开云体育

It would be possible to move a DM-RMC-100C to the new system while keeping all the old DM-RMC-100 on the old system.? However it will not be cheap.? What you can do is buy a DM-TX-4KZ-100-C-1G for

Hi Lincoln, sorry for being unprecise on the part number – it?s indeed about a DM-RMC-100. So I guess the only route to run the new system in parallel to the old system is to use EISC. However, I

RMC100 isn't a complete/valid part number... Do you mean a QM-RMC, a DM-RMC-100, a DM-RMC-100-C, RMC3, RMC4, or something else? If it is a QM-RMC or RMC3 you can only have one master if it is in

Hi, i?m currently doing a rebuild of an existing system to a new one. The system uses a couple of old RMC100 to remote control devices via IR. These are included in the existing program as separate

Did he sign up to be a beta tester when he downloaded the app?? It will say "Crestron Home (Beta)" at the top on the Play Store app page.? I am curious.I am, I feel your pain, and the last app

Thanks Troy wrote:

Yes, yes, very true!

"Isn't that what "Labs" is for???" er, you mean 'WAS FOR', Brian...

Ahh, I neglected to say you will need to re-enter the CDS authentication credentials after updating the firmware.

I have a tech with an Android phone, and for the past couple Home projects he has been on, his device isn't syncing with the CP4R to get proper room status.? He gets a message at the bottom of the

I had tried upgrading one of the TSR remotes to the latest firmware (tsr-310_2.001.0095.001). However, it still wouldn't connect.? It wasn't until I set the user level higher that it would connect.

Turns out this was a bug in the setcsconnection command itself. It was fixed in 2.001.0079. Access level of user should be sufficient for hosted projects and connect should be sufficient for

It really sounds like what you're looking for is a pub/sub implementation for your S+ module instances. Doing this in S+ is *not* the right way to approach this... If you use RegisterDelegate() with a

You can still deserialize to the type you want without having to create another class by selecting the internal object. var acStateObject = JObject.Parse(inputJson); JToken acStateToken =

I'm still reviewing some info, but if I'm understanding correctly so far... v10.6.99 is "Sonos_Dummy.apk" ( https://i.imgur.com/pgmv5r0.png ) pulled from the App Manifest, and is intended to *disable*

I agree with Matt, even though the whole thing is mucho painful!... I tried years ago to use the update capability and it was mostly hash...

OL, "a panel that had been updated for Crestron Home and then returned to standard Crestron service => 10.6.99 - not working " I think that you probably have some of that greasy CH sauce still in the

It can, but the project becomes very bloated and you will have to go back and fix a few things depending on the design. I find it less time consuming to rebuild it from scratch in smart graphics and

Sonos App versions: => 9.0.1 - working => updated (appupdate sonos) => 10.6.2 - still working but a panel that had been updated for Crestron Home and then returned to standard Crestron service =>

https://support.crestron.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5773