开云体育

Locked Re: Build Fail, claims no route for cars #operationspro


 

On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 02:08 PM, Joe Z. wrote:
NSVL 82 aka the wolfpen turn picks its cars up from the Yard (Lyndhurst) and the goes out .
Joe,
?
The build report you attached above shows this train (NSVL 82) originates in Afton, runs to Lyndhurst then returns to Afton.? In your original post, you asked...
Can you tell me why it will not move a car from Afton (staging) to Lyndhurst Yard and then onto the transload via the Wolfpen turn?
So what exactly are you wanting to have happen?? The Wolfpen Turn does not visit the location of Lyndhurst Transload...
?
It would appear that a car from Afton (in order to get to the Transload) would have to be moved on the NSVL 82 to Lyndhurst.? From there it also appears that another train would have to move the car to get it to the Transload track.? This is similar to the SOU 91801 (HopCmnt) which is also at Afton, and has to be routed via an additional train in order to get to its destination.
Generate load for (SOU 91801) type (HopCmnt) empty (E) at (Afton, Afton-4) destination ()?
? ? Try spur (Wolfpen, Roanoke Cement-C) custom load (MTY)
? ? Train (NSVL 82) can't transport car (SOU 91801) out of staging (Afton) directly to (Wolfpen, Roanoke Cement-C)?
? ? Car (SOU 91801) departing staging (Afton), try routing car to (Wolfpen, Roanoke Cement-C) using two or more trains?
? ? Route for car (SOU 91801): (Afton, Afton-4)-> (Lyndhurst, Yard)-> (Wolfpen, Roanoke Cement-C)?
? ?Car (SOU 91801) custom load (MTY) final destination (Wolfpen, Roanoke Cement-C)?
? ? Car (SOU 91801) load (MTY) has assigned destination (Lyndhurst, Yard)?
? Car (SOU 91801) assigned to train, destination (Lyndhurst, Yard)
Is this case, the HopCmnt is sent to Lyndhurst on train NSVL 82, then will be set out for movement on another train (one serving the location of Wolfpen), before it will reach the Roanoke Cement-C spur.
In the calculation of how the car can be routed from Afton to Wolfpen, the program must have found a C/I track in Lyndhurst that can receive the car from train NSVL 82, and from which, another train can "pick up" the car and take it to Wolfpen.
The next car checked in the build report was the VC 9017 (Boxcar) and this car has to be handled by three trains in order for it to get delivered to Dunn Papermill and track Dunn T3-B.
Couldn't route car (VC 9017) using two trains, routing using multiple trains begins?
? ? Routing using 3 trains destination (Dunn Papermill, Dunn T3-B) begins?
? ? Route for car (VC 9017): (Afton, Afton-4)-> (Lyndhurst, Yard)-> (Schuyler, Schuyler Interchange)-> (Dunn Papermill, Dunn T3-B)?
? ?Car (VC 9017) custom load (Paper RecyK) final destination (Dunn Papermill, Dunn T3-B)?
? ? Car (VC 9017) load (Paper RecyK) has assigned destination (Lyndhurst, Yard)?
? Car (VC 9017) assigned to train, destination (Lyndhurst, Yard)
In both cases of the cars that are successfully loaded in Afton by the program, the program finds a track in Lyndhurst (the track is called "Yard") that allows the NSVL 82 to "set out" and other trains to "pick up" to then further deliver the cars to their destinations.
Yet, when the program tried to load CSXT 247307 (Hopper) with Fertilizer, it did find a Spur, it just could not find a working Route...
Try spur (Lyndhurst Transload, LYN Trans-L 2C).
Car (CSXT 247307) departing staging (Afton), try routing car to?
? ? (Lyndhurst Transload, LYN Trans-L 2C) using two or more trains?
? ? Could not find a last hop C/I or yard track that can service car to destination (Lyndhurst Transload)
So, I suspect that the problem might lie in the track named "Yard" in Lyndhurst.? Since the build report shows other cars successfully routed through this track (meaning the NSVL 82 is allowed to set out), I would check to see if the track allows "pick ups" by the train that then serves the location of Lyndhurst Transload.? Or if perhaps the track services specific "destinations" (and currently this does not include Lyndhurst Transload).
?
The detail of which tracks in Lyndhurst are set up for what exactly, is why I suggested you reset the Route detail level (to Very Detailed) for this train and rebuild it, ...to show us the build report with more specifics.
?
Happy to help, hope it helps,
<Pete Johnson>

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.