Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- TekScopes
- Messages
Search
Re: Tek P6xxx probe reference question
Hi,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Interesting! First, somehow I would not expect Tek to reduce themselves as you describe (obsolescence). Second, the meaning of the size (2.33 - 2 MHz). Thanks, larry On Aug 24, 2019, at 9:38 PM, John Griessen <john@...> wrote: |
Re: Tek 576 Curve Tracer HV Transformer winding
And 547s and 7934s ...
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
DaveD On 8/25/2019 8:12 AM, RustySparks wrote:
I wonder if the same company could make a batch of HV transformers for the 453 scope? I think several users of this group, including myself, have 453 scopes with bad HV transformers. |
Re: Tek 576 Curve Tracer HV Transformer winding
RustySparks
I wonder if the same company could make a batch of HV transformers for the 453 scope? I think several users of this group, including myself, have 453 scopes with bad HV transformers.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks, Harry -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of drawding@... Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2019 1:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tek 576 Curve Tracer HV Transformer winding "Where do they get the cores to make a compatible transformer that works in the 576 circuit. This is not a 115v 60 Hz transformer." I believe that they make them in house. I sent them the original Tek transformer specification. I got the specification drawing from Bob Koller (now posted online as per this thread). Thanks, Dave |
Re: Plug for 7CT1N captive lead?
Something like an RG58 crimp BNC plug and remove the outer locking ring (with extreme prejudice) looks like it would work on mine, feed the wire through the shield 'spigot' and secure with RTV or even lightly crimp it to the jacket and then a bit of heat-shrink?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 8/25/2019 7:21 AM, EJP wrote:
The plug has finally broken off the captive lead on my 7CT1N, the one that goes out to a vertical amp or time-base depending on which side you have it installed. I'm sure I'm not the first victim of this. I can obviously replace it with an ordinary BNC plug, and am doing so temporarily (I hope), but it rattles around etc., and it also has a redundant earth connection. I'm wondering if there is something more suitable, short of the unobtainium (I presume) entire 195-0095-00 assembly, that is maybe made of plastic and/or only has the inner connecting ring. |
Re: Plug for 7CT1N captive lead?
When I went to put on a standard soldered BNC plug I found there is no shielding in the cable, only a pretty thick set of strands for the inner conductor, so I was unable to even fix the outer cover on. So I settled for just the pin. I'm not happy with it, as it is uninsulated: gaffer tape awaits, but also a better solution, if there is one.
EJP |
Re: 11801C and the T1331 error: lost factory TB calibration data.
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:54 AM, Dennis Tillman W7PF wrote:
A few years ago I visited Agoston Agoston in Beaverton. I'm not sure when heI have probably concluded it rather than established it. In 1987 Aki was with Tek, in 1992 he was already with Hyperlabs. 11800 came out in late 1980's? Agoston Agoston is listed as an inventor in dual TDR head design which is, essentially what SD-24 is Leo |
TLA7PG2 Pattern Generator Probe Termination/Adapter Boards.
Hi to All,
On this moment I am looking for the A100 and A101 Termination/Adapter Boards for the obsolete TLA700 Pattern Generator Probes (P6470, P6471 e.a.). Anybody willing to separate from these for a good price? You can contact me off list. Greetings to All, Egge Siert. |
Re: Plug for 7CT1N captive lead?
Have you thought about cutting off the outer part of the new BNC connector?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dave Casey On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:21 AM EJP <esmond.pitt@...> wrote:
The plug has finally broken off the captive lead on my 7CT1N, the one that |
Plug for 7CT1N captive lead?
The plug has finally broken off the captive lead on my 7CT1N, the one that goes out to a vertical amp or time-base depending on which side you have it installed. I'm sure I'm not the first victim of this. I can obviously replace it with an ordinary BNC plug, and am doing so temporarily (I hope), but it rattles around etc., and it also has a redundant earth connection. I'm wondering if there is something more suitable, short of the unobtainium (I presume) entire 195-0095-00 assembly, that is maybe made of plastic and/or only has the inner connecting ring.
Thanks in advance EJP |
Re: Tek 576 Curve Tracer HV Transformer winding
"Where do they get the cores to make a compatible transformer that works in the 576 circuit. This is not a 115v 60 Hz transformer."
I believe that they make them in house. I sent them the original Tek transformer specification. I got the specification drawing from Bob Koller (now posted online as per this thread). Thanks, Dave |
Re: What to do on a lazy summer day near the end of August
Hi John,
Just $.02 from the peanut gallery.. Totally worth it if you ask me. I even uploaded some encouragement for you: /g/TekScopes/album?id=94563 I just rebuilt a new-to-me as of a few months ago 535A and had to buy most of the tubes to go into it. The B plugin needed a lot of TLC too. All new caps (well, almost - there's a couple of the bumble-bees lurking on the least accessible rotary switches and I haven't got the gumption to go in and replace those yet), almost all new tubes, calibration (I'm not quite happy with my geometry and delay line yet, but I'm close on both) and I use the old beast in my other hobby - tube audio. It is a rather daunting task at first, but doing a little here and there, it's surprising how it doesn't take that long and just how bright, sharp and usable the displays are. So long as you don't need a device that is super fast, they can still make remarkable companions. Plus with winter around the corner, an extra space heater for your workroom may not hurt your feelings either. Lastly, you get the feeling of satisfaction of keeping a genuinely awesome piece of functional engineering going. Where do you see this kind of quality that is this well thought out nowadays? Sure the newer ones may have more bells and whistles, but I can't help but notice how well even the old tube-based triggers just seem so much less fiddly and quick to lock onto what I'm after than the horizontal plugins for my 5113 (5B10N/5B12N), 7834 (7B85/7B80/7B92), and my TAS465. Don't get me wrong, those are fine instruments and I can extract more from them, but for quickly assessing things, my 503 and 535A are just a pleasure to use and aid me in how I want to set up the newer siblings. For what it is worth, I'm just beginning the restoration on my 547. The A trigger is barely functional (I'm not far enough in to even know whether I should suspect the tunnel diode or something else yet), the geometry is definitely needing help, lots of capacitors to replace, although I have replaced most of the tubes in it already. On the upside, the B trigger is strong and time-base seems pretty close, the HV transformer seems fine so far and it is overall in pretty good shape. But again, it will be a half-hour here, an hour or so there and hopefully in a couple months, it will be working alright as well. But all this could just be me and my affliction.. sorry affection for old Tek gear. :-) Jason |
Re: Tek P6xxx probe reference question
What sort of irks me a bit is when Tek refers to an accessory for a x.xmm probe but, yet does not reference that to what probes are covered. Then you look at the probe data sheets and most of the time they do not mention the referenced dimension. So it's then time for a call to the manufacturer.
Greg |
Re: Tek P6xxx probe reference question
John Griessen
On 8/24/19 8:23 PM, Greg Muir via Groups.Io wrote:
From a little more digging it appears that the measurement Tek uses applies to the diameter of the metal part of the probe tip body itself; sort of a mystery since Tek does not indicate what they are referring to in any of their literature.It's a planned obsolescence thing. Mentioning that the tip male prong and barrel on the body of the probe are well known standards might reduce sales. Most companies in test equipment know that they make plenty from selling accessories. 5mm barrel and 2.5mm barrel on probe tips are a pseudo standard with Tek and it allows any low frequency parts to swap out or substitute willy nilly. I like some thin small probes by HP such as 10017A probes. Their probe tip barrel diameter is 2.33mm, not standard with Tek at all, and not even a perfect input capacitance match, but I use them up to 20 MHz with no big troubles. For higher frequencies, the probe for the scope will be better. An example of how 5mm probe tip barrel diameters allow swapping things is those funny elephant trunk-looking tips for the P6046 diff probes, and also the nifty shorting tips that come with those probes for performance checks and cal. |
Re: Tek P6xxx probe reference question
I think I have managed to better understand what Tek is doing here, From a little more digging it appears that the measurement Tek uses applies to the diameter of the metal part of the probe tip body itself; sort of a mystery since Tek does not indicate what they are referring to in any of their literature.
Greg |
Re: Tek 576 Curve Tracer HV Transformer winding
peter bunge
Thanks Miguel; my 576 just quit again. It has a dot floating near the top
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
left. Another bad connection. I will check it tomorrow. Peter. On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 3:11 PM Miguel Work <harrimansat@...> wrote:
I have two 576, if you told me which test you need to compare, I will do |
Tek P6xxx probe reference question
I guess this is sort of an academic question about how Tek refers to their P6xxx probe series via a dimension.
In several probe accessory references Tek Refers to some probes in the series as "2.5mm" and others as "3.5mm" probes. I am trying to figure out to what part of the probe these dimensions apply. i can't seem to find any dimension on the probe body that comes close to those referenced except possibly the length of the bare tip. Could this be it? Any ideas? Greg |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss