¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: New radio
RE: It happened that the difference in voices of the different dispatchers. We had to install a switch to select different audio input levels for everyone to be heard on the air. Just labeled it 'Men'
By Greg Liverman · #18081 ·
Re: New radio
Nope. Available now. Clint K6LCS
By Clint Bradford · #18080 ·
Re: New radio
The most sexist and stupid post I have read in years. Our daughter - a CHP and military dispatcher - has scores of examples of just how ridiculous that post is. Took my mind off national
By Clint Bradford · #18079 ·
Happy World Radio Day
Hey Folks I don't usually do this, but today is a day we should all celebrate because it is all about our hobby. World Radio Day is an observance day held annually on 13 February. World Radio Day is
By WN6WJN · #18078 ·
Re: New radio
Hi Mark, Just wanted to comment on the audio of some "public safety" channels. I have 2 FT-60's and mainly monitor police, fire and EMS with them. I find that when there is weak audio, it is
By Art Roberts <w1aer@...> · #18076 ·
Re: New radio
Thanks. I hadn¡¯t considered that. I¡¯ve programmed it using the ADMS software, but I¡¯ll check. Yes, I know about Narrow Band. You¡¯re right. I could be the problem.
By Mark Lassman · #18077 ·
Re: New radio
For listening on Public Safety or business freqs, make sure you are set for Narrow Band. That could make the difference in the audio. Jardy Dawson WA7JRD Message sent through sub space hailing
By JARDY DAWSON · #18075 ·
Re: New radio
I have NO hearing issues, yet I find that I can barely hear the audio on some of the ¡°public safety¡± channels. I suspect that might be something on THEIR end, I don¡¯t know. Ham repeaters are
By Mark Lassman · #18074 ·
Re: New radio
how does the mic connect on the new radio? ?K3CLT Chuck Tobias To: FT-60@... Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 10:09 PM Subject: Re: [FT-60] Re: New radio ? The new FT-65 touts
By cltoby600 · #18073 ·
Re: New radio
I have owned a few since the moment they hit the US market. Haven't needed a factory part yet. (grin) Clint
By Clint Bradford · #18071 ·
Re: New radio
The new FT-65 touts "louder audio." If anyone needs louder audio than an FT-60R, then they REALLY need an audio accessory (earpiece or speaker-mic). If your environment is so loud that you need to
By Clint Bradford · #18072 ·
Re: New radio
Less the aviation band.
By Dave Jeffries AF0DJ · #18070 ·
Re: New radio
I would imagine so. The FT-60 has been in production for at least a dozen years and some parts are likely becoming hard to get. 73, Jim K5JG
By Jim K5JG <k5jg@...> · #18069 ·
Re: New radio
I have used the FT-60 airband monitoring to track down several ELTs. It is a great radio to body shield with. www.silverstarsar.org WSDOT (WA State DOT) Aviation Division Jardy Dawson
By JARDY DAWSON · #18067 ·
Re: New radio
How is it ¡°less a radio¡±?
By Mark Lassman · #18066 ·
Re: New radio
No airband, but in its place gimmicky broadcast band FM (Like all those CCC radios). 1950 mAh Li-ion battery. 6.25 kHz steps. 'Quick recall keys' Only 200 memories. One thing I'd
By sadfilms@... · #18068 ·
Re: New radio
I hope not. ? ?It's considerably less a radio then the -60?Dave J? To: FT-60@... Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 10:30 PM Subject: Re: [FT-60] Re: New radio ? I didn't catch
By Dave Jeffries AF0DJ · #18064 ·
Re: New radio
Darn, ?I imagine most of us have a high fidelity radio for broadcast FM but the -60 served as an alerting device for emergencies deriving from the old (but still in use) ?121.5 beacon freq.?Dave
By Dave Jeffries AF0DJ · #18065 ·
Re: New radio
I didn't catch it, but are they going to quit making the FT-60 all together??? --------------------------------------------
By LYLE M · #18063 ·
Re: New radio
Looking at the rec range posted on the mail list, it would appear while they added broadcast FM they dropped the AM Aircraft band? Sent from my Sprint Phone.
By Jeff · #18062 ·