开云体育

Thank you again!? Will check the forums.? Since I now know that the machine is not a W&W, I'll try not to discuss it much more here.? However, as you mentioned, the W&W base is perplexing.? If

Huh.? I wonder if the parts list was put out as Singer was changing the name, because it also has "UFA" at the bottom.? Clearly, there's a crossover in name prior to any design change.? The 29s

bsiegmund01, my assumption about the UFA being a No. 29 was based on this.? I really know nothing about them.

If you'll allow me, that is not a 29.? That is a UFA, which pre-dates the 29 series.? ISMACS notes that they were produced from 1877 to 1892+.? The 29-4 started in 1896, but no real data on US or

Great find. The "cobbler" looks like it will be a fun machine to restore. I am a bit envious. [email protected]> wrote: -- Bill Wells ronone69@...

Thank you both!? It appears that the machine is 100% Singer and matches photos for Singer No. 29.? My next question is about what kind of W&W machine head would've originally been on the base.? I'm

Universal Feed Arm.? If that's what it is, it's a fabulous, bordering on rare catch!

roxy via groups.io wrote: Interesting. You might try googling for UFA (can't remember what that stands for) since it looks older tgan the 29-4, and that suggests a UFA machine. Also, you should feel

Hello, all.? I've been lurking here for a few months and have so appreciated your wealth of knowledge.? I currently have a beautiful W&W 9 in a gorgeous cabinet, a D9 machine head that was rescued

sunday, at end of a pillowcase for small friend, plastic wonder sm tied up t_read.....?? and anot_er sm suddenly as no feed.. !!! so, i'm off to WONDERFUL no 8!!!!! pillowcase is done and off to

MB, I think Miller would have referred to the 1908 Singer Bridgeport catalog which notes "corrected to Nov 23- 11"? for model information.? I recall a few W&W's from Russia that didn't fit any of

Jon, Miller and I corresponded often right up to the time he passed away. ?I miss and enjoyed his patience and subject knowledge no matter what the question was I asked him. Miller told me he could

Thanks for creating and up loading this bobbin list. My collection contains nearly all of those machines, except for the Mundlos and Stoewer. And my? W&W12 is a 12W. Additionally, my collection

The person I corresponded with at the Smithsonian is Jim Roan. I have to correct my contact time. It was March 2021 - but seems like a year ago. I am sure Jim can provide better detail than I. His

Thank you for doing this research! ?Much more thorough than mine. I have one of these machines. Here are the pictures in my Flickr album

bill wrote: That's very interesting to hear. Do you have any idea how that works, as a volunteer? What sort of time commitment, how much you need to be willing to do, etc? There's clearly some amount

If I had time, and that is a very big if, I would like to check the advertising for the different machines and use those images to determine changes in the machines. The W&W would be of no help. Mr.

MB, The past owner or moderator of the group was Miller Fulks who passed about a year or two ago.? He was a retired machinist and very knowledgable about all things W&W and repair.? Much of his work

Very well done.? This comparison will be very useful.? The only thing I'd change is 9D model to D9. Thanks! Jon

For those who have wondered as I did what model Singer 9W they have,?this may be useful. ?I present this as information only from my?research experience. The sources below provide information