开云体育

Well yeah! Delay to inactive should do the trick. I was not aware of that little tool. I'll give it a try. Tnx again George

Hi folks Well darn! As usual the answer is easy but I didn’t think of it Thank very much! ? John Stewart Birmingham District MRR

Which decoder definition is this, exactly? Bob — Bob Jacobsen rgj1927@...

Wouter comments: “The question should really be asked as: - what does jmri write to these cvs? - what is read back on the programming track? That would rule out another type of error.”

John, I would also recommend that you disable pickups on the staging arrivals track, so the program does not move the "moves" to the last movement. Eric

The question should really be asked as: - what does jmri write to these cvs? - what is read back on the programming track? That would rule out another type of

Yes John, you can control how the program deals with cars out of staging.? Don't allow set outs on the staging departure track.? That will force the cars to take a

After writing back to the decoder, what’s in cvs 1, 17, 18, 29 and 19?? Phil G

Continuing the conversation, Don responds: “Are you saying that CV 19 would somehow elude the Compare?” Not likely – CV19 is just another location in the decoder to be compared to the data

True. The complete session would be best, but that runs the risk of getting not just one session but the last - many (from the "other" file). You're right, I should have been

Wouter, "salient part" is subject to missing important data. Dave Sand

Erik, You can either do a cut-and-paste of the salient part, or add the file to directory "problemsbeingworkedon" in the file area, following that with the posting of a link to it in this

Erik, Go to "Help -> System Console". Click on the "Copy to clipboard" button and paste into a reply. Dave Sand

Wouter, can you please explain how to post the logfile here so one knows it belongs to this discussion? Thank you Erik

George, Maybe you could put a long going "inactive delay" on block A. Or both if bi-directional. Dave Sand

Dave I think LogixNG would work here. I tried putting a dummy block in between that was constantly occupied but that did not work unsurprisingly. But I'm confused about your third option. I'm already

Ralph, In agreement with the previous posters on this thread, the concept of dynamically removing track seems like something for a bad horror movie.? Really? However, since Sensors and Turnouts are

I like the symmetry of constructors and destructors. I do understand that automatic garbage collection was a primary justification for Java (yet another programming language), and destructors per se

George, If you can use a test release, JMRI 5.11.2 introduced a concept called a ghost block. The allows Dispatcher to simulate a train going through the ghost block. If you are just looking at

Hello folks I've been using JMRI for Operations for about 12 years, with good success, thanks in no small part to this forum.? I operate a windows 10 system computer with JMRI 5.10 with Java 17.? I