开云体育

Christopher, it seems that here is the Yaesu TCXO-9 still available: Yaesu TCXO-9 (mwf-service.com) ( https://www.mwf-service.com/shop/yaesu-tcxo-9-temperaturgesteuerter-quarzoszillator-05ppm.html )

My FT817ND does drift slowly on 2 meres, but this is manageable. I don't use it on 70cms FT8

Chuck, be sure that nobody is insulting hospitality of all here. Please do not overdo it... If the 818 group will be shown as unnecessary and useless then it can be cancelled... I did not want to

I feel the new group is insulting the hospitality of all here, and has no reason or purpose or need to be separate.

I have been using an FT817ND as an IF rig for the microwave bands on 144 and 432 MHz. I do not have the TCXO installed. I have never had any problem with its stability or accuracy. 73, Zack W9SZ

It looks like the OEM TCXO-9 is out of stock, I am not sure if it is discontinued or there are just supply chain issues. There are all kinds of Chinese copies of these things for dirt cheap. However,

I have heard you do need the TCXO for VHF/UHF.? I don't think you do for HF as I am running it even with WSPR it seems to work fine on HF.? However, the Chinese knock offs generate more phase noise.

I'm using a FT818. With a transverter when using QO-100, and a chip SDR to receive. The only problem I never had is with a LNB without TXO... Trust in it Pietro I2OIM

Hi Just found Ur e mail, How do I get the recorded version of last nights meet Pse.. I have already logged it in for the following sessions.. Sincerely Trevor M7BWW 73

It is not as simple as it looks like Roger... Except these mentioned changes (lack helical filter on 70cm is shame) realize: - no longer orange light on 818 front panel to indicating battery charging

Does anyone have experience of using the FT-817 on V-UHF FT8? If so, how do you find the frequency stability? Apparently, for FT8 you would need less than?0.5 Hz/second drift to be successful. Real

Beginner's Guide to HF Operating Co-presenters Dennis Kidder, W6DQ and Anthony Luscre, K8ZT, present a series of three sessions covering aspects of getting on HF for new hams. The sessions will be

The only significant difference in design with the FT-818 not yet discussed in this group is the deletion of the helical resonator in the 430 MHz receiver section. This is a fairly expensive part

Hi all, After recent inquiries, this is a reminder that all members of the [email protected] group can still take advantage of Pro Audio Engineering's special 10% discount pricing for our Kx33 Low-RFI

Simply rename this group to FT817/8 or whatever is acceptable to FB? 73, Leon G1HSM

Bob, not at all... no more issues or specific problems on new 818. Please do not look for anything complicated in it. I just thought some of the 818 only topics might be bothersome to other 817/817ND

Doesn't seem good to dilute and hide info by a pointless subdivision. A common library for 8177/818 stuff would be good, but we have that now. wrote:

If that's the case, might it not be a good idea to have included that information in the original invitation? I have an FT-817, but I do not have an FT-818 so I had /assumed /that this new group would

Jeff, thanks for reply. Simply to not bother 817/817ND users with specific 818 issues or info over here. ...of course there is friendly partnership with this current amazing 817 large group and

I joined briefly. It's empty. This group is already a great place for finding info and asking questions about the 817 and 818.... Why dilute the medicine?