¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Reverse part lockups

 

I am of the minority opinion here. The file is linear. You grab the scroll bar and scroll to where you need to be. For me it's quick.

I'm just waiting for someone to post an OCR'd/searchable file. I would like to copy and paste a couple of pages and see how well it matches the RPR. Believe me, I tried different tools and the accuracy was absolutely awful. My opinion is that a false search is worse than no search, hence the lack of OCR. I don't think microfiched 132 column computer printout works all that well for this purpose.

Tektronix gave the museum a release. I personally spent 80+ hours scanning these documents and put a lot of care into them. I have an OCR version of the 670 RPR. Here's what the part numbers look like when I copy and paste to see what's really there..
670-0070-01
67o-oo71-00
67(R)07~:.:oo
670-0073-00
:67(R)07S~tr

A full search of this document is taking a very long time and it will never find 670-0071-00. Your mileage may vary. I chose to use the scroll bar as it is faster and accurate. Somebody prove me wrong. I'd like to know what tool you used that gave accurate results.

Dave


Re: 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

David Collier
 

Thanks all for advice. Yes would love to get a 500-series TEK! A 535 (?) in particular, just before the multi-tubed Y amp version.
Forgot to mention I have TEK TAS465; HP1640A and Hantek 200MHz digital available as test gear.
Didn't see a 'reply' icon previously, no idea why not.
Valves (tubes) keep you warm in the winter.
Regards


Re: Strange Tek2440 issue

 

Hey Vince,

My bet would be that if you go back to the 5VD supply, you'll find that
C455 and/or C262 are shot. CR354 is also a suspect, but the bulk caps on
the 5VD supply are the primaries. If you can find a way to look at the
supply before L256, I betcha you're going to find it all jaggy and
disgusting.
If you have a way to measure the two capacitors, that'd work too. Assuming
F269 is not soldered in, you can pretty much isolate the two capacitors by
popping it out.

Good luck,
Siggi

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 6:23 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:

Yep, I have a 2430A and a couple of 11402s. I used the 2430A.

I checked the + and -5 and the + and -15 volt rails. Sure enough, the
+5 volt rail drops exactly 1 volt while it's happening.

I'm thinking, would piggybacking another 5 volt source on that rail
isolate if it's the power supply or something else?

Thanks!
Vince.


On 08/31/2020 05:09 PM, Siggi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 2:04 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:

Acquisition stopped, doesn't happen. I can go all the way to 2ns/div.

Normal trigger but trigger set to +or- 90v (not triggering), it happens.

Single, doesn't happen, can go all the way to 2ns/div, can even trigger
it (in single) and it doesn't happen. The probe was hooked to the
calibrator for the triggers. Normally doesn't matter if there's a
signal there or not.
Interesting. I'd look at the power supplies, should be easy enough to see
what's happening as this is reproducible. Do you have a second digital or
storage scope to look at what's happening on the power rails?
The only difference between single shot and run without trigger is that
the
single shot capture has a very limited duration. Maybe the problem is
that
a power rail is marginal, and so gets dragged down when the CCDs &
capture
clock keep running for a while.
Once you start capturing the CCDs start storing (and discarding) the
signal, waiting for a trigger.


--
K8ZW




Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:03 PM, zenith5106 wrote:


Yes absolutely, it's the same one. Off course I had to unlock it first but
reference to VintageTek is still s?there.
I use an old Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro and bookmarking isn't that much work, it may
have taken me less than 30 minutes.
Hi H?kan,
Thanks for allowing me to look into your file. I don't think both are the same scan. I'll PM you re. this.
Re. bookmarking: You're using it to create a TOC, which can be as limited or extensive as you want. I like your choice. A search function after OCR'ing provides functionality a bit like a cross reference. Every search takes the role of an entry into an xref-table, which can be many thousands. In this document it would e.g. allow finding the Tek number for a particular JEDEC transistor, like a 2N4275. Can be very handy if a JEDEC-to-Tek list isn't available.
Unfortunately, I found both your and my OCR result lacking, as expected and mentioned by others in this thread.

Raymond

Raymond


Re: Strange Tek2440 issue

 

Yep, I have a 2430A and a couple of 11402s. I used the 2430A.

I checked the + and -5 and the + and -15 volt rails. Sure enough, the +5 volt rail drops exactly 1 volt while it's happening.

I'm thinking, would piggybacking another 5 volt source on that rail isolate if it's the power supply or something else?

Thanks!
Vince.

On 08/31/2020 05:09 PM, Siggi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 2:04 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:

Acquisition stopped, doesn't happen. I can go all the way to 2ns/div.

Normal trigger but trigger set to +or- 90v (not triggering), it happens.

Single, doesn't happen, can go all the way to 2ns/div, can even trigger
it (in single) and it doesn't happen. The probe was hooked to the
calibrator for the triggers. Normally doesn't matter if there's a
signal there or not.
Interesting. I'd look at the power supplies, should be easy enough to see
what's happening as this is reproducible. Do you have a second digital or
storage scope to look at what's happening on the power rails?
The only difference between single shot and run without trigger is that the
single shot capture has a very limited duration. Maybe the problem is that
a power rail is marginal, and so gets dragged down when the CCDs & capture
clock keep running for a while.
Once you start capturing the CCDs start storing (and discarding) the
signal, waiting for a trigger.

--
K8ZW


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:03 PM, zenith5106 wrote:


If you want to have a look at it
Got it, H?kan.

Raymond


Re: Strange Tek2440 issue

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 2:04 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:

Acquisition stopped, doesn't happen. I can go all the way to 2ns/div.

Normal trigger but trigger set to +or- 90v (not triggering), it happens.

Single, doesn't happen, can go all the way to 2ns/div, can even trigger
it (in single) and it doesn't happen. The probe was hooked to the
calibrator for the triggers. Normally doesn't matter if there's a
signal there or not.
Interesting. I'd look at the power supplies, should be easy enough to see
what's happening as this is reproducible. Do you have a second digital or
storage scope to look at what's happening on the power rails?
The only difference between single shot and run without trigger is that the
single shot capture has a very limited duration. Maybe the problem is that
a power rail is marginal, and so gets dragged down when the CCDs & capture
clock keep running for a while.
Once you start capturing the CCDs start storing (and discarding) the
signal, waiting for a trigger.


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:14 PM, Raymond Domp Frank wrote:


The 151 file I downloaded was 243 MB and locked. Was yours smaller or did you
reduce the size that much? And AFAIK bookmarking is done manually. With the
file being 762 pages that's a lot of work!
Are we talking about the same thing?
Yes absolutely, it's the same one. Off course I had to unlock it first but reference to VintageTek is still s?there.
I use an old Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro and bookmarking isn't that much work, it may have taken me less than 30 minutes.
Then again it's only bookmarked every 50'th P/N but it allows you to find a number close to the one you
need and then scroll only a few pages. For searching to be efficient you have to be very sure that all pages
was correctly OCR'ed and that there were no misses.
If you want to have a look at it it's here for a short while: www.hakanh.com/dl/temp/RPR151.pdf

/H?kan


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:01 PM, zenith5106 wrote:


I didn't make a complete new version, I just OCR'ed and bookmarked the one
available on the Wiki.
Hi H?kan,
The 151 file I downloaded was 243 MB and locked. Was yours smaller or did you reduce the size that much? And AFAIK bookmarking is done manually. With the file being 762 pages that's a lot of work!
Are we talking about the same thing?

Raymond


Re: 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

 

It might be possible to power a 1S1 from an IO-14 scope but IMO it's deep into "not worth the effort" territory. Do it right and get a Tek mainframe.

The 1S1 is a fine sampling system but be aware that it contains a number of different types of tunnel diode which are not known for reliability. Plus it's easy to burn out the sampling diodes. Expect some serious troubleshooting before it's working. You'll need to build or buy a fast-rise pulser to do some of the common adjustments.

HTH,
Dave Wise
________________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Colin Herbert via groups.io <colingherbert@...>
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 10:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

Hi,
I have a copy of the IO-14 scope schematic as 4 gif files. I could email it to you if you are interested, but I don't think it would be easy (or useful) to try to connect it to a 1S1. You really need a 500-series Tek scope to use it. Others may have different ideas.
Colin.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of dc888@...
Sent: 31 August 2020 06:04
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TekScopes] 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

Hi all,
just acquired the above (but missed out on the actual TEK scope), all at a local recycling centre.
Would like to buy a TEK scope, working or not, in which I can use the 1S1.
Is anyone prepared to dispose of a suitable TEK scope? Plus carriage to Oz at cost.
Alternatively there is a Heathkit IO-14 (8MHz, valves/tubes, triggers to 2.5 MHz) on its way to me.
Maybe I could use the 1S1 in this, with suitable connections? I have the IO-14 schematic, but Heathkit Manuals have now been commercialised.
Any advice appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
David C.


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:38 PM, Raymond Domp Frank wrote:


Unfortunately, the one available contains so much "detail" that much automatic compression doesn't seem likely
I didn't make a complete new version, I just OCR'ed and bookmarked the one available on the Wiki.

/H?kan


Re: TM500 series plastic face plate repair; solvents?

 

I have repaired non-styrene plastic with a UV-cured resin called Bondic.
The kit comes with a tube of the resin and a blunt needle-type application
tip built-in. The opposite end includes a UV LED "flashlight". The stuff
cures very quickly on exposure to this light (or other shortwave UV
source). It is clear and needs to be used where the UV light can get to it
or it won't cure. The resulting plastic is hard and quite strong. I fixed
an ID card that cracked at the oval cutout for the neck lanyard. I
reinforced it front and back with pieces of clear plastic cut from a
typical semi-rigid plastic package. That repair has held up very well with
no delamination and despite some flexing of the card. To repair something
like a faceplate, if a small piece is missing, it could be built up with
the resin (best to cure it in "layers") and then sanded and painted to
match. A crack could be repaired from the back and then sanded down. Any
resin that gets into the crack by capillary action will cure when UV
exposed. I fixed a chipped piece of crystal this way - let the resin be
drawn in by capillary action, then UV zapped it. I built it up to bulge
above the surface and then once hardened. used a single-edge razor blade to
cut it down to match the underlying surface.

I admit to not having tried this on any plastic instrument faceplates, but
I think it might work given my experience.

Steve H

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 2:56 PM Dave Seiter <d.seiter@...> wrote:

In the world of modeling and slot cars (and any other place styrene is
used) there is a repair technique whereby one uses liquid styrene modeling
solvent to "melt" scrap plastic into a goo that can be applied as a filler
to holes, missing sections, or even build up new features that didn't
previously exist. Once the solvent outgasses, the new plastic can be
worked the same as the original. Slot car folks do this all the time,
because kids were encouraged to "modify" their cars, leaving endless cut
wheel wells in their wake. A really good repair is almost invisible, but
usually given away by dirt/slight discoloring in the repair.
Last night I was wondering if the same technique could be applied to all
those broken corners on the TM500 plugins. The plastic isn't styrene, and
while the styrene solvent did dissolve the plastic, it became chalky and
unusable, even the next morning.
Has anyone experimented with this before? Know what type of plastic was
used? It wouldn't be good for large missing sections (too much time
involved), but smaller missing sections could easily be repaired if the
right solvent was found.
-Dave




Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:01 PM, zenith5106 wrote:


FYI, the 151 version I made for my own use, as mentioned in a previous post,
is about 40 Mb.
234 MB seems quite big for the file so I'm not surprised yours is smaller. Unfortunately, the one available contains so much "detail" that much automatic compression doesn't seem likely. As I mentioned in another message, my results still seemed quite OK at 196 MB.

It is OCR'ed (not so good) and bookmarked every 50 P/N. Personally I prefer bookmarking over
searching the document.
Depends on the kind of document and the intended use.
Some paper books contain bookmarks (TOC-like) *and* are searchable. Searchable is a kind of virtual xref.
With the component tables, I far prefer them being searchable over having to bookmark them.
Imagine trying to find the Tek number from a JEDEC number in a Tek component number organized list... With HP numbers I find it even worse - in HP lists that is...

You can find a specific P/N just as fast if not faster
with bookmarking.
Depending on the file, bookmarking can be a *lot* of work...

Raymond


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 04:48 PM, Raymond Domp Frank wrote:


I have -151 ready, just waiting for "permission"(?) to upload. Good OCR and
size reduced to 196MB with little quality degradation. Non-reduced is also
available, almost same size as before
FYI, the 151 version I made for my own use, as mentioned in a previous post, is about 40 Mb.
It is OCR'ed (not so good) and bookmarked every 50 P/N. Personally I prefer bookmarking over
searching the document. You can find a specific P/N just as fast if not faster with bookmarking.

/H?kan


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

Please find my comments embedded. My text refers to the text immediately above it:

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 07:39 PM, Dallas Smith wrote:


Sorry all for any confusion, was just looking for someway to reverse part
lookup. I have a large number of Tek PC Boards to use for parts but take a lot
of time to find an available part from. Was not aware of the TekWiki RPR's
file supplied by the Tek Museum, couldn't find them from the home page index.
In my opinion the RPR files are somewhat useless without the ability to search
them.
I fully agree.

I think making them full OCR is different than making them searchable.
Absolutely:
- "Full OCR" implies converting a printed (text-)document to a character-by-character computer-redable and -modifiable document.
- "Searchable" means that text can be searched on a computer, even if the text is (or seems) part of an image on the computer screen.
I think what most of us are looking for is just text searchable, not full-OCR, meaning the document will not be editable or otherwise modified as text.
Bookmarks may be added to an unlocked document by a user with the right tool.

I sent Raymond an unlocked version on the 155 RPR for him to checkout to see if
it could be compressed more.
The 155-document that I received is searchable (as I got it from Dallas) but hardly compressable further. It's only 11 MB, that's small by comparison with some of the others.

Are there more RPR files for other parts available somewhere, such as the 156 parts?
Yes and no. Several are available on Tekwiki, here:
Unfortunately, 156 isn't one of them (yet?).
Several other interesting ones are available though, like 151 (Transistors). That's a big one (234 MB). I thought that might be caused by the images (each page is an image) being uncompressed or only slightly compressed in the PDF.
With the rather poor quality of the images, the right way to "OCR" them is to use the method of adding an invisible text layer put "behind" the images and searching that layer. A hit will cause the (approximate) spot on the image to be highlighted. Most OCR programs can prepare the text layer and PDF-readers see it.
I decided to try 151 and have been able to make it text-searchable and compress it a bit (to 196 MB), with very little loss of quality. The two operations aren't linked, so keeping best available quality, not compressed further, would be an option. If the files in their text-searchable form are put back on Tekwiki locked, a user wouldn't be able to compress.

With permission I would be willing to unlock all the PRP files for Raymond to
process.
And I would be willing to process them.

Raymond is looking for ways to make large PDF's more usable to us. If
Raymond can not make them searchable I would be willing to spend the four or
more hours to do so if legal, but will still be unlocked.
The example of 151 makes it likely that I would be successful at the others as well.
To do that, I would need to know if the intended operation is allowed, IOW is not prohibited by someone's copyright (claim) or (Tek's) release permission.
Dave Brown suggested such prohibition.
Perhaps after processing, I could submit the files to Dave (Tek Museum) for them to lock and upload.

Any thoughts Dennis?
And Dave Brown?

Raymond


TM500 series plastic face plate repair; solvents?

 

In the world of modeling and slot cars (and any other place styrene is used) there is a repair technique whereby one uses liquid styrene modeling solvent to "melt" scrap plastic into a goo that can be applied as a filler to holes, missing sections, or even build up new features that didn't previously exist.? Once the solvent outgasses, the new plastic can be worked the same as the original.? Slot car folks do this all the time, because kids were encouraged to "modify" their cars, leaving endless cut wheel wells in their wake.? A really good repair is almost invisible, but usually given away by dirt/slight discoloring in the repair.
Last night I was wondering if the same technique could be applied to all those broken corners on the TM500 plugins.? The plastic isn't styrene, and while the styrene solvent did dissolve the plastic, it became chalky and unusable, even the next morning.??
Has anyone experimented with this before?? Know what type of plastic was used?? It wouldn't be good for large missing sections (too much time involved), but smaller missing sections could easily be repaired if the right solvent was found.
-Dave


Re: Strange Tek2440 issue

 

Acquisition stopped, doesn't happen. I can go all the way to 2ns/div.

Normal trigger but trigger set to +or- 90v (not triggering), it happens.

Single, doesn't happen, can go all the way to 2ns/div, can even trigger it (in single) and it doesn't happen. The probe was hooked to the calibrator for the triggers. Normally doesn't matter if there's a signal there or not.

Thanks!
Vince.

On 08/31/2020 01:43 PM, Siggi wrote:
Hey Vince,

I have no idea what's going on there, though I'd suggest looking at the
power supplies as a first step.
You can also - perhaps - diagnose this a little ways by playing with
trigger and acquisition settings. My guess would be that a power supply is
collapsing when the sample clock exceeds some particular rate, though
that's of course just a guess.
Does this still occur when the acquisition is stopped? If not, you can
maybe narrow this down by e.g. going to NORM sweep/trigger mode, and
setting up a trigger that never hits. Does it still happen when acquisition
is started but no trigger fires? How about under a single-shot acquisition
in AUTO mode, etc.

Siggi

On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 5:37 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:


I picked up a 2440 on ebay that had the dead nvram battery problem. Got
that fixed up with an external battery. Ran thru the self cal and ext
cal and all seems fine, except when the sweep rate is turned above 100
or 200 ns.

In trying to research this a bit, the only thing I could find was on one
of the Tek forums back in 2017 but there were zero responses. Here is
how the other person described the problem:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The 5 volt regulated rail is getting crowbared when the scope Sec/Div is
set to 100ns or faster. If save is pressed at a slower setting the
Sec/Div can then be set to any value without the 5 Volt rail getting
pulled down. It appears the issue only occurs during an active
acquisition cycle at 100ns Sec/Div or faster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

While I didn't measure the 5v rail, the screen shrinks a couple of times
as the waveform changes, the inputs get switched to GND and the display
goes blank. Sometimes, if I'm quick enough, I can turn the sweep back
down (1us or slower) and it'll recover, but I still have to go to the
input coupling and switch the inputs off of GND.

Anyone seen this or have any ideas what's going on?

Thanks!
Vince.
--
K8ZW



--
K8ZW


Re: 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

 

Hi,
I have a copy of the IO-14 scope schematic as 4 gif files. I could email it to you if you are interested, but I don't think it would be easy (or useful) to try to connect it to a 1S1. You really need a 500-series Tek scope to use it. Others may have different ideas.
Colin.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of dc888@...
Sent: 31 August 2020 06:04
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TekScopes] 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

Hi all,
just acquired the above (but missed out on the actual TEK scope), all at a local recycling centre.
Would like to buy a TEK scope, working or not, in which I can use the 1S1.
Is anyone prepared to dispose of a suitable TEK scope? Plus carriage to Oz at cost.
Alternatively there is a Heathkit IO-14 (8MHz, valves/tubes, triggers to 2.5 MHz) on its way to me.
Maybe I could use the 1S1 in this, with suitable connections? I have the IO-14 schematic, but Heathkit Manuals have now been commercialised.
Any advice appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
David C.


Re: Strange Tek2440 issue

 

Hey Vince,

I have no idea what's going on there, though I'd suggest looking at the
power supplies as a first step.
You can also - perhaps - diagnose this a little ways by playing with
trigger and acquisition settings. My guess would be that a power supply is
collapsing when the sample clock exceeds some particular rate, though
that's of course just a guess.
Does this still occur when the acquisition is stopped? If not, you can
maybe narrow this down by e.g. going to NORM sweep/trigger mode, and
setting up a trigger that never hits. Does it still happen when acquisition
is started but no trigger fires? How about under a single-shot acquisition
in AUTO mode, etc.

Siggi

On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 5:37 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:


I picked up a 2440 on ebay that had the dead nvram battery problem. Got
that fixed up with an external battery. Ran thru the self cal and ext
cal and all seems fine, except when the sweep rate is turned above 100
or 200 ns.

In trying to research this a bit, the only thing I could find was on one
of the Tek forums back in 2017 but there were zero responses. Here is
how the other person described the problem:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The 5 volt regulated rail is getting crowbared when the scope Sec/Div is
set to 100ns or faster. If save is pressed at a slower setting the
Sec/Div can then be set to any value without the 5 Volt rail getting
pulled down. It appears the issue only occurs during an active
acquisition cycle at 100ns Sec/Div or faster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

While I didn't measure the 5v rail, the screen shrinks a couple of times
as the waveform changes, the inputs get switched to GND and the display
goes blank. Sometimes, if I'm quick enough, I can turn the sweep back
down (1us or slower) and it'll recover, but I still have to go to the
input coupling and switch the inputs off of GND.

Anyone seen this or have any ideas what's going on?

Thanks!
Vince.
--
K8ZW




Re: Reverse part lockups

Dallas Smith
 

Sorry all for any confusion, was just looking for someway to reverse part lookup. I have a large number of Tek PC Boards to use for parts but take a lot of time to find an available part from. Was not aware of the TekWiki RPR's file supplied by the Tek Museum, couldn't find them from the home page index. In my opinion the RPR files are somewhat useless without the ability to search them. I think making them full OCR is different than making them searchable. I send Raymond a unlocked version on the 155 RPR for him to checkout to see if it could be compressed more. Are there more RPR files for other parts available somewhere, such as the 156 parts?

With permission I would be willing to unlock all the PRP files for Raymond to process. Raymond is looking for ways to make large PDF's more usable to us. If Raymond can not make them searchable I would be willing to spend the four or more hours to do so if legal, but will still be unlocked.

Any thoughts Dennis?

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:21 PM, Dallas Smith wrote:


Hello today,
Is there a master list somewhere for reverse part number lockups. Provide a
part number to see what Tek models use that part. Tek must have had mainframe
computer listings of such data? Any retired Tek employees here have access to
such a list? Tek might sign off for such a request from old equipment that
they will never support.
The obvious answer is no such luck.
Dallas