Marcia Singer wrote:
[snip]
And anyway, scientists (we're talking biologists and not theoretical
physicists here) are now theorizing that....
there are no rules of nature, but rather
deeply ingrained habits. Things are the way they are because
there is a memory of their own past.
He (Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, Royal Society biologist) proposes that this
memory is carried by a non-material medium
called a "morphogenetic field". . . .
I like Rupert, but he is not "mainstream" (FWIW).
So then, the "rules of nature" are simply a belief system, which is simply
the same thoughts thought over and over again.....like Abe says.....and CAN
BE CHANGED like any other habit.
As another dead guy essence named Elias says.....There are no absolutes....
I am not arguing for absolutes "Local regulations" serve a fine purpose.
As Abe says, they provide a predictable context in which to create.
I liken them to agreeing on parameters prior to a game -- whether
volleyball, chess, poker or LOE (life on earth).
An Abe analogy is that it is reassuring that gravity is not a whimsical
thing and you can depend on the likelihood of your monster bus staying
on the ground as it rounds the next turn.
Your serve, move, deal, creation . . .
Rick
.
