¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: TDS784D attenuator

 

I have several attenuators from a different series. Substrate marking is below.

I'm working on an SPC problem on a 784A at the moment and think I have successfully fixed it by excersizing all the relays in a C# program and GPIB control. At first it was 50% success but realized I had not included the AC coupling relays, re-did it. 100 passes on the relays and it now passes SPC 100% for the last 10 tries.

Can you tell me what relay is used in the 784D? I was surprised to find the garden variety Aromats in the 784A. I expected more exotic but apparently they worked for Tek.

Substrate marked: H2365J (there is a parts site, Qservice, that references this for use in the TDS500 and TDS600 series but does not mention the TDS700)

Den

--- In TekScopes@..., "baltimora86" <acuffe@...> wrote:

I have a TDS784D where all four ceramic attenuator hybrids are cracked. I'm looking for replacements, and would like to know if any other models use compatible attenuators. Would the attenuators from a TDS744A work (even partially so I can check the rest of the scope)?

If anyone knows where I might be able to find them at a reasonable cost, I would love to hear from you. I'll take one with SPC problems since I know I can replace the relays.


Re: 244B internal temperature

Bob Koller
 

The fan control circuit in all these model variations have a thermistor to vary the fan speed as the internal temperature increases. The outgoing airflow is mainly directed out the right rear corner, when viewed from the front of the instrument. Air flow on all the 24x5x instruments is critical, or certain hybrids will overheat to destruction. The TDS420 and related scopes do not have temperature control, while the 465 series does, but the fan is indeed quieter. The 7904 does not have a fan, but the 7904A does.


From: raymonddompfrank
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 2:00 PM
Subject: [TekScopes] 244B internal temperature

?
Hi,
The following has been sort of haunting me for a while:

When I switch on my 2445B, the fan starts running at a low speed and is barely audible. After a while, it increases its speed to what I consider its maximum. It is quite audible by then. At the same time, I detect no air flow. Using a piece of tissue as an airflow detector I can't "prove" there's any air flow, apart from the fan's location at the back. Inside the 'scope, nothing is impeding the air flow. This seems independent of ambient temperature, which varies between 18C and 25C. The fact that I can't detect an airflow as such does't give me much concern, since often it's just a little "moving air" that's enough but i'd like to know if this is normal behaviour.
Can anyone of you confirm that it is normal for these 'scopes' (24x5y's) fans to be running at or close to maximum speed under normal operating conditions?
FYI, I'd like to add that I'm sure it's not noisy bearings or anything like that.
AAMOF, my TDS420 is even noisier, having a much larger fan as well.
My 465B isn't anywhere near as noisy, let alone my 7904 (which has no fan).

I'd appreciate to hear about anybody else's experiences.

Raymond




Re: Just got a tek 555 for free, and in need of some advice!

 

So now I finally have some updates for you guys. My "easier" 6 week summer engineering class ended 3 weeks ago, and now im going into the 3rd week of the harder control systems class, so i've barely had any time to work on my 555.

Today I thoroughly inspected and cleaned out whole 555 case. I also cut the wires to the fan, disassembled it, lubed it all up with 3-in-one oil so it now finally spins freely, then brought the fan to school, measured about 55 ohm's between the leads, so i brought it up from 0-120V with a variac there, and its working great. As for the 555, I removed all the plug-ins, and used 3 air cans to spray the crap outta it. Some of the tubes and areas are still kinda dusty, but it seems like i would need to get my air compressor involved to do any better of a job.

I noticed a couple strange things. I probably will need to provide some pictures at some point to show you guys what im talking about. My biggest concern, is there is a burned turquiose wirewound resistor in the circuitry at the very bottom of the 555. (aka the circuitry that you have to remove the bottom panel to access.) I dont even know what resistor it is yet, in the next few days after my wednesday exam, ill note its location and go through the manual to find out exactly what resistor it is.

the other concern, is that it appears that someone in the past monkeyed around with the Type M 4 trace plug-in and installed a strange looking computer 15 pin input. it looks a bit like a RS-232 but instead of 9 pins theres 15. It seems someone had tried to make it so the type M's outputs could be send to a DAC into a computer or something. Anyways, there are a couple wires that are connected to a some of the resistors, but these wires are going nowhere. these wires dont look as if they're affecting anything, and they definitely dont look like they're part of the original type M.

I did some research on the tektronix silver solder and its supposed to be a flux cored alloy of 60% tin, 37% lead, and 3% silver also known as 60/37/3 solder. I am having quite a bit of trouble finding this exact composition online, and most of the crap on ebay is lead free, which i think is crap, and apparently there are small rolls of radio shack 60/38/2 solder, but i don't know if 2% solder is enough.

I tried Stan Griffiths website store about the solder about two weeks ago, he emailed me back asking how much solder i needed, but when i sent them another email i have yet to hear back. I guess i'll try again.

When i get around to it, I would like to show you guys some pictures of the type M plugin and the burnt resistor. Inside the 'scope on the inspection stamps I saw '64 written in pencil in two locations, but i saw '61 written in another. I had thought my scope was a '67 since thats what the power supply says, but now i'm not sure.

And one more thing, Keith, I no longer need a cover clamp. I found my missing one hiding inside the type 21A plugin when i removed it. I guess it had fallen in there from the first time i opened up the covers!

Thanks,

Robby

--- In TekScopes@..., "Morris" <vilgotch@...> wrote:

Hi Robbie,

The Tek solder is flux cored so all you have to do is follow the soldering instructions in the manual.

It's not a bad idea to install connectors in the motor leads. Purists might object but I don't think there's anything wrong with it. I always install IEC mains connectors in those old scopes even though they were never heard of when the scopes were made.

If the filament of V799 tests zero ohms then it's probably OK. Just make sure it lights up when you next power it up. Pin 5 should be an open circuit to both sides of the filament.

Good luck,

Morris

--- In TekScopes@..., "dutchbosstard" <childwhereugo@> wrote:



thanks morris. I am going to try and buy the silver solder from stan's parts shop. I might also try and buy the cover clamps from there also since there is a minimum $10 order.

will I need to use flux with this tektronix silver solder, or is it already flux-cored? All the soldering I have done has always been with 60/40 flux cored solder, so I have never used flux and solder separately. If I do need to use flux, which kind should I use with this kind of solder?

As far as the fan goes, couldnt I just cut the wires and after I take it apart, soak it if necessary, and re-lube it, reconnect it back using these insulated male/female disconnect connectors from home depot? I know it would probably look tacky, but couldn't this possibly be better than having to solder/unsolder, especially if i ever need to pull the fan out again? Or do I just need to suck it up and stop being a pansy about soldering? haha.

this is what I had in mind if i were to just cut the wires:



let me know what you think, I am still going to try and buy about 15-20 feet of silver solder, in case I ever need it.

also since im not gonna be able to power on the scope until I get that fan taken care of, I did find V799, did some reading and looked up the datasheet, checked it with my multimeter and it measured zero ohms between pins 3&4 and 2&7. pin 5 is the plate, and i'm not sure if i could check it's resistance.

let me know what you think,

-Robby

--- In TekScopes@..., "Morris" <vilgotch@> wrote:

Hi again Robbie,

In answer to your questions, firstly no, you don't have to soak the bearings if you can get them turning. I have found that a lot of gunk collects there in some scopes if they were used in a dusty environment so I just like to give them a good clean. If 3-in-one works then go with it.

Tek solder would be ideal if you can get it. If it appears cheaply on ebay then so much the better.

The easiest way to check the sensing diode is to see if it lights up. Checking the filament pins with an ohmmeter will work but it should be obvious by inspection. Note that those tubes have an internal spring contact that shorts across the diode (anode to one side of filament) if and when the filament burns out. That's a fail safe mechanism to make sure the regulated heater voltage fails low.

It's good that you have the A type newer timebases. They can be a bit finicky to get going but hopefully the tunnel diodes in them are OK. We'll see once you've got through the preparatory stuff.

Let us know how you get on,

Morris


--- In TekScopes@..., "dutchbosstard" <childwhereugo@> wrote:



first I would like to say thank you for the very clear advice.

I have been slowly going through the manual since the day i got the scope, but i definitely need to read it thoroughly instead of just kind of skimming it. Yes, i did read the part in the manual about running it with all plug-ins installed. If anyone would like to know, I believe my scope may be a 1967 model, since there is a little information diagram on the bottom of the power supply that has written that it was inspected in '67. It also has the newer 21A and 22A time bases, and the vertical plugins that came with it are the type 53/54K and the type M 4 trace plugin. I do not know the name of the style of screw-in connector, not a BNC. they look like these:




can someone give me the name for those things? i guess i should be happy that the 2 probes that came with the scope have the same strange looking connector. the timebases have BNC connectors.

as far as the fans go, would it really be necessary to soak them in diesel fuel, if i happen to get em turning after disassembly? I know that electric motors and generators often use oil-lite bearings, i've never heard of the bearings losing their oil, but then again I dont know much about oil-lite other than it feels strange, looks strange, and has an interesting smell to it. However, if i cannot get the 555 fan to get turn nicely after taking it apart, i will surely follow your advice word for word.

as far as solder goes, I did indeed read where it says in the power supply to use the silver bearing solder. what I am confused on is: is this solder flux cored, or do i need to solder it with external flux (ive only ever soldered with 60/40 flux cored solder) or does this specific solder need flux? my last solder question is, should I buy this tektronix solder off of ebay?



as far as V799, the thermonic diode, I just did a little reading about it online, could i look up the datasheet to find the pins, remove it and measure the resistance of the filament to make sure its not blown that way?

thanks,

Robby


--- In TekScopes@..., "Morris" <vilgotch@> wrote:

Hi,

Let me add some comments from an experienced Tek scope (including a 555 scoposaurus) restorer to the excellent advice you have had so far:

I gather you are not experienced with vacuum tube equipment although you have worked with high voltage before. I assume you know how to be careful around gutsy power supplies, there's more than enough juice in the 555 to kill you.

At this stage you have had the scope running after a fashion so you can probably assume that the CRT is OK, you know the time delay relay works, no electrolytics have blown up, no smoke got released and the power supplies are at least producing enough to a give you a green flash. That's all very encouraging.

What I would do now is to stop and read the manual thoroughly so you become familiar with what's there, where the test points are and how the thing works. Then I would give it as thorough a clean as possible as has been discussed. The next thing to do before anything else is to get the fan working. The best way to do that is to remove it altogether which involves unsoldering the leads from the tagstrip, taking careful note of where to reconnect them. If there is no little roll of silver solder with the scope you need to go and get some - the commercially available silver bearing solder stuff is not exactly the same as the Tek solder but is preferable to ordinary 60/40 which should not be used.

Taking the fan motor apart is pretty straightforward, just make sure you record where everything goes so you can reassemble it. The bearings can be soaked in thin oil (such as 3-in-1), diesel fuel or kerosene to clean all the gunk off and then lubed with something thicker. Car engine oil is probably OK. Once it spins freely, you can put it back. Eventually you might do the same for the fan in the power supply but for now just put some oil into the oil holes on the bearings.

Once both fans are running you can run the scope again and check the LV power supply voltages at the test points. Start with the -150 which is the master reference for everything else. You don't need to measure the HV just yet but make sure the heater voltages are right. The heater supply is regulated using V799 in the power supply, a special thermal sensing diode type 2AS15A. If it's failed with an open filament then the heater voltage will be low to pretty well all the tubes in the scope. If V799's not lighting up you will need to suspend all operations until you can find a replacement (plenty available on eBay).

Incidentally I missed whether you mentioned which timebase & vertical plugins are installed. Please let us know. Don't try to run the scope without plugins.

Once you've done all that, get back to the brains trust here and I'm sure you will get excellent advice on how to proceed further.

Good Luck!!

Morris

--- In TekScopes@..., "dutchbosstard" <childwhereugo@> wrote:

so yesterday i got real brave and decided to power the scope up. the power supply had the proper 5 amp fuse, but the heater supply had an 8 amp fuse instead of the 7 amp one. i checked the fan in the power supply and i tried turning it by hand and it seemed to spin pretty well, but the larger fan in the 555 was harder to turn, and i also had to remove its dust screen since the dust screen was pressed in, preventing the fan's movement. i powered it on with all the covers off and the PSU fan came on right away, but i noticed that the 555's fan wasnt powering on. all the tubes started to glow and i heard a relay click and then i started fiddling trying to find a beam. i rotated both of the horizontal display knobs and i couldnt get a trace, but every time i turned the know, a trace would appear for a slit second. both beams did this. after the scope had teen turned on for a whole minute, i decided to shut the thing off since the fan in the 555 didnt come off. the fan in the PSU box also had originally started rotating rather slow, but kept gaining speed until after about 30 seconds it started rotating extremely fast.

now this might be a dumb question, but could I have damaged anything by powering it on with a 8amp heater supply fuse instead of the listed 7amp? and also, is there any difference between a "slo-blow" fuse and a "time-delay" fuse?

also, what should i do about the fan in the 555? should i disconnect it and try to power it up with 115v on its own?


Re: OT: Component sought

 

Would this help:? http://www.robotroom.com/Color-PCBs-5.html

A dissolveable IC socket.? I do remember seeing somewhere a carrier of sorts that has just the pins. So, you can solder either side and then remove the carrier.

In this case, you could put the socket on an IC,? dissolve it away.? Solder on either side and remove the IC.? You could then use the item pictured, I think.


--- On Sat, 7/21/12, lilacbarn wrote:

From: lilacbarn
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: OT: Component sought
To: TekScopes@...
Date: Saturday, July 21, 2012, 10:40 PM

?



--- In TekScopes@..., "David C. Partridge" wrote:
>
> What I am looking for is something to allow a single sided PCB to be plugged into a DIL IC socket and have the tracks on the lower side.
>
> The following links look almost right, but AFAICT they can only work on a DS PCB with plated holes (I just want to use single sided 0.1" strip-board for this).
>
> <>
>
> <>
>
> I'm sure something suitable must exist ...
>
> Thanks
> Dave
>
Dave, have you got any old wire wrap IC sockets? I have used them in the past for exactly this purpose, but I have to be careful which type of DIL socket I use on the MB as the pins are square for wire wrap and bigger than a standard IC pin. I solder them to the daughter board but leave the full length of pin to push into the MB socket. It is a fixed height above the MB.
Geoff.


Re: OT: Component sought

 

That would be a sound option, thank you. On balance after reading all the replies, I think I'll probably just use the first of the items I listed in my original mail.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of lilacbarn
Sent: 22 July 2012 03:41
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: OT: Component sought



--- In TekScopes@..., "David C. Partridge" <david.partridge@...> wrote:

What I am looking for is something to allow a single sided PCB to be plugged into a DIL IC socket and have the tracks on the lower side.
<>
Dave, have you got any old wire wrap IC sockets? I have used them in the past for exactly this purpose, but I have to be careful which type of DIL socket I use on the MB as the pins are square for wire wrap and bigger than a standard IC pin. I solder them to the daughter board but leave the full length of pin to push into the MB socket. It is a fixed height above the MB.
Geoff.


Re: New Curve Tracer Test Fixture - Not for Vacuum Tubes, for SOT23 instead

Gordon
 

On 22/07/2012 00:54, Dennis Tillman wrote:
Everywhere I have ever lived and worked, Rev B came AFTER Rev A. Why would
they name things in reverse alphabetical order?
No idea, but that's the way it looks. BTW Rollyn pointed out that there's apparently no difference, it's on the web site, I just missed it.

I don't recall seeing a choice at the time I ordered it.
There are three listed for some reason.

Do you see any differences in the drawings?
Slight. From memory the contacts looked slightly different and at least one of the dimensions.

Cheers

Gordon


Re: questions to ask: buying a 494P

 

Hi John,

Thank you for that comprehensive reply.

Regards,

Mark

--- In TekScopes@..., "John Miles" <jmiles@...> wrote:

I am interested in getting a Tek 21GHz 494P (possibly from eBay), and
probably
will need international shipping to New Zealand. I wonder if you guys can
help
with a succinct list of issues that I need to address.

Import: I have an import license, so not too concerned about incoming
paperwork, local taxes etc.

Export: A web site indicates that 494P may possibly be subject to US
export
control, in the form of "22 CFR". Is this true ?
No, not in general. Pretty much everything exported from the US is "subject
to export control," but a Tek 494P doesn't require a license unless you are
on a list of prohibited trading partners, associated with any such
organizations or states, or if the seller has any reason to think you will
use it to develop WMDs or otherwise engage in any prohibited usage. All of
that would be just as true if the item were a toothbrush.

There are two different lists that must be checked when considering whether
something requires an export license. The CCL is the civilian/dual-use
list, and the USML is the ITAR (arms control) list. Each has to be checked
separately, as almost nothing appears on both lists. The CCL mandates
export licensing (or the use of a specific exemption) for certain signal
analyzers that work above 30 GHz, if they have RBWs of 10 MHz or higher
and/or real-time analysis bandwidth exceeding 20 MHz. None of those
conditions apply to a 494P.

The USML (22 CFR) is concerned mostly with military items. If an item is
not designed, modified, or otherwise configured for military, security, or
intelligence use, e.g. with extended temperature ranges and/or radiation
hardening, then it is generally not covered by 22 CFR. Only a few
hot-button exceptions exist, like advanced inertial measurement hardware and
night vision gear. Those will get you a visit from people with expensive
sunglasses.

Interestingly, Tektronix has a handheld spectrum analyzer (

) with a prominent warning that says it is "listed on the United States
Munitions List (USML)." I don't see how that could be the case, since it
isn't specifically designed, modified, or configured for "intelligence,
security, or military purposes," as cited in USML category XI (b). But
then, logic doesn't always prevail in these matters.

About the only remaining complication for your seller would be if that
particular 494P was part of a specific defense system, something that was
not supposed to have been released as surplus but nevertheless was. Even a
screwdriver can be considered an ITAR-controlled item, if it was part of a
contract for maintaining fighter jets or missiles. There are lots of
stories on this list from people who have had innocuous-sounding items
"recalled" by the US government, sometimes months after purchase. This can
happen at any time, but it would be the seller's problem, not yours.

Technical: expensive things that must work to spec: YIG LO, YIG
pre-selector,
CRT and mixer. Anything else to watch out for with this unit ? How good is
the
power-on-self-test of the unit ? catching CRC errors in EEPROMs is easy,
but I
am hoping for a more thorough internal loop-back of RF.
The self-test is important but it's far from comprehensive. However, 494s
are among the more reliable variants of the 49x models, so if it works, it
is a pretty safe buy. You just need to make sure the mixer and/or
attenuator haven't been fried, and unfortunately, only checking a known
signal will reveal that. There is no substitute for hooking up a cable to
the calibrator jack and verifying that the 100 MHz signal shows up near -20
dBm regardless of the attenuator or span width.

Seller: Finding a seller with decent eBay feedback and who can check the
100MHz ref level on the unit seems a minimum. I believe that the same
mixer is
used for all bands, so is this a strong enough single test of YIG
stability, and
mixer function ? Anything else that is a valuable, quick and easy test ?
Make sure the CRT is good and that the fan isn't noisy. Both are hard to
find.

You should assume you will eventually need to swap out some of the power
supply capacitors (see for more on that),
but that is nothing to be particularly afraid of.

-- john, KE5FX


Re: OT: Component sought

 

--- In TekScopes@..., "David C. Partridge" <david.partridge@...> wrote:

What I am looking for is something to allow a single sided PCB to be plugged into a DIL IC socket and have the tracks on the lower side.

The following links look almost right, but AFAICT they can only work on a DS PCB with plated holes (I just want to use single sided 0.1" strip-board for this).

<>

<>

I'm sure something suitable must exist ...

Thanks
Dave
Dave, have you got any old wire wrap IC sockets? I have used them in the past for exactly this purpose, but I have to be careful which type of DIL socket I use on the MB as the pins are square for wire wrap and bigger than a standard IC pin. I solder them to the daughter board but leave the full length of pin to push into the MB socket. It is a fixed height above the MB.
Geoff.


Re: questions to ask: buying a 494P

John Miles
 

I am interested in getting a Tek 21GHz 494P (possibly from eBay), and
probably
will need international shipping to New Zealand. I wonder if you guys can
help
with a succinct list of issues that I need to address.

Import: I have an import license, so not too concerned about incoming
paperwork, local taxes etc.

Export: A web site indicates that 494P may possibly be subject to US
export
control, in the form of "22 CFR". Is this true ?
No, not in general. Pretty much everything exported from the US is "subject
to export control," but a Tek 494P doesn't require a license unless you are
on a list of prohibited trading partners, associated with any such
organizations or states, or if the seller has any reason to think you will
use it to develop WMDs or otherwise engage in any prohibited usage. All of
that would be just as true if the item were a toothbrush.

There are two different lists that must be checked when considering whether
something requires an export license. The CCL is the civilian/dual-use
list, and the USML is the ITAR (arms control) list. Each has to be checked
separately, as almost nothing appears on both lists. The CCL mandates
export licensing (or the use of a specific exemption) for certain signal
analyzers that work above 30 GHz, if they have RBWs of 10 MHz or higher
and/or real-time analysis bandwidth exceeding 20 MHz. None of those
conditions apply to a 494P.

The USML (22 CFR) is concerned mostly with military items. If an item is
not designed, modified, or otherwise configured for military, security, or
intelligence use, e.g. with extended temperature ranges and/or radiation
hardening, then it is generally not covered by 22 CFR. Only a few
hot-button exceptions exist, like advanced inertial measurement hardware and
night vision gear. Those will get you a visit from people with expensive
sunglasses.

Interestingly, Tektronix has a handheld spectrum analyzer (

) with a prominent warning that says it is "listed on the United States
Munitions List (USML)." I don't see how that could be the case, since it
isn't specifically designed, modified, or configured for "intelligence,
security, or military purposes," as cited in USML category XI (b). But
then, logic doesn't always prevail in these matters.

About the only remaining complication for your seller would be if that
particular 494P was part of a specific defense system, something that was
not supposed to have been released as surplus but nevertheless was. Even a
screwdriver can be considered an ITAR-controlled item, if it was part of a
contract for maintaining fighter jets or missiles. There are lots of
stories on this list from people who have had innocuous-sounding items
"recalled" by the US government, sometimes months after purchase. This can
happen at any time, but it would be the seller's problem, not yours.

Technical: expensive things that must work to spec: YIG LO, YIG
pre-selector,
CRT and mixer. Anything else to watch out for with this unit ? How good is
the
power-on-self-test of the unit ? catching CRC errors in EEPROMs is easy,
but I
am hoping for a more thorough internal loop-back of RF.
The self-test is important but it's far from comprehensive. However, 494s
are among the more reliable variants of the 49x models, so if it works, it
is a pretty safe buy. You just need to make sure the mixer and/or
attenuator haven't been fried, and unfortunately, only checking a known
signal will reveal that. There is no substitute for hooking up a cable to
the calibrator jack and verifying that the 100 MHz signal shows up near -20
dBm regardless of the attenuator or span width.

Seller: Finding a seller with decent eBay feedback and who can check the
100MHz ref level on the unit seems a minimum. I believe that the same
mixer is
used for all bands, so is this a strong enough single test of YIG
stability, and
mixer function ? Anything else that is a valuable, quick and easy test ?
Make sure the CRT is good and that the fan isn't noisy. Both are hard to
find.

You should assume you will eventually need to swap out some of the power
supply capacitors (see for more on that),
but that is nothing to be particularly afraid of.

-- john, KE5FX


Re: New Curve Tracer Test Fixture - Not for Vacuum Tubes, for SOT23 instead

 

Sorry I took so many days to answer but I was away.

I'm delighted others have found a use for the SOT23 curve tracer test
fixture. I especially like the creativity others are employing to build
theirs. I was fortunate in having the blank fixture in my Tek parts drawer
since I like to make things as professionally as possible. So I spent my
entire life learning many skills so I could make anything I ever wanted and
do it so well it would be impossible to tell it wasn't made by Tek.

But I forget that others are not as lucky or as well equipped as I am to do
things like this. I had no idea anyone else would have a need for the SOT23
test fixture (that was short sighted) so I didn't bother to mention the
problems I had to overcome along the way. Yes, there are no mounting holes
for the socket which makes it very difficult to work with. After carefully
measuring where to drill 2 holes for the leads to come through I epoxied the
socket down to the top of the fixture. It worked so far.

Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf
Of Dennis Tillman
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 4:55 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Re: New Curve Tracer Test Fixture - Not for Vacuum
Tubes, for SOT23 instead

Hi Gordon,
Everywhere I have ever lived and worked, Rev B came AFTER Rev A. Why would
they name things in reverse alphabetical order?

I don't recall seeing a choice at the time I ordered it.

Do you see any differences in the drawings?

Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: charter_67, Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:26 AM

--- In TekScopes@..., "Dennis Tillman" <dennis@...> wrote:
For those of you that want to make one yourself the test and burn-in
socket came from WaveShare in China (sales@...). Their part number is
499-P44-10 (REV.B). The price is $27 plus $14 to mail it via USPS. I
have no affiliation with the manufacturer etc. Better pictures of the
socket than I can take can be seen at


Hi Dennis. What made you choose REV-B? REV-A is the most recent (2/10/06)
according to the drawings. REV-B has 4/11/01 as the drawn date.

Cheers

Gordon



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Fan noise in 2445B

 

Hi Raymond,

I own a 2465A and 2467. At least with those models, there is only one fan speed as there is no thermostatic control. I do not think the fans are very noisy and the amount of air flow is not tremendous.

I suggest that you remove the rear plastic cover and measure the voltage from the feedthrough capacitor located in the upper left corner (when viewing the rear) to ground. Note that the fan receives DC power via that capacitor.

You should find this voltage is constant. If you agree that the voltage is constant, yet the fan speed varies, then the fan needs help (perhaps cleaning) or replacement.

Good luck,

Patrick Wong AK6C

--- In TekScopes@..., "raymonddompfrank" <r.domp.frank@...> wrote:

Hi,
The following has been sort of haunting me for a while:

When I switch on my 2445B, the fan starts running at a low speed and is barely
audible. After a while, it increases its speed to what I consider its maximum.
It is quite audible by then.


Re: questions to ask: buying a 494P

Artekmedia
 

On 7/21/2012 8:09 PM, Mark wrote:
Seller: Finding a seller with decent eBay feedback and who can check the 100MHz ref level on the unit seems a minimum. I believe that the same mixer is used for all bands, so is this a strong enough single test of YIG stability, and mixer function ? Anything else that is a valuable, quick and easy test ?
Check the input attenuator in all positions to be sure it tracks

--
Dave& Lynn Henderson
Manuals@...
www.Artekmedia.com
PO Box 175
Welch,MN 55089


questions to ask: buying a 494P

 

Hi All,

I am interested in getting a Tek 21GHz 494P (possibly from eBay), and probably will need international shipping to New Zealand. I wonder if you guys can help with a succinct list of issues that I need to address.

Import: I have an import license, so not too concerned about incoming paperwork, local taxes etc.

Export: A web site indicates that 494P may possibly be subject to US export control, in the form of "22 CFR". Is this true ?

Technical: expensive things that must work to spec: YIG LO, YIG pre-selector, CRT and mixer. Anything else to watch out for with this unit ? How good is the power-on-self-test of the unit ? catching CRC errors in EEPROMs is easy, but I am hoping for a more thorough internal loop-back of RF.

Seller: Finding a seller with decent eBay feedback and who can check the 100MHz ref level on the unit seems a minimum. I believe that the same mixer is used for all bands, so is this a strong enough single test of YIG stability, and mixer function ? Anything else that is a valuable, quick and easy test ?

Shipping: I have had success getting a 40kg SA shipped using Bax Global from USA to NZ. Any experience with international shippers and insurance who won't charge the earth (also, who not to use) ?

Thought, comments and pearls of wisdom always appreciated.

Thanks,

Mark


WANTED -TEK7XXX RACK MOUNT IN UK

 

Hi all, does anyone have a spare/unused 7xxx series rack mount scope they dont need.I only require the mainframe,no plugins are needed as this unit will have a custom plugin designed to display x-y signals.
Cost is a major concern as ive just been made redundant,so will consider a faulty mainframe if complete and crt ok.
Let me know if you can assist...Many thanks Pete Harrison


Re: New Curve Tracer Test Fixture - Not for Vacuum Tubes, for SOT23 instead

 

Hi Gordon,
Everywhere I have ever lived and worked, Rev B came AFTER Rev A. Why would
they name things in reverse alphabetical order?

I don't recall seeing a choice at the time I ordered it.

Do you see any differences in the drawings?

Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: charter_67, Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:26 AM

--- In TekScopes@..., "Dennis Tillman" <dennis@...> wrote:
For those of you that want to make one yourself the test and burn-in
socket came from WaveShare in China (sales@...). Their part number is
499-P44-10 (REV.B). The price is $27 plus $14 to mail it via USPS. I
have no affiliation with the manufacturer etc. Better pictures of the
socket than I can take can be seen at


Hi Dennis. What made you choose REV-B? REV-A is the most recent (2/10/06)
according to the drawings. REV-B has 4/11/01 as the drawn date.

Cheers

Gordon


Re: 7633 readout problem, advice or hints needed

Albert
 

Hi Max,
This makes contacts A37 and B37 suspect.
Remember this is a first check. The fault could also be in a readout board channel selector IC for instance.
Albert

Hi Albert,

thanks a lot; just tested the following:

I have 2 pcs. 7A22, 1 pc 7A26, 1 pc 7B53A, 1 pc 7B85.

The 7A26 in left position shows both channels ok, in centre position only CH2 (bottom middle position readout) ok, CH1 (top middle position) no readout.
7B53A and 7B85 timebases show no difference (except additional 7B85 readout bottom right).

It seems to be the problem of the backplane-connector you mentioned.

Did you read the other readout problems thread, concerning a R7903?
not yet; have not known it yet.

Max.


Fan noise in 2445B

raymonddompfrank
 

Hi,
The following has been sort of haunting me for a while:

When I switch on my 2445B, the fan starts running at a low speed and is barely
audible. After a while, it increases its speed to what I consider its maximum.
It is quite audible by then. At the same time, I detect no air flow. Using a
piece of tissue as an airflow detector I can't "prove" there's any air flow,
apart from the fan's location at the back. Inside the 'scope, nothing is
impeding the air flow. This seems independent of ambient temperature, which
varies between 18C and 25C. The fact that I can't detect an airflow as such
does't give me much concern, since often it's just a little "moving air" that's
enough but i'd like to know if this is normal behaviour.
Can anyone of you confirm that it is normal for these 'scopes' (24x5y's) fans to
be running at or close to maximum speed under normal operating conditions?
FYI, I'd like to add that I'm sure it's not noisy bearings or anything like
that.
AAMOF, my TDS420 is even noisier, having a much larger fan as well.
My 465B isn't anywhere near as noisy, let alone my 7904 (which has no fan).

I'd appreciate to hear about anybody else's experiences.

Raymond


Help! Tek 2235 Signal on Ch1 appears on Ch2

 

My Tek 2235 has a problem, The input signal on Ch1 also is displayed by Ch2. This occurs whenever CH2 is displayed (Both or CH2 only) . It occurs even if Ch2 input is set to DC, GND or AC. When I adjust the vertical position of CH1, Ch2 moves. If I put the input on Ch2, Ch1 is not affected.

Can anyone help me troubleshoot this?


Re: 7633 readout problem, advice or hints needed

 

Hi Albert,

thanks a lot; just tested the following:

I have 2 pcs. 7A22, 1 pc 7A26, 1 pc 7B53A, 1 pc 7B85.

The 7A26 in left position shows both channels ok, in centre position only CH2 (bottom middle position readout) ok, CH1 (top middle position) no readout.
7B53A and 7B85 timebases show no difference (except additional 7B85 readout bottom right).

It seems to be the problem of the backplane-connector you mentioned.

Did you read the other readout problems thread, concerning a R7903?
not yet; have not known it yet.

Max.


--- In TekScopes@..., "Albert" <aodiversen@...> wrote:

Hi Max,

Did you read the other readout problems thread, concerning a R7903? Very informative and you might have a similar contact problem.
First of all put a dual channel vertical amplifier (like 7A18, 7A26) in the right vertical bay and find out whether the problem is restricted to just one of the channels. If so, you might also have that bad contact in the main interface (backplane) connector. If the problem is the same for both channels then one or more of the Time Slot contacts could be bad. Each TS pulse (TS-1, TS-2, ...) uses its own plugin contact, common for CH1 and CH2.
The ReadOut display is "compiled" from the results of several TS pulses. Hence a change in readout as response to turning V/div is not a guarantee that *all* connections from plugin to readout board are intact.

Albert

--- In TekScopes@..., "max_3289" <max_3289@> wrote:

as this is my first posting in this group i hope doing right...

I want to ask for some advice solving the following problem:
After some weeks of storage, the readout of the centre bay (right vertical module) makes problems: first the text itself was not OK (-> "4", "40m", "3S" (!), ...), then there was no text anymore. A few weeks in the past, everything was OK.
Changing the vertical modules did not move the problem, therefore the modules must be OK. As there were changes in readout when changing the scale factor, connection to the readout board A13 (early version without ROM) seems to be OK ?.?
Readout of the left vertical module and the timebase is OK.

I have not found a proper starting point in the schematics to begin searching. Hints and advices are highly appreciated.

Thanks a lot,
Max


Re: Tektronix 475 with no display

none
 

Thanks for confirming that resource. I was hesitant without knowing if it was true or replacement parts.

I ordered the part, so I should receive it sometime this next week.

Now I just need to source a grey replacement knob for the trigger adjustment (366-1280-00 part number).

-Josh

On Jul 21, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Tom Miller wrote:

?

2N4931
?
Vernonia northern is an excellent resource. They are real Tek parts.
?
Tom
?
----- Original Message -----
From: Rob
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 2:36 PM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Tektronix 475 with no display

?

One reference I have seems to say 151-0280-00 is a type 2N5416. Mouser lists a 2N5416 so that you can compare to the schematic, etc¡­.

That said, I highly recommend you let others reply first because the site I trust the most:

Doesn¡¯t list a cross part number for 151-0280-00 although they do have replacements both new and used. That being the case I think you will find if a 2N5416 gets you running it either won¡¯t last long or it won¡¯t perform how it should for alignment, etc.

I usually play it pretty loose on the passive components by going up a bit in capacitance and voltage for example. However TEK is famous for utilizing semiconductors in ways pushing the envelope so I do not even try to look into their mind when it comes to semiconductors.. ??

Finally, ?the other site I used to visit for part crosses appears to be down. I am not sure if they are going off the WWW or just forgot to renew so here is the link for future if they are simply in .

Double finally, Not knowing the circuit your dealing with I do not want to comment strongly. However at face value your moving up in capacitance that far may lead current problems (as I understand it anyway). Most all of the large capacitance values I have dealt with are tolerance of -10% or 20% and + 20% or 50%.

I do therefor try to stay with a modern capacitor value between 350uf and 700uf in your case. Again however there are people here with way more expertise than me. 1000uf may indeed be ¡®ok¡¯ for they ckt¡­ ?I can comment with a tad more expertise on the voltage value you were forced to choose. Via recent conversation we had on the Forum. You are pretty much only limited on higher voltage by the physical dimensions. Basically if it will fit it is OK.. Twas my understanding.

I hope this at least helps.

Rob

From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of none
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 12:17 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tektronix 475 with no display



One place claims that this is a replacement:

This is the place:

If that all seems legit, I'll just use those specs to check some local places and then order from the internet if needed.

-Josh

On Jul 21, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Tom Miller wrote:



?

Ok, that's good. You might check the bridge rectifier diodes. You might have one diode open. Or maybe just replace it anyway. I have gotten them from radio shack - I think it is a 400 volt bridge.

Tom

----- Original Message -----

From: none

Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 12:20 PM

Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tektronix 475 with no display

?

Unfortunately, I don't currently have access to another scope. Still haven't heard back from the guy I asked.

I did remove C1412 (350uf, 75V), but ESR seems fine (in and out of circuit). I tested the system with another cap (1000uf, 200V) but everything was the same. Did my (limited) choice of test capacitor affect my testing?

I started testing everything else I could last night. I wasn't finding too much wrong with simple components. The op-amp voltages were lower than the schematic shows (9.6 instead of 10.4, and 8.8 instead of 9.0), but swapping with a matching op-amp didn't change anything (for either the 50V section of the swapped section).

One odd thing, which was throwing me for a loop, was that the unreg 50V and the 105/160 test points were always low and I assumed that was partially why the 110V was only reading 94V. This morning, I powered it up to verify some numbers for this post. It was reading better on the the unreg 50 and 105/160 lines (roughly 66 and 136.6, respectively).

I tested some more expected voltages around the 110V area (as listed on the schematic) and found Q1496 transistor to be the first place that I saw only 93.x volts. I pulled that and it tested to be open with all +/- test variations (the ground was shorted to the case, of course, but the pin tests were all open).

I'll start by replacing that part next and hope it's the last piece of the puzzle.

Any input on the capacitor would be appreciated as well. At this point, it seems like my C1412 is fine and I'll probably just place it back into the system.

Josh

On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Tom Miller wrote:



?

I think you need to change C-1412 also.

Can you take a look at the ripple on the 110 volt?test point? Be careful. 110 volts hurts a bit.

Tom

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 5:31 PM

Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tektronix 475 with no display

?

So I replaced the two capacitors (C1414 and C1442), reviewed the schematic and made sure that any connected points were still making contact (need to add a jumper from C1442 to CR1415, due to my removal accident where I damaged a trace).?

I backed off the +50V adjustment, fired it up, adjusted it back to 50.0V and now I get the following:

+50=50.0V

+110=91.0V

+15=15.0V

+5=5V

-15=-14.8V

-8=-7.9V

+105=132.0V

UNREG 50=~66V

Now, those all look to be within spec except for +110 (at 91V) and possibly the 105 (at 132, schematic shows 136). I did some searching/testing and didn't see anything major wrong, so I tested the resistance values.

TP - expected - measured

110 - 11K - >20K (too high)

50 - 2.7K - 2.7K (perfect)

15 - 63 - 66.3 (within range)

5 - 46 - 49.9 (within range)

-15 - 480 - 12.9K (too high)

-8 - 32 - 31.2 (within range)

UNREG 50 - 14K - >20K (too high)

105 - 12K - >20K (too high)

So my 110 and 105 lines are both showing low voltage, so the higher resistance made sense to me. But the high resistance on the -15 line seemed odd. My assumption is that it means the voltage compensation is working overtime and properly correcting for an issue somewhere. Is that correct?

In reading the service manual, it states to attempt to test the rectifier, the current-limiting transistor, and the op amp. I see that the 105 and 110 both get fed from the +50V rectifier as well as the 110 op-amp pulling from the regulated 50V line.

When I get home from work, I intend to test the 50V supply area more. What I'm wondering is if anything I've stated throws an "obvious" flag for anyone with more experience. When I tested the current-limiting transistor for the 50V section, it had some voltage (the manual states it should be "off", which I take to mean 0V). I'm just not sure if that's the cause of the issue, or a result.

Based on some time staring at the manual, I'm assuming the rectifier is more of an issue, but that's a guess.

Also, as a side note, I can get a line when I press the beam finder button now (I did not previously). So some progress is being made (aside from the obvious progress of mostly-proper voltages).

One final thing to mention: This morning I powered it up before heading to work, just to make sure I had noted the proper values. When I did that, the voltage readings were better on 110 and 105 (94, 136.9 respectively). But as a minute or two went by, and things warmed up, the voltages started to drop. Again, this tends to make sense to me as something is most likely expanding, providing more resistance, and cutting down the potential. Any confirmation/correction would be appreciated.

Also, again, those caps are tricky. I've been soldering (hobbiest, not full-time) for at least 15 years, and I had a rough time replacing the caps. Everything works and tests out nicely, but it doesn't look so great (good joints, but heat marks, etc). I'm definitely not used to this older style of circuit board. Way too easy to lift traces, but that was a good lesson learned.

As always, thanks for all of the information. It's been greatly useful for my learning process.

-Josh

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:08 AM, David <davidwhess@...> wrote:

?

On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:25:01 -0500, "fakecrap@..."
<fakecrap@...> wrote:

>Great info, thanks. I was under the impression that I should replace with
>like-sized capacitance and at least similar voltage (higher being OK as
>well).

In high ripple current applications, sometimes higher voltage
capacitors than strictly necessary are used because the larger
physical size can dissipate more heat so they last longer.



>I assume the capacitance is OK to increase because it's a power supply and
>gets regulated afterword, correct?

It is fine within reason. Increasing the capacitance could increase
the startup current or delay the startup in a switching power supply.
In this case it is a standard 60Hz rectifier and capacitor filter so
the surge current will be higher with more capacitance. I would use
the same value or the next higher standard value if I was being
conservative.



>Either way, I'll order some of those up and see what happens. I'm thinking
>I'll leave others alone, but I'm still internally re-hashing the age-old
>debate of whether or not to just replace all the big cans while I'm at it.

If the failure is age related, then I usually replace all of the
similar capacitors.