>Besides, it was us, who before becoming physical, set into place the
dominant beliefs that we all now agree on - like 'the Sun shines',
'Earth stays in orbit', 'tomatoes bring forth tomatoes', etc. We
designed the whole thing. It's the stable platform from which we can
serenely go forth and do further creating, knowing that there is a basis
>of stability.
Being a crow would not be considered a stable platform :) Yes, it is an
alternative to flying directly, being a fish is an alternative to
altering something in ourselves under water.
This isn't about changing the earth's orbit or keeping the sun from shining.
And anyway, scientists (we're talking biologists and not theoretical
physicists here) are now theorizing that....
there are no rules of nature, but rather
deeply ingrained habits. Things are the way they are because
there is a memory of their own past.
He (Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, Royal Society biologist) proposes that this
memory is carried by a non-material medium
called a "morphogenetic field". Thus rabbits are "rabbit-shaped"
because they tune into the morphogenetic field and through a
process of "morphic resonance" produce offspring that are also
rabbits! The same is true of the shapes of molecules, the
propagation of ideas, and the formation of ice crystals. Also,
once a habit is broken, it becomes easier for others to do the
same through this same morphic resonance. This is why, after
Roger Bannister first broke the 4-minute mile, many hundreds of
other athletes did the same within a year. A new "habit" was
established.<
So then, the "rules of nature" are simply a belief system, which is simply
the same thoughts thought over and over again.....like Abe says.....and CAN
BE CHANGED like any other habit.
As another dead guy essence named Elias says.....There are no absolutes....
Marcy
