Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Jmriusers
- Messages
Search
Locked
Re: PanelPro icon sets question
Nick
Thanks Greg, The explanation is clear and simple. I will give my friend the assist in doing it.? One question; what if there is no "next" signal ? We are just starting his signaling and he only has a few signals in place. Those signals simply "hold" traffic outside of his classification yard, until the operators are given permission to enter. There is no "next" signal, the destination is the yard. Signal masts are foreign to me. I've only used simple signal logic where I define which signal,sensors, or turnouts determines the aspect. I don't use layout editor either nor Logix . I just didn't want my friend to get into territory where I can't help him. I am climbing the learning curve after almost 10 years of not working on panels. Thanks for the assist, Nick ? "I'm not a failure. I started at the bottom and I found it easily attainable. Life is too short to set unattainable goals" - Nick Kulp From: Greg McCartney via Groups.Io <gregmcty@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 4:25 PM Subject: Re: [jmriusers] PanelPro icon sets question If you truly want to create a simple ABS signal system with PRR signals, the easiest would be to use signal mast logic.? You have already done the hard part of building the signal head in JMRI.? Just create masts from them now.? The PRR-1956 system has a single head absolute mast with 4 aspects.? You can disable the permissive aspect during the process of building the masts.? That will leave you with clear, approach, and stop.? Once the masts are defined, all that other stuff you want to be rid of will be gone.? Setting up ABS will be super easy.? In the signal mast logic, instead of using discovery, manually set the destination signal and the block sensor and your done.? You could use discovery but that adds the complexity of making sure the layout is drawn properly in the layout editor.? I don't think there is a way you can do it that is any easier or simpler than that.? The red x's when the panel starts will go away as well. Greg McCartney |
Locked
Re: Decoder Pro problems
Mark,
I notice in your log file that you have a 'no acknowledge from locomotive' message. This is the same problem that my friend is having with his PR4. Like you we tried the Digitrax SoundLoader and that seemed to work. He sent his PR4 back to Digitrax for repair (just before the hurricane) and just heard back that they cannot find anything wrong. It is beginning to sound like there are more differences between the PR3 and PR4 than Digitrax is letting on. JMRI may need to be modified to accept the PR4. Just my $0.02 Stefan -- Stefan Bartelski Home layout: The Blue Ridge Line, an HO representation of the L&N Etowah Old Line from Etowah to Elizabeth, set in 1986 9under construction) Modular Layout: Shoofly module of the Country RRoads Modular group |
Locked
Re: PanelPro icon sets question
Nick,
The biggest issue people have with masts is the masts want to follow the rules. Doing things 'with modeler license' are not so easy. The concept is you build the one mast by telling it which is the next mast. Then you add what turnouts have to be set which ways for that to be the next mast. Add the block sensors in between, and it works. For the most part, that's what the logic builder does for you automatically. I generally let the builder do its thing. -Ken Cameron, Member JMRI Dev Team www.jmri.org www.fingerlakeslivesteamers.org www.cnymod.com www.syracusemodelrr.org |
Locked
Re: Layout Editor Turnout control definition
A serial link, with JMRI thinking its talking to a C/MRI system and your hardware-control PC emulating a C/MRI system, will work for Turnouts and Sensor.
But it won¡¯t work for throttle control from JMRI. C/MRI, hence the C/MRI protocol, doesn¡¯t know how to do that. So you can either use a 2nd serial link from JMRI to the EasyDCC system directly, bypassing your PC, or you can use a 2nd serial link from JMRI to your PC that¡¯s carrying the EasyDCC protocol. Bob On Jan 2, 2019, at 1:31 PM, Don Weigt <dweigt47@...> wrote:-- Bob Jacobsen rgj1927@... |
Locked
Re: Layout Editor Turnout control definition
Thanks, Bob. I'm a little closer to understanding. All of your reply was clear, until the final question about two serial links to the PC. Does C/MRI always and only use a serial link to the computer? Or, where else were you envisioning it? I didn't expect to duplicate C/MRI interface hardware, only mimic enough to use the same message structures. It seems I should research C/MRI before asking anyone on this list to answer questions about connecting JMRI to it with my hardware. Don Weigt |
Locked
Re: Decoder Pro problems
Andy,
The problem with my DCS-51 is it will not allow me to Program anything.? I discovered this when it wouldn't allow me to program anything. Mark DeSchane |
Locked
Re: PanelPro icon sets question
If you truly want to create a simple ABS signal system with PRR signals, the easiest would be to use signal mast logic.? You have already done the hard part of building the signal head in JMRI.? Just create masts from them now.? The PRR-1956 system has a single head absolute mast with 4 aspects.? You can disable the permissive aspect during the process of building the masts.? That will leave you with clear, approach, and stop.? Once the masts are defined, all that other stuff you want to be rid of will be gone.? Setting up ABS will be super easy.? In the signal mast logic, instead of using discovery, manually set the destination signal and the block sensor and your done.? You could use discovery but that adds the complexity of making sure the layout is drawn properly in the layout editor.? I don't think there is a way you can do it that is any easier or simpler than that.? The red x's when the panel starts will go away as well.
Greg McCartney |
Locked
Re: JMRI Not Identifying Locomotives Properly
This isn't a JMRI issue but an ID naming issue on your part. Gerry has already suggest one way to do it.
-- Peter Ulvestad JMRI Users Group Moderator - ( ) Tam Valley Group Moderator - ( ) Sprog-DCC Group Moderator - ( ) Edmonton Model Railroad Association - |
Locked
Re: JMRI Not Identifying Locomotives Properly
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý?????? I do a lot of installs for others so it is not unusual to get locos with the same number. My method of assigning the file name would be in your case:- NYC 4301 MRL 4301 I then have the owners initials after the number - so NYC 4301 xx and MRL 4301 yy This might help.? You can also sort the roster either by File ID or Loco number. Gerry
On 3/01/2019 7:57 am, dcesharkman via
Groups.Io wrote:
I have many locomotives with proper road numbers that overlap with others. For example, I have a Kato NYC PA unit with the number of 4301, but I also have a Kato SD70ACE in MRL with the same number.? I have many instances of this same situation.? There must be a better way to assign the identity of a locomotive so that these miss-identities do not happen. I have 62 of these occurrences. This is where better indexing could keep this from happening. -- Gerry Hopkins MMR #177 FNMRA Great Northern Downunder NMRA Australasian Region Contest & AP Chairman Web Administrator |
Locked
Re: Test version 4.15.1 of JMRI/DecoderPro is available for download
Jon Miller
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý??? Running 4.15.1 loaded just fine.? Using SPROG IIv3 and noticed that the throttle speed control has changed.? It works OK, is just different.? Is this normal? ??? Also the lights changed on the engine that has been sitting
on the track.? I will see if I can change later or if it's a
problem.? Decoder is a QSI version7. -- Jon Miller For me time stopped in 1941 Digitrax Chief/Zephyr systems, SPROG, JMRI User NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS |
Locked
JMRI Not Identifying Locomotives Properly
I have many locomotives with proper road numbers that overlap with others. For example, I have a Kato NYC PA unit with the number of 4301, but I also have a Kato SD70ACE in MRL with the same number.? I have many instances of this same situation.? There must be a better way to assign the identity of a locomotive so that these miss-identities do not happen. I have 62 of these occurrences. This is where better indexing could keep this from happening.
|
Locked
Re: Upgrading
Hi Morgan, I'm new here too and had the same question (but only in my head). I discovered that one of my my new locos doesn't have it's decoder listed in the JMRI database yet so that right there is one reason to update- at least when there are production releases. Best of luck. Andy On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 12:42 PM PennsyNut <pennsynut@...> wrote: Since I don't have anything up and running yet. Let me start: I have a Zephyr/50 and some BLI locos. I have downloaded JAVA and JMRI. And have played a bit with JMRI. But. I keep reading about all these updates. Both to Java and to JMRI. Are these really important to the average user? Example: After one sets up the system and has figured out DecoderPro and has programmed some locos. Is there a good reason to keep updating? Once it's up and running as expected, why do we need all these updates/upgrades? I keep reading about all the problems people have after they upgrade. Usually JMRI. I suspect that JAVA MUST be updated. So can that be done without having to keep updating JMRI? Obviously, I'm a novice and hope this isn't a stupid question. Windows 10 updates automatically and I never see what it "upgrades". Can't JMRI do much the same thing? Or as with Windows, have it set auto or ask first? I suspect Windows vs JMRI is apples and oranges. -- Andrew Roberts |
Locked
Re: Decoder Pro problems
Hello Mark (Deschane??), First, let me apologize for hijacking (or at very least, misdirecting) your thread. I felt like we may have had similar issues but it now seems I have confused your discussion and potential problem solving. I'm sorry about that. I will restate my issue in a new thread shortly and refrain from commenting on my issue here. To follow up on something you've mentioned, I'm wondering what the problem is with your DCS51 and how you discovered it.? Thanks, Andy Roberts On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 7:46 AM <mvdeschane@...> wrote: I feel the need to reiterate my problem again, as we are now on the second page of this thread, Also, I would appreciate it if you have a question not pertaining to my situation that you start your own thread, so as not to confuse me with questions and answers not pertaining to my Decoder Pro problem, Thanks! -- Andrew Roberts |
Locked
Re: PanelPro icon sets question
Hi Nick, It sounds like the way you might want to go is defining your own (signalmast) signalling system. I know that sounds daunting, but even I was able to do that quite quickly; I derived a system from the 'basic' system that is much simpler even than the basic one itself. A few xml-files and a few icons was all it took, and if you can re-use some existing icons then you'll be done even faster. If you like, I can send you that entire signal system as a zip or tar file so you can try it out. It's a one lamp dwarf, either red, yellow or green. And it works with the existing signal logic without any trouble. I was impressed at the ease of the process! Wouter On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 20:23, Nick via Groups.Io <cornwall9=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Locked
Re: Trying to get on top of jython
Hi Bob, Re 1) Not only did I think that was the way to do it, I was also (and am still) just building my 'library of tricks' to use in the proper, big script later on. This is one of the stages of learning! I have now removed the join, and made the spawned threads daemons, and that now works a *lot* better! Not only do I now get error messages when I need them (hurray!), the user interface no longer locks up, as you predicted (double hurray!). Re 2) The line you mention is there. I'll see next what happens when I do not create that 'sensors' variable myself. IF it still goes wrong, at least I have an error message now to tell me where and how I goofed. It's a lot better already, so thank you very much for the help so far. I'll let you know the result of the test once I get to it, which won't be today, but I hope to find time tomorrow. Thanks again, Wouter On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 20:03, Bob Jacobsen <rgj1927@...> wrote: 1) Why make the main thread wait with a join?? What does that do for you? |
Locked
Re: PanelPro icon sets question
Nick
Thanks Bob, It has been a long time since I worked on a signaling project. I was not aware of the ability to disable aspects. in masts. Since I have not worked with them , I wanted to sty with what I know. I will try aspects just for the fun of learning something new. I will give that a try and it sounds like that will solve my friend's problem with the dreaded Red X. Thanks for the assist (again) Nick Kulp Unfortunately, I don¡¯t think there¡¯s much that can be done about that. It¡¯s just the way Signal Heads work. You said you don¡¯t want to use Signal Masts, but they do provide that ability to disable an aspect.? Then you only see the ones you want (the ones that are not disabled) Bob > On Dec 31, 2018, at 10:46 AM, Nick via Groups.Io <cornwall9=[email protected]> wrote: > > Spuds, > > Thanks for the response. My REAL question is how do I get rid of it ? I do not use Logix or signal masts . All I want is to create a simple model railroad signal set like the on in signal masts . It only has 4 icons. I do not want 8, or 10 "selections" that need to be "scrolled" through until I can get to the one I want on the panel. When I try to create a set, the only "choices" I get provide 8-10 blanks with red X's to place my icons into. Any unused box will bring up the red X if not changed. All I want is a set with 4 boxes so I can use the 3 basic aspects, Red, Yellow, Green, period. > > Is there any way I can accomplish that in signal heads ? > > Thanks, > Nick Kulp > > "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." > > -Thomas Jefferson > > > > From: Spuds McCat <spudsmccat@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2018 12:21 PM > Subject: Re: [jmriusers] PanelPro icon sets question > > The red x is caused by lack of logic. It's telling you that that head has no clue what it should be displaying. > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018, 10:48 Nick via Groups.Io <cornwall9=[email protected] wrote: > Friends, > > After being away from panel creation for a LONG time, I have been helping a friend prep his layout for signaling. Getting signals set up is not a problem. I can actually still do that. I like some of the changes in the way things work but I have a question about Panel Editor. > > He uses Digitrax, Windows 7 64-bit PRO, Locobuffer USB, and it has worked a long time without problems. > > In one location, he has a simple signal set up that his dispatcher can "clear" for train movement by clicking on the signal on the panel and it will return to Red when the train trips a sensor past the yard entrance. It is simple and uncomplicated. > > Previously, he was using a very old version of JMRI, (Version 3.11 I think) Before the new JAVA update. Since I was using a later version that offered more options and a better CMRI interface, I suggested that he update his to the newest 4.15 just released. He had to update JAVA, then update JMRI. Naturally, this created havoc. The new file system completely bollixed his panel and that took a little time to repair. After we solved that problem (error messages about turnouts out of range LT3005 which didn't exist) , we started to experiment with creating CMRI signal heads. He will be using PRR Position lights with only ONE head and 3 aspects . > > To keep things simple, all signal HEADS will be the same configuration. Triple Output, Steady, with the signal lit. > > Our problem is that when we try to create an icon set with limited icons (He HATES the RED X when the panel comes up), I cannot figure out how to eliminate the "fancy" settings like flashing or dark so that only the icons we want are in the set. Currently when we want to add signals, there are 8-10 icons needed. We don't want to build signal masts. The signals will be ultra simple, ABS. The dispatcher only controls routes, not signals. This might change in the distant future, but for now. the KISS method will be what we want. > > How can we eliminate the extra aspects when we create our icon set ? I apologize for the lengthy question but this is the first time I have been unable to keep abreast of simple signaling problems. Any help will be appreciated. > > Regards and Happy New Year, > Nick Kulp > > > -- Bob Jacobsen rgj1927@... |
Locked
Re: Connect JMRI to Loconet through WIFI
Hi,
Trying a similar thing with RPI 3 running JMRI 4.12, Java 191 but using the Loconet simulator for testing purposes.? The client is a Pi zero wireless with same pieces of software on the same network. (The zero with a small touch screen is actually cheaper that iPads, etc.).? Set up the server start action in preferences.? Restarted JMRI on the RPI.? ?Opened a Panel Editor panel.? Started JMRI on the zero.?? No joy with any of the JMRI client/server options: Simple server, Loconet 'direct', Loconet over IP... The zero says cannot connect to the server and opens the preference dialog to update.? The Loconet tab is highlighted in red. The RPI does not?seem to start the Loconet Server at init, even though I get INFO - lnPacketizer Started [main] in the console; and starting it manually gives: WARN - Could not Create RMI Registry, Attempting to locate existing Registry for: LoconetServer [AWT-Eventque-0] Both systems can ping each other across the network. Please advise, and thanks, Martin Booker BTW: the Web pages for client server configuration need an update as those screens are not the same in 4.12 |
Locked
Re: PanelPro icon sets question
Unfortunately, I don¡¯t think there¡¯s much that can be done about that. It¡¯s just the way Signal Heads work.
You said you don¡¯t want to use Signal Masts, but they do provide that ability to disable an aspect. Then you only see the ones you want (the ones that are not disabled) Bob On Dec 31, 2018, at 10:46 AM, Nick via Groups.Io <cornwall9@...> wrote:-- Bob Jacobsen rgj1927@... |
Locked
Re: Trying to get on top of jython
1) Why make the main thread wait with a join? What does that do for you?
2) I¡¯m not a Bash expert, but that looks like it should work. Somehow, Jython isn¡¯t initializing properly for you. Are you getting a line like this in the log? 2019-01-02 11:58:29,512 script.JmriScriptEngineManager INFO - python 2.7 is provided by jython 2.7.0 [AWT-EventQueue-0] When I force an error, I get output that starts like: 2019-01-02 11:58:41,099 jython.InputWindow ERROR - Error executing script [AWT-EventQueue-0] javax.script.ScriptException: NameError: name 'xo' is not defined in <script> at line number 1 at org.python.jsr223.PyScriptEngine.scriptException(PyScriptEngine.java:202) at org.python.jsr223.PyScriptEngine.eval(PyScriptEngine.java:42) at org.python.jsr223.PyScriptEngine.eval(PyScriptEngine.java:31) at javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.eval(AbstractScriptEngine.java:264) Bob On Jan 2, 2019, at 8:24 AM, whmvd <vandoornw@...> wrote:-- Bob Jacobsen rgj1927@... |
Locked
Re: Upgrading
Hi Morgan, There are definitely advantages to staying up to date as far as JMRI is concerned. For one thing, if at one time, say in four years, you find you HAVE to upgade (for whatever reason; could be a solved bug, a new feature, or a new decoder on your layout) it will become a much more daunting task than the small updates once every half year. The chances of fouling up become a lot bigger. Another reason is that, if you need support, there will be many more group members able to help if you are on a release that is current, or nearly current. Support requests for version 1 and 2 are now pretty unlikely to be resolved - knowledge slips away, but also interet in getting an old version back to life becomes very limited. And actual fixes on old releases, even if a bug is found, are highly unlikely to happen. Once in a very big while, a new version of JMRI
might mean that you need to update Java as well. That is, however,
extremely rare. Another factor is what other things you use your computer for. Nothing? Then that's very nice and easy. Don't even connect it to the internet, to prevent any automatic updates to, for instance, Windows which is many ases causes problems. It also makes antivirus software superfluous, which is something else that can muck up the installation process. If you *do*? use it for other things (or if your JMRI usage includes anything cloud based, like Dropbox) then you're prett much sunk and you need to keep OS and Java up to date anyway. And if you use a brower, then that, too. Bottom line is, that only YOU can determine what's necessary - once you know the ins and outs of every choice you can make. Nobody can do it for you. From where I'm sitting, it sounds like a cheap, dedicated computer for just your trains sounds like the way to go. And I would advise keeping up to dte with production releases of JMRI, and of Java when JMRI says so. Yes, it's a bit more money that co-use of that computer with other applications. But it will give peace of mind. Wouter Wouter On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 18:27, Mike Chamberlain <mikec6201@...> wrote:
|
to navigate to use esc to dismiss