开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: Pre-battle reconnaissance


Alan Reynolds
 

开云体育

Richard
?
What sparked the thought?
?
Was it the fact that we have seen examples of attackers being thrown off balance by some "unexpected" forces/dispositions, if so I might argue that better use of existing spotting/reconnaissance rules would have served to eliminate the unknown.
Equally tactical reconnaissance could be provided by an increase in this type of force on the table, as you said last week providing the Germans with a couple of 222's could have "tripped" the defensive line of the Brits.
If you are thinking "strategic" reconnaissance then it may well apply to both the defender and attacker, depending on the situation.
Normally this is taken care of in the briefing notes but if you want to add an additional phase of reconnaissance, should both defender and attacker have the chance to benefit?
?
Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: richardclarkerli [mailto:richardclarkerli@...]
Sent: 05 May 2003 10:32
To: Toofatlardies@...
Subject: [Toofatlardies] Pre-battle reconnaissance

Gents

A pre-battle reconnaissance system has just struck me, that would
allow for an attacker to have some prior knowledge of what he is
coming up against.?

At the start of a game there is a facility for each force to dice for
how many blinds it has.? This could also be used to allocate an
attacker a certain number of pre-deployment spotting attempts.? This
would reflect how much prior knowledge they have of their opponent.?

For example as this chart currently stands good regulars have 1D6
number blinds.? Equally this could also reflect how many spotting
attempts they get before deciding on where to attack.

This would need to be adjusted for circumstances.? For example…..

The force is strong in dedicated recce troops????? ????? +2
The force has dedicated aerial recce to mission????? ????? +1
The force has faced this enemy in relatively static
????? positions for a week or more.????? ????? ????? +2
The contact is relatively unexpected????? ????? ????? -2
The contact is entirely unexpected????? ????? ????? -4

Let us presume we have an element of 7 Panzer post the Meuse
crossing, so driving like hell through northern France.? The force in
question may or may not benefit from aerial recce, depending on its
mission.? Let's assume it doesn't as this would apply in most
circumstances.? It does, however, have a good recce troops so gets a
+2 there.? Whilst contact is expected somewhere, this may come at any
point, so becomes "relatively unexpected", a +2, giving us a net
result of 1D6.?

On the tabletop the defender allocates troops as usual.? The attacker
would sketch out a general plan at this stage, however, before
finally allocating his troops the attacker then rolls his D6.? He
rolls a 4.? He now has four "spots" on the table before deciding on
his plan.?

For every spot the attacker rolls one dice.? If the target area,
which would be 1 foot square (?) is within a foot of the point? (or
any point if multiple) of attackers table entry the spot is
automatic.? If it is between 1 and 2 feet a 2 or more is needed on a
D6; between 2 and 3 feet, a 3 or more is required, up to between 5
and 6 feet where a 6 is required.?

For each unit "spotted" a blind is put down on the table.? The
attacker then rolls a D6 for each of these blinds, and on a 6 the
actual defending figures are put down.? This reflects that the recce
forces will more generally identify where an enemy is, rather than
what he is.?

The attacker, with his fresh knowledge, may have five minute to then
finalise his plans (after all contact has now been made, the enemy
are alerted).? For every minute over this five taken the defender may
remove one of the spotted blinds and deploy elsewhere.? A rather
nasty device to get the game started on time.?

Any thoughts?




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Toofatlardies-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.