
Hernando Co ARES EC
Spring Hill, Florida also n9ee55@...


On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 08:52:51 PM EST, Kent Trimble, K9ZTV <k9ztv@...> wrote:


Dennis ...

If MENU 19 in the FT-897D is set to 4800 bps, and MENU 20 is set to CAT (not TUNER), then the problem probably lies with the cable.

Are you using the original DIN-8 cable supplied by LDG with the tuner? ?Make sure the pins aren't bent, the connections are fully seated, and the cable isn't damaged.

73,
Kent
K9ZTV




On Feb 6, 2023, at 5:54 PM, Dennis via groups.io <spike.dennis@...> wrote:

?
I have two FT-857's, two FT-897's, two LDG YT-100, and one AT-897+.
The AT-897+ refuses to work with either of the FT-897's. They do not recognize each other at all. On the other hand, it works fine with both of the FT-857's.?

To further confuse things, the YT-100's both work fine with the FT-897's! I have checked, and re-checked all the settings.

So what's going on that the AT-897+ refuses to work with the FT-897's?

I have searched this groups message archives and have found nothing. I've been to LDG's webs site and it appear to have been stagnant for months(none of it's links, are pages, come up. I've also message LDG's support email but have received no response. Is the company still in business?

Dennis Starks
Military-Radio-Guy
KB?SFP


Re: Problem with FT-897 & AT-897+

 

开云体育

Dennis ...

If MENU 19 in the FT-897D is set to 4800 bps, and MENU 20 is set to CAT (not TUNER), then the problem probably lies with the cable.

Are you using the original DIN-8 cable supplied by LDG with the tuner? ?Make sure the pins aren't bent, the connections are fully seated, and the cable isn't damaged.

73,
Kent
K9ZTV




On Feb 6, 2023, at 5:54 PM, Dennis via groups.io <spike.dennis@...> wrote:

?
I have two FT-857's, two FT-897's, two LDG YT-100, and one AT-897+.
The AT-897+ refuses to work with either of the FT-897's. They do not recognize each other at all. On the other hand, it works fine with both of the FT-857's.?

To further confuse things, the YT-100's both work fine with the FT-897's! I have checked, and re-checked all the settings.

So what's going on that the AT-897+ refuses to work with the FT-897's?

I have searched this groups message archives and have found nothing. I've been to LDG's webs site and it appear to have been stagnant for months(none of it's links, are pages, come up. I've also message LDG's support email but have received no response. Is the company still in business?

Dennis Starks
Military-Radio-Guy
KB?SFP