Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- TekScopes
- Messages
Search
Burned diode on CRT driver board CSA803A
Dear all,
The screen of my CSA803A developed a problem. It showes flyback lines, low intensity and I could not get it calibrated properly. The size of the picture, focus and convergence are o.k.. After removing the CRT driver board A8 (671-1027-01), it turned out that a (zener?) diode is completely burned and also a 100uF/50V elco did not look healthy. This diode is immediately below the metal box shielding the flyback transformer and alongside what seems to be a very big tantalum elco. Any help in finding the type of this diode is very much appreciated! Kind regards, Gerard |
Re: Looking for 067-0521-01
Ditto. I found a TU-7 on ebay for a reasonable price on ebay awhile back
after searching for several years. DaveD KC0WJN On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 07:47 Eric Boyle via groups.io <k0elb= [email protected]> wrote: Just keep an eye out on eBay for them, I bought a 1M1 for $40 plus |
Re: Tek T-130 LC - add mains/EMC filter or not?
The130 uses two low frequency oscillators, 100..150 kHz. No modern line filter works below the FCC, or other minimum frequency.
The instrument is not affected by incoming EMI nor creates conducted EMI. I would forget the filter and just install a plain IEC recepticle Jon |
Tek T-130 LC - add mains/EMC filter or not?
As my Tek 130 has lost its NEMA 5-15 inlet, and been butchered to use an IEC inlet.
I'm tidying up the rear panel and adding a small anodised plate to cover theunsightly square-peg-in-round-hole issue, but/and I have the option to either: (a) Use an integrated IEC filter (e.g. a 1A Schaffner), or, (b) Add some basic XY filtering across a non-filtered IEC, or, (c) Add a chassis mount power filter. (a) is neatest but needs further minor chassis butchering, (b) very easy, and (c) doable but less original. Before I consume any cycles investigating, do people here think I need to consider adding filtering to this particular instrument? |
Re: Looking for 067-0521-01
On 4 Jan 2025 9:25 pm, John Williams wrote:
I have not seen the history of these fixtures, the TU-7, 1M1, and 067-0521-01. I would like to believe the products developed out of in-house test fixtures used to initially calibrate new units, or in repair to test customers oscilloscopes before shipping them back.I would think that very possible. HP developed a three-piece VTVM calibration system for use in the factory and by field techs. The calibration generator was originally assigned a five digit specification number (a system used in-house) but later released to the public in the catalog with a conventional three-digit plus one letter model number. -- Dale H. Cook, GR/HP/Tek Collector, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA |
Re: Looking for 067-0521-01
I have not seen the history of these fixtures, the TU-7, 1M1, and 067-0521-01. I would like to believe the products developed out of in-house test fixtures used to initially calibrate new units, or in repair to test customers oscilloscopes before shipping them back. If anyone has some information on this, I would appreciate hearing about it.
|
Re: 7904 strange problems
I started looking at the vertical interface board and how the 7A18s could not work here while 7A26s are fine, then took some wild goose chases that were dead ends. I decided to make sure it was the 7904 and not the 78A18s again. I went to try them in another 7904 - one that I had fixed previously. I fired it up and it immediately went crazy due to a HV problem inside the PS unit. Not due to the 7A18s, but plain old HV breakdown I think because it's been sitting in the garage by the front doors for a long time, in the damp and cold. I never had one bit of HV trouble on this one or the others through the summer during all the repairs. So, I'm down one unit again. This is why I need so many mainframes, just to be sure of some being usable.
Anyway, I tried again with another unit that fired up OK, and the 7A18s worked, so the problem was this particular 7904, but still a mystery. After much more fooling around with it, I finally found there was no +50V supply ONLY on the plug-in connectors. The +50 was all over the place, and in fact is distributed from the main interface to everything else, so this was very unusual. There are no filter chokes or resistors or anything else in series to the connectors. Long story short, the connection failed at the lead and plated through hole at the plus end of the big Ta bypass capacitor for that supply. Either I or someone else long ago had pulled that cap to check or replace it, and the bond to the inner layer run that apparently feeds only the plug-in connectors broke down on re-soldering, unbeknownst to me. I believe this is a four-layer board, which always has potential grief on soldering difficult parts or locations. This looked very bad, the kind of thing that can make it a junker due to having to rip everything apart so far down just to figure it out and repair the problem. This is the worst part of the whole scope, accessibility-wise. After some difficult measurements I found that the connectors were all still tied to each other at least, so I just had to go around the broken hole to re-hook to +50V and the cap lead, without having to take everything apart. I managed to tack onto the connector that comes right from the supply (a sure thing), then to the cap and then the pin 19 on the right vertical, and voila, back in business. I proofed it with the 7A18s, all good apparently. So now it all seems to work with all slots and plugs so far. That crashing when the 5V light is unloaded is still there - a strange one but maybe something also related to the main interface. I checked to make sure it wasn't shorted to the regular +5V - it's OK there. Next is to figure out the return path(s). I first thought I need to check all the mods that are supposed to be done in the PS, but remembered that I had worked on it extensively and almost certainly did all those already, before shelving it and later finally finding the bad HV multiplier last week. It is getting close, and I think I'll have it figured out soon. Once I get this one done, I'll have to fix the other one that just crapped out. It seems like I always have at least one that's busted - it's hard to keep up. Ed |
Re: Adapter PCBs for 148-003x-00 relay replacement
I'd like to have some of those boards. I have two 7A13s and would like to replace all the relays. I also have a 7A12 which uses 8 of them.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
In addition I need two of the "polarized" relays (148-0063-00). I cobbled up something out of two small relays that worked but getting two small relays in the small compartment is challenging. Please let me know. Thanks, Barry - N4BUQ ----- Original Message -----
From: "w.m.d.koch via groups.io" <w.m.d.koch@...> Hello all, |
Re: odd connectors on an 11801B
They operate a test equipment calibration service and sales from a
brick and mortar so it's a step up from an ebay seller but yes that price is still absurd for what it is. What drives me nuts is that they are experts so they should know this isn't the conventional version of 1M and they think it's part of 1T which it obviously is not. The original listing I shared was $397.00 with about $120 for shipping. Which is closer to sanity. I am unclear on how they ended up making two listings for the same item. On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 5:10?PM John Williams via groups.io <books4you4@...> wrote:
|
Re: Adapter PCBs for 148-003x-00 relay replacement
On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 08:02 AM, <w.m.d.koch@...> wrote:
I will not need all 330 PCBs, maybe 15 to 20. Therefore, I am willing to sellI'm certainly interested, at least in the PCB. I've actually been having this same battle with a 7A13 this last week, and was getting read to ask the list if anyone had published a PCB adapter since Tom Ford's isn't available. I think I have at least two that are causing different problems, but hate to cut into them for cleaning without a backup plan in place. Some of the relay alternatives noted in the archives are also obsolete, and I don't think any of them are rated to the original 7A13 spec of 500 V (though I may be interpreting that wrongly). thanks, Adam |
3 photos uploaded
#photo-notice
Group Notification
The following photos have been uploaded to the Tek 148-003x-00 relay replacement ( /g/TekScopes/album?id=299851 ) photo album of the [email protected] group.
* TEK_Relay_Adapter_PCB.png ( /g/TekScopes/photofromactivity?id=3872576 ) * TEK_Relay_Adapter_PCB_Concept1.png ( /g/TekScopes/photofromactivity?id=3872577 ) * TEK_Relay_Adapter_PCB_Concept1_Section.png ( /g/TekScopes/photofromactivity?id=3872578 ) *By:* w.m.d.koch@... |
Re: Adapter PCBs for 148-003x-00 relay replacement
Hello again,
after sending the message I saw that I forgot the most crucial part in my BOM. 1x Relay (IM06TS) 1x Diode Array (BAS40DW-04) 0.1x Pin Header (W+P 952-09-080-2 cut into 10 pieces) 1x SMD Resistor 0603 1.8kOhm 1x SMD LED 0603 yellow now the BOM should be complete Best regards, Wolfgang |
Adapter PCBs for 148-003x-00 relay replacement
Hello all,
after quite a few years of absence from this group and from my trusty 7000-series equipment, I am back. The reason is quite obvious. I have a special measurement job which needs my 7A13. As expected, after almost 10 years of sitting around my 7A13 has quite a few issues, but this is a story on its own. As the subject already tells all the relays within the 7A13 have gone bad. Some seemed to work fine, but on closer inspection every relay has its own problems. Mostly contact resistance of the relays is highly unstable. Sometime you can get the relay down to 100mOhm, sometimes the same contact has up to 10 Ohm. Of course, I tried all the recommended reviving techniques like repeated switching at high frequency under load, etc. but nothing really helped. I remember that I replaced 2 of the relays already 10 years ago by a self-made free-floating solution to fit a new relay into the old socket. This was quite tedious and I don't want to repeat the same thing again. Leave alone the fact that this free-floating solution might not be capable of providing the right HF and Isolation performance. By searching for a better solution in this group I saw the solution of Tom Ford back in 2019. (/g/TekScopes/album?id=91736) Unfortunately, he didn't provide any design data and he seems to be offline since then. Therefore, I went to action and designed my own little adapter PCB. And I will also try to document my work as good as possible, to give anyone else enough information to do this on his own. Related pictures can be found here and maybe on my GibHub. /g/TekScopes/album?id=299851 My first Idea was to replace the internals of the original TEK relays with a modern relay with the original TEK Housing still in place. Therefore, the PCB had to be so small to fit inside the original housing and connect to the relay and the header pins. In addition to the relay there also should be a small bridge rectifier to get rid of the polarity issue most modern relays have (most modern relays are polarized) and optional a little SMD LED to see if the relay is activated. As the space within the relay is really tiny, I came up with the idea of using a 2layer Flex PCB which would be bent and hold the relay, a bridge rectifier and an LED + resistor. This concept (concept 1) looked really good but I had quite a few problems: 1. Crosstalk between channels and isolation between open contacts was not that good because of relatively long tracks in the flat flex running in parallel. 2. Flux residue between the flat flex and the header caused leakage which cause "enormous" leakage currents. Not the required +/-0.2nA more the +/-15nA or even more. 3. Due to the tight space within the relay the bending radius of the flat flex was quite tight and only in the range of 1-1.5mm. This caused on some trials problems with broken tracks. All in all, the ideas sounded great but the realization was not the great at all. For my next concept (concept2) I reverted back to the idea of Tom Ford and created my own little adapter PCB for both needed relay types used in the 7A13. At the moment this is an unproven design as the relays are still on back order and I'm waiting for the distributor to dispatch my order. For the relay I did a longer market study to find the best fitting relay. In the end I decided to use the AXICOM IM06TS which is really tiny and still provides relatively good switching and HF performance. The footprint of the relay is a little issue as the row spacing between the pins is only 5.08mm. This makes the pads slightly interfere with the through hole pads of the socket header. To still accommodate the socket header and the relay on the same PCB without interfering I decided that the pins of the relay need to be bent outwards a little (~.7mm per side). This is not a really nice solution but I assume it will work fine. If the socket header would have been available in a SMT version the use of a SMT relay would have made everything a lot easier. I presume Tom Ford used the BAS3007 as bridge rectifier. Unfortunately, this part was not available at my favorite distributor. Thus, I selected the BAS40DW-04 which is not exactly a bridge rectifier, but it can be connected as one while still being really tiny. As I already wrote I also added a small surface mount LED together with a resistor to the PCB because I experienced on my unit some issues with the Cam-Switches which could have been easily debugged if there had been a little indicator in place. All in all, the BOM for a 148-0034-00 relay replacement looks like this, for the 148-0035-00 it is basically the same, you only need to remove some pins from the pin header rows. 1x Relay (IM06TS) 0.1x Pin Header (W+P 952-09-080-2 cut into 10 pieces) 1x SMD Resistor 0603 1.8kOhm 1x SMD LED 0603 yellow The resulting PCB is measuring 8 x 14.5mm and is still smaller than the original relay (8.5 x 16mm). My favorite Chinese PCB manufacturer charges me the same no matter if the PCB is 8x14.5mm or 100x100mm. Therefore, I decided to make my own custom panel which utilizes the 100x100mm as good as possible. Now I have 5 panels of 66PCBs each lying next to me waiting for assembly. Each PCB holds 36 148-0034-00 compatible PCBs and 30 148-0035-00 compatible PCBs. As already stated above I was not able to do any tests, but I will definitely do tests as soon as I have some relay. As soon as my concept of the PCB is tested and proven good, I will give you all a follow up on the status and will also publish the design data in case you want to replicate or improve my design. I will not need all 330 PCBs, maybe 15 to 20. Therefore, I am willing to sell these to anyone interested in getting some relay replacements. As I also ordered a solder paste stencil I will wait how big the interesst in these PCB is before i start populating a whole panel. I think it would be the easiest if I sell these PCBs with the SMT parts already soldered on. Best regards, Wolfgang |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss