Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Z-Bend-Track
- Messages
Search
New At Ztrack Center For August, F7 LEDS and Portals!
NEW FOR AUGUST! Ztrack Center is now taking orders for four new products.
First. High Tech Modellbahnen has released a Micro-Trains F7 LED upgrade kit. The kit includes a directional controlled LED board, special inserts designed to fit the locomotive shell and a new screw shaft. The kit is designed for a maximum of 10 volt analog operation. 1zu220 has released three tunnel portals! Each portal is available in your choice of red, ocher, brown or gray base colors. The first portal is a the single track "Germunden" three piece set. The second single track portal is the "Weisenbrom 1905" three set. The third portal is the two track "Ippensen" three piece set. For more information on these products, and to your, please visit: Rob Kluz Ztrack Magazine Ltd. 6142 Northcliff Blvd. Dublin, OH 43016 phone/fax: (614) 764-1703 www.ztrack.com www.ztrackcenter.com Distributor American Z Line **** It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here. () |
Grassinator for sale; Brand New, Never Used
I Have a brand new never used Melissa Cull (UK) GRASSINATOR for sale.
Connects to Standard 12volt DC Photo's of the Grassinator UK version are uploaded to the files/folder area under "Grassinator by Melissa Cull". Make your scenicing grass "stand on end" for the best in realism. $75.00 plus USPS Domestic Mailing cost. Payment via personal check, ¡.or verified PayPal account. Only one unit available. Contact me off the forum at: donfedjur@... Don Fedjur, Carlsbad, CA |
Re: Interface question
Good point there Dave. M?rklin's 1" pc is the simplest with a M?rklin or Peter Wright Euro tie turnout but can still be used on MTL's American ties and won't look to different, especially if ballasted. You can even cut a short piece of Micro Track because you'll have to in other places to get the 195 & 220mm to work out to the ZBT 9 & 10" anyway.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You can go direct to the turnout but be prepared one day to have to replace it. And hopefully not at a show ! Outer track turnouts can lead to spur modules or have a 2x2-1/2 module to get 3" on both front and back or, just 3 or 6" on the front. Of course, if you make a "Bend" module, the Outer (and Inner) can have the need angles or space for spurs. Balloon modules (e.g.) 3x3' can place asymmetrical crossovers (a L&R rather than a parallel tracks two L's or two R's that form that classic S). This make for smooth Inner / Outer transitions). Jeff SF Bay Area Z ------Original Message------
From: Dave Hjortnaes Sender: Z-Bend_Track@... To: Z-Bend_Track@... ReplyTo: Z-Bend_Track@... Sent: Aug 4, 2008 8:21 PM Subject: [Z-Bend_Track] Re: Interface question Dear Russ: I am assuming you want to put the switch on the inner track. As long as the train is not going to fast, that should not be a problem. You have to concern yourself with the stress that the transition track puts on the switch. It could throw it out of alignment. Marklin makes a piece of track that is only 1 inch long. If you can solder that to the end of the switch, you only loose an inch of space on the module, yet you gain extra track to take the stress. That might work. WIZKidZ has 4 end modules at this time, but we would love to have you bring yours to a show, and we can set up two layouts. BYOZ You probably can put a switch on the outer track, but I would recommend that the straight section be a part of the main loop. With a 2x2 module, that does not give you much room on the side to add a short section of track, but it can be done. The greatest part about Z-Bend is it's flexibility. You can do whatever you want as long as the interface is standard. Many thanks to Bill and friends with what they accomplished for all of us. dave hj ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile |
Re: Interface question
Dear Russ:
I am assuming you want to put the switch on the inner track. As long as the train is not going to fast, that should not be a problem. You have to concern yourself with the stress that the transition track puts on the switch. It could throw it out of alignment. Marklin makes a piece of track that is only 1 inch long. If you can solder that to the end of the switch, you only loose an inch of space on the module, yet you gain extra track to take the stress. That might work. WIZKidZ has 4 end modules at this time, but we would love to have you bring yours to a show, and we can set up two layouts. BYOZ You probably can put a switch on the outer track, but I would recommend that the straight section be a part of the main loop. With a 2x2 module, that does not give you much room on the side to add a short section of track, but it can be done. The greatest part about Z-Bend is it's flexibility. You can do whatever you want as long as the interface is standard. Many thanks to Bill and friends with what they accomplished for all of us. dave hj |
Re: Interface question
Russ,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
To answer your interface questions: First, a correction: The first dimension is 2-1/8" (2.125"), not 2-7/8" from the edge of the module. The second length of 2-7/8 is correct. 1. MTL sectional track is creates a few challenges. The height and end length are OK, comparable to Flex or M???rklin sectional with MidWest Products cork (just make sure what ever you use, you 1) make the Z-Bend Track holes 3" from the TOP of the RAIL, not the module top and 2) you grind enough of the 2-1/8 cork down so that the M???rklin expansion track has a little bit of a gap under it (manila folder thickness). This assures that the expansion track does not get leveraged up and if it does during installation, they can be pushed down a bit to level them. NOTE: MTL flex is NOT the same height as M???rklin / Peco flex. The rail height is only a few thousandth less than M???rklin/Peco and the ties the same but MTL places their rail more prototypically closer to the ties. The total is about 0.010" less than the M???rklin/Peco flex so make sure that the cork is sanded down accordingly. This assures that the higher M???rklin expansion track does not get forced up by leverage. The rail ends interface is a bit different. They expect the interlocking alignment pieces. You will have to cut two of them in "1/2" to fill in the void (spares are available from MTL or any of us). Make sure you pull the joiner off per Z-Bend Track or, leave the same single one on if these are your own modules (really no need to take the one off - they all have to go on anyway). You main challenge as you mention is geometry. Since you are limited to straight and curve, you will have to cut pieces to make every thing fit. Not hard to do, many have done it. Make sure that when you secure the sectional pieces, they are FLAT. There are quite a few that have very slight arcs or twists in them. Very, very small but you can see it when connected in a chain. 2. You can do what you want with that next 2-7/8", even a curve. However, it is recommended that it be straight as the expansion tracks create 1) a bumpy surface in the middle and 2) the modules are normally never perfectly aligned (both up/down and left/right). Placing a turnout straight counts as straight but like the expansion tracks, an additional bumpy ride. We've all done it so have it. The only thing we ask is that at shows, all modules should be proven runners with variations to the standard. Jeff SF Bay Area Z "The BAZ BoyZ" -----Original Message-----
From: Z-Bend_Track@... [mailto:Z-Bend_Track@...]On Behalf Of Russ Meier Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 5:32 PM To: Z-Bend_Track@... Subject: [Z-Bend_Track] Interface question Hello everyone: Well, I decided to finally start two end modules that I'll plan to interface with one of the two Z-Bend groups in Milwaukee. I've had tremendous fun with my own layout at home, but I'd really like to be able to join everyone at gatherings. I also plan that these two end modules will interface as a second home layout for the fun of the new scenery and industries! I've been talking to Randy through email, but he recommended I just post on out to the group. So, here are a couple of interface questions: 1. What has been the modeler's success when using MTL snap-sectional track on the modules rather than flex or non-snap? Obviously, the geometries are still limited by availability, but specifically, how about at the interface? If cork roadbed is added at the interface to bring it up to height, do the Marklin interface tracks slide right in with no problems? I haven't decided if I'll use the new MTL snap or not. It's tempting. 2. I understand that the first 2-1/8" is reserved for the interface tracks. But, the next 2-7/8" is also reserved for "straight" sections so that the trucks are rolling straight when they enter the interface. But, can that straight section be a left or right turn-out? My bet is no because of the hazard of derailment across the points and frogs. Suppose you built a 2' by 2' end module. In order to have a local siding or industry spur, you almost have to turn-out in that first 2-7/8"! If this is not allowed, then I'm thinking that 2' by 2' is really too small for much other than simple mainline loop backs. Does anyone have any thought on that limited space? Can you work in anything but those loops? Thanks for your thoughts Russ Milwaukee, WI ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links |
Re: Interface question
Jim,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Perfect for those purposes. For the show modules with the multi-module clusters, it looks better and we can run more variety with the larger modules and radius. Post pix of your work ! Jeff Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -----Original Message-----
From: "Jim Glass" <Berjimgl@...> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:09:36 To: <Z-Bend_Track@...> Subject: Re: [Z-Bend_Track] Re: Interface question I use two 2 X 2 end modules to complement my 2 X 4 module on a banquet table as a BYOZ; no need for legs. In addition the two end modules together make a simple, small BYOZ of a nice size for portability. Also, my 2 X 4 module, when alone, also serves as a BYOZ or as an end module. I have the best of both worlds, module or BYOZ. Occasionally when I go to a show, I do not know in advance what the group setup will be; but I can go either way with no muss, no fussl if I remember to bring my legs. These pieces' track layouts were designed by me, but built by fellow Z'ers, Tom Gilchrist and Chris Germond. As always the pieces are a project in progress . Jim Glass Redmond, WA P.S. No, I won't send a track plan. Our next "viewing" is Nov. 15-16 at Puyallup. ----- Original Message ----- From: Russ Meier<mailto:agentink_and_zfan@...> To: Z-Bend_Track@...<mailto:Z-Bend_Track@...> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 7:37 AM Subject: [Z-Bend_Track] Re: Interface question --- In Z-Bend_Track@...<mailto:Z-Bend_Track@...>, Jim Thomas <jim29t@...> wrote: > > I found that there is no particular reason to limit end loops to 2 x 2. I have one end loop that is at least 3 x 2. I had extra space to fill and needed the extra length to interface with a yard module. Unless you have space limitations there is nothing sacred about 2 x 2. Jim > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > Thanks for your thoughts Jim. I've already built the 2x2s so I'd like to do something with them. I was already thinking of "up-ing" the size to 2x3 if noone on the list had a good answer to track planning in the limited space. Russ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links |
Re: Interface question
Loren
Hey John,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You obviously don't have enough to do so you have to give me a bad time huh? :o) Hey, I'm already putting some thinking into NTS 2011. It will sneak up real fast,.....just you watch. Hope all is well down there. Still in the mid 90s each day here in Medford. Went to my son's wedding this past weekend up in the Willamette valley near Salem and it was actually overcast and sprinkled a bit. What a nice change. Ok, back to real life, Loren ----- Original Message -----
From: "John Duino" <jduino@...> To: <Z-Bend_Track@...> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 11:21 AM Subject: Re: [Z-Bend_Track] Interface question ...but then again, I know better than anyoneHauling or dribbling? :-D |
Re: Interface question
David George
If you always set everything down at table top height so Munchkins ,and old folks ,and short people can see your handiwork,,,,then problem solved.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Cordially, Mister Dave ----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Glass To: Z-Bend_Track@... Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 2:09 PM Subject: Re: [Z-Bend_Track] Re: Interface question I use two 2 X 2 end modules to complement my 2 X 4 module on a banquet table as a BYOZ; no need for legs. In addition the two end modules together make a simple, small BYOZ of a nice size for portability. Also, my 2 X 4 module, when alone, also serves as a BYOZ or as an end module. I have the best of both worlds, module or BYOZ. Occasionally when I go to a show, I do not know in advance what the group setup will be; but I can go either way with no muss, no fussl if I remember to bring my legs. These pieces' track layouts were designed by me, but built by fellow Z'ers, Tom Gilchrist and Chris Germond. As always the pieces are a project in progress . Jim Glass Redmond, WA P.S. No, I won't send a track plan. Our next "viewing" is Nov. 15-16 at Puyallup. ----- Original Message ----- From: Russ Meier<mailto:agentink_and_zfan@...> To: Z-Bend_Track@...<mailto:Z-Bend_Track@...> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 7:37 AM Subject: [Z-Bend_Track] Re: Interface question --- In Z-Bend_Track@...<mailto:Z-Bend_Track@...>, Jim Thomas <jim29t@...> wrote: > > I found that there is no particular reason to limit end loops to 2 x 2. I have one end loop that is at least 3 x 2. I had extra space to fill and needed the extra length to interface with a yard module. Unless you have space limitations there is nothing sacred about 2 x 2. Jim > > > > > > Thanks for your thoughts Jim. I've already built the 2x2s so I'd like to do something with them. I was already thinking of "up-ing" the size to 2x3 if noone on the list had a good answer to track planning in the limited space. Russ |
Re: Interface question
David George
If you always set everything down at table top height so Munchkins ,and old folks ,and short people can see your handiwork,,,,then problem solved.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Cordially, Mister Dave ----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Glass To: Z-Bend_Track@... Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 2:09 PM Subject: Re: [Z-Bend_Track] Re: Interface question I use two 2 X 2 end modules to complement my 2 X 4 module on a banquet table as a BYOZ; no need for legs. In addition the two end modules together make a simple, small BYOZ of a nice size for portability. Also, my 2 X 4 module, when alone, also serves as a BYOZ or as an end module. I have the best of both worlds, module or BYOZ. Occasionally when I go to a show, I do not know in advance what the group setup will be; but I can go either way with no muss, no fussl if I remember to bring my legs. These pieces' track layouts were designed by me, but built by fellow Z'ers, Tom Gilchrist and Chris Germond. As always the pieces are a project in progress . Jim Glass Redmond, WA P.S. No, I won't send a track plan. Our next "viewing" is Nov. 15-16 at Puyallup. ----- Original Message ----- From: Russ Meier<mailto:agentink_and_zfan@...> To: Z-Bend_Track@...<mailto:Z-Bend_Track@...> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 7:37 AM Subject: [Z-Bend_Track] Re: Interface question --- In Z-Bend_Track@...<mailto:Z-Bend_Track@...>, Jim Thomas <jim29t@...> wrote: > > I found that there is no particular reason to limit end loops to 2 x 2. I have one end loop that is at least 3 x 2. I had extra space to fill and needed the extra length to interface with a yard module. Unless you have space limitations there is nothing sacred about 2 x 2. Jim > > > > > > Thanks for your thoughts Jim. I've already built the 2x2s so I'd like to do something with them. I was already thinking of "up-ing" the size to 2x3 if noone on the list had a good answer to track planning in the limited space. Russ |
Re: Interface question
I use two 2 X 2 end modules to complement my 2 X 4 module on a banquet table as a BYOZ; no need for legs. In addition the two end modules together make a simple, small BYOZ of a nice size for portability. Also, my 2 X 4 module, when alone, also serves as a BYOZ or as an end module. I have the best of both worlds, module or BYOZ. Occasionally when I go to a show, I do not know in advance what the group setup will be; but I can go either way with no muss, no fussl if I remember to bring my legs. These pieces' track layouts were designed by me, but built by fellow Z'ers, Tom Gilchrist and Chris Germond. As always the pieces are a project in progress .
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Jim Glass Redmond, WA P.S. No, I won't send a track plan. Our next "viewing" is Nov. 15-16 at Puyallup. ----- Original Message -----
From: Russ Meier<mailto:agentink_and_zfan@...> To: Z-Bend_Track@...<mailto:Z-Bend_Track@...> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 7:37 AM Subject: [Z-Bend_Track] Re: Interface question --- In Z-Bend_Track@...<mailto:Z-Bend_Track@...>, Jim Thomas <jim29t@...> wrote: > > I found that there is no particular reason to limit end loops to 2 x 2. I have one end loop that is at least 3 x 2. I had extra space to fill and needed the extra length to interface with a yard module. Unless you have space limitations there is nothing sacred about 2 x 2. Jim > > > > > > Thanks for your thoughts Jim. I've already built the 2x2s so I'd like to do something with them. I was already thinking of "up-ing" the size to 2x3 if noone on the list had a good answer to track planning in the limited space. Russ |
Re: Interface question
Loren
Jeff is right on with his suggestions for minimum radius. I think the BAZ boys are the most experienced when it comes to larger end modules. No one using the larger radius is sorry they did,...........except for when it comes to hauling them around, but then again, I know better than anyone else about hauling large oversized modules around......I must be nuts.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Loren ----- Original Message -----
From: <sjbazman49@...> To: <Z-Bend_Track@...> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 9:46 AM Subject: Re: [Z-Bend_Track] Interface question Yes please, LARGER end loops ! One thing we have been talking about for Z-Bend Track is some enhancements to the now 20 year old standard. One big issue is the smaller radius used, especially end modules. With the longer rolling stock (passenger cars, 60', 89', etc, and longer locos, it is really necessary to use at least 12" radius at a minimum and more ideally 15". This easily fits in a 3' wide end module. It also dramatically improves mainline looks and blends in better with the 19" radius of the M???rklin, MTL or Peter Wrights turnouts ! |
Re: Interface question
Yes please, LARGER end loops ! One thing we have been talking about for Z-Bend Track is some enhancements to the now 20 year old standard. One big issue is the smaller radius used, especially end modules. With the longer rolling stock (passenger cars, 60', 89', etc, and longer locos, it is really necessary to use at least 12" radius at a minimum and more ideally 15". This easily fits in a 3' wide end module. It also dramatically improves mainline looks and blends in better with the 19" radius of the M?rklin, MTL or Peter Wrights turnouts !
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Jeff SF Bay Area Z ------Original Message------
From: Jim Thomas Sender: Z-Bend_Track@... To: Z-Bend_Track@... ReplyTo: Z-Bend_Track@... Sent: Aug 4, 2008 6:10 AM Subject: Re: [Z-Bend_Track] Interface question I found that there is no particular reason to limit end loops to 2 x 2.? I have one end loop that is at least 3 x 2.? I had extra space to fill and needed the extra length to interface with a yard module.? Unless you have space limitations there is nothing sacred about 2 x 2.???? Jim [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile |
Re: Interface question
Loren
Russ,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
May I also add that 2x2 is minimum and since more locos and rolling stock look better and some require a larger radius to operate smoothly, the larger the radius the better. 2x2 is the starting point but you can go larger with no complaint from anyone using Z Bend Track standards. Loren ----- Original Message -----
From: "Russ Meier" <agentink_and_zfan@...> To: <Z-Bend_Track@...> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 7:37 AM Subject: [Z-Bend_Track] Re: Interface question --- In Z-Bend_Track@..., Jim Thomas <jim29t@...> wrote: that is at least 3 x 2. I had extra space to fill and needed the extra length to interface with a yard module. Unless you have space limitations there is nothing sacred about 2 x 2. Jim |
Re: Interface question
--- In Z-Bend_Track@..., Jim Thomas <jim29t@...> wrote:
that is at least 3 x 2.? I had extra space to fill and needed the extra length to interface with a yard module.? Unless you have space limitations there is nothing sacred about 2 x 2.???? Jim Thanks for your thoughts Jim. I've already built the 2x2s so I'd like to do something with them. I was already thinking of "up-ing" the size to 2x3 if noone on the list had a good answer to track planning in the limited space. Russ |
Re: Interface question
I found that there is no particular reason to limit end loops to 2 x 2.? I have one end loop that is at least 3 x 2.? I had extra space to fill and needed the extra length to interface with a yard module.? Unless you have space limitations there is nothing sacred about 2 x 2.???? Jim
|
Interface question
Hello everyone:
Well, I decided to finally start two end modules that I'll plan to interface with one of the two Z-Bend groups in Milwaukee. I've had tremendous fun with my own layout at home, but I'd really like to be able to join everyone at gatherings. I also plan that these two end modules will interface as a second home layout for the fun of the new scenery and industries! I've been talking to Randy through email, but he recommended I just post on out to the group. So, here are a couple of interface questions: 1. What has been the modeler's success when using MTL snap-sectional track on the modules rather than flex or non-snap? Obviously, the geometries are still limited by availability, but specifically, how about at the interface? If cork roadbed is added at the interface to bring it up to height, do the Marklin interface tracks slide right in with no problems? I haven't decided if I'll use the new MTL snap or not. It's tempting. 2. I understand that the first 2 7/8" is reserved for the interface tracks. But, the next 2 7/8" is also reserved for "straight" sections so that the trucks are rolling straight when they enter the interface. But, can that straight section be a left or right turn-out? My bet is no because of the hazard of derailment across the points and frogs. Suppose you built a 2' by 2' end module. In order to have a local siding or industry spur, you almost have to turn-out in that first 2 7/8"! If this is not allowed, then I'm thinking that 2' by 2' is really too small for much other than simple mainline loop backs. Does anyone have any thought on that limited space? Can you work in anything but those loops? Thanks for your thoughts Russ Milwaukee, WI |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss