开云体育

I would agree with Big Al. The spotting rules we have are pretty good. What you have suggested would be interesting but I would worry that it will slow the game up and may mean that it may not be

Richard What sparked the thought? Was it the fact that we have seen examples of attackers being thrown off balance by some "unexpected" forces/dispositions, if so I might argue that better use of

Gents A pre-battle reconnaissance system has just struck me, that would allow for an attacker to have some prior knowledge of what he is coming up against. At the start of a game there is a facility

Probably a "What?!!" but I am sure that "we are unworthy" (this was typed whilst grovelling in front of the holy writ as received on my equally unworthy computer). Alan

Am I a God or what?!! wrote: in late Bren Panthers). inside make the visors tank would

According to the oracle in these matters (my father-in-law), even in late war, the anti-tank platoon when all else had failed would load up a Bren with AP rounds and try and hit the same spot on a

Sounds good to me, there was always a chance that vision blocks or visors etc would be hit and any calibre bullet whizzing round inside a tank would make the crew uncomfortable to say the

As some of you may realise their is a function in the rules that allow rifle sections to fire on weakly armoured vehicles and drive them back. This was originally written to stop people driving all

Asbolutely right (for a change), Buttoned up tanks with lots of fire coming in-good chance of the vehicle at least backing off. In addition, if scots are involved and accompanied by a piper, the

Nod Saw that first site the other day. The officer's "kepi" is pretty easy, I'll just use the heads from 1870s Wurttemburgers, but the Finnmarkslue, as you so eloquently put it, is less clear. I

Your right, the caption on the pic states they were used for policing. But knowing the frogs, maybe some had surrendered before the outbreak of hostilities.

I rest my case.

Aynsley, Not too well read on the campaign - the naval conflict was one of the most interesting of WWII. take a look at http://www.nuav.net/Nouniforms.html. looks like very little in the way of a

richardclarkerli@... writes: Have you been watching those strange films again?

This may seem a trifle daft, but does anyone know of any manufacturer of 15mm Norwegians for 1940? I want to extend the supplement on the Russo-Finish war to include this campaign as well. It's a

Sounds like a victory for common sense. Well done the discussion group, our value is proven! (actually, that deserves another exclamation mark so her it is: !) Richard Clarke wrote:

Haven't you heard "Deutschland Deutschland Uberalles" on the bagpipes? And hopefully you never will. Were the peeps as effective later in the war as many replacements to Scottish units were not

No. It was aimed entirely at you, essentially for your puerile overuse of the exclamation mark! (see, one's enough) I am saying that it should provide a movement bonus, but not with a card. The

"Donald was ordered to play "Pibroch o' Donald Dubh" which luckily the Black Watch recognized." Who the hell else would have been playing the bagpipes? or were the Germans using bagpipers at this

Presumably your cretin comment is aimed at those who either don't bother to read or fail to understand an argument. The use of a bonus card, in other words a command and control bonus, is precisely