Re: tektronix 318 logic analyzer probe
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:12 PM, <cleyson@...> wrote:
Unused new old stock and comes with a full set of leads. Price might be more than you want to pay, but you can't make your own probes for the same money.
I have to disagree, the price of $100 per probe is not viable. The Tek 308 is a primitive 20MHz logic analyzer, it would make no sense at all to spend $200 to get it going. You could get a much better logic analyzer for less than that (Tek 1240, HP 16500, HP 1662, etc.). Then there's the issue that these are the normal P6451s, which might not even plug in to the 308, since it seems to require a special version with a right angle connector. And, of course you could make your own probes for much less than that, if you could find the connectors, or if you just patched in to the logic analyzer input. You would just need ECL line receivers (10115 etc.) with your choice of input buffer.
|
Re: Service manual question
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Chris G <tikitoteam@...> wrote:
Hi guys i got a ECI MODEL 40600 FUNCTION GENERATOR and can find the service and operator manual online,is anybody here that know where i can find or place to buy it....thanks
These people seem to sell the ECI line, maybe they can help you?
|
Re: tektronix 318 logic analyzer probe
Hi
Unused new old stock and comes with a full set of leads. Price might be more than you want to pay, but you can't make your own probes for the same money.
Best regards Chris
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., Gala Dragos <gala_dragos@...> wrote: Hi, I've just acquired a Tektronix 318 logic?analyzer, but it came without the pods. It's a nice unit, and by the looks of it, it works, well it displays random logic levels on screen as no pods are plugged in. Can I make those pods myself ? If not, what pods do I need and where do I find them ?
|
Re: T935A seized pots help
Hi, Thanks to everybody that replied, and for the tips, had wondered about applying some oil but I am worried that in time it might get through to the pot track and damage it? I should say that the pots are coupled to the front panel via long shafts and are directly mounted onto the pcbs so will take some work to remove. One pot is more accessable and may be removable without removing the pcb. Also the pots have a 'click' position for the 'cal' setting so I'm wondering if its that mechanism that has seized. Thanks M8JPK (didn't get your name) for the kind offer to repair. If no joy then I may well be in contact! Thanks all, Andrew
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., Andrew <irbsurfing@...> wrote: Hi, First posting on this group, hope someone can help.... I have a T935A scope which has developed a problem and I'd like to try and fix it as its a very useful portable scope. Basically two of the front panel variable pots, the Y2 axis variable and the X axis variable have seized solid. Y1 seems okay. So before I strip the scope down, which looks to be quite a job to get the relevant pcbs out, has anybody come across this before? Is there much hope that I can fix the existing pots or do they need to be replaced (any suggestions for good suppliers that will ship to the UK?). Many thanks, Andrew
|
546 on Fort Collins Craigslist
I have no affiliation with the seller.
-Kurt
|
543A on Minneapolis Craigslist
I have no affiliation with the seller.
-Kurt
|
Re: Service manual question
--- In TekScopes@..., Chris G <tikitoteam@...> wrote: Hi guys i got a ECI MODEL 40600 FUNCTION GENERATOR and can't find the service and operator manual online,is anybody here that know where i can find or place to buy it....thanks
|
Re: tektronix 318 logic analyzer probe
Seems the sphere guys no longer have these probes, so I'm in the market for some P6451 probes, part number 010-6451-07 to be exact.
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- On Tue, 2/19/13, David DiGiacomo wrote: From: David DiGiacomo Subject: Re: [TekScopes] tektronix 318 logic analyzer probe To: TekScopes@... Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 8:14 PM
?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Gala Dragos gala_dragos@...> wrote:
> I've just acquired a Tektronix 318 logic analyzer, but it came without the pods.
>
> It's a nice unit, and by the looks of it, it works, well it displays random logic levels on screen as no pods are plugged in.
>
> Can I make those pods myself ?
>
> If not, what pods do I need and where do I find them ?
The 318 used a special version of the P6451 probe, with a right angle
connector. I don't know if a standard P6451 can be made to work.
You can make the probe circuit, but I don't think you can find the
connectors, except on a probe.
|
Re: 475 Where is the transistor 3984?
Thank you!
At this point the voltages are not OK, so I'll start to study the circuit.?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
El 18/02/2013, a las 23:07, raymonddompfrank escribi¨®:
?
My manual, for SN B250000 and up, does in fact say "check the collector of Q984", so you're right.
Raymond
--- In TekScopes@..., Javier Alberola wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to repair a 475 following the procedure in the manual. In the page 4-16, paragraph "sweep and logic", step 2, the manual says to "check the collector of (3984". Is this an errata, and it should be Q984?
>
> The previous test are OK, after changing a damaged capacitor with a huge dielectric absorption (thank you, Tom Miller)
>
> Thanks in advance.
> >
>
|
Re: tektronix 318 logic analyzer probe
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Gala Dragos <gala_dragos@...> wrote: I've just acquired a Tektronix 318 logic analyzer, but it came without the pods.
It's a nice unit, and by the looks of it, it works, well it displays random logic levels on screen as no pods are plugged in.
Can I make those pods myself ?
If not, what pods do I need and where do I find them ? The 318 used a special version of the P6451 probe, with a right angle connector. I don't know if a standard P6451 can be made to work. You can make the probe circuit, but I don't think you can find the connectors, except on a probe.
|
Re: tektronix 318 logic analyzer probe
Please try asking walter2@.... He has a wharehouse of stuff to clear. In his latest update, he mentioned about Tek 308 and many pods and probes.? Difficult to make your own; best to buy actual probes.?
cslim
|
Re: 2246 Mod A - no trace
After installing the socket, I did an ohmmeter test on all connections to the socket from other chips and they are all fine. By default (no voltage applied), the input selection relay selects GND, so it should still show the trace. Ch2, Ch3 and Ch4 were working before I installed the socket, so it is baffling.
It does show "Self check Volts Cal error" (this is new) and also complains about the battery not working correctly (this error was there before).
With the beam finder on, it shows a very bright horizontal line display with some vertical deflection at the center of the screen. Believe that is how it is supposed to work.
I will pull back and see if somehow the front panel controls are far off somehow, though that would not result in a Volts Cal error. Something is not good with the motherboard near the repair - the same something that caused the failure to begin with.
Priya.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Miller" <tmiller11147@...> wrote: When you removed the chip did any of the plated through holes loose the plating? I think the board is up to six layers. You may have lost an internal connection to the chip.
Tom
----- Original Message ----- From: nielsentelecom@... To: TekScopes@... Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:10 PM Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 2246 Mod A - no trace
Priya,
Wow, I didn't know it was all channels! Check your trigger setting, try a single shot too. maybe your focus is so far out you can't see it. Look at it in the dark too. Check the rejection section in the trigger area, set it for DC. Use the menu to set things to default just in case you got into unfamiliar territory. I don't see how putting in that socket would have done anything else barring you accidently damaged something in the process or zapped something that is static sensitive.
Pull back for a second. Hopefully you just overlooked something!
Nick Nielsen
--- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" wrote: > > Hi Nick, > > There is currently no trace on any of the channels after installing the IC socket at U174. However, the beam finder works as do all the menus and also the vertical time base cursors and readouts. I suspect something with the motherboard now at or near U174. Using your plan, I will apply an identical calibration signal to Ch2 and Ch3 and compare what happens to the signal using my R7704 as a test scope. More to come on this ... > > Yes, I will be careful as you say to not blow up something else along the way! > > Priya. > > --- In TekScopes@..., "nielsentelecom@" wrote: > > > > Priya, > > > > You could probably use ch3 to probe for the comparisons as a last resort on the following. > > > > I would set up identical conditions on both ch2 and ch1. then on ch 2 compare signal traces starting at the input. Place the same signal on both leads(channels). Check the U175 relay driver on ch2 and find out if any are high. You can also check the U171/U172 if your input to the U174/U175 does not match. But they appear to do different jobs on given pins. Probably best to test at the inputs of U174 & U175. Then go forward till you lose identical signal. Since you don't have U174 installed, just the socket instead, U171 may be calling for one of the relays in the Ch1 circuit to be pulled in or activated if you prefer. Then jumper where U174 should be on the affected driver. If as you say the relays are all operating as they should, you should expect the ch1 and ch2 relays to all align identically. It is possible one of the relays just isn't pulled in correctly. You can also check test point 1A (AT117 pin 7) in the ch1 circuit, and At127 pin 7 to ensure the they match once you get both attenuators aligned the same. > > > > Don't forget, BE CAREFUL! Don't blow up ch2!! > > > > Nick Nielsen > > > > > > --- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" wrote: > > > > > > Update: I soldered an IC socket in U174 thinking that I would connect leads to it externally to diagnose the Ch1 issue and now the trace has completely disappeared! The beam finder works, but when I release the beam finder button, there is nothing on the screen other than the vert and hor selection displays. The menus are all fine and the time cursors work fine too - just no signal trace. Checked all the voltages and they are fine. > > > > > > I assume that I have to use another scope to trace the vertical amplifier area, but would appreciate any tips here - if the vertical amplifier was bad, would it not also affect the beam finder, displays and menus? > > > > > > Priya Jakatdar. > > > > > > --- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" wrote: > > > > > > > > I put the scope back together and it runs fine on Ch2, Ch3 and Ch4 including time & frequency measurements. All secondary voltages are well within the spec range (7.48V, -7.47V, 5.2V, -5.2V, 15.1V, -15.9V etc), so I have not made any adjustment to the 44VDC rail to avoid calibrating the scope from scratch. Will use it this way for now and let it run for some time to be sure nothing else is wrong or will fail before attempting further repair. > > > > > > > > The issue with Ch1 and voltage measurements is a charred U174 transistor relay driver IC (Intersil 3082) that appears to have caused the SMPS to fail in the first place. I have not replaced the chip thinking there may be a larger issue with or around U174. The Ch1 individual relays are all working fine (tested with a Kikusui constant-voltage constant-current supply) and drawing 25 mA or 12 mA according to their spec. When I do get some time later, I am thinking about validating the Shift Register output pins of U171 that drives U174 first and then maybe installing an IC socket rather than soldering a new U174. > > > > > > > > I have searched the archives and not found anything specific with respect to U174. Any thoughts or previous experience with this will be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > I want to thank everyone's help in getting my scope back into working condition. I have learned a lot about my 2246 and it is mainly because of you guys. > > > > > > > > Priya. > > > > > > > > --- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Tom, > > > > > > > > > > I was only able to get enough time to assemble the SMPS into the chassis with just the main board and it runs fine - without the 40W series bulb:). The voltages are a bit off (5.28V, 7.46V etc) but I won't adjust anything till the proc board and the pot boards are in and providing normal operating load. > > > > > > > > > > That's for the weekend. More to come. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for taking the time to make resistance measurements - very similar to mine. > > > > > > > > > > Priya. > > > > > > > > > > --- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Jobe" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Priya, > > > > > > Resistances were taken on a nice working 2246 with a Fluke 110 which does not have enough voltage to forward bias the diodes. > > > > > > I tried this Fluke meter on some standard diodes and some Schottky diodes and there was not much of a connection either way, just a little leakage depending on the polarity > > > > > > There is not much difference from your readings, and no obvious indication of a problem on any of the voltages. > > > > > > I will add my readings on to the end of your list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > +5:100 ?? - mine is 99 ohm - 106 ohm > > > > > > > -5:50 ?? - mine is 41 ohm - 53 ohm > > > > > > > -15:500 ?? - mine is 750 ohm - 590 ohm > > > > > > > +15:400 ?? - mine is 583 ohm - 483 ohm > > > > > > > +7.5:150 ?? - mine is 134 ohm - 152 ohm > > > > > > > -7.5:180 ?? - mine is 143 ohm - 150 ohm > > > > > > > +58: 7500 ?? - mine is almost open ( 8M ohm) - 2.5 M ohm? impossible to get a good reading > > > > > > > +130: 9000 ?? - mine is 10,000 - 9000 ohm > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess the next step is to see what happens when you put the scope back together tonight. > > > > > > tom jobe... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: Mover > > > > > > To: TekScopes@... > > > > > > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 12:20 PM > > > > > > Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 2246 Mod A main board overloading the SMPS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom & Francis, > > > > > > > > > > > > I discovered what it is - the ultra cautious in me had left a 40W light bulb in series with the isolation transformer secondary providing AC line power to the scope. It was there originally to prevent further collateral damage to the scope through my repair and testing. With any load exceeding the load provided by the fan, the SMPS pulls enough current through the light bulb that the AC line power to the scope drops below the 80V required to keep the SMPS running. This shuts down the SMPS and the 40W bulb comes on as the SMPS restarts - absolutely normal behavior. I had completely forgotten about the light bulb till this afternoon when I chanced to glance at it cycling with the SMPS and then I had an AHA moment! > > > > > > > > > > > > Regardless, I did measure resistances (with a Fluke 116 - don't own a meter recommended by TEK) and here they are: > > > > > > > +5:100 ?? - mine is 99 ohm > > > > > > > -5:50 ?? - mine is 41 ohm > > > > > > > -15:500 ?? - mine is 750 ohm > > > > > > > +15:400 ?? - mine is 583 ohm > > > > > > > +7.5:150 ?? - mine is 134 ohm > > > > > > > -7.5:180 ?? - mine is 143 ohm > > > > > > > +58: 7500 ?? - mine is almost open ( 8M ohm) > > > > > > > +130: 9000 ?? - mine is 10,000 > > > > > > > > > > > > Other than the 58V resistance probably becuase my meter can't drive the diodes, my measurements looks fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > I ran it without the series light bulb and it happily drives a 10 ohm resistor from the 5V and regulation is excellent at 5.05 VDC. With the light bulb in series, it won't run anything more than the fan. Indeed, the fan is not sufficient load to test the SMPS. > > > > > > > > > > > > Believe I am ready to put the SMPS back into the scope tonight. I apologize to everyone who I misled with my earlier post on this and thanks as always for quick and thoughtful responses. You guys are great! > > > > > > > > > > > > Priya. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In TekScopes@..., "Francis" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > several things: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Tom Jobe suggested, you can do the following: > > > > > > > with the scope disconnected from the mains, check the resistances > > > > > > > between ground and each supply. As Tek says, use an ohmeter that is able to forward bias diodes, usually a low range. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Values are > > > > > > > +5:100 ?? > > > > > > > -5:50 ?? > > > > > > > -15:500 ?? > > > > > > > +15:400 ?? > > > > > > > +7.5:150 ?? > > > > > > > -7.5:180 ?? > > > > > > > +58: 7500 ?? > > > > > > > +130: 9000 ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > these values are taken from a 2245A manual, but should not be > > > > > > > very different on your scope. If one is significantly lower, > > > > > > > check the related circuitry. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The fan is not a sufficient load for the SMPS. When I make > > > > > > > my trials, I use 2 4.7 ?? paralleled on the +5v. > > > > > > > If the supply still ticks, try to disconnect the crowbar protection, > > > > > > > or tie together the gate and the cathode of the SCR. Maybe some > > > > > > > overvoltage due to a dying cap can fire it. Same recommendation > > > > > > > about Q2208 (base tied to ground). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alas - if only it were that simple ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I finally fixed my SMPS and put it back into the chassis with only the main board. It runs in chirp mode - about every 1 sec there is a clicking sound - the secondary voltages rise and then something gets overloaded and the SMPS shuts down and then cycles again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I quickly disconnected power, isolated the SMPS and again verified that the SMPS is fine on its own with just the cooling fan load with a steady internal 44 VDC. No new or collateral damage thankfully. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are no obvious shorts on any of the supply lines on the main board. The issue may still very well be with the SMPS being unable to handle load even though the fan runs fine and the other voltages are fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I assume that chirp mode is a common issue with these SMPS supplies. What have others done to (1) find whether the issue is with the SMPS or with the main board and if the latter, (2) which supply line or lines is drawing too much current and how to isolate the problem further? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Priya. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
|
tektronix 318 logic analyzer probe
Hi,
I've just acquired a Tektronix 318 logic?analyzer, but it came without the pods.
It's a nice unit, and by the looks of it, it works, well it displays random logic levels on screen as no pods are plugged in.
Can I make those pods myself ?
If not, what pods do I need and where do I find them ? |
|
Re: IC programmers slightly OT
I'm partial to Advin myself. Alternatively, a decent used Data I/O programmer. Happy hunting. * REPLY SEPARATOR * On 19-Feb-13 at 10:46 Alexandre Souza - Listas wrote: Anybody familiar with the Xeltec line of programmers? Good, bad, indifferent? I see a batch of 'em all the time on Ebay, some going
for seemingly high prices. Good programers, but I'd buy Elnec Ops, I have a beeprog from Elnec :)
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Re: 2246 Mod A - no trace
When you removed the chip did any of the plated through holes loose the
plating? I think the board is up to six layers. You may have lost an internal
connection to the chip.
?
?
Tom
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:10
PM
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 2246 Mod A - no
trace
?
Priya,
Wow, I didn't know it was all channels! Check your trigger
setting, try a single shot too. maybe your focus is so far out you can't see
it. Look at it in the dark too. Check the rejection section in the trigger
area, set it for DC. Use the menu to set things to default just in case you
got into unfamiliar territory. I don't see how putting in that socket would
have done anything else barring you accidently damaged something in the
process or zapped something that is static sensitive.
Pull back for a
second. Hopefully you just overlooked something!
Nick
Nielsen
--- In TekScopes@...,
"Mover" wrote: > > Hi Nick, > > There is currently no
trace on any of the channels after installing the IC socket at U174. However,
the beam finder works as do all the menus and also the vertical time base
cursors and readouts. I suspect something with the motherboard now at or near
U174. Using your plan, I will apply an identical calibration signal to Ch2 and
Ch3 and compare what happens to the signal using my R7704 as a test scope.
More to come on this ... > > Yes, I will be careful as you say to
not blow up something else along the way! > > Priya. >
> --- In TekScopes@...,
"nielsentelecom@" wrote: > > > > Priya, > >
> > You could probably use ch3 to probe for the comparisons as a
last resort on the following. > > > > I would set up
identical conditions on both ch2 and ch1. then on ch 2 compare signal traces
starting at the input. Place the same signal on both leads(channels). Check
the U175 relay driver on ch2 and find out if any are high. You can also check
the U171/U172 if your input to the U174/U175 does not match. But they appear
to do different jobs on given pins. Probably best to test at the inputs of
U174 & U175. Then go forward till you lose identical signal. Since you
don't have U174 installed, just the socket instead, U171 may be calling for
one of the relays in the Ch1 circuit to be pulled in or activated if you
prefer. Then jumper where U174 should be on the affected driver. If as you say
the relays are all operating as they should, you should expect the ch1 and ch2
relays to all align identically. It is possible one of the relays just isn't
pulled in correctly. You can also check test point 1A (AT117 pin 7) in the ch1
circuit, and At127 pin 7 to ensure the they match once you get both
attenuators aligned the same. > > > > Don't forget, BE
CAREFUL! Don't blow up ch2!! > > > > Nick Nielsen >
> > > > > --- In TekScopes@...,
"Mover" wrote: > > > > > > Update: I soldered an IC
socket in U174 thinking that I would connect leads to it externally to
diagnose the Ch1 issue and now the trace has completely disappeared! The beam
finder works, but when I release the beam finder button, there is nothing on
the screen other than the vert and hor selection displays. The menus are all
fine and the time cursors work fine too - just no signal trace. Checked all
the voltages and they are fine. > > > > > > I assume
that I have to use another scope to trace the vertical amplifier area, but
would appreciate any tips here - if the vertical amplifier was bad, would it
not also affect the beam finder, displays and menus? > > >
> > > Priya Jakatdar. > > > > > > --- In
TekScopes@...,
"Mover" wrote: > > > > > > > > I put the scope
back together and it runs fine on Ch2, Ch3 and Ch4 including time &
frequency measurements. All secondary voltages are well within the spec range
(7.48V, -7.47V, 5.2V, -5.2V, 15.1V, -15.9V etc), so I have not made any
adjustment to the 44VDC rail to avoid calibrating the scope from scratch. Will
use it this way for now and let it run for some time to be sure nothing else
is wrong or will fail before attempting further repair. > > > >
> > > > The issue with Ch1 and voltage measurements is a
charred U174 transistor relay driver IC (Intersil 3082) that appears to have
caused the SMPS to fail in the first place. I have not replaced the chip
thinking there may be a larger issue with or around U174. The Ch1 individual
relays are all working fine (tested with a Kikusui constant-voltage
constant-current supply) and drawing 25 mA or 12 mA according to their spec.
When I do get some time later, I am thinking about validating the Shift
Register output pins of U171 that drives U174 first and then maybe installing
an IC socket rather than soldering a new U174. > > > >
> > > > I have searched the archives and not found anything
specific with respect to U174. Any thoughts or previous experience with this
will be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > I
want to thank everyone's help in getting my scope back into working condition.
I have learned a lot about my 2246 and it is mainly because of you
guys. > > > > > > > > Priya. > > >
> > > > > --- In TekScopes@...,
"Mover" wrote: > > > > > > > > > >
Tom, > > > > > > > > > > I was only able
to get enough time to assemble the SMPS into the chassis with just the main
board and it runs fine - without the 40W series bulb:). The voltages are a bit
off (5.28V, 7.46V etc) but I won't adjust anything till the proc board and the
pot boards are in and providing normal operating load. > > > >
> > > > > > That's for the weekend. More to
come. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for
taking the time to make resistance measurements - very similar to
mine. > > > > > > > > > > Priya. >
> > > > > > > > > --- In TekScopes@..., "Tom
Jobe" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >
Hi Priya, > > > > > > Resistances were taken on a nice
working 2246 with a Fluke 110 which does not have enough voltage to forward
bias the diodes. > > > > > > I tried this Fluke meter on
some standard diodes and some Schottky diodes and there was not much of a
connection either way, just a little leakage depending on the polarity >
> > > > > There is not much difference from your readings, and
no obvious indication of a problem on any of the voltages. > > >
> > > I will add my readings on to the end of your list. > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +5:100 ?? - mine is
99 ohm - 106 ohm > > > > > > > -5:50 ?? - mine is 41
ohm - 53 ohm > > > > > > > -15:500 ?? - mine is 750
ohm - 590 ohm > > > > > > > +15:400 ?? - mine is 583
ohm - 483 ohm > > > > > > > +7.5:150 ?? - mine is 134
ohm - 152 ohm > > > > > > > -7.5:180 ?? - mine is 143
ohm - 150 ohm > > > > > > > +58: 7500 ?? - mine is
almost open ( 8M ohm) - 2.5 M ohm? impossible to get a good reading >
> > > > > > +130: 9000 ?? - mine is 10,000 - 9000
ohm > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess
the next step is to see what happens when you put the scope back together
tonight. > > > > > > tom jobe... > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >
> > > > From: Mover > > > > > > To: TekScopes@...
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 12:20
PM > > > > > > Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 2246 Mod A main
board overloading the SMPS > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Tom & Francis, > > > > > > > > >
> > > I discovered what it is - the ultra cautious in me had left a
40W light bulb in series with the isolation transformer secondary providing AC
line power to the scope. It was there originally to prevent further collateral
damage to the scope through my repair and testing. With any load exceeding the
load provided by the fan, the SMPS pulls enough current through the light bulb
that the AC line power to the scope drops below the 80V required to keep the
SMPS running. This shuts down the SMPS and the 40W bulb comes on as the SMPS
restarts - absolutely normal behavior. I had completely forgotten about the
light bulb till this afternoon when I chanced to glance at it cycling with the
SMPS and then I had an AHA moment! > > > > > > >
> > > > > Regardless, I did measure resistances (with a Fluke
116 - don't own a meter recommended by TEK) and here they are: > >
> > > > > +5:100 ?? - mine is 99 ohm > > > >
> > > -5:50 ?? - mine is 41 ohm > > > > > > >
-15:500 ?? - mine is 750 ohm > > > > > > > +15:400 ??
- mine is 583 ohm > > > > > > > +7.5:150 ?? - mine is
134 ohm > > > > > > > -7.5:180 ?? - mine is 143
ohm > > > > > > > +58: 7500 ?? - mine is almost open (
8M ohm) > > > > > > > +130: 9000 ?? - mine is
10,000 > > > > > > > > > > > >
Other than the 58V resistance probably becuase my meter can't drive the
diodes, my measurements looks fine. > > > > > > >
> > > > > I ran it without the series light bulb and it happily
drives a 10 ohm resistor from the 5V and regulation is excellent at 5.05 VDC.
With the light bulb in series, it won't run anything more than the fan.
Indeed, the fan is not sufficient load to test the SMPS. > > >
> > > > > > > > > Believe I am ready to put the
SMPS back into the scope tonight. I apologize to everyone who I misled with my
earlier post on this and thanks as always for quick and thoughtful responses.
You guys are great! > > > > > > > > > >
> > Priya. > > > > > > > > > > >
> --- In TekScopes@...,
"Francis" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > several things: > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > as Tom Jobe suggested, you can do the
following: > > > > > > > with the scope disconnected
from the mains, check the resistances > > > > > > >
between ground and each supply. As Tek says, use an ohmeter that is able to
forward bias diodes, usually a low range. > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Values are > > > >
> > > +5:100 ?? > > > > > > > -5:50
?? > > > > > > > -15:500 ?? > > > >
> > > +15:400 ?? > > > > > > > +7.5:150
?? > > > > > > > -7.5:180 ?? > > > >
> > > +58: 7500 ?? > > > > > > > +130: 9000
?? > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> these values are taken from a 2245A manual, but should not be >
> > > > > > very different on your scope. If one is
significantly lower, > > > > > > > check the related
circuitry. > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > The fan is not a sufficient load for the SMPS. When I make >
> > > > > > my trials, I use 2 4.7 ?? paralleled on the +5v.
> > > > > > > If the supply still ticks, try to
disconnect the crowbar protection, > > > > > > > or
tie together the gate and the cathode of the SCR. Maybe some > >
> > > > > overvoltage due to a dying cap can fire it. Same
recommendation > > > > > > > about Q2208 (base tied
to ground). > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > --- In TekScopes@...,
"Mover" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > Alas - if only it were that simple ... > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I
finally fixed my SMPS and put it back into the chassis with only the main
board. It runs in chirp mode - about every 1 sec there is a clicking sound -
the secondary voltages rise and then something gets overloaded and the SMPS
shuts down and then cycles again. > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I quickly disconnected power,
isolated the SMPS and again verified that the SMPS is fine on its own with
just the cooling fan load with a steady internal 44 VDC. No new or collateral
damage thankfully. > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > There are no obvious shorts on any of the supply
lines on the main board. The issue may still very well be with the SMPS being
unable to handle load even though the fan runs fine and the other voltages are
fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > I assume that chirp mode is a common issue with these SMPS
supplies. What have others done to (1) find whether the issue is with the SMPS
or with the main board and if the latter, (2) which supply line or lines is
drawing too much current and how to isolate the problem further? > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > Priya. > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
|
Re: 2246 Mod A - no trace
Priya,
Wow, I didn't know it was all channels! Check your trigger setting, try a single shot too. maybe your focus is so far out you can't see it. Look at it in the dark too. Check the rejection section in the trigger area, set it for DC. Use the menu to set things to default just in case you got into unfamiliar territory. I don't see how putting in that socket would have done anything else barring you accidently damaged something in the process or zapped something that is static sensitive.
Pull back for a second. Hopefully you just overlooked something!
Nick Nielsen
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" <priya_jakatdar@...> wrote: Hi Nick,
There is currently no trace on any of the channels after installing the IC socket at U174. However, the beam finder works as do all the menus and also the vertical time base cursors and readouts. I suspect something with the motherboard now at or near U174. Using your plan, I will apply an identical calibration signal to Ch2 and Ch3 and compare what happens to the signal using my R7704 as a test scope. More to come on this ...
Yes, I will be careful as you say to not blow up something else along the way!
Priya.
--- In TekScopes@..., "nielsentelecom@" <nielsentelecom@> wrote:
Priya,
You could probably use ch3 to probe for the comparisons as a last resort on the following.
I would set up identical conditions on both ch2 and ch1. then on ch 2 compare signal traces starting at the input. Place the same signal on both leads(channels). Check the U175 relay driver on ch2 and find out if any are high. You can also check the U171/U172 if your input to the U174/U175 does not match. But they appear to do different jobs on given pins. Probably best to test at the inputs of U174 & U175. Then go forward till you lose identical signal. Since you don't have U174 installed, just the socket instead, U171 may be calling for one of the relays in the Ch1 circuit to be pulled in or activated if you prefer. Then jumper where U174 should be on the affected driver. If as you say the relays are all operating as they should, you should expect the ch1 and ch2 relays to all align identically. It is possible one of the relays just isn't pulled in correctly. You can also check test point 1A (AT117 pin 7) in the ch1 circuit, and At127 pin 7 to ensure the they match once you get both attenuators aligned the same.
Don't forget, BE CAREFUL! Don't blow up ch2!!
Nick Nielsen
--- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" <priya_jakatdar@> wrote:
Update: I soldered an IC socket in U174 thinking that I would connect leads to it externally to diagnose the Ch1 issue and now the trace has completely disappeared! The beam finder works, but when I release the beam finder button, there is nothing on the screen other than the vert and hor selection displays. The menus are all fine and the time cursors work fine too - just no signal trace. Checked all the voltages and they are fine.
I assume that I have to use another scope to trace the vertical amplifier area, but would appreciate any tips here - if the vertical amplifier was bad, would it not also affect the beam finder, displays and menus?
Priya Jakatdar.
--- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" <priya_jakatdar@> wrote:
I put the scope back together and it runs fine on Ch2, Ch3 and Ch4 including time & frequency measurements. All secondary voltages are well within the spec range (7.48V, -7.47V, 5.2V, -5.2V, 15.1V, -15.9V etc), so I have not made any adjustment to the 44VDC rail to avoid calibrating the scope from scratch. Will use it this way for now and let it run for some time to be sure nothing else is wrong or will fail before attempting further repair.
The issue with Ch1 and voltage measurements is a charred U174 transistor relay driver IC (Intersil 3082) that appears to have caused the SMPS to fail in the first place. I have not replaced the chip thinking there may be a larger issue with or around U174. The Ch1 individual relays are all working fine (tested with a Kikusui constant-voltage constant-current supply) and drawing 25 mA or 12 mA according to their spec. When I do get some time later, I am thinking about validating the Shift Register output pins of U171 that drives U174 first and then maybe installing an IC socket rather than soldering a new U174.
I have searched the archives and not found anything specific with respect to U174. Any thoughts or previous experience with this will be greatly appreciated.
I want to thank everyone's help in getting my scope back into working condition. I have learned a lot about my 2246 and it is mainly because of you guys.
Priya.
--- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" wrote:
Tom,
I was only able to get enough time to assemble the SMPS into the chassis with just the main board and it runs fine - without the 40W series bulb:). The voltages are a bit off (5.28V, 7.46V etc) but I won't adjust anything till the proc board and the pot boards are in and providing normal operating load.
That's for the weekend. More to come.
Thanks for taking the time to make resistance measurements - very similar to mine.
Priya.
--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Jobe" wrote:
Hi Priya, Resistances were taken on a nice working 2246 with a Fluke 110 which does not have enough voltage to forward bias the diodes. I tried this Fluke meter on some standard diodes and some Schottky diodes and there was not much of a connection either way, just a little leakage depending on the polarity There is not much difference from your readings, and no obvious indication of a problem on any of the voltages. I will add my readings on to the end of your list.
+5:100 ?? - mine is 99 ohm - 106 ohm -5:50 ?? - mine is 41 ohm - 53 ohm -15:500 ?? - mine is 750 ohm - 590 ohm +15:400 ?? - mine is 583 ohm - 483 ohm +7.5:150 ?? - mine is 134 ohm - 152 ohm -7.5:180 ?? - mine is 143 ohm - 150 ohm +58: 7500 ?? - mine is almost open ( 8M ohm) - 2.5 M ohm? impossible to get a good reading +130: 9000 ?? - mine is 10,000 - 9000 ohm I guess the next step is to see what happens when you put the scope back together tonight. tom jobe...
----- Original Message ----- From: Mover To: TekScopes@... Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 12:20 PM Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 2246 Mod A main board overloading the SMPS
Tom & Francis,
I discovered what it is - the ultra cautious in me had left a 40W light bulb in series with the isolation transformer secondary providing AC line power to the scope. It was there originally to prevent further collateral damage to the scope through my repair and testing. With any load exceeding the load provided by the fan, the SMPS pulls enough current through the light bulb that the AC line power to the scope drops below the 80V required to keep the SMPS running. This shuts down the SMPS and the 40W bulb comes on as the SMPS restarts - absolutely normal behavior. I had completely forgotten about the light bulb till this afternoon when I chanced to glance at it cycling with the SMPS and then I had an AHA moment!
Regardless, I did measure resistances (with a Fluke 116 - don't own a meter recommended by TEK) and here they are: > +5:100 ?? - mine is 99 ohm > -5:50 ?? - mine is 41 ohm > -15:500 ?? - mine is 750 ohm > +15:400 ?? - mine is 583 ohm > +7.5:150 ?? - mine is 134 ohm > -7.5:180 ?? - mine is 143 ohm > +58: 7500 ?? - mine is almost open ( 8M ohm) > +130: 9000 ?? - mine is 10,000
Other than the 58V resistance probably becuase my meter can't drive the diodes, my measurements looks fine.
I ran it without the series light bulb and it happily drives a 10 ohm resistor from the 5V and regulation is excellent at 5.05 VDC. With the light bulb in series, it won't run anything more than the fan. Indeed, the fan is not sufficient load to test the SMPS.
Believe I am ready to put the SMPS back into the scope tonight. I apologize to everyone who I misled with my earlier post on this and thanks as always for quick and thoughtful responses. You guys are great!
Priya.
--- In TekScopes@..., "Francis" wrote: > > Hi, > > several things: > > as Tom Jobe suggested, you can do the following: > with the scope disconnected from the mains, check the resistances > between ground and each supply. As Tek says, use an ohmeter that is able to forward bias diodes, usually a low range. > > Values are > +5:100 ?? > -5:50 ?? > -15:500 ?? > +15:400 ?? > +7.5:150 ?? > -7.5:180 ?? > +58: 7500 ?? > +130: 9000 ?? > > these values are taken from a 2245A manual, but should not be > very different on your scope. If one is significantly lower, > check the related circuitry. > > The fan is not a sufficient load for the SMPS. When I make > my trials, I use 2 4.7 ?? paralleled on the +5v. > If the supply still ticks, try to disconnect the crowbar protection, > or tie together the gate and the cathode of the SCR. Maybe some > overvoltage due to a dying cap can fire it. Same recommendation > about Q2208 (base tied to ground). > > --- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" wrote: > > > > Alas - if only it were that simple ... > > > > I finally fixed my SMPS and put it back into the chassis with only the main board. It runs in chirp mode - about every 1 sec there is a clicking sound - the secondary voltages rise and then something gets overloaded and the SMPS shuts down and then cycles again. > > > > I quickly disconnected power, isolated the SMPS and again verified that the SMPS is fine on its own with just the cooling fan load with a steady internal 44 VDC. No new or collateral damage thankfully. > > > > There are no obvious shorts on any of the supply lines on the main board. The issue may still very well be with the SMPS being unable to handle load even though the fan runs fine and the other voltages are fine. > > > > I assume that chirp mode is a common issue with these SMPS supplies. What have others done to (1) find whether the issue is with the SMPS or with the main board and if the latter, (2) which supply line or lines is drawing too much current and how to isolate the problem further? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Priya. > > >
|
Re: 2400 series of scopes -- automatic voltage measurement
The 24xx digital scopes lack any such limit because they make measurements in a completely different matter. What I wonder is why the 2247A series which *do* operate in a similar way do not have such a limit listed. If the peak detection circuit in the 2465B series is good down to the specified 10ns, then I have no idea what the 1 MHz restriction refers to. Those two specifications seem to conflict. On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:33:14 -0000, "victor_j_silva" <daejon1@...> wrote: I assume you mean a 2445A/65A/67 and 2445B/65B/67B.
I know the 24xx Digital Scopes have no such limit.
I just tried using a 1.2V sine wave and was able to measure pk-pk accurately to over 200MHz.
Maybe it depends on the signal amplitude.
--Victor
--- In TekScopes@..., Steve <steve65@...> wrote:
Looking for confirmation of my understanding of the Tek specs for automatic voltage measurement in the 2400 series scopes.
Am I right in understanding that automatic voltage measurement is spec'ed to 1MHz? And that it is not spec'ed to function accurately above 1MHz?
That's what I get from my reading of the the catalog pages and the service manual. Am I reading those documents correctly?
Thanks.
Steve
|
Re: 2400 series of scopes -- automatic voltage measurement
Are you referring to Page 1-11, Volts, Maximum sine-wave frequency?
This is very confusing because here it actually says greater than or equal to 1MHz.
--Victor
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., Steve <steve65@...> wrote: Hi Victor,
Yes, I was referring specifically to a 2456B.
TEK specifications indicate that the automatic voltage reading is good up to 1MHz. Interesting that you are seeing it function up to 200MHz.
Thanks.
Steve
On 2/18/2013 10:33 PM, victor_j_silva wrote:
I assume you mean a 2445A/65A/67 and 2445B/65B/67B.
I know the 24xx Digital Scopes have no such limit.
I just tried using a 1.2V sine wave and was able to measure pk-pk accurately to over 200MHz.
Maybe it depends on the signal amplitude.
--Victor
--- In TekScopes@..., Steve <steve65@> wrote:
Looking for confirmation of my understanding of the Tek specs for automatic voltage measurement in the 2400 series scopes.
Am I right in understanding that automatic voltage measurement is spec'ed to 1MHz? And that it is not spec'ed to function accurately above 1MHz?
That's what I get from my reading of the the catalog pages and the service manual. Am I reading those documents correctly?
Thanks.
Steve
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Re: Tek 2245A Backup Battery Exchange -- Any special steps?
Francis: ? I wanted to let you know that the battery was exactly where you suggested.? The replacement is completed with no issues, Thank You again for your help, it is appreciated. ? Chuck? W9POU
|
Re: IC programmers slightly OT
Magnus/Alexandre,
Thanks for the feedback!
Mark
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/19/2013 9:47 AM, magnustoelle wrote: Hi Mark,
I have not seen any Xeltec programmer over many years.
However, if I am allowed to make a recommendation: I can honestly recommend the products from batronix.com. I have their BX40, and it works like a charm. Oh, I can see that they are a Distributor of Xeltec - interestingly enough...
Cheers,
Magnus
--- In TekScopes@..., "Mark Wendt (Contractor)" <mark.wendt@...> wrote:
Anybody familiar with the Xeltec line of programmers? Good, bad, indifferent? I see a batch of 'em all the time on Ebay, some going for seemingly high prices.
Thanks, Mark
|