¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Strange Tek2440 issue

 

I picked up a 2440 on ebay that had the dead nvram battery problem. Got that fixed up with an external battery. Ran thru the self cal and ext cal and all seems fine, except when the sweep rate is turned above 100 or 200 ns.

In trying to research this a bit, the only thing I could find was on one of the Tek forums back in 2017 but there were zero responses. Here is how the other person described the problem:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The 5 volt regulated rail is getting crowbared when the scope Sec/Div is set to 100ns or faster. If save is pressed at a slower setting the Sec/Div can then be set to any value without the 5 Volt rail getting pulled down. It appears the issue only occurs during an active acquisition cycle at 100ns Sec/Div or faster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

While I didn't measure the 5v rail, the screen shrinks a couple of times as the waveform changes, the inputs get switched to GND and the display goes blank. Sometimes, if I'm quick enough, I can turn the sweep back down (1us or slower) and it'll recover, but I still have to go to the input coupling and switch the inputs off of GND.

Anyone seen this or have any ideas what's going on?

Thanks!
Vince.
--
K8ZW


5441 rack / bench conversion document

 

from Tim P (UK)
Does anyone (Hakan?) have the documents detailing the conversion between
rack / bench formats ? they are 040-0583-02 and 040-0584-03
I don't see how to do it without unsoldering the delay line.
thanks
Tim


Re: Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

 

Slight correction. From the manual, it appears TP60 (et. al.) has a 28uS period making that about 38kHz instead of 30kHz.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry" <n4buq@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2020 11:21:43 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

Harrison,

If you suspect the multiplier is bad, you can disconnect its input by
unsoldering the wire to the transformer. You can see that in the the
picture of the HV board that I added just now here:

/g/TekScopes/album?id=252850

If I remember correctly, you have to be somewhat careful that the wire is not
close enough to arc back to the transformer. I remember that happening and
had to move it a bit further away so that I could have the rest of the HV
circuit operating but not engage the multiplier. If you have a meter that
can measure the output of the transformer (I forget the output value but it
would theoretically be 1/3 of the anode voltage and it's at around 30kHz as
I recall), then you might could establish that everything else works up to
that point.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "n4buq" <n4buq@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2020 10:32:17 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

Hi Harrison,

Yes, the 3x multiplier is U550. For mine, even after I replaced it, I did
some testing on it and, at lower voltages, it would triple the input
voltage; however, it appeared that at operating voltage, it would arc
internally thus blowing the fuse. If I'm not mistaken, this is a common
failure for that module after all these years.

There's a thread on/around October 7, 2017, where the messages for that can
be found.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harrison" <buma7@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2020 9:10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

Barry; When you stated you replaced the multiplier, are you saying you
replaced the U550 module? Harrison N1FAM






Re: TDS3054 Replacement of DALLAS DS1742W (U640), data content in NV-RAM

 

you can just throw in a completely blank chip in there, no problem
reading the old chip and writing in the new one doesn't do much and doesn't do any harm either as I have learned...specially now that the # of hours is messed up

the number of hours are stored in minutes (in HEX) at 07E0-07E3 and also at 07E8-07EB (the same number repeated)
that's probably the only thing you need


Re: Free 6 pin lemo cable and THS720 question

 

As far as I know, there is no menu accessible way to see the battery condition on the THS720. I think that got added to the THS730, but that may be wishful recollection on my part.
One usability issue on the THS720 that is worth keeping in mind is that the two input channels do not share a ground. For low speed stuff with other scopes, I commonly just ground an unused input channel to the board under test and then wrap the ground lead of the probe that I am using arount the probe cable to keep it out ot the way. That does not work on the THS720! Each input channel must have it's own ground connection.
The THS720 is a really handy little scope! I like mine a lot. Thanks for the article on building the battery packs!
BobH


TDS3054 Replacement of DALLAS DS1742W (U640), data content in NV-RAM

 

Hello all,

a TDS3054 (built in year 2001) shows the following symptoms when connected to power:
- 'A system error has occured', Error Count =11, 'display error', goes away after short power off/on
- Unrealistic high 'total operation time' (16350105 hours)
- Impossible time setting (e.g. '11:80:21')

Topic #157465 also deals with this issue, the problem is data corruption inside
U640 DALLAS DS1742W, exhausted lithium battery, date code on the
package is '0029'.

I ordered replacement DS1742W via Amazon in China (the chips I received seem fully functional when
tested on a programmer), date code on the package is '0945'.

How should I prepare the new DS1742W I am going to install in the scope?

Simply read out the (most probably) rubbish of the old DS1742W and copy
it to the new one?

Is a memory map available somewhere which shows the addresses of the
relevant memory locations and their expected content in a working scope?
(the address locations 0x7F8...0x7FF are described in the DS1742W data
sheet)

I cannot believe that appr. 2k of memory are fully used to store internal scope
status data.

Thanks for any help!

Best regards
-Roland


Re: Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

 

Harrison,

If you suspect the multiplier is bad, you can disconnect its input by unsoldering the wire to the transformer. You can see that in the the picture of the HV board that I added just now here:

/g/TekScopes/album?id=252850

If I remember correctly, you have to be somewhat careful that the wire is not close enough to arc back to the transformer. I remember that happening and had to move it a bit further away so that I could have the rest of the HV circuit operating but not engage the multiplier. If you have a meter that can measure the output of the transformer (I forget the output value but it would theoretically be 1/3 of the anode voltage and it's at around 30kHz as I recall), then you might could establish that everything else works up to that point.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "n4buq" <n4buq@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2020 10:32:17 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

Hi Harrison,

Yes, the 3x multiplier is U550. For mine, even after I replaced it, I did
some testing on it and, at lower voltages, it would triple the input
voltage; however, it appeared that at operating voltage, it would arc
internally thus blowing the fuse. If I'm not mistaken, this is a common
failure for that module after all these years.

There's a thread on/around October 7, 2017, where the messages for that can
be found.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harrison" <buma7@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2020 9:10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

Barry; When you stated you replaced the multiplier, are you saying you
replaced the U550 module? Harrison N1FAM






Re: DEC PDP11/05 on a 202D cart - did one survive?

 

Hi Tim!
Thanks for your response.

I think my question wasn't straightforward - I'm looking for pictures from this special cart combinded with the DEC minicomputer.

Holger


Re: DEC PDP11/05 on a 202D cart - did one survive?

 

From Tim P (UK)
I don't know if you have seen the P7001 section on TekWiki - it's under
7000 series, as it uses the 7704A.
Lots of pictures of the 'guts' of the P7001 and some stuff on the
interfacing.
I would be interested in how many were sold, and who bought them. (Chuck,
do you know??).
Tim


On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 16:17, Holger L¨¹bben <tekscopesinput@...>
wrote:

Hi!

I've added an old picture of a Tektronix DPO/DEC PDP 11/05 combination on
a 202D cart to the photo section:

/g/TekScopes/photo/252847/0

Has one of these machines survived?
I'm looking for some detailed pictures of this combination.

Holger




Re: Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

 

Hi Harrison,

Yes, the 3x multiplier is U550. For mine, even after I replaced it, I did some testing on it and, at lower voltages, it would triple the input voltage; however, it appeared that at operating voltage, it would arc internally thus blowing the fuse. If I'm not mistaken, this is a common failure for that module after all these years.

There's a thread on/around October 7, 2017, where the messages for that can be found.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harrison" <buma7@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2020 9:10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

Barry; When you stated you replaced the multiplier, are you saying you
replaced the U550 module? Harrison N1FAM




DEC PDP11/05 on a 202D cart - did one survive?

 

Hi!

I've added an old picture of a Tektronix DPO/DEC PDP 11/05 combination on a 202D cart to the photo section:

/g/TekScopes/photo/252847/0

Has one of these machines survived?
I'm looking for some detailed pictures of this combination.

Holger


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 04:02 PM, Lawrance A. Schneider wrote:


I hope this can be resolved. Unlocking - OCRing - relooking seems perfectly
reasonable. I don't see how this violates whatever agreement.
I have -151 ready, just waiting for "permission"(?) to upload. Good OCR and size reduced to 196MB with little quality degradation. Non-reduced is also available, almost same size as before.

Raymond


Re: Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

 

In circuit tests of these components will be quite meaningless because of
the low impedance components connected to them and the other semiconductors
connected across them, such as CR556 across Q556 b-e junction. The only
accurate way to test is to remove them and test out of circuit.

Before you start removing parts, have you replaced the fuse and checked for
55v across C558? Q552 and Q556 comprise a blocking oscillator which provides
primary excitation for T550. This oscillator cannot function without the 50 volt bias
at T550 pin 4 (or across C558). Q554 and Q548 are control circuits which regulate the
blocking oscillator output to provide a stable +95volts.

The voltages across C721, C741 and C761 all look good, so they are not the problem.

Dave



On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 07:38 PM, Harrison wrote:


I will check out voltages across C721. Since my last posting I did some
reading after which I decided to look closer at the HV Oscillator and HV
Regulator circuits. I did an in circuit check of Q556, Q552, Q548, Q544,
C548, and L554. I used my beckman DMM in the diode mode or the SZBJ BM4070
digital LCR tester. All seemed to check out okay except the Q552 (part of the
HV Oscillator circuit). I plan on removing it, doing an out of circuit test
and replace it regardless. But if I understand the manual correctly that
circuit has a direct impact on the oscillation and output of T550.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 10:28 PM, Harrison wrote:


Read out the voltages across C721. Also read out C741 and C761. Used the
Beckman HD110 MM with the common to ground. C721; three of four pins read
zero, both AC and DC. The fourth pin read 55.5V DC and 0.240V AC. C741; four
of five pins read zero, both AC and DC. The fifth pin read 11.4V DC and
0.068V AC. C761; four of five pins read 11.3V DC and 0.078V AC. The fifth
pin read zero, both AC and DC.


Re: Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

 

Barry; When you stated you replaced the multiplier, are you saying you replaced the U550 module? Harrison N1FAM


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

I hope this can be resolved. Unlocking - OCRing - relooking seems perfectly reasonable. I don't see how this violates whatever agreement.

larry


Re: Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

 

Read out the voltages across C721. Also read out C741 and C761. Used the Beckman HD110 MM with the common to ground. C721; three of four pins read zero, both AC and DC. The fourth pin read 55.5V DC and 0.240V AC. C741; four of five pins read zero, both AC and DC. The fifth pin read 11.4V DC and 0.068V AC. C761; four of five pins read 11.3V DC and 0.078V AC. The fifth pin read zero, both AC and DC.


Re: Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

 

Hi Harrison,

Back in 2017, I worked on my 465M. The following is from an email I sent outlining what I did. Perhaps that will help since it sounds very similar to what you're seeing with yours.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And, so, to recap - after getting the scope on the cheap via a Craglist buy and finding it inoperative:

1. Filter capacitors were bad and restuffed them with new capacitors
2. Accidentally bumped L582 (in the +95V filter) damaging it beyond repaid so replaced it ("repaid" should have been "repair" - Barry)
3. Scope then worked for about 15 minutes and then pfffffft - F558 blew
4. Found Q552 was bad and replaced it but the HV oscillator was now drawing excessive current blowing F558 again
5. Multiplier was bad and replaced it and scope appears to be working again
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BTW, the 465M still works fine - at least the last time I used it several months ago.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harrison" <buma7@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 9:38:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

I will check out voltages across C721. Since my last posting I did some
reading after which I decided to look closer at the HV Oscillator and HV
Regulator circuits. I did an in circuit check of Q556, Q552, Q548, Q544,
C548, and L554. I used my beckman DMM in the diode mode or the SZBJ BM4070
digital LCR tester. All seemed to check out okay except the Q552 (part of
the HV Oscillator circuit). I plan on removing it, doing an out of circuit
test and replace it regardless. But if I understand the manual correctly
that circuit has a direct impact on the oscillation and output of T550.




Re: Tek 4654M; No Trace, No +5V, No +95V; Help

 

I will check out voltages across C721. Since my last posting I did some reading after which I decided to look closer at the HV Oscillator and HV Regulator circuits. I did an in circuit check of Q556, Q552, Q548, Q544, C548, and L554. I used my beckman DMM in the diode mode or the SZBJ BM4070 digital LCR tester. All seemed to check out okay except the Q552 (part of the HV Oscillator circuit). I plan on removing it, doing an out of circuit test and replace it regardless. But if I understand the manual correctly that circuit has a direct impact on the oscillation and output of T550.


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 08:47 PM, Dave Brown wrote:


I believe you are referring to the RPR files I put up on TekWiki from the
museum. The museum password protected the files since we added our scanned
information at the bottom so one would know the source of the file, especially
since it is covered by a release from Tektronix. We know it is easy to get
around as was done in order to OCR the file.
I'm afraid I've lost track of what we're trying to do here.
As I understand, the main issue is having OCR'ed versions of the files on TekWiki that are available here:



Dave seems to have locked them for reasons he describes above. I'm not sure if unlocking, OCR'ing and relocking them would pose a problem as to the release by Tek although the release in itself may have made them "untouchable".
If unlocking and relocking is ok, we'll be able to add OCR where necessary and possibly (very likely) reduce size for the very large files (>200MB). Their size seems unnecessarily large but that happens when you just scan and store.
I am willing and able to give OCR'ing and size-reducing a try. I have done that for many manuals, like 7L13, 7L26 etc. etc.
The -155 file (Tek-made IC's) seems to have been done already.

Maybe it has all been done already and I'm just a little behind.

Raymond


Re: Right to Repair - Re: [TekScopes] Digital scope with CRT

 

On 2020-08-29 6:25 p.m., Ed Breya via groups.io wrote:
Sometimes the "service manual" is built into the appliance. In nearly every washer, dryer, dishwasher, frig, microwave, and HVAC thing I've worked on (many dozens of items) over the years, I have found what are called "service sheets," I think, which may range from a sticker with the wiring diagram, to fairly elaborate multi-page documents with diagnostics

This is a wonderful practice and I hope it returns soon.

Vaguely related, this is also something I saw recently that seems very
hacker friendly and maybe others on the group will enjoy:



--Toby


and all. They are typically folded up nicely and taped or tie-wrapped
onto something inside. The trick is to find them. As soon as you have to
open something up, look all over the place for any sign of this info,
which is usually just behind a cover panel or something a repair person
would first open up to start work. They aren't necessarily easy to find
- I've seen dishwashers with the documents taped to the bottom of the
tub (not easily spotted), or worse, hanging from the back of a built-in
unit. You'd never find it unless it's so bad it had to be pulled out of
the cabinet.

Ed