开云体育

I'm pretty sure the reason Crestron doesn't do Pointers is because of support. They tend to perform a lot of support that doesn't seem to be "their problem" - issues that are clearly programming

Why? You're just saying if some condition is true, then do nothing. Not exactly something I'd typically see someone programming, but it *IS* perfectly valid.

What error? From the IF-ELSE: " IF ( <expression>) [{] <statements> [}] [ELSE] [{] <statements> [}]] ... In any section of the construct, if <statements> is

That module should get you some form of action - certainly at least a response of some sort from the unit. Are you seeing a string going out to the box in SIMPL Debugger but nothing coming back?

Here's a basic command, I tend to use the V command more than anything. **V4,5,5,5,5,5,0,0!! This will switch input 5 on levels 1,2,3,4,5 (RGBHV) to output 4, while not changing the current source

Has that worked for you? I am having trouble getting reliable response from the SP870. BenQ provided me with the command protocol, but after 30 seconds the projector stops responding to

Well both of them are in the beta of SIMPL at this point so that is always a good sign of things to come. I'd say it is likely they could ship any day based on previous trends of when things show up

Anyone know the status of these products? Has anyone used these products? Opinions?

wrote: program - issues ..... I was having MASSIVE compile time problems with both VTPro-e and SIMPL Windows for some time now - ever since I got my new computer this past fall (a dual core T9300

Can anyone point me to (or send me) a simple program were controlling a Sierra router is involved? I have a SierraPro XL1204 that doesn't react on the commands I try to send it. I have probably

I too am experiencing the hang at about 50% as it tries to do something with the fonts. It always finishes eventually, however. - Jeff

Oddly enough, I've just been sent another spec from Samsung. It gives PC1 and PC2 as &#92;x15 and &#92;x16 respectively. So that would

the semi-colon after the if() is a valid statement from the parser's point of view; it just doesn't do what you want/expect here is a simple example of how that is useful; the following 'C' code

Not fatal in that way, just fatal in term of doing what you want. And, I blame it on being very hot here today (must be 40°C in my office at the moment) for my forgetting that the BREAK would exit on

I would have expected to see a compiler error on the fatal ; at the end of an IF statement. fatal, were file. to assigned

The Break; provided a nice exit and good reason why there was only 1 output... :) And I'm on the other side of the fence with the single-statement IF. If I'm 90% certain I'll never need to add

True, but I always put them in so that if I do add another line I don't mess up the execution order/nesting. (Didn't see the ; - fatal, but a trace should have shown 10 outputs rather than just

Thanks Lindsay and Chip, it's always puntuation isn't it. If I were to remove the trace statement, could you use no brackets? If the brackets are required, I guess there's another error in the help

Anyone else working on this or got this working? I believe I have the checksum calculation working correctly, and am getting the expected &#92;xFD ACK response to all my commands, but the player

And nuke the semicolon at the end of the IF statement line - I think what you had is equivalent to "if this condition is met, do absolutely squat". :) Function Main() { FOR(i = 10 to 1 Step