Although it's pretty possible, and sweden's april's fools is April 1st, don't forget that today is "that day" among many countries of hispanic tradition. I'd wait a few days for confirmation.
On Wednesday, December 28 2022, 08:54:40, Reed Fite W4JZ wrote:
1. ( ) text/plain (*) text/html
This was posted on FB by a dealer in Sweden.
Reed W4JZ
May be an image of text
-- Those who build beneath the stars build too low. --- Edward Young
On Dec 28, 2022, at 11:01, Luis Miguel Casta?eda <octabod@...> wrote:
? Although it's pretty possible, and sweden's april's fools is April 1st, don't forget that today is "that day" among many countries of hispanic tradition. I'd wait a few days for confirmation.
On Wednesday, December 28 2022, 08:54:40, Reed Fite W4JZ wrote:
1. ?( ) text/plain ?????????(*) text/html
This was posted on FB by a dealer in Sweden.
Reed ?W4JZ
May be an image of text
-- Those who build beneath the stars build too low. --- Edward Young
If I am reading the tea leaves properly, they have sufficient repair parts, for now anyway, but not enough for manufacturing any more of either radios.
Doubtful, I suspect Yaesu may prefer a different tack than rehashing a 20+ year-old design.
As I recall, many 'in the community' were upset that Yaesu didn't do a redesign when they released the FT-818.
If Yaesu is to replace the FT-818 with a new radio, I suspect they'll take a good look at the FT-817 ecosystem of accessories and try to incorporate many of them in the design and work around the challenges of the previous design, like older battery technology, small display, add-in filters, etc.
This is the end of an era, I suspect, and you can either weep for its passing or look forward to what coming.
Many years of experience in electronic manufacturing have taught me that a 20 years old technology may be obsolete, but it is certainly more expensive than updated technology. So Yaesu will, perhaps, do a complete redesign for the segment, if they still deem?it profitable.
Il giorno gio 29 dic 2022 alle ore 16:53 Ken N2VIP <ken@...> ha scritto:
Doubtful, I suspect Yaesu may prefer a different tack than rehashing a 20+ year-old design.
As I recall, many 'in the community' were upset that Yaesu didn't do a redesign when they released the FT-818.
If Yaesu is to replace the FT-818 with a new radio, I suspect they'll take a good look at the FT-817 ecosystem of accessories and try to incorporate many of them in the design and work around the challenges of the previous design, like older battery technology, small display, add-in filters, etc.
This is the end of an era, I suspect, and you can either weep for its passing or look forward to what coming.
Many years of experience in electronic
manufacturing have taught me that a 20 years old technology may
be obsolete, but it is certainly more expensive than updated
technology. So Yaesu will, perhaps, do a complete
redesign for the segment, if they still deem?it profitable.
Pietro I2OIM
Il giorno gio 29 dic 2022 alle
ore 16:53 Ken N2VIP <ken@...>
ha scritto:
Doubtful, I suspect Yaesu may prefer a
different tack than rehashing a 20+ year-old design.
As I recall, many 'in the community' were upset that
Yaesu didn't do a redesign when they released the FT-818.
If Yaesu is to replace the FT-818 with a new radio, I
suspect they'll take a good look at the FT-817 ecosystem
of accessories and try to incorporate many of them in the
design and work around the challenges of the previous
design, like older battery technology, small display,
add-in filters, etc.
This is the end of an era, I suspect, and you can
either weep for its passing or look forward to what
coming.
If I am reading the tea leaves properly, they have sufficient repair parts, for now anyway, but not enough for manufacturing any more of either radios.
Ken, N2VIP
On Dec 28, 2022, at 19:24, D. Scott MacKenzie <kb0fhp@...> wrote:
?
I guess that means that I need to get my finals replaced pronto
We're both speculating, so neither is right or wrong, but I think your comment had a typo - is "20 years old technology" really "more expensive than updated technology"?
To support my own argument, here are two small examples, why would anyone release another 'refreshed' radio that dedicates so much internal space to filters that are no longer available new or to NIMH batteries as opposed to a DSP and LiFePO4 batteries? Yes, both could likely be replaced with 'drop-in' upgrades, but I suspect after 20+ years, it may be time to revisit the QRP market as it is today, not as it was back at the turn of the century. ;^)
On Dec 29, 2022, at 10:12, Pietro Molina <pietro@...> wrote:
?
Many years of experience in electronic manufacturing have taught me that a 20 years old technology may be obsolete, but it is certainly more expensive than updated technology. So Yaesu will, perhaps, do a complete redesign for the segment, if they still deem?it profitable.
Pietro I2OIM
Il giorno gio 29 dic 2022 alle ore 16:53 Ken N2VIP <ken@...> ha scritto:
Doubtful, I suspect Yaesu may prefer a different tack than rehashing a 20+ year-old design.
As I recall, many 'in the community' were upset that Yaesu didn't do a redesign when they released the FT-818.
If Yaesu is to replace the FT-818 with a new radio, I suspect they'll take a good look at the FT-817 ecosystem of accessories and try to incorporate many of them in the design and work around the challenges of the previous design, like older battery technology, small display, add-in filters, etc.
This is the end of an era, I suspect, and you can either weep for its passing or look forward to what coming.
Funny thing is, all this QRP HF stuff aside, my 817 is still the best 2m rig in my collection of HTs.? I shall miss it for it’s versatility. ?
The 817 is also the best 6m HT I have ever come across.?
Neither of these seem like it’s strongest selling points, they just happened.? Interesting, to me at least, convergence of happenstance that made a notably great product.?
I agree a DSP and modern battery technology remake of a DC to daylight all bands all modes QRP rig might well be marketable. ?
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 08:32 Ken N2VIP <ken@...> wrote:
We're both speculating, so neither is right or wrong, but I think your comment had a typo - is "20 years old technology" really "more expensive than updated technology"?
To support my own argument, here are two small examples, why would anyone release another 'refreshed' radio that dedicates so much internal space to filters that are no longer available new or to NIMH batteries as opposed to a DSP and LiFePO4 batteries? Yes, both could likely be replaced with 'drop-in' upgrades, but I suspect after 20+ years, it may be time to revisit the QRP market as it is today, not as it was back at the turn of the century. ;^)
Ken, N2VIP
On Dec 29, 2022, at 10:12, Pietro Molina <pietro@...> wrote:
?
Many years of experience in electronic manufacturing have taught me that a 20 years old technology may be obsolete, but it is certainly more expensive than updated technology. So Yaesu will, perhaps, do a complete redesign for the segment, if they still deem?it profitable.
Pietro I2OIM
Il giorno gio 29 dic 2022 alle ore 16:53 Ken N2VIP <ken@...> ha scritto:
Doubtful, I suspect Yaesu may prefer a different tack than rehashing a 20+ year-old design.
As I recall, many 'in the community' were upset that Yaesu didn't do a redesign when they released the FT-818.
If Yaesu is to replace the FT-818 with a new radio, I suspect they'll take a good look at the FT-817 ecosystem of accessories and try to incorporate many of them in the design and work around the challenges of the previous design, like older battery technology, small display, add-in filters, etc.
This is the end of an era, I suspect, and you can either weep for its passing or look forward to what coming.
I'm sad to see the 818 go, but if you can't get parts there's not much choice.? I really like my 817, but it is a 20 year old design.
I have to believe that Yaesu saw this coming for a while.? Hopefully they've already started working on a new design.? Personally, I think something that rivals the IC-705 would be a winner.? C4FM instead of D-Star, and an internal antenna tuner.? Even at a 705-like price point I think they would sell a ton of them.? And make it full duplex to capture the satellite market...
You're talking about a QRP version of the FT-991A, that seems unlikely, and full-duplex would add significantly to the cost of the unit while only benefitting a small portion of the potential market. If adding full-duplex added 50% to the price of the radio (a made up, but seemingly reasonable number), that would put this imaginary full-duplex FT-818 replacement at just about $1,000. Such a price point would shrink the potential market in my opinion.
On Dec 30, 2022, at 09:09, Kevin McCarthy via groups.io <kmccarthy1454@...> wrote:
?I'm sad to see the 818 go, but if you can't get parts there's not much choice.? I really like my 817, but it is a 20 year old design.
I have to believe that Yaesu saw this coming for a while.? Hopefully they've already started working on a new design.? Personally, I think something that rivals the IC-705 would be a winner.? C4FM instead of D-Star, and an internal antenna tuner.? Even at a 705-like price point I think they would sell a ton of them.? And make it full duplex to capture the satellite market...
Yaesu has had a year+ to observe sales of the IC-705. I'm guessing Yaesu already has designed something similar but they're waiting on economic conditions and supply chain improvements before going into production.?
My FT-817ND's? only 5 yrs old, they'll probably last longer than me, Hah!
You're talking about a QRP version of the FT-991A, that seems unlikely, and full-duplex would add significantly to the cost of the unit while only benefitting a small portion of the potential market. If adding full-duplex added 50% to the price of the radio (a made up, but seemingly reasonable number), that would put this imaginary full-duplex FT-818 replacement at just about $1,000. Such a price point would shrink the potential market in my opinion.
Keep it cheap and buy a bunch!
Ken, N2VIP
On Dec 30, 2022, at 09:09, Kevin McCarthy via groups.io <kmccarthy1454@...> wrote:
?I'm sad to see the 818 go, but if you can't get parts there's not much choice.? I really like my 817, but it is a 20 year old design.
I have to believe that Yaesu saw this coming for a while.? Hopefully they've already started working on a new design.? Personally, I think something that rivals the IC-705 would be a winner.? C4FM instead of D-Star, and an internal antenna tuner.? Even at a 705-like price point I think they would sell a ton of them.? And make it full duplex to capture the satellite market...
Now that inrad seems to be out of stock of pcbs things are slightly more complicated, but there seems to be at least one OM who still can provide of those.
On the other hand, AOR still has stock of 500hz CW mechanical filters, it's the same collings, just that it doesn't have the yaesu sticker on top. Call your local AOR distributor and ask for them, you might have a pleasant surprise if you're looking for one.
On Friday, December 30 2022, 10:41:41, Andy Foad via groups.io wrote:
I'll never part with my FT817's.
But I agree it's time to move on a bit for Yaesu. [...]
Come on Yaesu, two small tweaks, CW filters and a bit ore space for homebrew battery packs and you can be king of the castle ;-)
-- Armaments, universal debt and planned obsolescence - those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. --- Aldous Huxley
Now that inrad seems to be out of stock of pcbs things are
slightly more
complicated, but there seems to be at least one OM who still can
provide of
those.
On the other hand, AOR still has stock of 500hz CW mechanical
filters, it's the
same collings, just that it doesn't have the yaesu sticker on top.
Call your
local AOR distributor and ask for them, you might have a pleasant
surprise if
you're looking for one.
On Friday, December 30 2022, 10:41:41, Andy Foad via groups.io
wrote:
I'll never part with my FT817's.
But I agree it's time to move on a bit for Yaesu. [...]
Come on Yaesu, two small tweaks, CW filters and a bit ore space
for homebrew battery packs
and you can be king of the castle ;-)
--
Armaments, universal debt and planned obsolescence - those are the
three pillars of Western prosperity.
?--- Aldous Huxley