¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: A nearly working 7B80 (S/N B058022)


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

>Mon Jul?16,?2012 11:35?am (PDT) . Posted by:

"Albert" aobp11

>It depends on how enthusiastically the "inker" did the job. Two of my 7B80 have 7 00 >inked in the 3 blank fields, but a third one has a blank field followed by a very big 7 >across the version fields. The intention will be 670-4177-00 in all cases.

>John, did you receive my pictures?
>I still don't see what would be wrong in the documentation or in the board IC labeling.

>Albert
------------------------------------

No Albert, nothing this end.
I confirm yr comment about the "big 7", mine is like that , the 7 over writes the two? (blank) white squares by a big margin

Ive spent some time tracking down where my download of the 7B80 manual? came from.(between efforts at pulling the engine out of? my car, would be nice if they made it pluggable like an IC with a socket)
Its from BAMA . if you download this and have a look? it will be self explanatory.
On page 101? the schematic says U722 for the FP cal set pot? IC and etc.
On page 102 is the board drawing for above. There is NO U722 on it, but U 841 is drawn in its place. The other two ICs are correctly designated.
The "page numbers" quoted above are what my reader says on screen ... no actual manual page numbers appear on the scanned schematics etc for this download.
Were you reading from a "real" TEk manual, Albert ?? Whatever your case yr manual would be better than the BAMA download one if yours give the same IC designator on each of the drawings.
Best Rgds
John



Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.