¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Interface question


 

Russ,

To answer your interface questions:

First, a correction: The first dimension is 2-1/8" (2.125"), not 2-7/8"
from the edge of the module. The second length of 2-7/8 is correct.

1. MTL sectional track is creates a few challenges.

The height and end length are OK, comparable to Flex or M???rklin sectional
with MidWest Products cork (just make sure what ever you use, you 1) make
the Z-Bend Track holes 3" from the TOP of the RAIL, not the module top and
2) you grind enough of the 2-1/8 cork down so that the M???rklin expansion
track has a little bit of a gap under it (manila folder thickness). This
assures that the expansion track does not get leveraged up and if it does
during installation, they can be pushed down a bit to level them.

NOTE: MTL flex is NOT the same height as M???rklin / Peco flex.
The rail height is only a few thousandth less than
M???rklin/Peco and the ties the same but MTL places their rail more
prototypically closer to the ties. The total is about 0.010" less than the
M???rklin/Peco flex so make sure that the cork is sanded down accordingly.
This assures that the higher M???rklin expansion track does not get forced up
by leverage.

The rail ends interface is a bit different. They expect the interlocking
alignment pieces. You will have to cut two of them in "1/2" to fill in the
void (spares are available from MTL or any of us). Make sure you pull the
joiner off per Z-Bend Track or, leave the same single one on if these are
your own modules (really no need to take the one off - they all have to go
on anyway).

You main challenge as you mention is geometry. Since you are limited to
straight and curve, you will have to cut pieces to make every thing fit.
Not hard to do, many have done it. Make sure that when you secure the
sectional pieces, they are FLAT. There are quite a few that have very
slight arcs or twists in them. Very, very small but you can see it when
connected in a chain.

2. You can do what you want with that next 2-7/8", even a curve. However,
it is recommended that it be straight as the expansion tracks create 1) a
bumpy surface in the middle and 2) the modules are normally never perfectly
aligned (both up/down and left/right). Placing a turnout straight counts as
straight but like the expansion tracks, an additional bumpy ride. We've all
done it so have it. The only thing we ask is that at shows, all modules
should be proven runners with variations to the standard.

Jeff
SF Bay Area Z
"The BAZ BoyZ"

-----Original Message-----
From: Z-Bend_Track@...
[mailto:Z-Bend_Track@...]On Behalf Of Russ Meier
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 5:32 PM
To: Z-Bend_Track@...
Subject: [Z-Bend_Track] Interface question


Hello everyone:

Well, I decided to finally start two end modules that I'll plan to interface
with one of the two Z-Bend groups in Milwaukee. I've had tremendous fun
with my own layout at home, but I'd really like to be able to join everyone
at gatherings. I also plan that these two end modules will interface as a
second home layout for the fun of the new scenery and industries!

I've been talking to Randy through email, but he recommended I just post on
out to the group. So, here are a couple of interface questions:

1. What has been the modeler's success when using MTL snap-sectional track
on the modules rather than flex or non-snap? Obviously, the geometries are
still limited by
availability, but specifically, how about at the interface? If cork roadbed
is added at the interface to bring it up to height, do the Marklin interface
tracks slide right in with no problems? I haven't decided if I'll use the
new MTL snap or not. It's tempting.

2. I understand that the first 2-1/8" is reserved for the interface tracks.
But, the next 2-7/8" is also reserved for "straight" sections so that the
trucks are rolling straight when they enter the interface. But, can that
straight section be a left or right turn-out? My bet is no because of the
hazard of derailment across the points and frogs. Suppose you built a 2' by
2' end module. In order to have a local siding or industry spur, you almost
have to turn-out in that first 2-7/8"! If this is not allowed, then I'm
thinking that 2' by 2' is really too small for much other than simple
mainline loop backs. Does anyone have any thought on that limited space?
Can you work in anything but those loops?

Thanks for your thoughts

Russ
Milwaukee, WI


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.