开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: What a Cowboy When?

John Gephart
 

Or the CoC Far East supplement?


On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:15 PM Brian Burger <wirelizard@...> wrote:
The same Easter that In The Buff is released!

On Sun., Dec. 13, 2020, 08:00 James Catchpole via , <jlcatchpole=[email protected]> wrote:
Well, we know *that*, the question is *which* Easter! ;^D

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 15:36 Penguin Koen, <kgpm.desmedt@...> wrote:
My guess is Easter....

Op zo 13 dec. 2020 om 16:32 schreef cscholti <cscholti@...>:
I've been watching the What a Cowboy game reports with great interest and anticipation. Will it be a published rules set or included in Lard Magazine?

Thanks

Chuck



--
---


Re: What a Cowboy When?

 

The same Easter that In The Buff is released!


On Sun., Dec. 13, 2020, 08:00 James Catchpole via , <jlcatchpole=[email protected]> wrote:
Well, we know *that*, the question is *which* Easter! ;^D

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 15:36 Penguin Koen, <kgpm.desmedt@...> wrote:
My guess is Easter....

Op zo 13 dec. 2020 om 16:32 schreef cscholti <cscholti@...>:
I've been watching the What a Cowboy game reports with great interest and anticipation. Will it be a published rules set or included in Lard Magazine?

Thanks

Chuck



--
---


Re: What a Cowboy When?

 

Well, we know *that*, the question is *which* Easter! ;^D


On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 15:36 Penguin Koen, <kgpm.desmedt@...> wrote:
My guess is Easter....

Op zo 13 dec. 2020 om 16:32 schreef cscholti <cscholti@...>:
I've been watching the What a Cowboy game reports with great interest and anticipation. Will it be a published rules set or included in Lard Magazine?

Thanks

Chuck



--
---


Re: What a Cowboy When?

 

My guess is Easter....

Op zo 13 dec. 2020 om 16:32 schreef cscholti <cscholti@...>:

I've been watching the What a Cowboy game reports with great interest and anticipation. Will it be a published rules set or included in Lard Magazine?

Thanks

Chuck



--
---


What a Cowboy When?

 

I've been watching the What a Cowboy game reports with great interest and anticipation. Will it be a published rules set or included in Lard Magazine?

Thanks

Chuck


Infamy in Darkest Africa?

 

Knowing the propensity for Lardyphiles to adapt rules to different periods I've been wondering about earlyish [muskets not rifles] Colonial games using Infamy. In particular looking at the Perry Cape Wars range. If the indigenous tribes attack hand to hand like Celts and Germans the building up of Fervour might work well for Zulus and Xhosa. The Colonial Forces could use the Roman rules to reflect their discipline in linear formations fighting to the front. Moving from the grasslands to the forests what about the French Foreign Legion facing the Amazons of Dahomey [Dixons do these and I think there may be a newer range] where the trees will reduce firearm ranges? The 'darken the skies' would enable a crashing volley.

It's all just idle talk at the moment, I've no immediate plans to rush out and buy new figures - I've still some Romans to paint as it is. It's just that some of the Infamy mechanisms look useful in other settings. If you've nothing sensible to do you might care to share your thoughts.

"Playing the Period not the Game" is a good reminded that we're offered specific rules to fir specific era's tactical challenges but as gamers we can't help wondering even if it leads nowhere. By the sounds of "What a Cowboy" - sometimes it works!

Stephen


CoC Petsamo Kirkenes game

 

It was so nice to get an in person game in.? Jess and I played a CoC game on his back deck with my 15mm stuff.? It was a Probe game set in the Kirkenes Petsamo campaign of 1944.? Unfortunately, due to the pandemic and weather likely turning, it will probably be the last game there this year.??
Link to flickr AAR:

Mark


Re: Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

 



On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 14:37, sackatotties <stephendphilp@...> wrote:
The Late Empire pretty much turns everything on it's head as it's a completely different kind of warfare.? Much more emphasis on combined arms, mobility and missile power.? In some cases the infantry is only there to support the cavalry.? The Pilum is replaced by the Spiculum, legionaries dont venture much out of their garrisons and much of the horse is armoured impact cavalry with supporting horse archers.? Combined units start to appear and warfare is probably closer to medieval than classical.? Many of the 'barbarian' troops are as well 'drilled' as the Romanised ones.? It is a period of change.?

Indeed - Oman's 'Art of War in the Middle Ages' starts with Adrianople in 378.? Basically once heavy cavalry becomes the premier arm it's medieval not ancient any more.

As Carole says it really needs a set of rules specifically written for it.? Infamy is too focused on the Early Empire to be of much use in the later periods.


Re: Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

 

开云体育

Nah – that was largely the Normans.

?

But you could always argue that the ruling classes still speak Latin.

?

D.

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Leese
Sent: 13 November 2020 22:29
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TooFatLardies] Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

?

Doug

What’s up with Sub Romans ?

And Romano Brits ?

?Where else would we get an Upper Class ? ?;-)

Best Regards

?

Mike Leese

(N. Wales)

?



On 13 Nov 2020, at 21:56, Doug Melville <dougmelville@...> wrote:

?

Not to mention that the Legions are relegated to occasional starring? appearances in losses. And the Auxilia Palatina become elite, the change from centrally raised legions to local forces and so on.

?

No, it would be a challenge to add the 4th Century in. It’s not included in Dux other than a very small subset, and not relevant to more than one remote, small, insignificant Roman province on the outskirts of Europe.

?

D.

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sackatotties
Sent: 13 November 2020 14:37
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TooFatLardies] Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

?

The Late Empire pretty much turns everything on it's head as it's a completely different kind of warfare.? Much more emphasis on combined arms, mobility and missile power.? In some cases the infantry is only there to support the cavalry.? The Pilum is replaced by the Spiculum, legionaries dont venture much out of their garrisons and much of the horse is armoured impact cavalry with supporting horse archers.? Combined units start to appear and warfare is probably closer to medieval than classical.? Many of the 'barbarian' troops are as well 'drilled' as the Romanised ones.? It is a period of change.?

As Carole says it really needs a set of rules specifically written for it.? Infamy is too focused on the Early Empire to be of much use in the later periods.


--
Regards

Mike Leese


Re: Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

 

开云体育

Doug
What’s up with Sub Romans ?
And Romano Brits ?
?Where else would we get an Upper Class ? ?;-)

Best Regards

Mike Leese
(N. Wales)


On 13 Nov 2020, at 21:56, Doug Melville <dougmelville@...> wrote:

?

Not to mention that the Legions are relegated to occasional starring? appearances in losses. And the Auxilia Palatina become elite, the change from centrally raised legions to local forces and so on.

?

No, it would be a challenge to add the 4th Century in. It’s not included in Dux other than a very small subset, and not relevant to more than one remote, small, insignificant Roman province on the outskirts of Europe.

?

D.

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sackatotties
Sent: 13 November 2020 14:37
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TooFatLardies] Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

?

The Late Empire pretty much turns everything on it's head as it's a completely different kind of warfare.? Much more emphasis on combined arms, mobility and missile power.? In some cases the infantry is only there to support the cavalry.? The Pilum is replaced by the Spiculum, legionaries dont venture much out of their garrisons and much of the horse is armoured impact cavalry with supporting horse archers.? Combined units start to appear and warfare is probably closer to medieval than classical.? Many of the 'barbarian' troops are as well 'drilled' as the Romanised ones.? It is a period of change.?

As Carole says it really needs a set of rules specifically written for it.? Infamy is too focused on the Early Empire to be of much use in the later periods.


--
Regards

Mike Leese


Re: Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

 

开云体育

Not to mention that the Legions are relegated to occasional starring? appearances in losses. And the Auxilia Palatina become elite, the change from centrally raised legions to local forces and so on.

?

No, it would be a challenge to add the 4th Century in. It’s not included in Dux other than a very small subset, and not relevant to more than one remote, small, insignificant Roman province on the outskirts of Europe.

?

D.

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sackatotties
Sent: 13 November 2020 14:37
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TooFatLardies] Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

?

The Late Empire pretty much turns everything on it's head as it's a completely different kind of warfare.? Much more emphasis on combined arms, mobility and missile power.? In some cases the infantry is only there to support the cavalry.? The Pilum is replaced by the Spiculum, legionaries dont venture much out of their garrisons and much of the horse is armoured impact cavalry with supporting horse archers.? Combined units start to appear and warfare is probably closer to medieval than classical.? Many of the 'barbarian' troops are as well 'drilled' as the Romanised ones.? It is a period of change.?

As Carole says it really needs a set of rules specifically written for it.? Infamy is too focused on the Early Empire to be of much use in the later periods.


Re: Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

 

开云体育

But only in England. It doesn’t cover any of the East, or Germany – it’s all about Romano-British vs Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Picts and Scotti.

?

Nothing about the Germanic or Persian Limes.

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Ratcliffe
Sent: 13 November 2020 09:48
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TooFatLardies] Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

?

I think this is the period which is covered in the Dux Britanniarum rule set.?

Which coincidentally I see are in a sale on TFLs web site.

Egg

?

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 20:22, Tom Downs <tdowns3@...> wrote:

I'm not too interested in the Early Republic etc but an fascinated by the "Late" Empire-say 300-450.? I'm wondering (obviously) if Infamy, Infamy contains the data to game that period.? Or is a supplement on the horizon?

TIA

Tom from Seattle


Re: Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

 

The Late Empire pretty much turns everything on it's head as it's a completely different kind of warfare.? Much more emphasis on combined arms, mobility and missile power.? In some cases the infantry is only there to support the cavalry.? The Pilum is replaced by the Spiculum, legionaries dont venture much out of their garrisons and much of the horse is armoured impact cavalry with supporting horse archers.? Combined units start to appear and warfare is probably closer to medieval than classical.? Many of the 'barbarian' troops are as well 'drilled' as the Romanised ones.? It is a period of change.?

As Carole says it really needs a set of rules specifically written for it.? Infamy is too focused on the Early Empire to be of much use in the later periods.


Re: Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

 

I think this is the period which is covered in the Dux Britanniarum rule set.?
Which coincidentally I see are in a sale on TFLs web site.
Egg

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 20:22, Tom Downs <tdowns3@...> wrote:
I'm not too interested in the Early Republic etc but an fascinated by the "Late" Empire-say 300-450.? I'm wondering (obviously) if Infamy, Infamy contains the data to game that period.? Or is a supplement on the horizon?
TIA
Tom from Seattle


Re: Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

 

开云体育

HI Tom,

?

As it stands no. You could potentially fudge something but the current base set contains Later Republic & Early Imperial, plus Gauls, Britons and Germans. The next supplement I believe adds ‘Mediterranean’ so Carthage, Greece etc. I expect Late Classical, LIR, Goths, Sasanians etc will appear in a later supplement.

?

My one observation would be that the later period and the East are very much more focused on mounted warfare, and so far, the attention has very much been on foot.

?

Cheers

?

Doug

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Downs
Sent: 12 November 2020 20:22
To: 'toofatlardies ([email protected])' <[email protected]>
Subject: [TooFatLardies] Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

?

I'm not too interested in the Early Republic etc but an fascinated by the "Late" Empire-say 300-450.? I'm wondering (obviously) if Infamy, Infamy contains the data to game that period.? Or is a supplement on the horizon?

TIA

Tom from Seattle


Re: Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

 

It seems to me, as someone who has spent a long time studying the Dominate period and beyond that you could possibly use some of the mechanisms from Infamy for the Romans, but not really for the "barbarians", who were not as "barbaric" as those of the Late Republic or early Principate. Concepts like fervour and the use of fanatics seem far less appropriate in Late Antiquity and the beginning of the early Mediaeval.

Looking at the troop types available to the Romans, you need to remember that their equipment was different to that of the Principate; no pila, no segmented armour, probably more mounted archers, more archers on foot too, mail armour for everyone (plus occasional scale armour), long spears, plumbatae, staff slings etc as infantry weapons and probably a different approach to drill. Cavalry would also be different, more heavily armoured in some cases.

Some of those things would also apply to the various "barbarian" troop types too, many of whom would have at some point probably fought as allies (foederati) of the Romans in Roman armies and who looked pretty similar anyway. When you look at the Goths (i.e. the Tervingi and Greuthungi) and other Germanic groups, you are looking at people who were far more militarily sophisticated than the Germanic tribes of the time of the Teutoburger Wald and who were themselves Christians, in the main.

In fact, as I am writing this, it seems to me that what is required is a different set of rules.?

Carole


Infamy, Infamy in the Late Empire

 

开云体育

I'm not too interested in the Early Republic etc but an fascinated by the "Late" Empire-say 300-450.? I'm wondering (obviously) if Infamy, Infamy contains the data to game that period.? Or is a supplement on the horizon?
TIA
Tom from Seattle


Re: Infamy Roman Cart colours

 

Doug,

Googling found this
wagon mosaic in various colours -
wagon mosaic -?

Googling chariot mosaics shows all sorts of colours and decoration - I suspect that, as others have said, you could colour it how you want - the more affluent the owner the more decorated it would probably be,

Andy M


Re: Infamy Roman Cart colours

 

开云体育

Thanks Robert,

?

I was going to go with a dull red, possibly with yellow framing. I just wondered if paint samples or mosaics gave any indications. Reproduction ones tend to be left bare wood, which seems unlikely if you didn’t want them rotting away.

?

All the best

?

Doug

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Sulentic
Sent: 12 November 2020 02:27
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TooFatLardies] Infamy Roman Cart colours

?

?Google "painted carts of sicily".? While They probably weren't as intricate as those, I'll bet they were brightly painted if used by civilians. Military ones were probably painted just to deter weathering. You can never go wrong?with red!

?

-RNS

?

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 3:37 AM Doug Melville <dougmelville@...> wrote:

Slightly offbeat one, I am looking for any suggestions on colours for the Roman passenger cart. I haven't come across any original depictions and wondered what they might have been painted.

Many thanks

Doug





Re: Infamy Roman Cart colours

 

?Google "painted carts of sicily".? While They probably weren't as intricate as those, I'll bet they were brightly painted if used by civilians. Military ones were probably painted just to deter weathering. You can never go wrong?with red!

-RNS

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 3:37 AM Doug Melville <dougmelville@...> wrote:
Slightly offbeat one, I am looking for any suggestions on colours for the Roman passenger cart. I haven't come across any original depictions and wondered what they might have been painted.

Many thanks

Doug