¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: A nearly working 7B80 (S/N B058022)

 

It is. I just confirmed on the physical box itself.
-ls-




"Albert" <aodiversen@...> wrote:

Hi John,
I'm not at home where I have a paper manual, but I could download the
BAMA manual here. It looks like we are talking about different things.
At page 102, figure 8-11, all 3 ICs are shown, U722, U842 and U416.
The A1 board layout is shown 3 times in the pdf and all 3 occurences
show those 3 ICs. I didn't check traces, so I don't know whether the
FP control is really connected to the IC which is labeled U722 at the
board.
Albert


Re: 549 and 543 in San Jose

 

just outta curiosity, how good are those scopes?

how does the 549 compare to the 564 storage scope? I see from tekwiki that it has a greater BW. and is the 543 similar to the the 545 or 547?

-Robby

--- In TekScopes@..., tubesnthings@... wrote:

...and I was tempted by the 7704 stuff...until I found out about the 549
;)
Bernd


In a message dated 7/17/2012 12:40:05 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
d.seiter@... writes:

I was tempted by the 549 when I was picking up the 7704A stuff today, but
decided against it. John tried to interest me in an HP 17xx scope too, but
I had to draw the line somewhere.

-Dave


____________________________________
From: tubesnthings@...
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 3:39:01 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] 549 and 543 in San Jose




scopes are taken - thanks, again, Kurt
Bernd


In a message dated 7/16/2012 2:44:18 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
sipespresso@... writes:


I have no affiliation with the seller.
_
()
-Kurt


Re: 7000 series on screen graphics question 7704A versus 7633

 


No, it doesn't look right. I have the same scope (also NOS, maybe
from the same MOD source ?) and mine looks like the first image.
IIRC, the character generator has 2 sets of adjustments, some on
the board itself (position, hight , width etc) and more adjustments
on the V-output amp where the vector is summed (and possibly on
H-output as well). I bet the lead routes make a difference too . I
also have a 7603 with a similar looking defect (it resisted my
attempts to adjust it / fix it - but it's a spare so I didn't look too hard)
You will need the serial numbers as there are serveral different versions ...
dc


17/07/2012 21:54

Thanks David, mine came from a charming lady re seller in Somerset,
one of a pair she was selling. I'm going to get David Partridge to
cast his expert eye over it shortly, it's a shame not to set it to
rights, being such an otherwise mint example. It's perfectly usable as
is, but things like that frankly bug the hell out of me ;)

--
Best Regards,
Chris Wilson.


Re: New Curve Tracer Test Fixture - Not for Vacuum Tubes, for SOT23 instead

Gordon
 

On 17/07/2012 19:56, ROLYNN PRECHTL K7DFW wrote:
Note: There is no difference among the sockets 499-P44-10 (REV.B), 499-P44-20 (REV.A) and
499-P44-00, it is the same socket which marked "499-044-00".
Thanks, missed that.

Gordon


Re: A nearly working 7B80 (S/N B058022)

Albert
 

Hi John,
At Kurt's Tekwiki you will find a 10 MB text-searchable pdf:

You can even search for U722 in the pictures!
Albert


Re: New Curve Tracer Test Fixture - Not for Vacuum Tubes, for SOT23 instead

 

What made you choose REV-B? REV-A is the most recent (2/10/06) according to the drawings. REV-B has
4/11/01 as the drawn date.

----------------------------------------------------------


From the web site.

Note: There is no difference among the sockets 499-P44-10 (REV.B), 499-P44-20 (REV.A) and
499-P44-00, it is the same socket which marked "499-044-00".


Re: A nearly working 7B80 (S/N B058022)

Albert
 

Hi John,
I'm not at home where I have a paper manual, but I could download the BAMA manual here. It looks like we are talking about different things. At page 102, figure 8-11, all 3 ICs are shown, U722, U842 and U416. The A1 board layout is shown 3 times in the pdf and all 3 occurences show those 3 ICs. I didn't check traces, so I don't know whether the FP control is really connected to the IC which is labeled U722 at the board.
Albert

>It depends on how enthusiastically the "inker" did the job. Two of my
7B80 have 7 00 >inked in the 3 blank fields, but a third one has a blank
field followed by a very big 7 >across the version fields. The intention
will be 670-4177-00 in all cases.

>John, did you receive my pictures?
>I still don't see what would be wrong in the documentation or in the
board IC labeling.

>Albert
------------------------------------

No Albert, nothing this end.
I confirm yr comment about the "big 7", mine is like that , the 7 over
writes the two (blank) white squares by a big margin

Ive spent some time tracking down where my download of the 7B80 manual
came from.(between efforts at pulling the engine out of my car, would be
nice if they made it pluggable like an IC with a socket)
Its from BAMA . if you download this and have a look it will be self
explanatory.
On page 101 the schematic says U722 for the FP cal set pot IC and etc.
On page 102 is the board drawing for above. There is NO U722 on it, but
U 841 is drawn in its place. The other two ICs are correctly designated.
The "page numbers" quoted above are what my reader says on screen ... no
actual manual page numbers appear on the scanned schematics etc for this
download.
Were you reading from a "real" TEk manual, Albert ? Whatever your case
yr manual would be better than the BAMA download one if yours give the
same IC designator on each of the drawings.
Best Rgds
John


Re: New Curve Tracer Test Fixture - Not for Vacuum Tubes, for SOT23 instead

 

I made my own out of copper tape and a proto-board. The commercial socket does look just a tad more professional.


Re: 7B92A with tunnel diodes vs. version without

Richard Solomon
 

Thank you.

Mine are all above S/N B069999, so I guess I don't get to play !!

73, Dick, W1KSZ


On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:46 AM, David <davidwhess@...> wrote:
?

The tunnel diode based 7B92A is serial number B069999 and below.

Physically if you look inside at the two trigger circuit boards, the
ones with tunnel diodes have 3 DIP packages in a row while the newer
ones without tunnel diodes have a DIP package next to an X shaped IC
or hybrid mount.



On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:09:01 -0700, Richard Solomon
<dickw1ksz@...> wrote:

>I have a few 7B92's here. How do I tell which ones have TD's in them. Is
>there
>a particular place on the board to look for them ?
>
>Tnx, Dick, W1KSZ
>
>On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Albert <aodiversen@...> wrote:
>
>> **

>>
>> Hi Raymond,
>>
>> Tried a tunnel diode based 7B92 in a 7904A/7A29, with input from a TG501
>> and internal triggering. At 2 ns and 1 ns the TG501 "pulse" stream is
>> nearly a sine wave. At 2 ns (500 MHz) the 7B92 triggers well in Norm mode
>> with signal less than 0.5 div. At 1 ns (1 GHz) it fails in Norm mode but
>> syncs in HF Sync mode (and signal far below 0.5 div). But a 7B15 performed
>> far better with a much sharper trace, so with much less jitter. Even at 1
>> GHz the 7B15 would trigger in Norm mode.
>> Checking TB performance this way in a 7904(A) is somewhat undefined since
>> it's not clear what trigger amplitude arrives at the TB. Testing in a 7104
>> would give better information.
>> The 7B92 was "as is", so other units might perform better.
>>
>> Albert
>>
>> > Tried my newly acquired SG504 (with leveling head) and saw this 7B92A
>> triggering happily at around 1.05 GHz on my 7904 + 7A19... Of course,
>> amplitude isn't shown anywhere near correctly. 7B92A is specified to
>> trigger "above 500MHz".
>> >
>> > Raymond



561A in Portland

sipespresso
 

I have no affiliation with the seller.

-Kurt


Re: 7B92A with tunnel diodes vs. version without

 

The tunnel diode based 7B92A is serial number B069999 and below.

Physically if you look inside at the two trigger circuit boards, the
ones with tunnel diodes have 3 DIP packages in a row while the newer
ones without tunnel diodes have a DIP package next to an X shaped IC
or hybrid mount.

On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:09:01 -0700, Richard Solomon
<dickw1ksz@...> wrote:

I have a few 7B92's here. How do I tell which ones have TD's in them. Is
there
a particular place on the board to look for them ?

Tnx, Dick, W1KSZ

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Albert <aodiversen@...> wrote:

**

Hi Raymond,

Tried a tunnel diode based 7B92 in a 7904A/7A29, with input from a TG501
and internal triggering. At 2 ns and 1 ns the TG501 "pulse" stream is
nearly a sine wave. At 2 ns (500 MHz) the 7B92 triggers well in Norm mode
with signal less than 0.5 div. At 1 ns (1 GHz) it fails in Norm mode but
syncs in HF Sync mode (and signal far below 0.5 div). But a 7B15 performed
far better with a much sharper trace, so with much less jitter. Even at 1
GHz the 7B15 would trigger in Norm mode.
Checking TB performance this way in a 7904(A) is somewhat undefined since
it's not clear what trigger amplitude arrives at the TB. Testing in a 7104
would give better information.
The 7B92 was "as is", so other units might perform better.

Albert

Tried my newly acquired SG504 (with leveling head) and saw this 7B92A
triggering happily at around 1.05 GHz on my 7904 + 7A19... Of course,
amplitude isn't shown anywhere near correctly. 7B92A is specified to
trigger "above 500MHz".

Raymond


Re: New Curve Tracer Test Fixture - Not for Vacuum Tubes, for SOT23 instead

charter_67
 

--- In TekScopes@..., "Dennis Tillman" <dennis@...> wrote:
For those of you that want to make one yourself the test and burn-in socket
came from WaveShare in China (sales@...). Their part number is
499-P44-10 (REV.B). The price is $27 plus $14 to mail it via USPS. I have no
affiliation with the manufacturer etc. Better pictures of the socket than I
can take can be seen at


Hi Dennis. What made you choose REV-B? REV-A is the most recent (2/10/06) according to the drawings. REV-B has 4/11/01 as the drawn date.

Cheers

Gordon


Re: 549 and 543 in San Jose

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

...and I was tempted by the 7704 stuff...until I found out about the 549? ;)
Bernd
?
In a message dated 7/17/2012 12:40:05 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, d.seiter@... writes:

I was tempted by the 549 when I was picking up the 7704A stuff today, but decided against it.? John tried to interest me in an HP 17xx scope too, but I had to draw the line somewhere.

-Dave


From: tubesnthings@...
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 3:39:01 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] 549 and 543 in San Jose

?

scopes are taken - thanks, again, Kurt
Bernd
?
In a message dated 7/16/2012 2:44:18 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, sipespresso@... writes:
?

I have no affiliation with the seller.

-Kurt


Re: 7B92A with tunnel diodes vs. version without

Richard Solomon
 

I have a few 7B92's here. How do I tell which ones have TD's in them. Is there
a particular place on the board to look for them ?

Tnx, Dick, W1KSZ


On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Albert <aodiversen@...> wrote:
?

Hi Raymond,

Tried a tunnel diode based 7B92 in a 7904A/7A29, with input from a TG501 and internal triggering. At 2 ns and 1 ns the TG501 "pulse" stream is nearly a sine wave. At 2 ns (500 MHz) the 7B92 triggers well in Norm mode with signal less than 0.5 div. At 1 ns (1 GHz) it fails in Norm mode but syncs in HF Sync mode (and signal far below 0.5 div). But a 7B15 performed far better with a much sharper trace, so with much less jitter. Even at 1 GHz the 7B15 would trigger in Norm mode.
Checking TB performance this way in a 7904(A) is somewhat undefined since it's not clear what trigger amplitude arrives at the TB. Testing in a 7104 would give better information.
The 7B92 was "as is", so other units might perform better.

Albert

> Tried my newly acquired SG504 (with leveling head) and saw this 7B92A triggering happily at around 1.05 GHz on my 7904 + 7A19... Of course, amplitude isn't shown anywhere near correctly. 7B92A is specified to trigger "above 500MHz".
>
> Raymond



Re: A nearly working 7B80 (S/N B058022)

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

>Mon Jul?16,?2012 11:35?am (PDT) . Posted by:

"Albert" aobp11

>It depends on how enthusiastically the "inker" did the job. Two of my 7B80 have 7 00 >inked in the 3 blank fields, but a third one has a blank field followed by a very big 7 >across the version fields. The intention will be 670-4177-00 in all cases.

>John, did you receive my pictures?
>I still don't see what would be wrong in the documentation or in the board IC labeling.

>Albert
------------------------------------

No Albert, nothing this end.
I confirm yr comment about the "big 7", mine is like that , the 7 over writes the two? (blank) white squares by a big margin

Ive spent some time tracking down where my download of the 7B80 manual? came from.(between efforts at pulling the engine out of? my car, would be nice if they made it pluggable like an IC with a socket)
Its from BAMA . if you download this and have a look? it will be self explanatory.
On page 101? the schematic says U722 for the FP cal set pot? IC and etc.
On page 102 is the board drawing for above. There is NO U722 on it, but U 841 is drawn in its place. The other two ICs are correctly designated.
The "page numbers" quoted above are what my reader says on screen ... no actual manual page numbers appear on the scanned schematics etc for this download.
Were you reading from a "real" TEk manual, Albert ?? Whatever your case yr manual would be better than the BAMA download one if yours give the same IC designator on each of the drawings.
Best Rgds
John




Make a backup of your TDS5xx/6xx/7xx memories

 

Hello,

Here's how to do it:

- Compile the code below (you know what to change in the code for various memories)

- Get your NI GPIB adapter and attach it to the scope
- Put NVRAM protection switch (S1002) to forward position
- Turn the scope on

- Run the PC program


Hopefully the result of this is loads and loads of firmware and NVRAM backups uploaded somewhere safe like ko4bb-site.

Have fun.

...

#include <windows.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include "ni488.h"

void GpibError(const char * msg); /* Error function declaration */

int Device = 0; /* Device unit descriptor */
int BoardIndex = 0; /* Interface Index (GPIB0=0,GPIB1=1,etc.) */

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
FILE *outfile;

int f;

unsigned long addr, straddr, endaddr, data;
unsigned short lenght;
unsigned char checksum;
unsigned char str[0x100];

int PrimaryAddress = 29; /* Primary address of the device */
int SecondaryAddress = 0x7E; /* Secondary address of the device */
unsigned char Buffer1[0x500]; /* Read buffer */


Device = ibdev( /* Create a unit descriptor handle */
BoardIndex, /* Board Index (GPIB0 = 0, GPIB1 = 1, ...) */
PrimaryAddress, /* Device primary address */
SecondaryAddress, /* Device secondary address */
T3s, /* Timeout setting (T10s = 10 seconds) */
1, /* Assert EOI line at end of write */
0); /* EOS termination mode */

if (ibsta & ERR) { /* Check for GPIB Error */
GpibError("ibdev Error");
}

ibclr(Device); /* Clear the device */
if (ibsta & ERR) {
GpibError("ibclr Error");
}

/* Attempt to read TDS544A flash ROM contents */

outfile = fopen("KRNLdump.bin","wb");
printf("&#92;n");

// straddr = 0x01000000L; /* Start of flash ROM */
// endaddr = 0x01FFFFFFL; /* End of flash ROM */

// straddr = 0x04000000L; /* Start of TDS544A NVRAM */
// endaddr = 0x0407FFFFL; /* End of TDS544A NVRAM */

straddr = 0x00000000L; /* Start of Kernel ROM */
endaddr = 0x0003FFFFL; /* End of Kernel ROM */

addr = straddr;

do {
/* Read memory message */

str[0] = 'm'; /* m - read memory command */
str[1] = 0x00; /* checksum - fill later */
str[2] = 0x00; /* message lenght MSB */
str[3] = 0x08; /* message lenght LSB */

str[4] = (unsigned char)(addr >> 24 & 0xFF);
str[5] = (unsigned char)(addr >> 16 & 0xFF);
str[6] = (unsigned char)(addr >> 8 & 0xFF);
str[7] = (unsigned char)(addr & 0xFF);

str[8] = 0x00; /* data lenght - try 16 bytes first */
str[9] = 0x00;
str[10] = 0x04;
str[11] = 0x00;

checksum = str[0] + str[2] + str[3];
for(f = 4; f < 12; f++) checksum += str[f];
str[1] = (unsigned char) checksum;

//printf("&#92;nSending:&#92;n");
//for(f = 0; f < 12; f++) printf("%02X ", str[f]);
ibwrt(Device, str, 12); /* Send */
if (ibsta & ERR) GpibError("ibwrt Error");

/* Read Acknowledge (plus-sign msg) */
ibrd(Device, Buffer1, 1); /* Read up to x bytes from the device */
if (ibsta & ERR) GpibError("ibrd Error");
//printf("&#92;nAck reveiced:&#92;n");
//for(f = 0; f < 1; f++) printf("%02X ", Buffer1[f]);

/* Read reply message */
ibrd(Device, Buffer1, 0x404); /* Read up to x bytes from the device */
if (ibsta & ERR) GpibError("ibrd Error");
//printf("&#92;nReceived:&#92;n");
//for(f = 0; f < 0x404; f++) printf("%02X ", Buffer1[f]);

/* Save buffer contents */
for(f = 4; f < 0x404; f++)
{
fputc(Buffer1[f], outfile);
}

/* Send Acknowledgement (plus-sign msg) */
str[0] = '+';
ibwrt(Device, str, 1); /* Send */
if (ibsta & ERR) GpibError("ibwrt Error");

addr += 0x400;

} while(addr <= endaddr);

fclose(outfile);

ibonl(Device, 0); /* Take the device offline */
if (ibsta & ERR) GpibError("ibonl Error");

system("PAUSE");
}


void GpibError(const char *msg) {

printf("%s&#92;n", msg);

printf("ibsta = 0x%x <", ibsta);
if (ibsta & ERR ) printf(" ERR");
if (ibsta & TIMO) printf(" TIMO");
if (ibsta & END ) printf(" END");
if (ibsta & SRQI) printf(" SRQI");
if (ibsta & RQS ) printf(" RQS");
if (ibsta & CMPL) printf(" CMPL");
if (ibsta & LOK ) printf(" LOK");
if (ibsta & REM ) printf(" REM");
if (ibsta & CIC ) printf(" CIC");
if (ibsta & ATN ) printf(" ATN");
if (ibsta & TACS) printf(" TACS");
if (ibsta & LACS) printf(" LACS");
if (ibsta & DTAS) printf(" DTAS");
if (ibsta & DCAS) printf(" DCAS");
printf (" >&#92;n");

printf ("Iberr() = %d", iberr);
if (iberr == EDVR) printf(" EDVR <Driver error>&#92;n");
if (iberr == ECIC) printf(" ECIC <Not Controller-In-Charge>&#92;n");
if (iberr == ENOL) printf(" ENOL <No Listener>&#92;n");
if (iberr == EADR) printf(" EADR <Address error>&#92;n");
if (iberr == EARG) printf(" EARG <Invalid argument>&#92;n");
if (iberr == ESAC) printf(" ESAC <Not System Controller>&#92;n");
if (iberr == EABO) printf(" EABO <Operation aborted>&#92;n");
if (iberr == ENEB) printf(" ENEB <No GPIB board>&#92;n");
if (iberr == EOIP) printf(" EOIP <Async I/O in progress>&#92;n");
if (iberr == ECAP) printf(" ECAP <No capability>&#92;n");
if (iberr == EFSO) printf(" EFSO <File system error>&#92;n");
if (iberr == EBUS) printf(" EBUS <Command error>&#92;n");
if (iberr == ESTB) printf(" ESTB <Status byte lost>&#92;n");
if (iberr == ESRQ) printf(" ESRQ <SRQ stuck on>&#92;n");
if (iberr == ETAB) printf(" ETAB <Table Overflow>&#92;n");
if (iberr == ELCK) printf(" ELCK <Lock error>&#92;n");
if (iberr == EARM) printf(" EARM <Ibnotify rearm error>&#92;n");
if (iberr == EHDL) printf(" EHDL <Invalid Handle>&#92;n");
if (iberr == EWIP) printf(" EWIP <Wait already in progress>&#92;n");
if (iberr == ERST) printf(" ERST <Notification cancelled due to reset>&#92;n");
if (iberr == EPWR) printf(" EPWR <Power error>&#92;n");

printf("Ibcnt() = %u&#92;n", ibcnt);
printf("&#92;n");

/* Call ibonl to take the device and interface offline */
//ibonl(Device, 0);

//system("PAUSE");
//exit(1);
}


Re: PG-506 Calibration

 

On further examination, I think I found the reason.

The negative pulse edge of the high amplitude output develops
considerable bowing above about 65 volts. When it is trimmed for a
maximum output of 5.2 volts into 50 ohms, the maximum output is 64
volts into a high impedance load. The specifications require an
output of 60 volts or greater unterminated and 5 volts or greater into
50 ohms.

On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 03:43:22 -0000, "Patrick Wong" <patwong3@...>
wrote:

Hi David,

Congratulations on restoring proper operation to your unit.

Since a spec is the high amplitude output is adjustable up to > 5V into 50 ohms, I suppose that is the reason that the adjustment procedure has you setting the max output at 5.2V, giving you 4% over-range.

If you are asking what is the utility of the high amplitude output, there are at least a couple of uses in the analog 24xx scope calibration procedure:

1. CAL 06 - Vertical Transient Response, where the high amplitude output powers a tunnel diode pulser. A maximum voltage setting is required from the high amplitude output here.

2. Adjustment of CH1 and CH2 input capacitance, although in this case it looks like only 300 - 600 mV signal is required.

Patrick Wong AK6C

--- In TekScopes@..., David <davidwhess@...> wrote:

...My question concerns the high amplitude output calibration. Why is it
even adjustable via R790? The output level has no important
application that I can see so why bother adjusting it to 5.2 volts
into a 50 ohm load?


Re: 7000 series on screen graphics question 7704A versus 7633

 

No, it doesn't look right. I have the same scope (also NOS, maybe from the same MOD source ?) and mine looks like the first image.

IIRC, the character generator has 2 sets of adjustments, some on the board itself (position, hight , width etc) and more adjustments on the V-output amp where the vector is summed (and possibly on H-output as well). I bet the lead routes make a difference too :-) . I also have a 7603 with a similar looking defect (it resisted my attempts to adjust it / fix it - but it's a spare so I didn't look too hard)

You will need the serial numbers as there are serveral different versions ...

dc

--- In TekScopes@..., Chris Wilson <chris@...> wrote:



16/07/2012 21:06

Thanks for the replies re this issue. Whilst I agree the "hand drawn"
quality is somewhat charming my old eyesight isn't what it was and I
have to peer at the screen to work them out sometimes. I am convinced
there's now something not quite right about this. The numerals /
letters also waver very slightly, but only horizontally. I have been
offered the display board from a breaker 7704A, is it safe to plug it
in and see what happens, or is it not that simple? Thanks gentlemen!

--
Best Regards,
Chris Wilson.
mailto: chris@...


Re: SC504 HV

Mark Wendt
 

Jerry,

I'm thinking along those lines too. Also, I noticed a bad zener diode, VR1490. Forward voltage curve looks good, but no reverse voltage curve? Wonder if someone previous to me put in a regular diode. Very strange. This thing was hacked on quite a bit before I got it, so it's definitely got it's issues. Not the first component on this guy I've had to replace because it was the wrong part.

Definitely the SC504 from hell... ;-)

Mark

On 07/17/2012 08:42 AM, jerry massengale wrote:


Mark,

It very well could be the multiplier. If you go ahead and disconnect the multiplier input, it may run okay.

Jerry Massengale



-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Wendt <mark.wendt@...>
To: TekScopes <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Tue, Jul 17, 2012 5:52 am
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] SC504 HV

Jim,

Well, I was incorrect this time around. Q1380 and Q1381 were both ok,
but the fuse did blow. I've got replacements for Q1380, Q1381 and Q1378.
I'll put the unit back together, after I figure out where the short is,
and drop the lead from the transformer to the multiplier and see what
happens.

Mark

On 07/16/2012 04:49 PM, Jim Popwell Jr wrote:
Hi Mark,
same symptoms as mine¡­. drop the connection to the hv multiplier
block, one wire from t1475, right at the block.
replace Q1380 and check Q1378 and Q1381,be careful , these
transistors have non standard pin outs.

replace the fuse,, try again¡­..if it runs¡­.. the block is probabbly
breaking down under hv. this load reflects back on the transistors¡­..they overheat and go into thermal runaway, short and bye bye¡­..

i've replaced three of the blocks, 2 sc504's 1 sc503¡­.
they are hard to find¡­.

but the scope is worth it¡­.
jim



On Jul 16, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Mark Wendt wrote:


Jim,

The current problem with this guy is something is drawing so much power
it causes Q1380 on the main board to blow. Q1381 is okay. When Q1380
goes, it also takes F3488 with it.

On 07/16/2012 10:31 AM, Jim Popwell Jr wrote:

what's up mark? I have an sc504 that i had problem with.
mine turned out to be the hv multiplier.
jim



Re: SC504 HV

 

Mark,

It very well could be the multiplier. If you go ahead and disconnect the multiplier input, it may run okay.

Jerry Massengale



-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Wendt
To: TekScopes
Sent: Tue, Jul 17, 2012 5:52 am
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] SC504 HV

?
Jim,

Well, I was incorrect this time around. Q1380 and Q1381 were both ok,
but the fuse did blow. I've got replacements for Q1380, Q1381 and Q1378.
I'll put the unit back together, after I figure out where the short is,
and drop the lead from the transformer to the multiplier and see what
happens.

Mark

On 07/16/2012 04:49 PM, Jim Popwell Jr wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> same symptoms as mine¡­. drop the connection to the hv multiplier block, one wire from t1475, right at the block.
> replace Q1380 and check Q1378 and Q1381,be careful , these transistors have non standard pin outs.
>
> replace the fuse,, try again¡­..if it runs¡­.. the block is probabbly breaking down under hv. this load reflects back on the transistors¡­..they overheat and go into thermal runaway, short and bye bye¡­..
>
> i've replaced three of the blocks, 2 sc504's 1 sc503¡­.
> they are hard to find¡­.
>
> but the scope is worth it¡­.
> jim
>
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Mark Wendt wrote:
>
>
>> Jim,
>>
>> The current problem with this guy is something is drawing so much power
>> it causes Q1380 on the main board to blow. Q1381 is okay. When Q1380
>> goes, it also takes F3488 with it.
>>
>> On 07/16/2012 10:31 AM, Jim Popwell Jr wrote:
>>
>>> what's up mark? I have an sc504 that i had problem with.
>>> mine turned out to be the hv multiplier.
>>> jim
>>>