开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

AXA or BXA


 

I want to switch QC tool posts for something I can easily find extra holders. Looking at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are you using with your 12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5" with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your input.
Dan Coleman


 

开云体育

I asked this question a year and a half back, being my first lathe, and having just rebuilt it I got the answer to be AXA.? It was the choice for 12 and under.


I belive you could get away with BXA but others with more.knowledge can give you the.downside to that.?

If you will be transitioning to a 13" then maybe make do with BXA to avoid buying another round of tooling.
My $0.02.
-Jody


-------- Original message --------
From: Dan and Marlene Coleman <dan_marlene@...>
Date: 1/14/19 7:52 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

I want to switch QC tool posts for something I can easily find extra holders. Looking at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are you using with your 12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5" with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your input.
Dan Coleman


 

I have 2 wedge type holders from CDCO tools. in Chicago. I am happy with them tool holders are no problem they have plenty

GP

--------------------------------------------

On Mon, 1/14/19, Dan and Marlene Coleman <dan_marlene@...> wrote:

Subject: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, January 14, 2019, 8:52 PM

I want to switch QC tool posts for
something I can easily find extra holders. Looking at the
Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes.
It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are you using
with your 12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA
because I could also transfer this tooling to my 13"
lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the tooling
limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently using
surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x
2.5" with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for
your input.
Dan Coleman


 

开云体育

You might get away with AXA. Not sure on the 13

Get


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Dan and Marlene Coleman <dan_marlene@...>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 8:52:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
?
I want to switch QC tool posts for something I can easily find extra holders. Looking at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are you using with your 12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5" with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your input.
Dan Coleman


 

On 01/14/2019 07:52 PM, Dan and Marlene Coleman wrote:
I want to switch QC tool posts for something I can easily
find extra holders. Looking at the Aloris fit chart an AXA
is called out for all Atlas lathes. It looks like a BXA
would also fit. What size are you using with your 12"
Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also
transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only
concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close
the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe
tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5" with a spacer
on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your input.
I used an AXA-size on a 12" Atlas, and think a BXA would be
way too big.
The big issue is that the larger BXA holders will not go low
enough with some tooling.
The AXA has the slot for the tooling lower in the holders,
so that larger cutters can get down to the spindle
centerline without fooling around.

Jon


 

开云体育

I have an AXA from CDCO, and love it. I will say do not get rid of the lantern tool post if you have one though. The more I use my old machines, the more I realize they are best used how they were intended. I was roughing in a part yesterday of 12L14, and with a nice sharp HSS roughing tool, can easily take a 0.050 deep (0.100 on the diameter) with very little strain on my lathe. Even with W-1 I can take at 0.030 deep cut. Now I use my QCTP, it's not going anywhere, and you cant beat the convenience, just saying, they tear off the material instead of cutting it. The old guys knew what they were talking about.

Kurt S



Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Dan and Marlene Coleman <dan_marlene@...>
Date: 1/14/19 8:52 PM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

I want to switch QC tool posts for something I can easily find extra holders. Looking at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are you using with your 12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5" with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your input.
Dan Coleman


 

开云体育

I agree with GP,.if you need to save money, go with the CDCO tool post. They are nice and I have no complaints.? The holders are inexpensive also.
-Jody


-------- Original message --------
From: Guenther Paul <paulguenter@...>
Date: 1/14/19 8:28 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

I have 2 wedge type holders from CDCO tools. in Chicago. I am happy with them tool holders are no problem they have plenty

GP

--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 1/14/19, Dan and Marlene Coleman <dan_marlene@...> wrote:

Subject: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, January 14, 2019, 8:52 PM

I want to switch QC tool posts for
something I can easily find extra holders. Looking at the
Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes.
It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are you using
with your 12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA
because I could also transfer this tooling to my 13"
lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the tooling
limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently using
surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x
2.5" with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for
your input.
Dan Coleman


 

开云体育

I’m using a Yuasa AXA originally purchased new with my 3996.? There are two problems with the BXA.? One is that everything about it is more expensive (including additional holders which you will need to buy or you are no better off than with the 4-way turret, and the ?” cutters that it takes).? As I’ve written before, there are two groups of people who have BXA QCTP’s on their Atlas, those who will admit that they wish that they had bought the AXA, and those who won’t.? J

?

Robert Downs

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan and Marlene Coleman
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 19:53
To: [email protected]
Subject: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

?

I want to switch QC tool posts for something I can easily find extra holders. Looking at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are you using with your 12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5" with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your input.
Dan Coleman


 

I'm one of the one's that won't.?
I LOVE my BXA. No problems with using it that the original lantern post won't solve, although I haven't used the lantern post in more than 4 years. It holds 1/4 inch through 1 inch tool bits and I've never had trouble adjusting it for the height I want. Get the BXA and use the same tooling on both lathes, it would be silly to spend the extra for a set of AXA tooling.
Regards,
Rex


On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:46 PM Robert Downs via Groups.Io <wa5cab=[email protected]> wrote:

snip

?

? As I’ve written before, there are two groups of people who have BXA QCTP’s on their Atlas, those who will admit that they wish that they had bought the AXA, and those who won’t.? J

?

Robert Downs

?


Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [rexarino@...]

_._,_._,_


 

开云体育

Be easier to buy a AXA, and make a spacer to fit it on the 13" lathe. I got my AXA-clone from Amazon for $140, seems they're going for $150 & up now, where the BXA clones start around $190 & up.?

Don't see any reason anyone with a small mill or milling attachment couldn't make all the toolholders?they wanted, either.?

Bill in OKC?

Sent despite my Sprint Phone.

-------- Original message --------
From: Rexarino <rexarino@...>
Date: 1/15/19 2:19 AM (GMT-06:00)
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

I'm one of the one's that won't.?
I LOVE my BXA. No problems with using it that the original lantern post won't solve, although I haven't used the lantern post in more than 4 years. It holds 1/4 inch through 1 inch tool bits and I've never had trouble adjusting it for the height I want. Get the BXA and use the same tooling on both lathes, it would be silly to spend the extra for a set of AXA tooling.
Regards,
Rex


On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:46 PM Robert Downs via Groups.Io <wa5cab=[email protected]> wrote:

snip

?

? As I’ve written before, there are two groups of people who have BXA QCTP’s on their Atlas, those who will admit that they wish that they had bought the AXA, and those who won’t.? J

?

Robert Downs

?


Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [rexarino@...]


 

开云体育

Kurt,
What if you used that same HSS roughing tool in the QCTP???

Are others finding that large cuts on hard steel are more difficult with QCTP.? I haven't had experience with both in doing large cuts.
-Jody


-------- Original message --------
From: ksierens <ksierens@...>
Date: 1/14/19 10:00 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

I have an AXA from CDCO, and love it. I will say do not get rid of the lantern tool post if you have one though. The more I use my old machines, the more I realize they are best used how they were intended. I was roughing in a part yesterday of 12L14, and with a nice sharp HSS roughing tool, can easily take a 0.050 deep (0.100 on the diameter) with very little strain on my lathe. Even with W-1 I can take at 0.030 deep cut. Now I use my QCTP, it's not going anywhere, and you cant beat the convenience, just saying, they tear off the material instead of cutting it. The old guys knew what they were talking about.

Kurt S



Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Dan and Marlene Coleman <dan_marlene@...>
Date: 1/14/19 8:52 PM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

I want to switch QC tool posts for something I can easily find extra holders. Looking at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are you using with your 12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5" with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your input.
Dan Coleman


 

开云体育

Jody,

?

A number of problems.? The lantern tool post is centered on the compound, so the forces during cutting are straight down, as opposed to using a QCTP when the tool is hung? far from the centerline of the tool post. Second, you would need to duplicate the high positive rake of a tool like it is when you are using a lantern tool holder, but, if you were to grind a HSS tool with the same geometry and hold it in a QCTP, it will be much better.? I do not have a tangential (diamond) tool holder, but that should give you good result, but I still feel a lantern toolholder is still a much more rigid setup, but not convenient.

?

?

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jody
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

?

Kurt,

What if you used that same HSS roughing tool in the QCTP???

?

Are others finding that large cuts on hard steel are more difficult with QCTP.? I haven't had experience with both in doing large cuts.

-Jody



-------- Original message --------
From: ksierens <ksierens@...>
Date: 1/14/19 10:00 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA


I have an AXA from CDCO, and love it. I will say do not get rid of the lantern tool post if you have one though. The more I use my old machines, the more I realize they are best used how they were intended. I was roughing in a part yesterday of 12L14, and with a nice sharp HSS roughing tool, can easily take a 0.050 deep (0.100 on the diameter) with very little strain on my lathe. Even with W-1 I can take at 0.030 deep cut. Now I use my QCTP, it's not going anywhere, and you cant beat the convenience, just saying, they tear off the material instead of cutting it. The old guys knew what they were talking about.

?

Kurt S

?

?

?

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

?

?

-------- Original message --------

From: Dan and Marlene Coleman <dan_marlene@...>

Date: 1/14/19 8:52 PM (GMT-05:00)

Subject: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

?

I want to switch QC tool posts for something I can easily find extra holders. Looking at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are you using with your 12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5" with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your input.
Dan Coleman


 

Yes its true the most solid tool post is a lantern type. If you take heavy cuts a axa, bxa. cxa are not as solid

GP

--------------------------------------------

On Tue, 1/15/19, Jody <jp4lsu@...> wrote:

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 8:34 AM

Kurt,What if
you used that same HSS roughing tool in the
QCTP???
Are others finding that large cuts on hard steel
are more difficult with QCTP.? I haven't had experience
with both in doing large cuts.-Jody

-------- Original message --------
From: ksierens <ksierens@...>
Date: 1/14/19 10:00 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA






I have an AXA from CDCO, and love it. I will say do not
get rid of the lantern tool post if you have one though. The
more I use my old machines, the more I realize they are best
used how they were intended. I was roughing in a part
yesterday of 12L14,
and with a nice sharp HSS roughing tool, can easily take a
0.050 deep (0.100 on the diameter) with very little strain
on my lathe. Even with W-1 I can take at 0.030 deep cut. Now
I use my QCTP, it's not going anywhere, and you cant
beat the convenience, just
saying, they tear off the material instead of cutting it.
The old guys knew what they were talking about.



Kurt S










Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G
LTE smartphone







-------- Original message --------
From: Dan and Marlene Coleman
<dan_marlene@...>
Date: 1/14/19 8:52 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA



I want to switch QC tool posts for something I can
easily find extra holders. Looking at the Aloris fit chart
an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes. It looks like a
BXA would also fit. What size are you using with your
12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward
the BXA because I could also transfer this tooling to my
13" lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the
tooling limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently
using surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5
x 2.5" with a spacer on the
bottom. Thanks in advance for your input.

Dan Coleman


James Rice
 

I have an AXA on mine and on my South Bend 9A as well so I can appreciate you wanting to share holders and tooling between lathes as that is what I do as well.? My larger lathe is a South Bend 16 so I use a CXA post and holders on it.? It is close to the border between using a CA or a CXA.? I went CXA as I don't tend to hog out things on the lathe and the price difference between CA and CXA set and holders is huge!? I have a few friends who have Atlas lathes, one has a BXA and loves it, the others have AXA sets so I can't help you with an informed opinion.? I think I've used my rocker post twice in the last 11 years.

As far as the tangential tool holders that were mentioned above, they are my go to bit holder for all my lathes.? I have made one for my Atlas 618, I bought a Diamond set and a pair Wimberly holders for my 12" and 9A and have been making a set for my South Bend 16 that will take either a 3/8" or 1/2" square tool bit.? I may buy a Diamond 20 set for the SB16 depending upon how my shopmade versions turn out.? Wimberly doesn't offer a holder for my 16" lathe.

James

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:56 AM ksierens <ksierens@...> wrote:

Jody,

?

A number of problems.? The lantern tool post is centered on the compound, so the forces during cutting are straight down, as opposed to using a QCTP when the tool is hung? far from the centerline of the tool post. Second, you would need to duplicate the high positive rake of a tool like it is when you are using a lantern tool holder, but, if you were to grind a HSS tool with the same geometry and hold it in a QCTP, it will be much better.? I do not have a tangential (diamond) tool holder, but that should give you good result, but I still feel a lantern toolholder is still a much more rigid setup, but not convenient.

?

?

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jody
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

?

Kurt,

What if you used that same HSS roughing tool in the QCTP???

?

Are others finding that large cuts on hard steel are more difficult with QCTP.? I haven't had experience with both in doing large cuts.

-Jody



-------- Original message --------
From: ksierens <ksierens@...>
Date: 1/14/19 10:00 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA


I have an AXA from CDCO, and love it. I will say do not get rid of the lantern tool post if you have one though. The more I use my old machines, the more I realize they are best used how they were intended. I was roughing in a part yesterday of 12L14, and with a nice sharp HSS roughing tool, can easily take a 0.050 deep (0.100 on the diameter) with very little strain on my lathe. Even with W-1 I can take at 0.030 deep cut. Now I use my QCTP, it's not going anywhere, and you cant beat the convenience, just saying, they tear off the material instead of cutting it. The old guys knew what they were talking about.

?

Kurt S

?

?

?

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

?

?

-------- Original message --------

From: Dan and Marlene Coleman <dan_marlene@...>

Date: 1/14/19 8:52 PM (GMT-05:00)

Subject: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

?

I want to switch QC tool posts for something I can easily find extra holders. Looking at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are you using with your 12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5" with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your input.
Dan Coleman


 

开云体育

James, I tried to figure out those Diamond tangential tool holders. The manufacturer lists the sizes based on tool height in mm and none of them make any sense to me. How did you figure which size holder was good for your South Bend 9A and Which was was good for your 12" Atlas??

I want to order one for each of my machines, but I am stumped by the Australian website. Please, help.?


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of James Rice <james.rice@...>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 1:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
?
I have an AXA on mine and on my South Bend 9A as well so I can appreciate you wanting to share holders and tooling between lathes as that is what I do as well.? My larger lathe is a South Bend 16 so I use a CXA post and holders on it.? It is close to the border between using a CA or a CXA.? I went CXA as I don't tend to hog out things on the lathe and the price difference between CA and CXA set and holders is huge!? I have a few friends who have Atlas lathes, one has a BXA and loves it, the others have AXA sets so I can't help you with an informed opinion.? I think I've used my rocker post twice in the last 11 years.

As far as the tangential tool holders that were mentioned above, they are my go to bit holder for all my lathes.? I have made one for my Atlas 618, I bought a Diamond set and a pair Wimberly holders for my 12" and 9A and have been making a set for my South Bend 16 that will take either a 3/8" or 1/2" square tool bit.? I may buy a Diamond 20 set for the SB16 depending upon how my shopmade versions turn out.? Wimberly doesn't offer a holder for my 16" lathe.

James

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:56 AM ksierens <ksierens@...> wrote:

Jody,

?

A number of problems.? The lantern tool post is centered on the compound, so the forces during cutting are straight down, as opposed to using a QCTP when the tool is hung? far from the centerline of the tool post. Second, you would need to duplicate the high positive rake of a tool like it is when you are using a lantern tool holder, but, if you were to grind a HSS tool with the same geometry and hold it in a QCTP, it will be much better.? I do not have a tangential (diamond) tool holder, but that should give you good result, but I still feel a lantern toolholder is still a much more rigid setup, but not convenient.

?

?

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jody
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

?

Kurt,

What if you used that same HSS roughing tool in the QCTP???

?

Are others finding that large cuts on hard steel are more difficult with QCTP.? I haven't had experience with both in doing large cuts.

-Jody



-------- Original message --------
From: ksierens <ksierens@...>
Date: 1/14/19 10:00 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA


I have an AXA from CDCO, and love it. I will say do not get rid of the lantern tool post if you have one though. The more I use my old machines, the more I realize they are best used how they were intended. I was roughing in a part yesterday of 12L14, and with a nice sharp HSS roughing tool, can easily take a 0.050 deep (0.100 on the diameter) with very little strain on my lathe. Even with W-1 I can take at 0.030 deep cut. Now I use my QCTP, it's not going anywhere, and you cant beat the convenience, just saying, they tear off the material instead of cutting it. The old guys knew what they were talking about.

?

Kurt S

?

?

?

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

?

?

-------- Original message --------

From: Dan and Marlene Coleman <dan_marlene@...>

Date: 1/14/19 8:52 PM (GMT-05:00)

Subject: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

?

I want to switch QC tool posts for something I can easily find extra holders. Looking at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are you using with your 12" Atlas. I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5" with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your input.
Dan Coleman


 

if you check the specifications it will tell you what size tool holder to use For a 9A I would use a axa

GP

--------------------------------------------

On Tue, 1/15/19, Andrei <calciu1@...> wrote:

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 5:44 PM



James, I tried to figure out those Diamond tangential tool
holders. The manufacturer lists the sizes based on tool
height in mm and none of them make any sense to me. How did
you figure which size holder was good for your South Bend 9A
and Which was was good
for your 12" Atlas??





I want to order one for each of my machines, but I am
stumped by the Australian website. Please, help.?


From:
[email protected] <[email protected]>
on behalf of James Rice <james.rice@...>

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 1:37 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
?



I have an
AXA on mine and on my South Bend 9A as well so I can
appreciate you wanting to share holders and tooling between
lathes as that is what I do as well.? My larger lathe is a
South Bend 16 so I use a CXA post and
holders on it.? It is close to the border between using a
CA or a CXA.? I went CXA as I don't tend to hog out
things on the lathe and the price difference between CA and
CXA set and holders is huge!? I have a few friends who have
Atlas lathes, one has a BXA
and loves it, the others have AXA sets so I can't help
you with an informed opinion.? I think I've used my
rocker post twice in the last 11 years.



As far as
the tangential tool holders that were mentioned above, they
are my go to bit holder for all my lathes.? I have made one
for my Atlas 618, I bought a Diamond set and a pair Wimberly
holders for my 12" and 9A and
have been making a set for my South Bend 16 that will take
either a 3/8" or 1/2" square tool bit.? I may buy
a Diamond 20 set for the SB16 depending upon how my shopmade
versions turn out.? Wimberly doesn't offer a holder for
my 16" lathe.



James




On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:56 AM ksierens
<ksierens@...>
wrote:





Jody,
?
A number of problems.?
The lantern tool post is centered on the compound, so the
forces during cutting are straight down, as opposed to using
a QCTP when the tool is hung? far from the centerline of
the tool post. Second, you would need
to duplicate the high positive rake of a tool like it is
when you are using a lantern tool holder, but, if you were
to grind a HSS tool with the same geometry and hold it in a
QCTP, it will be much better.? I do not have a tangential
(diamond) tool holder,
but that should give you good result, but I still feel a
lantern toolholder is still a much more rigid setup, but not
convenient.
?
?
?
?


From:
[email protected] <[email protected]>
On Behalf Of Jody

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:34 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or
BXA


?
Kurt,

What if you used that
same HSS roughing tool in the QCTP???


?


Are others finding that
large cuts on hard steel are more difficult with QCTP.? I
haven't had experience with both in doing large
cuts.


-Jody





-------- Original message --------

From: ksierens <ksierens@...>


Date: 1/14/19 10:00 PM (GMT-06:00)

To: [email protected]


Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA







I have an AXA from CDCO,
and love it. I will say do not get rid of the lantern tool
post if you have one though. The more I use my old machines,
the more I realize they are best used how they were
intended. I was roughing in a part yesterday
of 12L14, and with a nice sharp HSS roughing tool, can
easily take a 0.050 deep (0.100 on the diameter) with very
little strain on my lathe. Even with W-1 I can take at 0.030
deep cut. Now I use my QCTP, it's not going anywhere,
and you cant beat the convenience,
just saying, they tear off the material instead of cutting
it. The old guys knew what they were talking
about.


?


Kurt S


?


?


?



Sent via the Samsung
Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone



?


?


-------- Original
message --------


From: Dan and Marlene
Coleman <dan_marlene@...>



Date: 1/14/19 8:52 PM
(GMT-05:00)


To:
[email protected]


Subject:
[atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA


?


I want to switch QC tool
posts for something I can easily find extra holders. Looking
at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas
lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are
you using with your 12" Atlas.
I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also
transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only
concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close
the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe
tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5"
with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your
input.

Dan Coleman


 

开云体育

GP, I have the AXA and lantern tool posts. I was looking at the website of the Australian manufacturer who makes tangential tool holders under the Diamond brand name?

Their website sucks, but I can't blame the man. His tools seem awesome, and that is what counts. He can always hire a web designing jockey to improve the site.?

The tool holders are listed by millimiter size and he is not measuring from the spindle center to the top of the compound to determine "tool height" which in turn is the size of the holder. I am a bit stumped by this or maybe my metric confusion is too great:??
The Diamond Tool Holder. The Diamond Tool Holders are available in several tool heights to suit most lathes. To find the best fit for your lathe go to the Tool Selection page first.. Check out the categories under The Diamond Tool Holders below.
www.eccentricengineering.com.au




From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Guenther Paul <paulguenter@...>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 5:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
?
if you check the specifications it will tell you what size tool holder to use For a 9A I would use a axa

GP

--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 1/15/19, Andrei <calciu1@...> wrote:

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 5:44 PM



James, I tried to figure out those Diamond tangential tool
holders. The manufacturer lists the sizes based on tool
height in mm and none of them make any sense to me. How did
you figure which size holder was good for your South Bend 9A
and Which was was good
for your 12" Atlas??





I want to order one for each of my machines, but I am
stumped by the Australian website. Please, help.?


From:
[email protected] <[email protected]>
on behalf of James Rice <james.rice@...>

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 1:37 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
?



I have an
AXA on mine and on my South Bend 9A as well so I can
appreciate you wanting to share holders and tooling between
lathes as that is what I do as well.? My larger lathe is a
South Bend 16 so I use a CXA post and
holders on it.? It is close to the border between using a
CA or a CXA.? I went CXA as I don't tend to hog out
things on the lathe and the price difference between CA and
CXA set and holders is huge!? I have a few friends who have
Atlas lathes, one has a BXA
and loves it, the others have AXA sets so I can't help
you with an informed opinion.? I think I've used my
rocker post twice in the last 11 years.



As far as
the tangential tool holders that were mentioned above, they
are my go to bit holder for all my lathes.? I have made one
for my Atlas 618, I bought a Diamond set and a pair Wimberly
holders for my 12" and 9A and
have been making a set for my South Bend 16 that will take
either a 3/8" or 1/2" square tool bit.? I may buy
a Diamond 20 set for the SB16 depending upon how my shopmade
versions turn out.? Wimberly doesn't offer a holder for
my 16" lathe.



James




On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:56 AM ksierens
<ksierens@...>
wrote:





Jody,
?
A number of problems.?
The lantern tool post is centered on the compound, so the
forces during cutting are straight down, as opposed to using
a QCTP when the tool is hung? far from the centerline of
the tool post. Second, you would need
to duplicate the high positive rake of a tool like it is
when you are using a lantern tool holder, but, if you were
to grind a HSS tool with the same geometry and hold it in a
QCTP, it will be much better.? I do not have a tangential
(diamond) tool holder,
but that should give you good result, but I still feel a
lantern toolholder is still a much more rigid setup, but not
convenient.
?
?
?
?


From:
[email protected] <[email protected]>
On Behalf Of Jody

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:34 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or
BXA


?
Kurt,

What if you used that
same HSS roughing tool in the QCTP???


?


Are others finding that
large cuts on hard steel are more difficult with QCTP.? I
haven't had experience with both in doing large
cuts.


-Jody





-------- Original message --------

From: ksierens <ksierens@...>


Date: 1/14/19 10:00 PM (GMT-06:00)

To: [email protected]


Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA







I have an AXA from CDCO,
and love it. I will say do not get rid of the lantern tool
post if you have one though. The more I use my old machines,
the more I realize they are best used how they were
intended. I was roughing in a part yesterday
of 12L14, and with a nice sharp HSS roughing tool, can
easily take a 0.050 deep (0.100 on the diameter) with very
little strain on my lathe. Even with W-1 I can take at 0.030
deep cut. Now I use my QCTP, it's not going anywhere,
and you cant beat the convenience,
just saying, they tear off the material instead of cutting
it. The old guys knew what they were talking
about.


?


Kurt S


?


?


?



Sent via the Samsung
Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone



?


?


-------- Original
message --------


From: Dan and Marlene
Coleman <dan_marlene@...>



Date: 1/14/19 8:52 PM
(GMT-05:00)


To:
[email protected]


Subject:
[atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA


?


I want to switch QC tool
posts for something I can easily find extra holders. Looking
at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all Atlas
lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are
you using with your 12" Atlas.
I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also
transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only
concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close
the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe
tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5"
with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your
input.

Dan Coleman


 

I wouldn't mind trying one of tool holders. does he ship from Australia. Didn't see the shipping cost

GP

--------------------------------------------

On Tue, 1/15/19, Andrei <calciu1@...> wrote:

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 6:12 PM



GP, I have the AXA and lantern tool posts. I was looking at
the website of the Australian manufacturer who makes
tangential tool holders under the Diamond brand name?www.eccentricengineering.com.au





Their website sucks, but I can't blame the man. His
tools seem awesome, and that is what counts. He can always
hire a web designing jockey to improve the site.?





The tool holders are listed by millimiter size and he is not
measuring from the spindle center to the top of the compound
to determine "tool height" which in turn is the
size of the holder. I am a bit stumped by this or maybe my
metric confusion is too great:??



The Diamond Tool Holder -
eccentricengineering.com.au

The Diamond Tool Holder. The Diamond Tool Holders are
available in several tool heights to suit most lathes. To
find the best fit for your lathe go to the Tool Selection
page first.. Check out the categories under The Diamond Tool
Holders below.

www.eccentricengineering.com.au














From:
[email protected] <[email protected]>
on behalf of Guenther Paul <paulguenter@...>

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 5:55 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
?

if you check the specifications it will tell you what
size tool holder to use For a 9A I would use a axa



GP



--------------------------------------------

On Tue, 1/15/19, Andrei <calciu1@...>
wrote:



Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>

Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 5:44 PM







James, I tried to figure out those Diamond tangential
tool

holders. The manufacturer lists the sizes based on tool

height in mm and none of them make any sense to me. How
did

you figure which size holder was good for your South Bend
9A

and Which was was good

for your 12" Atlas??











I want to order one for each of my machines, but I am

stumped by the Australian website. Please, help.?





From:

[email protected]
<[email protected]>

on behalf of James Rice <james.rice@...>



Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 1:37 PM



To: [email protected]



Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

?







I have an

AXA on mine and on my South Bend 9A as well so I can

appreciate you wanting to share holders and tooling
between

lathes as that is what I do as well.? My larger lathe is
a

South Bend 16 so I use a CXA post and

holders on it.? It is close to the border between using
a

CA or a CXA.? I went CXA as I don't tend to hog out

things on the lathe and the price difference between CA
and

CXA set and holders is huge!? I have a few friends who
have

Atlas lathes, one has a BXA

and loves it, the others have AXA sets so I can't
help

you with an informed opinion.? I think I've used my

rocker post twice in the last 11 years.







As far as

the tangential tool holders that were mentioned above,
they

are my go to bit holder for all my lathes.? I have made
one

for my Atlas 618, I bought a Diamond set and a pair
Wimberly

holders for my 12" and 9A and

have been making a set for my South Bend 16 that will
take

either a 3/8" or 1/2" square tool bit.? I may
buy

a Diamond 20 set for the SB16 depending upon how my
shopmade

versions turn out.? Wimberly doesn't offer a holder
for

my 16" lathe.







James









On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:56 AM ksierens

<ksierens@...>

wrote:











Jody,

?

A number of problems.?

The lantern tool post is centered on the compound, so the

forces during cutting are straight down, as opposed to
using

a QCTP when the tool is hung? far from the centerline of

the tool post. Second, you would need

to duplicate the high positive rake of a tool like it is

when you are using a lantern tool holder, but, if you
were

to grind a HSS tool with the same geometry and hold it in
a

QCTP, it will be much better.? I do not have a
tangential

(diamond) tool holder,

but that should give you good result, but I still feel a

lantern toolholder is still a much more rigid setup, but
not

convenient.

?

?

?

?





From:

[email protected]
<[email protected]>

On Behalf Of Jody



Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:34 AM



To: [email protected]



Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or

BXA





?

Kurt,



What if you used that

same HSS roughing tool in the QCTP???





?





Are others finding that

large cuts on hard steel are more difficult with QCTP.?
I

haven't had experience with both in doing large

cuts.





-Jody











-------- Original message --------



From: ksierens <ksierens@...>





Date: 1/14/19 10:00 PM (GMT-06:00)



To: [email protected]





Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA















I have an AXA from CDCO,

and love it. I will say do not get rid of the lantern
tool

post if you have one though. The more I use my old
machines,

the more I realize they are best used how they were

intended. I was roughing in a part yesterday

of 12L14, and with a nice sharp HSS roughing tool, can

easily take a 0.050 deep (0.100 on the diameter) with
very

little strain on my lathe. Even with W-1 I can take at
0.030

deep cut. Now I use my QCTP, it's not going anywhere,

and you cant beat the convenience,

just saying, they tear off the material instead of
cutting

it. The old guys knew what they were talking

about.





?





Kurt S





?





?





?







Sent via the Samsung

Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone







?





?





-------- Original

message --------





From: Dan and Marlene

Coleman <dan_marlene@...>







Date: 1/14/19 8:52 PM

(GMT-05:00)





To:

[email protected]





Subject:

[atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA





?





I want to switch QC tool

posts for something I can easily find extra holders.
Looking

at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all
Atlas

lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are

you using with your 12" Atlas.

I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also

transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only

concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close

the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe

tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5"

with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your

input.



Dan Coleman


 

开云体育

Probably 20 bucks or so

Get


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Guenther Paul <paulguenter@...>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:48:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
?
I wouldn't mind trying one of tool holders. does he ship from Australia. Didn't see the shipping cost

GP

--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 1/15/19, Andrei <calciu1@...> wrote:

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 6:12 PM



GP, I have the AXA and lantern tool posts. I was looking at
the website of the Australian manufacturer who makes
tangential tool holders under the Diamond brand name?www.eccentricengineering.com.au





Their website sucks, but I can't blame the man. His
tools seem awesome, and that is what counts. He can always
hire a web designing jockey to improve the site.?





The tool holders are listed by millimiter size and he is not
measuring from the spindle center to the top of the compound
to determine "tool height" which in turn is the
size of the holder. I am a bit stumped by this or maybe my
metric confusion is too great:??



The Diamond Tool Holder -
eccentricengineering.com.au

The Diamond Tool Holder. The Diamond Tool Holders are
available in several tool heights to suit most lathes. To
find the best fit for your lathe go to the Tool Selection
page first.. Check out the categories under The Diamond Tool
Holders below.

www.eccentricengineering.com.au














From:
[email protected] <[email protected]>
on behalf of Guenther Paul <paulguenter@...>

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 5:55 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
?

if you check the specifications it will tell you what
size tool holder to use For a 9A I would use a axa



GP



--------------------------------------------

On Tue, 1/15/19, Andrei <calciu1@...>
wrote:



Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>

Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 5:44 PM







James, I tried to figure out those Diamond tangential
tool

holders. The manufacturer lists the sizes based on tool

height in mm and none of them make any sense to me. How
did

you figure which size holder was good for your South Bend
9A

and Which was was good

for your 12" Atlas??











I want to order one for each of my machines, but I am

stumped by the Australian website. Please, help.?





From:

[email protected]
<[email protected]>

on behalf of James Rice <james.rice@...>



Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 1:37 PM



To: [email protected]



Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

?







I have an

AXA on mine and on my South Bend 9A as well so I can

appreciate you wanting to share holders and tooling
between

lathes as that is what I do as well.? My larger lathe is
a

South Bend 16 so I use a CXA post and

holders on it.? It is close to the border between using
a

CA or a CXA.? I went CXA as I don't tend to hog out

things on the lathe and the price difference between CA
and

CXA set and holders is huge!? I have a few friends who
have

Atlas lathes, one has a BXA

and loves it, the others have AXA sets so I can't
help

you with an informed opinion.? I think I've used my

rocker post twice in the last 11 years.







As far as

the tangential tool holders that were mentioned above,
they

are my go to bit holder for all my lathes.? I have made
one

for my Atlas 618, I bought a Diamond set and a pair
Wimberly

holders for my 12" and 9A and

have been making a set for my South Bend 16 that will
take

either a 3/8" or 1/2" square tool bit.? I may
buy

a Diamond 20 set for the SB16 depending upon how my
shopmade

versions turn out.? Wimberly doesn't offer a holder
for

my 16" lathe.







James









On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:56 AM ksierens

<ksierens@...>

wrote:











Jody,

?

A number of problems.?

The lantern tool post is centered on the compound, so the

forces during cutting are straight down, as opposed to
using

a QCTP when the tool is hung? far from the centerline of

the tool post. Second, you would need

to duplicate the high positive rake of a tool like it is

when you are using a lantern tool holder, but, if you
were

to grind a HSS tool with the same geometry and hold it in
a

QCTP, it will be much better.? I do not have a
tangential

(diamond) tool holder,

but that should give you good result, but I still feel a

lantern toolholder is still a much more rigid setup, but
not

convenient.

?

?

?

?





From:

[email protected]
<[email protected]>

On Behalf Of Jody



Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:34 AM



To: [email protected]



Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or

BXA





?

Kurt,



What if you used that

same HSS roughing tool in the QCTP???





?





Are others finding that

large cuts on hard steel are more difficult with QCTP.?
I

haven't had experience with both in doing large

cuts.





-Jody











-------- Original message --------



From: ksierens <ksierens@...>





Date: 1/14/19 10:00 PM (GMT-06:00)



To: [email protected]





Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA















I have an AXA from CDCO,

and love it. I will say do not get rid of the lantern
tool

post if you have one though. The more I use my old
machines,

the more I realize they are best used how they were

intended. I was roughing in a part yesterday

of 12L14, and with a nice sharp HSS roughing tool, can

easily take a 0.050 deep (0.100 on the diameter) with
very

little strain on my lathe. Even with W-1 I can take at
0.030

deep cut. Now I use my QCTP, it's not going anywhere,

and you cant beat the convenience,

just saying, they tear off the material instead of
cutting

it. The old guys knew what they were talking

about.





?





Kurt S





?





?





?







Sent via the Samsung

Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone







?





?





-------- Original

message --------





From: Dan and Marlene

Coleman <dan_marlene@...>







Date: 1/14/19 8:52 PM

(GMT-05:00)





To:

[email protected]





Subject:

[atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA





?





I want to switch QC tool

posts for something I can easily find extra holders.
Looking

at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all
Atlas

lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are

you using with your 12" Atlas.

I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also

transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only

concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close

the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe

tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5"

with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your

input.



Dan Coleman


 

I saw a product on e-bay the seller was in Australia the shipping was more then the product.

GP

--------------------------------------------

On Tue, 1/15/19, Andrei <calciu1@...> wrote:

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 7:49 PM






Probably 20 bucks or so






Get Outlook for Android




From:
[email protected] <[email protected]>
on behalf of Guenther Paul <paulguenter@...>

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:48:03 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA
?

I wouldn't mind trying one of tool holders. does he
ship from Australia. Didn't see the shipping cost




GP



--------------------------------------------

On Tue, 1/15/19, Andrei <calciu1@...> wrote:



Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>

Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 6:12 PM







GP, I have the AXA and lantern tool posts. I was looking at

the website of the Australian manufacturer who makes

tangential tool holders under the Diamond brand
name?www.eccentricengineering.com.au











Their website sucks, but I can't blame the man. His

tools seem awesome, and that is what counts. He can always

hire a web designing jockey to improve the site.?











The tool holders are listed by millimiter size and he is
not

measuring from the spindle center to the top of the
compound

to determine "tool height" which in turn is the

size of the holder. I am a bit stumped by this or maybe my

metric confusion is too great:??







The Diamond Tool Holder -

eccentricengineering.com.au



The Diamond Tool Holder. The Diamond Tool Holders are

available in several tool heights to suit most lathes. To

find the best fit for your lathe go to the Tool Selection

page first.. Check out the categories under The Diamond
Tool

Holders below.



www.eccentricengineering.com.au





























From:

[email protected] <[email protected]>

on behalf of Guenther Paul <paulguenter@...>



Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 5:55 PM



To: [email protected]



Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA

?



if you check the specifications it will tell you what

size tool holder to use For a 9A I would use a axa







GP







--------------------------------------------



On Tue, 1/15/19, Andrei <calciu1@...>

wrote:







Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA



To: "[email protected]"

<[email protected]>



Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 5:44 PM















James, I tried to figure out those Diamond tangential

tool



holders. The manufacturer lists the sizes based on tool



height in mm and none of them make any sense to me. How

did



you figure which size holder was good for your South Bend

9A



and Which was was good



for your 12" Atlas??























I want to order one for each of my machines, but I am



stumped by the Australian website. Please, help.?











From:



[email protected]

<[email protected]>



on behalf of James Rice <james.rice@...>







Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 1:37 PM







To: [email protected]







Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA



?















I have an



AXA on mine and on my South Bend 9A as well so I can



appreciate you wanting to share holders and tooling

between



lathes as that is what I do as well.? My larger lathe is

a



South Bend 16 so I use a CXA post and



holders on it.? It is close to the border between using

a



CA or a CXA.? I went CXA as I don't tend to hog out



things on the lathe and the price difference between CA

and



CXA set and holders is huge!? I have a few friends who

have



Atlas lathes, one has a BXA



and loves it, the others have AXA sets so I can't

help



you with an informed opinion.? I think I've used my



rocker post twice in the last 11 years.















As far as



the tangential tool holders that were mentioned above,

they



are my go to bit holder for all my lathes.? I have made

one



for my Atlas 618, I bought a Diamond set and a pair

Wimberly



holders for my 12" and 9A and



have been making a set for my South Bend 16 that will

take



either a 3/8" or 1/2" square tool bit.? I may

buy



a Diamond 20 set for the SB16 depending upon how my

shopmade



versions turn out.? Wimberly doesn't offer a holder

for



my 16" lathe.















James



















On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:56 AM ksierens



<ksierens@...>



wrote:























Jody,



?



A number of problems.?



The lantern tool post is centered on the compound, so the



forces during cutting are straight down, as opposed to

using



a QCTP when the tool is hung? far from the centerline of



the tool post. Second, you would need



to duplicate the high positive rake of a tool like it is



when you are using a lantern tool holder, but, if you

were



to grind a HSS tool with the same geometry and hold it in

a



QCTP, it will be much better.? I do not have a

tangential



(diamond) tool holder,



but that should give you good result, but I still feel a



lantern toolholder is still a much more rigid setup, but

not



convenient.



?



?



?



?











From:



[email protected]

<[email protected]>



On Behalf Of Jody







Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:34 AM







To: [email protected]







Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or



BXA











?



Kurt,







What if you used that



same HSS roughing tool in the QCTP???











?











Are others finding that



large cuts on hard steel are more difficult with QCTP.?

I



haven't had experience with both in doing large



cuts.











-Jody























-------- Original message --------







From: ksierens <ksierens@...>











Date: 1/14/19 10:00 PM (GMT-06:00)







To: [email protected]











Subject: Re: [atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA































I have an AXA from CDCO,



and love it. I will say do not get rid of the lantern

tool



post if you have one though. The more I use my old

machines,



the more I realize they are best used how they were



intended. I was roughing in a part yesterday



of 12L14, and with a nice sharp HSS roughing tool, can



easily take a 0.050 deep (0.100 on the diameter) with

very



little strain on my lathe. Even with W-1 I can take at

0.030



deep cut. Now I use my QCTP, it's not going anywhere,



and you cant beat the convenience,



just saying, they tear off the material instead of

cutting



it. The old guys knew what they were talking



about.











?











Kurt S











?











?











?















Sent via the Samsung



Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone















?











?











-------- Original



message --------











From: Dan and Marlene



Coleman <dan_marlene@...>















Date: 1/14/19 8:52 PM



(GMT-05:00)











To:



[email protected]











Subject:



[atlas-craftsman IO] AXA or BXA











?











I want to switch QC tool



posts for something I can easily find extra holders.

Looking



at the Aloris fit chart an AXA is called out for all

Atlas



lathes. It looks like a BXA would also fit. What size are



you using with your 12" Atlas.



I'm leaning toward the BXA because I could also



transfer this tooling to my 13" lathe later. My only



concern is the bulk of the tooling limiting getting close



the tailstock. I am currently using surplus mini lathe



tooling with the post measuring 2.5 x 2.5"



with a spacer on the bottom. Thanks in advance for your



input.







Dan Coleman