¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Using a Tek sampling head

 

Let me be heretical and suggest using an HP 1430 series head. They can be
made compatible w/ the S series but you'd have to roll-your-own interface.
They also have a very strange cable. But, it's another idea.

On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 3:53 PM, cmjones01 <chris@...> wrote:

I have much enjoyed the recent discussion here about the 7T11/7S11/7S12
sampling plugins and have learned a lot from the contributions.

I have a long-term quest to get my Soviet Ya4S-100/Ya4S-101 sampling
plugins working properly. They're roughly equivalent to the 7T11 and 7S11
but with some neat features, most notably a delta delayed timebase and
slideback-type voltage measurement, both with digital display on the
scope's readout. The problem is that I don't have the sampling head for
them. I'm searching high and low for one (and learning quite a lot of
Russian in the process) but they're like hen's teeth and always seem to
have gone missing. The official sampling head is a dual channel feed
through sampler with SR50-262 (almost identical to 'N' type) connectors for
input and output. The good news is that the schematic is available, though
seems to have been drawn by someone whose aim was to minimise the use of
paper and ink rather than to create useful documentation.

The sampling plugin has a 19-way connector for the sampling head. This
carries +/-15V, the signal and feedback for each channel, a single strobe,
and a mysterious signal called 'threshold' which looks like a TTL logic
output which alternates state on each trigger.

The good news is that my sampling plugins seem to be working well and all
the signals on the connector do the right things, so the project is worth
pursuing. My idea is to create an adapter cable so I can use Tek S-series
sampling heads until I find the original one. I don't have any S-series
heads at the moment, only SD-22 and SD-24 ones which involve too much
software, so I'd have to buy one to try out.

I've looked at the manuals for the 7S11 and various sampling heads. Is
there a clear specification anywhere of the interface, for example the
amplitude of the strobe pulse and the signal and feedback connections? I
would be quietly amused if the Soviet system turned out to be electrically
compatible with the Tek one...

All advice and thoughts much appreciated,
Chris




Re: My 422

 

Hi Jeff-
family issues and life stuff managed to derail ALL of my projects ( the 422 pwr sply, the 475 ps with issues, other radio projects ), however I did manage to get the supply working without a load (, hey this thing works down to 6V input!!! output Voltages are high but as expected!.) I know not recommended, under the load of the scope I noticed that it has issues too! so I have to find the faults in the scope before moving fwd.

the waveforms in the pwr sply look close to the ones in the book. I did notice that with something drawing too much current on the output it is exhibiting a similar issue as yours. Q1184 gets noticeably warmer than Q1174 as the input V increases. ( I also rises....yep, go figure, normal). I want to know why!
I will post my method and results at a later time. John's repair ( with the MJE1660) made me go back to my original premise that those transistors really do not matter and good old 2N3055/2n5881/2n5882 work just fine. just mounting issues with the TO-3 case. (currently they are mounted to an external heat sink)

I will go into monitor mode for a while longer.
Tnx for the assistance. It has been appreciated.
¸é±ð²Ô¨¦±ð

On 2018-05-28 09:01 AM, Jeff Urban wrote:
It is going on the back burner. I am going to put it together for its own safety. I am out of ideas and last I looked so was everyone, so I might just use it as a 12 volts scope or something...

If anyone gets any ideas I am all ears. For now I got bigger fish to fry, which ummm, by the way...

Yup, those 7000 series are next. Coming soon.



Re: Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)

 
Edited

OK, thanks for correcting me.

I unsoldered that ground link you circled, plugged P1445 back in, PDA lead still unplugged.

I still get nothing on screen, and the reading at TP1423 is still low... It seems as I hold the positive lead of my meter on to TP1423 that the reading fluctuates.. starting around -100V then gradually climbing... up to about -160V last I checked, as though some capacitor is charging? After about 30 minutes it seemed to have stabilized at about -102V. I also notice that one of the neon lights nearby flashes on briefly when I first touch the TP1423 with the meter lead.


My 422

 

It is going on the back burner. I am going to put it together for its own safety. I am out of ideas and last I looked so was everyone, so I might just use it as a 12 volts scope or something...

If anyone gets any ideas I am all ears. For now I got bigger fish to fry, which ummm, by the way...

Yup, those 7000 series are next. Coming soon.


Re: Tek 7904 CRT

 

Will one from a 7613 work ?


Re: Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)

 

No, no, no. You do not unplug P1445. That stays put.
Did you look at the picture I posted yesterday? I circled the part you need to UNSOLDER to open the ground to the HV Multi.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Ostertag" <stuff@...>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)


Thanks you for that clarification!

OK, so I unplugged P1445 and the PDA lead, then powered up and gave it some time to warm up.

Nothing on the screen even when beamfinder pressed, and TP1423 HV test point still reads about -87 volts.

So... that means the HV mulitplier is not dead? Or at least it means something else is causing the problem?


Re: Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)

 

Thanks you for that clarification!

OK, so I unplugged P1445 and the PDA lead, then powered up and gave it some time to warm up.

Nothing on the screen even when beamfinder pressed, and TP1423 HV test point still reads about -87 volts.

So... that means the HV mulitplier is not dead? Or at least it means something else is causing the problem?


Re: Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)

 

Yes, that is the connector for the HV lead that goes to the CRT Post Deflection Accelerator (PDA) electrode. The PDA is a conducting coating on the inside of the tube funnel that starts after the horizontal deflection plates.. You should be aware that the outer coating of the tube forms a capacitor that holds a high voltage charge for a long time. If you disconnect the HV connector, be careful that the lead does not come in contact with any circuitry as it will damage it.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Ostertag" <stuff@...>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)


Is this the PDA? /g/TekScopes/photo/49286/2?p=Name,,,20,1,0,0

I was thinking it was the end of the HV mulitplier...


Re: Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)

 

Yes, that is the connector for the HV lead that goes to the CRT Post Deflection Accelerator (PDA) electrode. The PDA is a conducting coating on the inside of the tube funnel that starts after the horizontal deflection plates.. You should be aware that the outer coating of the tube forms a capacitor that holds a high voltage charge for a long time. If you disconnect the HV connector, be careful that the lead does not come in contact with any circuitry as it will damage it.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Ostertag" <stuff@...>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)


Is this the PDA? /g/TekScopes/photo/49286/2?p=Name,,,20,1,0,0

I was thinking it was the end of the HV mulitplier...


Re: Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)

 

Is this the PDA? /g/TekScopes/photo/49286/2?p=Name,,,20,1,0,0

I was thinking it was the end of the HV mulitplier...


Re: PG502 Failure points?

 

Now it's coming back to me. The 10H was a geometry shrink with reduced
internal capacitances and higher fT so they could improve speed and lower
power. Pinout issues aside, the MC10H109 might well work in place of the
MC1660, the only way to know would be to try it. That would be my second
choice, sourcing an MC1660 would be my first.

Steve


Re: Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)

Chuck Harris
 

Post Deflection Accelerator. It is the Anode cap at
the edge of the CRT's funnel usually to the left of
the screen.

-Chuck Harris

Keith Ostertag wrote:

Thanks! That's jumper P1445, I believe.

What's the "PDA lead "? I don't recognize what PDA stands for...


Re: Deceptive fault in a 535A

 

Had same fault many years ago,replaced the resonator cap with, from memory, a 0.001/1000V
Styroseal (white) cap...should outlast the scope.
John


Re: Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)

 

Yes the 1330 manual is the correct manual for your unit. while the 1861 manual can be useful at times, as it pertains to your unit? you need to be very careful . Some circuits in the later manual are very different and some are essentially unchanged from the earlier version.

good luck
-dc
manuals@...

On 5/27/2018 9:24 PM, Keith Ostertag wrote:
My 465 SN is B175976.

I am looking at a manual marked "tek-070-1330-00" (236 pages, with yellow addendum pages added in the back), as well as a manual for later version 465's (070-1861-00, B250000 & up, says Rev B, June 1975, 291 pages).

I think the first is the correct one, but it is more limiting (for instance, no trouble shooting flowchart).


--
Dave
Manuals@...
www.ArtekManuals.com


Re: Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)

 

Hi Keith,

as others have already shown, that's not the one. Apparently I was
mistaken. The ground lead doesn't come out from between the two boards.
Here's a picture of what it looks like when the vertical board is removed:



The ground lead pokes through the board. My mistake, apologies. Others have
already shown what to remove to isolate the HV multiplier. All of them have
way more experience than I have.

Good luck,

Ian.

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 12:44 AM, Keith Ostertag <stuff@...> wrote:

So... if I remove that ground strap, and I still don't see anything on the
screen (not even using the beamfinder)... that suggests the HV multiplier
is NOT the fault that's causing my problem?

Is this the ground strap you mean? /g/TekScopes/
photo/49286/0?p=Name,,,20,1,0,0

Doesn't seem likely to me, as it isn't under the HV cover, but near the
front end... but it is the only ground strap visible on that side of the
main board on my scope.

Here is a photo of the area under the HV cover, and I don't seen anything
resembling a ground strap coming up between the "main board and the
vertical amplifier board" as you describe:

/g/TekScopes/photo/49286/1?p=Name,,,20,1,0,0




--
One man's "magic" is another man's engineering. "Supernatural" is a null
word.
-- Excerpt from the notebooks of Lazarus Long, from Robert Heinlein's "Time
Enough for Love"


Re: Tek S4 sampling head

Craig Sawyers
 

Correcting myself here already - Frye says the diodes switch off in 5 - 10ps. Say 7.5ps - so an
effective bandwidth of 50GHz. Dunno where I got 2ps from

So at least in theory, for someone who can handle chip level devices measuring 0.3mm square, and
access to a wire bonder, could fix an S4 using current generation microwave schottkys. Maybe.

Craig

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Craig Sawyers
Sent: 28 May 2018 07:02
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tek S4 sampling head

Frye reckons that the diodes (which will be schottky barrier) switch in 2ps. Which implies a 3dB
bandwidth per diode of 175GHz.

The nearest you can get to that performance are microwave schottkys, for example this range of
GaAs
devices from MACOM which have a
bandwidth of 80GHz. They have a junction capacitance of 0.02pF, which implies that the S4/S6
diodes
have a junction capacitance of 0.01pF (ie 10 femto-farads). And scaling from MACOM's drawings, the
actual junction is about 50um square. The S4/S6 diodes are 30um square - so 0.36 times the area
(and
capacitance) of an 80GHz device. Scaling that gives a bandwidth of the S4/S6 diodes of 222GHz -
close
enough to the 175GHz worked out from Frye's data.

Which is why the darned things are static damageable. Take a human with a body capacitance of
150pF
and an unspecified but almost always significant voltage up to 10kV, and connect that to a
junction
with 10fF capacitance. The result ought to surprise no one.

Note from the MACOM datasheet two things. First is a junction breakdown voltage in the range 4.5 -
7V, entirely consistent with the S4/S6 spec that says do not exceed 5V on the input. And secondly,
handling where MACOM say "Static sensitivity: Schottky barrier diodes are ESD sensitive and can be
damaged by static electricity. Proper ESD techniques should be used when handling these Class 0
devices"

Some interesting numbers here though regarding body voltage when properly grounded

static-se
nsitive-operations.php . In particular "international ESD losses that now exceed an estimated $90
billion"

All of which is why I take very great care of my unfixable samplers and fast pulse generators. And
I
urge others to do so too.

Craig




Per square nanometer. 1 square nanometer is 30um square - which is the
size of the S4/S6 diode junctions.

This is the designer George Frye's explanation of operation, including
a picture of the hybrid

I think it can easily be seen that this is not a repairable assembly.

Craig



Re: Tek P6046 Differential Probe

Craig Sawyers
 

Is the P6046 hard to find? Costly?

Is the probe and plugin often useful?
eBay is your friend. There are a range of prices from $50 for a probe only and no accessories, to
low hundreds. Worth lurking until you see something you like (I did that maybe ten years ago, and
snagged a new-old-stock one)

Tek manufactured this probe for 28 years (1968 until 1996), with many different iterations and
tweaks as semiconductors were obsoleted (particularly the input JFET's). It stood the test of time,
and lots and lots were made. And lots and lots are for sale at any one time.

Whether it is useful or not depends on what you want to measure with it. It can do measurements that
are difficult to do in any other way.

Craig


Re: Tek S4 sampling head

Craig Sawyers
 

Frye reckons that the diodes (which will be schottky barrier) switch in 2ps. Which implies a 3dB
bandwidth per diode of 175GHz.

The nearest you can get to that performance are microwave schottkys, for example this range of GaAs
devices from MACOM which have a bandwidth of
80GHz. They have a junction capacitance of 0.02pF, which implies that the S4/S6 diodes have a
junction capacitance of 0.01pF (ie 10 femto-farads). And scaling from MACOM's drawings, the actual
junction is about 50um square. The S4/S6 diodes are 30um square - so 0.36 times the area (and
capacitance) of an 80GHz device. Scaling that gives a bandwidth of the S4/S6 diodes of 222GHz -
close enough to the 175GHz worked out from Frye's data.

Which is why the darned things are static damageable. Take a human with a body capacitance of 150pF
and an unspecified but almost always significant voltage up to 10kV, and connect that to a junction
with 10fF capacitance. The result ought to surprise no one.

Note from the MACOM datasheet two things. First is a junction breakdown voltage in the range 4.5 -
7V, entirely consistent with the S4/S6 spec that says do not exceed 5V on the input. And secondly,
handling where MACOM say "Static sensitivity: Schottky barrier diodes are ESD sensitive and can be
damaged by static electricity. Proper ESD techniques should be used when handling these Class 0
devices"

Some interesting numbers here though regarding body voltage when properly grounded

nsitive-operations.php . In particular "international ESD losses that now exceed an estimated $90
billion"

All of which is why I take very great care of my unfixable samplers and fast pulse generators. And I
urge others to do so too.

Craig

Per square nanometer. 1 square nanometer is 30um square - which is the size of the S4/S6 diode
junctions.

This is the designer George Frye's explanation of operation, including a picture of the hybrid


I think it can easily be seen that this is not a repairable assembly.

Craig


Re: Deceptive fault in a 535A

 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Morris Odell" <vilgotch@...>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 12:12 AM
Subject: [TekScopes] Deceptive fault in a 535A


Hi all,


Crappy old capacitors - the gift that keeps on giving!

Morris



Wow, is that ever an understatement.

Haha.


Re: Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)

 

P1445 is the 4 pin connector right next to the jumper that disconnects the HV multiplier ground. The PDA cable is the high voltage that goes to the front of the CRT tube. You just need to pull it our about an inch to unload the multiplier output.

Once you do this and the -2450 VDC cathode comes back, you have found the bad multiplier.

Regards,
Tom

----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Ostertag" <stuff@...>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Help needed with no trace no beamfinder on 465 (not b)


Thanks! That's jumper P1445, I believe.

What's the "PDA lead "? I don't recognize what PDA stands for...