This version (QtTermTCP 54) compiles from source and runs ok on gentoo linux. I have KISS in the setup menu but when I select AGW, I can not connect to a station because the connect menu is gray and with this situation I can not enter a callsign in the next window as in version 52. In bottom right is mentioned AGW connected.
Am I doing something wrong? TIA

Teun PA1TB

In non-ax.25 drivers (but including UZ7HO) + is connected and ! is heard. For ax.25 . indicates robust packet, no character normal packet.
73,
John
On 06/07/2022 14:49, Jeff - WA4ZKO wrote:

On some HF drivers the dot behind the callsign equals that call was heard.
The +? equals a connection was made.

That is expected behavior. I know the Robust Packet hostmode Tracker DSP TNC driver does it, so probably the same for the Pactor drivers.
John can elaborate/correct me.

I've tried you the other afternoon on 20m RP, but no joy. Tad too close for 20m this time of year, but should be easy(ier) this Fall/Winter.


73
Jeff
WA4ZKO

On some HF drivers the dot behind the callsign equals that call was heard.
The +? equals a connection was made.

That is expected behavior. I know the Robust Packet hostmode Tracker DSP TNC driver does it, so probably the same for the Pactor drivers.
John can elaborate/correct me.

I've tried you the other afternoon on 20m RP, but no joy. Tad too close for 20m this time of year, but should be easy(ier) this Fall/Winter.


73
Jeff
WA4ZKO

On some HF drivers the dot behind the callsign equals that call was heard.
The +? equals a connection was made.
That is expected behavior. I know the Robust Packet hostmode Tracker DSP TNC driver does it, so probably the same for the Pactor drivers.
John can elaborate/correct me.
I've tried you the other afternoon on 20m RP, but no joy. Tad too close for 20m this time of year, but should be easy(ier) this Fall/Winter.
73
Jeff
WA4ZKO

Mike,

If it's being used only for 1200b packet, which is what I thought the context was here, then a speed of 9600 works fine.

Thanks,

Lee K5DAT?

On Tue, Jul 5, 2022, 8:36 PM Mike Melnik <N9PMO@...> wrote:

Lee

?

Kantronics 9612 (Dual Port) Hi speed TNC’S need to be run at a Com Port speed of 19200 or faster

remember you need to communicate with the TNC faster then the over the air speed is, 9600 Baud

would be slow for the Dual Port TNC.

?

SPEED=19200

?

This is the MODE Command out of Kiss mode must be set in both bpq32.cfg & the TNC

with a Comport speed of only 9600 Baud Ports A & B may not function correctly

?

See the Kantronics Manual for the MODE B & P commands

?

I also use SOFT CD (For open Squelch)

?

73

Mike Melnik-N9PMO
BPQ32 Group Moderator

It anyone wants to experiment with linbpq on FreeBSD I've upload a few files




These are for 32 bit or 64 bit versions of FreeBSD

I've done a bit of testing but can't check all possible configs.

These definitely won't work:

BPQETHER Driver
IPGateway
Using an SCS Dragon with the SCSPactor Driver

APRS Clients should work on the 32 bit version but not the 64 bit. But the web based APRS Mapping and Messaging do work on both.

I've also tried compiling a few of my Qt Programs





QtTerm and QtBPQAPRS seem to work fine. QtSM works although audio doesn't sound good. But I am running FreeBSD on a VM on Windows which is likely to affect performance.

Any feedback would be welcome.

73,
John

On 24/04/2022 17:26, John G8BPQ wrote:

just for a bit of fun I installed FreeBSD in a VMWare VM and tried compiling LinBPQ. It needed a few code changes but it is now basically working. It needs a bit of tidying up and a lot of testing but looks promising.

73,
John

On 23/04/2022 19:53, Eduardo Castillo (LU9DCE) wrote:

for when a version for freebsd 32bit
it can work since bsd has both architectures in 64bit

we already have ported
wsjt -? mshv?? - cqrlog
direwolf - soundmodem



bpq terminals made in qt compile perfectly

we need a bbs for packet that runs natively for bsd

being BPQ the best system

it would be a pride to have it for bsd

if needed for testing
I have a remote terminal to freebsd that can be used to test or compile linbpq

I know it's a lot to lose and work but these days freebsd far
exceeds linux and like the same software
making this system one of the best for radio

pls !!!!!

It anyone wants to experiment with linbpq on FreeBSD I've upload a few files




These are for 32 bit or 64 bit versions of FreeBSD

I've done a bit of testing but can't check all possible configs.

These definitely won't work:

BPQETHER Driver
IPGateway
Using an SCS Dragon with the SCSPactor Driver

APRS Clients should work on the 32 bit version but not the 64 bit. But the web based APRS Mapping and Messaging do work on both.

I've also tried compiling a few of my Qt Programs





QtTerm and QtBPQAPRS seem to work fine. QtSM works although audio doesn't sound good. But I am running FreeBSD on a VM on Windows which is likely to affect performance.

Any feedback would be welcome.

73,
John

On 24/04/2022 17:26, John G8BPQ wrote:

just for a bit of fun I installed FreeBSD in a VMWare VM and tried compiling LinBPQ. It needed a few code changes but it is now basically working. It needs a bit of tidying up and a lot of testing but looks promising.

73,
John

On 23/04/2022 19:53, Eduardo Castillo (LU9DCE) wrote:

for when a version for freebsd 32bit
it can work since bsd has both architectures in 64bit

we already have ported
wsjt -? mshv?? - cqrlog
direwolf - soundmodem



bpq terminals made in qt compile perfectly

we need a bbs for packet that runs natively for bsd

being BPQ the best system

it would be a pride to have it for bsd

if needed for testing
I have a remote terminal to freebsd that can be used to test or compile linbpq

I know it's a lot to lose and work but these days freebsd far
exceeds linux and like the same software
making this system one of the best for radio

pls !!!!!