Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Crestron
- Messages
Search
Re: Skipping Program Slots
Hey Chris,
I'm in the same camp as you, and like you, I do a mixture of custom and Adapt programming. For the majority of our large projects, at least 1 other processor takes responsibility for the other subsystems. Also, I always use the same program slots for the same subsystems.? (p1=lighting, p2=climate, etc.) If the client doesn't have one of these subsystems, I just skip that program slot. With many systems out there like this, I haven't had any issues.? I'm knocking on wood right now!!! It's so nice to be able to replace a security system (looking at you GE), and the main program never changes or takes a CPU hit. Brian |
Skipping Program Slots
Hi All,
Looking for others' opinions and experiences... Because I try to take a modular approach to system programming, etc., and I have a few secondary programs that I use on occasion to support our MAIN program (always Slot 1), there are times for example when I have a project that uses only one of the secondary programs. For a few reasons (not important for this discussion), I like to have each program dedicated to a particular slot. EX: Sonos interface (Slot 2), Lighting Interpreter (Slot 3), Security Interface (Slot 4), etc. etc. you get the idea. My question: If I have a project that only needs a 'Lighting Interpreter' secondary program, I would still like to have it reside in Slot 3, leaving slot 2 and 4-10 open. Does anyone think that there is any fundamental problem or issue with this approach...??? TIA!! |
Re: Analog values coming from an e-cross to the same type of user module are somehow jammed
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:26 PM, Brian Matson wrote:
It isn’t your dementia … this time!They know that I'm paying attention!? I just don't understand why they would want to trigger me all the time!!? It always comes back to bite them!...HaHa... |
File /Sonos playBar.ir uploaded
#file-notice
[email protected] Notification
The following files have been uploaded to the Files area of the [email protected] group. By: Deuterios <OSCAR7EMAIL@...> Description: |
Re: Lutron QSX Feedback
#lutron
The button feedback does work and is based on the protocol. Setting the button in the QSX program to “dual action” is the best way to get the feedback one would expect.
|
Re: Comm Port Madness
You might be crazy... but you're not the only one.? I've spent embarrassing amounts of time troubleshooting 232 wiring only to discover that I had F6d the COM port symbol. On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:19 PM ckangis <chris@...> wrote: WOW!! WOWWIE, WOW, WOW!!? |
File /NetCFSetupv35.msi uploaded
#file-notice
[email protected] Notification
The following files have been uploaded to the Files area of the [email protected] group. By: bradcleal <brad@...> Description: |
Re: Analog values coming from an e-cross to the same type of user module are somehow jammed
开云体育Thanks everyone. Turned out to be an Installation of simpl, databases and stuff that decided to be broken. Unistalling simpl Windows,crestron DB, device DB and the simpl+ cross Compiler, running some registry cleanup tool and reinstalling the stuff again fixed it. Von meinem/meiner Galaxy gesendet -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Brian Matson <bmatson@...> Datum: 10.08.21 04:26 (GMT+01:00) Betreff: Re: [crestron] Analog values coming from an e-cross to the same type of user module are somehow jammed It isn’t your dementia … this time! That indeed was an extra special feature that Crestron added to spice up our lives just a bit. They changed the default setting of F9 to be a replace all, and it would do exactly that in our entire program. I really think that Crestron’s just trying to see who’s paying attention! |
开云体育Hi, ? there?s an “alarm clock v2” symbol in the library you could use as a basis. It allows to select day of week and set the time. The only thing you?d need to add is program selection you mentioned. ? Cheers, Thorsten ? Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von assaf@... ? hi all, |
Re: Analog values coming from an e-cross to the same type of user module are somehow jammed
Hey Chris,
It isn’t your dementia … this time! That indeed was an extra special feature that Crestron added to spice up our lives just a bit. They changed the default setting of F9 to be a replace all, and it would do exactly that in our entire program. I really think that Crestron’s just trying to see who’s paying attention! |
Re: Comm Port Madness
WOW!! WOWWIE, WOW, WOW!!?
Dimitri, Thank you, thank you!!? I think that's it... As you may or may not know, F6 is also the short-cut to get the properties of Hardware devices like the serial port settings, TCP clients, EISC, TSW, etc...? (try it..) As you can guess, I use F6 for setting properties all the time, and I NEVER use it to copy signals from in to out (Not that there's anything wrong with that)... So I think what's happening to me is that in my speed, I hit F6 before I've clicked on the port symbol (or it didn't take the first time) and thus I inadvertently move a copy a signal... Thank you again, I thought I was going crazy...:)? ?(most people say I am anyway...HaHa!) |
Re: Analog values coming from an e-cross to the same type of user module are somehow jammed
I seem to remember something like this a year or so ago, where a version of SMW had a new *Feature* on my default that when you changed a signal name, it would change all the other identical signal names to your newly edited name.
I thought it might be in the preferences, but no... Anyone else remember this issue, or is my dementia setting in again??... |
Re: VTPro Text Entry
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Aug 9, 2021, at 3:04 PM, Crestron_Programmer <s.marszalek11@...> wrote:
|