Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Re: Interface question
Russ,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
To answer your interface questions: First, a correction: The first dimension is 2-1/8" (2.125"), not 2-7/8" from the edge of the module. The second length of 2-7/8 is correct. 1. MTL sectional track is creates a few challenges. The height and end length are OK, comparable to Flex or M???rklin sectional with MidWest Products cork (just make sure what ever you use, you 1) make the Z-Bend Track holes 3" from the TOP of the RAIL, not the module top and 2) you grind enough of the 2-1/8 cork down so that the M???rklin expansion track has a little bit of a gap under it (manila folder thickness). This assures that the expansion track does not get leveraged up and if it does during installation, they can be pushed down a bit to level them. NOTE: MTL flex is NOT the same height as M???rklin / Peco flex. The rail height is only a few thousandth less than M???rklin/Peco and the ties the same but MTL places their rail more prototypically closer to the ties. The total is about 0.010" less than the M???rklin/Peco flex so make sure that the cork is sanded down accordingly. This assures that the higher M???rklin expansion track does not get forced up by leverage. The rail ends interface is a bit different. They expect the interlocking alignment pieces. You will have to cut two of them in "1/2" to fill in the void (spares are available from MTL or any of us). Make sure you pull the joiner off per Z-Bend Track or, leave the same single one on if these are your own modules (really no need to take the one off - they all have to go on anyway). You main challenge as you mention is geometry. Since you are limited to straight and curve, you will have to cut pieces to make every thing fit. Not hard to do, many have done it. Make sure that when you secure the sectional pieces, they are FLAT. There are quite a few that have very slight arcs or twists in them. Very, very small but you can see it when connected in a chain. 2. You can do what you want with that next 2-7/8", even a curve. However, it is recommended that it be straight as the expansion tracks create 1) a bumpy surface in the middle and 2) the modules are normally never perfectly aligned (both up/down and left/right). Placing a turnout straight counts as straight but like the expansion tracks, an additional bumpy ride. We've all done it so have it. The only thing we ask is that at shows, all modules should be proven runners with variations to the standard. Jeff SF Bay Area Z "The BAZ BoyZ" -----Original Message-----
From: Z-Bend_Track@... [mailto:Z-Bend_Track@...]On Behalf Of Russ Meier Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 5:32 PM To: Z-Bend_Track@... Subject: [Z-Bend_Track] Interface question Hello everyone: Well, I decided to finally start two end modules that I'll plan to interface with one of the two Z-Bend groups in Milwaukee. I've had tremendous fun with my own layout at home, but I'd really like to be able to join everyone at gatherings. I also plan that these two end modules will interface as a second home layout for the fun of the new scenery and industries! I've been talking to Randy through email, but he recommended I just post on out to the group. So, here are a couple of interface questions: 1. What has been the modeler's success when using MTL snap-sectional track on the modules rather than flex or non-snap? Obviously, the geometries are still limited by availability, but specifically, how about at the interface? If cork roadbed is added at the interface to bring it up to height, do the Marklin interface tracks slide right in with no problems? I haven't decided if I'll use the new MTL snap or not. It's tempting. 2. I understand that the first 2-1/8" is reserved for the interface tracks. But, the next 2-7/8" is also reserved for "straight" sections so that the trucks are rolling straight when they enter the interface. But, can that straight section be a left or right turn-out? My bet is no because of the hazard of derailment across the points and frogs. Suppose you built a 2' by 2' end module. In order to have a local siding or industry spur, you almost have to turn-out in that first 2-7/8"! If this is not allowed, then I'm thinking that 2' by 2' is really too small for much other than simple mainline loop backs. Does anyone have any thought on that limited space? Can you work in anything but those loops? Thanks for your thoughts Russ Milwaukee, WI ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss