Re: 7T11 trace shifting left as time/div rotated.
Hi David, The start and stop levels should differ about 5 V. With start I (and you also I think) actually mean the stop level when the trace is at the left position. On the test scope you look at vertical position of the horizontal lines. It depends of Time Position. The graph 11 is for fully CW. If you rotate to fully CCW then the whole patter shift 5 V lower, from -5 V to -10 V. Albert
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thinking rather more about this, the start voltage of -2.22V for the TTH Miller circuit doesn't sound right - from all my reading in the manual I think it should be starting at 0V, and the screen shots in the manual also suggest this. The waveforms shown for the Horiz. Amp. also suggest that there's no (or very little) DC offset.
Comments?
Thanks again Dave
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Thanks Tom,
I will download it.
?
You are right, the Q9070 is on the
heatsink.? I was referring to the U930 driving via Q908 (and CR908) to
reach Q9070.
Noted on the connection to be broken for
direct 43V injection.
?
Noted on not having the need for the
isolation transformer for measurement.
Yes, I am aware of the risk of a floated
connection.
Then power supply in my country (Singapore) is similar to UK which is 3-pin.?
To do that, the earth line will have to be
lifted
?
I will probably go for the isolation transformer
but for a different reason.
If the 2220 overload is due to heat, then
using a 110V instead of the current 230V will definitely generated less heat on
the Q9070.
So isolation is an added benefit. ?
?
Rgds,
Chor Ming
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of tom jobe
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012
10:29 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
?
Hi Tan,
Some one told me that the 2220 is the 60 MHz version of the 2230 100 MHz
scope. If this is true, the 2230 manual might be your best bet. It is
available from several places including:
Now that I hear about your experience level and what equipment you have on
hand, I would fix the 2235 first as it has no top board limiting your access
to the power supply (and almost everything else in the scope) while the
scope is actually running.
You mention the need for an isolation transformer. You probably do not need
an isolation transformer at this point, as its only value is to be able to
"float" the scope so you can use another scope to look at the
inverter side
of the power supply. The inverter is already making the 43 VDC so what would
you need to check anyway? I know the service manual calls for an isolation
transformer (so I bought one) but my experience finds it to be fairly
useless in the 22xx repair process. Also, once you "float" the scope
the
chassis of the scope is now at some elevated voltage, which is a little
scary for an amateur like me.
You mentioned that Q908 was up on the heatsink but it isn't. Take a closer
look as it only is involved in running the "gate" of Q9070.
Q9070 is up on the heatsink. Q908 is a small transistor with minor currents
through it, and Q9070 does the real work of creating the 43 VDC for the
inverter.
If you ever decide to do the external injection of the 43 VDC, you need to
disconnect Q9070, not Q908.
tom jobe...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:37 PM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
> Thank you Tom for taking the time to point out specifically the likely
cause
> of the problem.
>
> I know it takes effort to go through the details and I really appreciate
it.
>
>
>
> Just to let you know where I come from, so that there is less to assume.
>
> I am an electronics engineer from Singapore above 50 so very much
familiar
> with vacuum and solid state electronics.
>
> I do not have the schematics for 2220 so like you I am assuming it is
quite
> similar to 2235 which I have it downloaded.
>
> I have both 2220 and 2235 and there appear to be quite similar though the
> PCB layout is slightly different.
>
> I have complete understanding of how the power supply works.
>
> Pre-regulator - PWM driving Q908 to produce +43V across TP940 and TP950
>
> Final Regulator - DC-DC push-pull inverter through Q947 and Q946.
>
>
>
> I have another scope 2235, unfortunately, it too went down at the same
time,
> so the only instrument I have is a multimeter.
>
> Anyway, I do not have an isolation transformer so even with the 2235
> working, I will need to get an isolation transformer before I could take
any
> measurement.
>
> Any idea what VA rating is needed for the isolation transformer?
>
> Based on the power needs, it appears to be at least 200VA.
>
>
>
> Initially, I was asking about R907, not because I was suspecting the
> resistor but I intend to check the load current by putting an ammeter in
> series with the resistor.
>
> For that to be useful I need to know what is expected. Like you. I am
> suspecting that the voltage at R907 has gone up after the set warms up
thus
> shutting down U930.
>
>
>
> I will probably go with the cap changes you have recommended since I have
> some time during the Lunar New Year break.
>
> Unfortunately, I do not have ESR meter, but I don't think that a big issue
> just replacing the caps.
>
>
>
> I am aware of the direct 43Vdc injection, but thank you for telling me the
> detail that Q908 needs to be disconnected.
>
> Unfortunately, I do not have a power supply with this voltage output. I
> only have a power supply of 18V max 2A. So I will have to hold off this
> approach.
>
>
>
> One more thing which I did not mention earlier is that I detached the
+5.2V
> connection to the digital board (for the storage function of 2220) and
> behaviour remains unchanged.
>
>
>
> Rgds,
>
> Chor Ming
>
> _____
>
> From: TekScopes@...
[mailto:TekScopes@...]
On
Behalf
> Of tom jobe
> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:30 AM
> To: TekScopes
> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
>
>
>
>
>
> I saw your 2220 question the first time you posted it a few days ago, and
I
> did not have a nice short answer for you. Since you have not gotten the
> answer
> you were looking for, let me comment a bit on this.
> First off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service manual for it, and none
of
> the download sites I checked seem to have it either, including
> ArtekMedia.com having it for purchase. So I will assume it is similar to
the
> better 22xx's such as the 2235, at least around the power supply. I will
> also assume that you do have a service manual to work with. U930 monitors
> the voltage drop across R907, and in your case it probably thinks the
> current is too high after a few minutes, so it shuts down.
> I have worked on lots of 22xx scopes and I have not seen the value of R907
> drift and cause this problem, but others have reported that as a
> possibility. Odds are, that this is not your problem.
> An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907 within the
> inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side of the main
> transformer.
> How you go about finding the problem depends on what equipment you have
> available, and what your testing preferences might be.
> If you don't have much to work with, just start changing components. In my
> experience the components in the right rear corner of the mainboard cause
> the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942 and C943. If you
have
> some decent soldering equipment you can change all three capacitors
quickly
> without removing the mainboard.
> If you have access to an ESR meter you could check all of the aluminum
> electrolytic capacitors in circuit. Most of the electrolytics give no
> trouble, especially the six(?) 840 uF caps in front of the heat sink for
> Q9070 (but you would want to check all of the electrolytic caps if you had
> an ESR meter handy).
> Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an external power
> source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If your power supply
> allowed you to adjust the current limit you could sneak up on it and just
> get the problem part(s) nice and warm. You will need to at least
disconnect
> Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP 950 from the
bottom
> or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two wires to the bottom side to
> make the 43 VDC connections. You can use the scope in its normal way when
it
> is powered with the external 43 VDC.
> The external 43 VDC idea came from a fine Tekscopes member named Hakan,
many
> years ago, and he has an excellent document you should read at:
>
> A couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly available
> components you might use to replace some of the original Tektronix part
> numbers that often fail. I can send you that directly or you can find it
in
> the Tekscopes Message archive if you like.
> Another thing you might do is take resistance readings from chassis ground
> to each of the voltage test points before you get very far into this
repair
> (with the scope not connected to the mains of course!).
> There are lots of other ideas to add to this, but this should get you
> started.
> This will be a simple fix, so just take your time and understand what you
> are doing.
> tom jobe...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@...
> >
> To: <TekScopes@...
>
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
>
> > Has anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series scope power
> supply?
> >
> >
> >
> > Behaviour
> >
> > 1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly and stay on for
a
few
> > minutes
> >
> > 2. Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to on again
and
> it
> > continues in this on/off mode
> >
> > 3. Pre-regulator out = 43V (between TP940 and TP950)
> >
> > 4. All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes are
+8.6, -8.6,
> > +5.2, +100 are all ok.
> >
> >
> >
> > What are likely problems before I start ripping the components from
the
> > circuit?
> >
> >
> >
> > ttesenq@...
it
> could be the pre-regulator MOSFET
> > P9070.
> >
> >
> >
> > I though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not look
likely
> > because electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit to fire
up
> for
> > a few minutes
> >
> > It is more likely a active component that weaken with increase
> temperature,
> > so ttesenq@...
could be
right.
> >
> > This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components
> >
> >
> >
> > Any other possible lead of similar experience.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
I wish I can use this approach but
unfortunately it cannot be used in this case because place that are heating up
ought to heat up but it may be heating up slightly more than usual.
This approach is good for part that should
not heat up and is heating up.
Anyway, I do not have heat mist here.
?
Rgds,
Chor Ming
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Mark Wendt (Contractor)
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012
9:54 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Re: Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
?
I've become a firm believer in the freeze mist. It
really helped me
recently find a problem transistor in a 7A13 plugin I have. Oh, and a
relatively cheap IR thermometer with a laser dot pointer that I picked
up from Radio Smack too. ;-)
Mark
On 1/21/2012 9:32 PM, amxcoder wrote:
> If it actually is something heating up a little and then shutting down, it
can be found with freeze mist. I can't remember how many times I have fixed
equipment this way with very little trouble shooting.
>
> Michael
>
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Ed,
Thank you for your extensive reply.
?
2220 is a storage 60mHz
2235 is a 100Mhz ?Non-storage
The power supply of the 2220 is quite
similar to the 2235 which I can see from the layout.?
These are some differences on the power
supply
- 2220
has an additional -5V supply
- Current
rating in at the 43V for 2220 is higher.? Based on design, R912 is
357 ohm for 2235 and 549 ohm for 2220.? This means current limit for
2235 = 0.86A and for 2220 = 1.3A
- The
added current is needed to drive the digital storage function which is a
separate board
- Based
on calculation, Shutdown voltage at R907 for 2235 = 0.18V and for 2220 = 0.26V.?
Measured value on 2220 is .285V.
?
I have a DMM, Analog Multimeter and my
other scope a 2235 has also a failed SCR for the crowbar.? I did not want
to fire it up until I get the crowbar function fixed.
I am planning to get an isolation
transformer and run it at 110, before I use my other scope if it is fixed to
measure the signal of the 2220.
?
This is the development
so far.
I have changed the following C925, C943,
C942, C940 with little improvement
I have also remove the connector to Q9070
and solder it directly to the leads.? This seems to have the most
improvement
Lifted the +5V supply to the digital board
Measured voltage on R907 at cold state =
0.17V (about 0.85A on 43V)
Measured voltage on R907 in warm state
(after 5 mins) = 0.19V (about 0.95A on 43V)
Scope can sustain operation for more than
15 minutes before the supply shutdown and up again for another 5~10 min and
repeat.?
This shows an intermittent overload
condition.
Not that bad because the scope can be used
with brief shutdown in-between.
?
?
Connect the +5V to the digital board
Measured voltage on R907 at cold state =
0.22V (about 1.1A on 43V)
Measured voltage on R907 in warm state
(after 1 mins) = 0.25V (about 1.25A on 43V)
Scope can sustain operation for more than
1 minutes before the supply shutdown and up again repeat every seconds later.?
This shows a sustained overload condition.
?
Measured voltage on pin15 of U930 is 0.285,
Clearly, the overload should not happen since this voltage limit for voltage at
R907 before shutdown happens.
This confirms that there are spike signal
riding on R907 that cause the comparator in U930 to cause a shutdown.
?
20Khz test
I thought maybe the pre-regular was
running at slightly higher frequency causing the switching efficiency to drop
which cause Q9070 and T906 to heat up.
Since I do have a working scope, I found
an interesting way to test this without instrument.
- Connect
a 470pf across C919 and the frequency will drop to ~15Khz because I can
heard the switch buzz.
- Without
the 470of, I could not heard the switching buzz, so I knew it must be slightly
past 20Khz
- I
confirm this because my son is able to hear the 20Khz buzz.
?
ESR on Cap.
I tried to change caps on C960 and C961,
but there is no change to the behaviour and leakage current on removed caps seems
to be low, so I do not suspect it is a ESR on cap issue.
The filtering caps are also warm (quite
hot) which means that it is filtering the ripple and converting to heat.?
It¡¯s not an indication of good ESR
though but poor ESR will have less heat.? I do not suspect the caps
causing the shutdown issue.?
As an improvement, I may change it later
but not now, unless I am convince that poor ESR can cause shutdown.
?
I am very much back to square one, because
everything seems to point to a normal working scope except that heat generated has
cause an overload condition
?
What¡¯s next.
?????? 1.?
Poor Switching
I suspect that there is a
poor switching from Q9070 and CR907 which can cause Q9070 to heat up in forward
inverter.
Haven¡¯t gotten the
component so will have to explore this later.?
Q9070 (P6N55) needs to be
at least 600V, 6A, RDSon 1.5 ohm
CR907 (BDY73G) needs to
at least 600V, 1A, Reverse recovery time 50nS.? Need 2 of these for 2220
in parallel, I believe 2235 uses only one.
.
- Overload
This is a likelihood but I
need a reference to know if the current measure on +43V is too high.
How could power ESR cause
overload?
Poor ESR will cause poor functional
performance because there is high ripple on the DC but will it cause an
overload?
?
Background.
Both scope were working scope which I have
not used for more than a year
?
Final Action if all else
fails.
I am quite sure if I run the 2220 at 110V
the shutdown issue will go away because of lower generated heat with 110V.
If the problem persist, I will just have
to switch to a lower line voltage supply on an isolation transformer.
?
Rgds,
Chor Ming
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Ed Breya
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012
2:43 AM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
?
Yes indeed, the 2220 is virtually identical to the
2230 in most respects - just a notch down to fill the price v. performance
market position at the time. The 2200 series models share the same basic power
supply topology, tweaked to get more power for the digital storage add-ons.
Your equipment appears to be very limited, but you do have a working DMM and a
"working" scope available for a few minutes at a time. You can use it
to look at its own supplies and other circuitry, at least up to the point of
shutdown.
Before delving further into the supply, I recommend that you first check your
line voltage to see if it's on the high side, or possibly has transients or
surges that may be causing the scopes to self-protect. I don't recall if the
2220 has the "trigger view" feature, but if so, set up for line
triggering, and activate that to see roughly what the line looks like. This is
band limited, so won't show fast transients. You can also look at the line
voltage directly and more accurately with a X10 probe tip to the hot side. DO
NOT connect the ground clip to anything, or preferably, disconnect it from the
probe whenever poking around line voltage.
As I recall, the scopes should run on any line voltage between the specified
limits, with no range switching needed. If you have access to a variac or
step-down transformer you can try running at lower line voltage. If not, you
can try loading down the branch circuit with extra lighting and appliances to
see if it drops significantly, or even try something wired temporarily in
series, like a space heater, coffee pot, or a large incandescent lamp.
Some background info should help:
1. Were these scopes working and then stopped, or did you just get them, and
they didn't work? It seems from your initial post that they both failed at the
same time. If so, one big thing in common would be line voltage problems. Do
both scopes exhibit the same symptoms?
2. Is the available run time always about the same before shutting down? Does
recycling the power make it run for the same length of time, or does it need to
cool down first?
If the shutdown timing is fairly predictable, it may be good to monitor the
outputs closely and watch to see if they sag or rise just before shutdown.
Also, watch the display closely for dimming or blooming - evidence of same on
the high voltage.
Also, look at the 20 kHz AC waveforms on the secondaries, ahead of the output
rectifiers to see if they are nice, rounded squarish waves, and see if that
shape changes just before shutdown.
That's probably enough for now.
I agree with the suggestion to revisit the 2235. It may be easier to fix, or
you may luck out and find it's problem - then you'll have one fully working
scope - a big improvement.
Ed
--- In TekScopes@...,
David wrote:
>
> When I was searching for a replacement channel swtich, I found that a
> number of the 22xx series oscilloscopes have the same main board which
> has the power supply including the 2213A, 2215A, 2230, 2232, 2235,
> 2236 but not the 2213 or 2215. For the analog only models, the extra
> outputs which would go to the digital storage board are tied to ground
> to maintain bias on the channel switches. The 2220 is much rarer with
> no online service manual so I never checked it.
>
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:28:59 -0800, "tom jobe"
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Tan,
> >Some one told me that the 2220 is the 60 MHz version of the 2230 100
MHz
> >scope. If this is true, the 2230 manual might be your best bet. It is
> >available from several places including:
> >
> >
> >
> >Now that I hear about your experience level and what equipment you
have on
> >hand, I would fix the 2235 first as it has no top board limiting your
access
> >to the power supply (and almost everything else in the scope) while
the
> >scope is actually running.
> >
> >You mention the need for an isolation transformer. You probably do not
need
> >an isolation transformer at this point, as its only value is to be
able to
> >"float" the scope so you can use another scope to look at
the inverter side
> >of the power supply. The inverter is already making the 43 VDC so what
would
> >you need to check anyway? I know the service manual calls for an
isolation
> >transformer (so I bought one) but my experience finds it to be fairly
> >useless in the 22xx repair process. Also, once you "float"
the scope the
> >chassis of the scope is now at some elevated voltage, which is a
little
> >scary for an amateur like me.
> >
> >You mentioned that Q908 was up on the heatsink but it isn't. Take a
closer
> >look as it only is involved in running the "gate" of Q9070.
> >Q9070 is up on the heatsink. Q908 is a small transistor with minor
currents
> >through it, and Q9070 does the real work of creating the 43 VDC for
the
> >inverter.
> >
> >If you ever decide to do the external injection of the 43 VDC, you
need to
> >disconnect Q9070, not Q908.
> >tom jobe...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Tan Chor Ming"
> >To: <TekScopes@...>
> >Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:37 PM
> >Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
> >
> >
> >> Thank you Tom for taking the time to point out specifically the
likely
> >cause
> >> of the problem.
> >>
> >> I know it takes effort to go through the details and I really
appreciate
> >it.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Just to let you know where I come from, so that there is less to
assume.
> >>
> >> I am an electronics engineer from Singapore above 50 so very much
familiar
> >> with vacuum and solid state electronics.
> >>
> >> I do not have the schematics for 2220 so like you I am assuming
it is
> >quite
> >> similar to 2235 which I have it downloaded.
> >>
> >> I have both 2220 and 2235 and there appear to be quite similar
though the
> >> PCB layout is slightly different.
> >>
> >> I have complete understanding of how the power supply works.
> >>
> >> Pre-regulator - PWM driving Q908 to produce +43V across TP940 and
TP950
> >>
> >> Final Regulator - DC-DC push-pull inverter through Q947 and Q946.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I have another scope 2235, unfortunately, it too went down at the
same
> >time,
> >> so the only instrument I have is a multimeter.
> >>
> >> Anyway, I do not have an isolation transformer so even with the
2235
> >> working, I will need to get an isolation transformer before I
could take
> >any
> >> measurement.
> >>
> >> Any idea what VA rating is needed for the isolation transformer?
> >>
> >> Based on the power needs, it appears to be at least 200VA.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Initially, I was asking about R907, not because I was suspecting
the
> >> resistor but I intend to check the load current by putting an
ammeter in
> >> series with the resistor.
> >>
> >> For that to be useful I need to know what is expected. Like you.
I am
> >> suspecting that the voltage at R907 has gone up after the set
warms up
> >thus
> >> shutting down U930.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I will probably go with the cap changes you have recommended
since I have
> >> some time during the Lunar New Year break.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, I do not have ESR meter, but I don't think that a
big issue
> >> just replacing the caps.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I am aware of the direct 43Vdc injection, but thank you for
telling me the
> >> detail that Q908 needs to be disconnected.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, I do not have a power supply with this voltage
output. I
> >> only have a power supply of 18V max 2A. So I will have to hold
off this
> >> approach.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> One more thing which I did not mention earlier is that I detached
the
> >+5.2V
> >> connection to the digital board (for the storage function of
2220) and
> >> behaviour remains unchanged.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Rgds,
> >>
> >> Chor Ming
> >>
> >> _____
> >>
> >> From: TekScopes@...
[mailto:TekScopes@...]
On
> >Behalf
> >> Of tom jobe
> >> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:30 AM
> >> To: TekScopes
> >> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I saw your 2220 question the first time you posted it a few days
ago, and
> >I
> >> did not have a nice short answer for you. Since you have not
gotten the
> >> answer
> >> you were looking for, let me comment a bit on this.
> >> First off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service manual for it,
and none
> >of
> >> the download sites I checked seem to have it either, including
> >> ArtekMedia.com having it for purchase. So I will assume it is
similar to
> >the
> >> better 22xx's such as the 2235, at least around the power supply.
I will
> >> also assume that you do have a service manual to work with. U930
monitors
> >> the voltage drop across R907, and in your case it probably thinks
the
> >> current is too high after a few minutes, so it shuts down.
> >> I have worked on lots of 22xx scopes and I have not seen the
value of R907
> >> drift and cause this problem, but others have reported that as a
> >> possibility. Odds are, that this is not your problem.
> >> An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907
within the
> >> inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side of the
main
> >> transformer.
> >> How you go about finding the problem depends on what equipment
you have
> >> available, and what your testing preferences might be.
> >> If you don't have much to work with, just start changing
components. In my
> >> experience the components in the right rear corner of the
mainboard cause
> >> the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942 and C943.
If you
> >have
> >> some decent soldering equipment you can change all three
capacitors
> >quickly
> >> without removing the mainboard.
> >> If you have access to an ESR meter you could check all of the
aluminum
> >> electrolytic capacitors in circuit. Most of the electrolytics
give no
> >> trouble, especially the six(?) 840 uF caps in front of the heat
sink for
> >> Q9070 (but you would want to check all of the electrolytic caps
if you had
> >> an ESR meter handy).
> >> Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an
external power
> >> source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If your power
supply
> >> allowed you to adjust the current limit you could sneak up on it
and just
> >> get the problem part(s) nice and warm. You will need to at least
> >disconnect
> >> Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP 950 from
the
> >bottom
> >> or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two wires to the
bottom side to
> >> make the 43 VDC connections. You can use the scope in its normal
way when
> >it
> >> is powered with the external 43 VDC.
> >> The external 43 VDC idea came from a fine Tekscopes member named
Hakan,
> >many
> >> years ago, and he has an excellent document you should read at:
> >>
> >> A couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly
available
> >> components you might use to replace some of the original
Tektronix part
> >> numbers that often fail. I can send you that directly or you can
find it
> >in
> >> the Tekscopes Message archive if you like.
> >> Another thing you might do is take resistance readings from
chassis ground
> >> to each of the voltage test points before you get very far into
this
> >repair
> >> (with the scope not connected to the mains of course!).
> >> There are lots of other ideas to add to this, but this should get
you
> >> started.
> >> This will be a simple fix, so just take your time and understand
what you
> >> are doing.
> >> tom jobe...
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Tan Chor Ming"
> >> >
> >> To: <TekScopes@...
>
> >> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:45 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
> >>
> >> > Has anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series
scope power
> >> supply?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Behaviour
> >> >
> >> > 1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly and
stay on for a
> >few
> >> > minutes
> >> >
> >> > 2. Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to
on again and
> >> it
> >> > continues in this on/off mode
> >> >
> >> > 3. Pre-regulator out = 43V (between TP940 and TP950)
> >> >
> >> > 4. All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes
are
> >+8.6, -8.6,
> >> > +5.2, +100 are all ok.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > What are likely problems before I start ripping the
components from the
> >> > circuit?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ttesenq@... suggested
that
> >it
> >> could be the pre-regulator MOSFET
> >> > P9070.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not
look likely
> >> > because electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit
to fire up
> >> for
> >> > a few minutes
> >> >
> >> > It is more likely a active component that weaken with
increase
> >> temperature,
> >> > so ttesenq@... could
be
> >right.
> >> >
> >> > This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Any other possible lead of similar experience.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
|
Re: Spare knobs for 24xx?
Qservice is another good source, their pricing is less than Sphere and order fulfillment is very fast. <>
Patrick Wong AK6C
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "victor_j_silva" <daejon1@...> wrote: They come up on fleabay for 4/$15 every so often. There's always Sphere, if you want to pay $15/each!
If I could get that much I'd be buying up 2445s on ebay just for the knob caps.
--Victor
--- In TekScopes@..., "zogher" <zogher@> wrote:
Hi,
Am looking for 3 or 4 knobs for the lower front intensity, focus, readout intensity and scale illumination controls for my 2445A. Tek part number is 366-2041-03. Anyone have any spares I can buy?
|
Re: focus/astig off the center.
A weak CRT can cause this also.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: Luis Cupido To: TekScopes@... Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 6:14 PM Subject: [TekScopes] focus/astig off the center.
?
Hi,
I have two 7623b with the following
symptom: Focus adjust perfect on the
center and not so perfect near the edges
so when readout is perfect for astig/focus
the center is bad and vice versa.
Not too severe on one, but quite bad on
the second scope.
I'm sure someone will know ...
so better ask before I tweak them up too much ;-)
Many thanks.
Luis Cupido
ct1dmk.
|
Re: Spare knobs for 24xx?
They come up on fleabay for 4/$15 every so often. There's always Sphere, if you want to pay $15/each!
If I could get that much I'd be buying up 2445s on ebay just for the knob caps.
--Victor
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "zogher" <zogher@...> wrote: Hi,
Am looking for 3 or 4 knobs for the lower front intensity, focus, readout intensity and scale illumination controls for my 2445A. Tek part number is 366-2041-03. Anyone have any spares I can buy?
Thanks, Chris fazeka (at) gmail (dot) com
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
I've become a firm believer in the freeze mist. It really helped me recently find a problem transistor in a 7A13 plugin I have. Oh, and a relatively cheap IR thermometer with a laser dot pointer that I picked up from Radio Smack too. ;-)
Mark
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 1/21/2012 9:32 PM, amxcoder wrote: If it actually is something heating up a little and then shutting down, it can be found with freeze mist. I can't remember how many times I have fixed equipment this way with very little trouble shooting.
Michael
|
Re: Tekscopes at the Computer History Museum
They have heard of analog computers, sort of, but they're treated like the redheaded stepchild.? There are a few analog machines on display near the entrance of the exhibit hall (and there are a few analog circuits and a picture of Bob Widlar tucked in the corner of the "Digital Logic" section):
Sadly, the big, beautiful GPS Instrument Company machine that used to be on display in the "Visual Storage" exhibit hall is no longer on display, but they do have a giant photograph of it hanging in the museum lobby.
Honestly, I think that the analog computers are some of the best looking machines in the museum (until you get to the Cray section).
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012, Jim Reese wrote:?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
And they've never heard of ANALOG computers?
?
There would not be computers as we know them with out influence/use of scopes back in the day and up to current technology.
?
I will definately have to get to the museum the next time I am at mother Trimble (work) in Sunnyvale!
?
Jim
|
Hi,
Am looking for 3 or 4 knobs for the lower front intensity, focus, readout intensity and scale illumination controls for my 2445A. Tek part number is 366-2041-03. Anyone have any spares I can buy?
Thanks, Chris fazeka (at) gmail (dot) com
|
Need Manual for Type W, SN 4560 & 5336
I recently acquired several 8416 tubes and decided to revive my two Type W plugins. As soon as I started working on them, several discrepancies between the manual and reality became apparent. Most noticeable is the circuit board located directly in front of the plugin connector. It contains Q294 and Q194(among other parts), which are not listed parts manifest of the manual on BAMA. In fact, judging by Figure 5-2, that whole circuit board doesn't exist in the manual I have. I haven't been able to find any other versions online.
Does anyone have either a scan of the correct manual or a hardcopy that they would be willing to part with at a reasonable price? On my current budget, reasonable is around $15.
This is for serial numbers 4560 and 5336 of the Type W.
Aaron
|
Re: 7T11 trace shifting left as time/div rotated.
I also note at least one transcription error!! The Start V for .5nS in the second half should of course be 90mV.
Very well spotted on the systematic nature of the offset BTW. I'd been banging my head on the wall (so to speak) with this problem for so long that I completely missed that!
Regards, David Partridge
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Albert Sent: 21 January 2012 23:06 To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 7T11 trace shifting left as time/div rotated. Hi David, It takes some time to remember what all those circuits in the 7T11 are doing! The shift in output of U512A in a 5-2-1 sequence corresponds nicely (as should be) to the increase in feedback resistors 10k-25k-50k, ratio 2:3. At 1 ns/div the shift is about 0.5 V and that same shift will appear at the input R647 to the Dot Position Memory. This memory should detect that systematic error and send a correction to the Slow Ramp Inverter. That in turn would (finally) result in a shift of the THT output range to correct the error. This doesn't seem to happen, or not not enough. At the faster sweep speeds U512B and D get switched in and introduce their own offsets. Again the Dot Pos Mem should correct for this. Maybe you can check its operation/calibration. I remember it's not an easy calibration and a lot of compromise is needed. Albert (BTW your packet calculator needs some attention as well...) In equivalent time, sequential mode, the trace is shifting left as I rotate the time/div knob.
All measurements were made on the 50nS sweep range with the timebase triggered from Pulse Out.
Looking at the signal at TP286 which is the output of the TTH circuit, I see:
Time/Div Start V Stop V Delta V 5nS -2.22V -7.82V -5.6V 2nS -2.22V -4.62V -2.3V 1nS -2.22V -3.5V -1.2V .5nS -2.22V -2.76V -560mV .2nS -2.22V -2.43mV -230mV .1nS -2.22V -2.34mV -120mV 50pS -2.22V -2.62mV -60mV (approx values) 20pS -2.22V -2.25V -30mV 10pS -2.22V -2.23V -10mV
Looking at the output of U512A (TP512):
Time/Div Start V Stop V Delta V 5nS -0.1V +5.5V 5.6V 2nS -0.3V +5.3V 5.6V 1nS -0.6V +5.0V 5.6V .5nS -900mV +470mV 560mV .2nS -210mV +350mV 560mV .1nS -420mV +140mV 560mV 50pS -70mV -10mV 60mV (approx values) 20pS -170mV -110mV 60mV 10pS -340mV -280mV 60mV
I don't think the ramp start voltage should be moving down like that.
Can anyone confirm my suspicions and suggest what the fault might be?
Thanks David Partridge
------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Re: 7T11 trace shifting left as time/div rotated.
Albert,
Thanks - you are right there are some calculation errors there - all my fault - no hardware to blame - apart from the grey mushy sort between my ears!
Thinking rather more about this, the start voltage of -2.22V for the TTH Miller circuit doesn't sound right - from all my reading in the manual I think it should be starting at 0V, and the screen shots in the manual also suggest this. The waveforms shown for the Horiz. Amp. also suggest that there's no (or very little) DC offset.
Comments?
Thanks again Dave
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Albert Sent: 21 January 2012 23:06 To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 7T11 trace shifting left as time/div rotated.
Hi David, It takes some time to remember what all those circuits in the 7T11 are doing! The shift in output of U512A in a 5-2-1 sequence corresponds nicely (as should be) to the increase in feedback resistors 10k-25k-50k, ratio 2:3. At 1 ns/div the shift is about 0.5 V and that same shift will appear at the input R647 to the Dot Position Memory. This memory should detect that systematic error and send a correction to the Slow Ramp Inverter. That in turn would (finally) result in a shift of the THT output range to correct the error. This doesn't seem to happen, or not not enough. At the faster sweep speeds U512B and D get switched in and introduce their own offsets. Again the Dot Pos Mem should correct for this. Maybe you can check its operation/calibration. I remember it's not an easy calibration and a lot of compromise is needed. Albert
(BTW your packet calculator needs some attention as well...)
|
--- In TekScopes@..., "Dave Ahrendt" <dkahrendt@...> wrote:
--- In TekScopes@..., "kd8dey" <kd8dey@> wrote:
I bought a 2235 on E-bay because it had the DMM/Freq counter and the digital display is bad.
I am wondering what other models have the DMM/counter BUT display on the scope itself?
I thought a 2235 was a 2236 without the CTM board and display? Are you sure you have a 2235?
I mistyped 35 instead of 36 sorry for the confusion. Since the DMM display is unobtainium unless you salvage one from another unit, I am curious as to which models might display the data on the scope screen instead of a separate display.
|
Re: focus/astig off the center.
Geometry is fine.
I'll check voltages carefully... they seemed about right but I did a quick check not a rigorous one.
tks.
lc ct1dmk
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 1/22/2012 2:19 AM, David wrote: How is the screen geometry?
I would check the various voltages to the CRT except the acceleration voltage with a medium voltage probe.
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:14:41 +0000, Luis Cupido<cupido@...> wrote:
Hi,
I have two 7623b with the following symptom: Focus adjust perfect on the center and not so perfect near the edges so when readout is perfect for astig/focus the center is bad and vice versa. Not too severe on one, but quite bad on the second scope. I'm sure someone will know ... so better ask before I tweak them up too much ;-)
Many thanks.
Luis Cupido ct1dmk. ------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Perhaps it was just easier to provide a DC heater supply of 12 volts at half the current of a 6 volt tube in a tubes scope for hum reduction.
Don Black.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 19-Jan-12 10:30 PM, phosphorphile wrote: Yes, it may be a 13 volt filament is easier to run at slightly lower voltage because perhaps the voltage being twice and the current being half of a 6 volt filament would make for a more constant current with line variations. Probably the way tungsten filaments work?
The 8393 was used in early 453's and later 503's, I know. Mebbe other models too.
Reducing heater voltage causes the cathode to produce a weaker electron cloud which reduces grid contact current. A positive voltage on the cathode sets plate current and normally blocks contact current with low DC resistance grid circuits but very high DC resistance grid circuits still suffer from grid current. I know for the 503 input 6DJ8's grid current was one of the selection criteria, too much produces diff amp balance instability.
308's were hot stuff when they came out but a little tricky to employ. Glad better types came out. Once ran into a PhD living in the past that thought a 308 was better than an OP27.
Arden
Phosphorphile posted
Ayup. I always wondered why Tek used the 8393, the 13> volt filament version of the 7586. Anyone? I dont know what instrument Tek used the 8393 in, so cant comment on an actual TEK unit, but running a13v volt filament on 12 v (provided the emission is high enough so the characteristics still suit the application ) will have two effects 1. All other things considered, it can lengthen the working life. 2. It will raise the input impedance much higher than when run at the specified filament watts.
I remember running 6.3 v fil s at 4,0v to get hi Z inputs for electrometer applications in the distant past. Cant remember the tube type now, maybe an EF37. Underrunning filaments in this way was a common thing to do in high input Z applications, but you had to select the right tube that could handle it, without poisoning etc. Special electrometer tubes were made with deliberately underrun filament voltages and some were specially selected types from a production run of normally 6.3 V filament units tyen rebranded to a different type number. The anode current was sigificantly reduced when this was done for the same grid base.
A somewhat parallel thing was done with the LM308A IC, which achieved a 40Mohm Dc Zin by running in "current starved " conditions
But maybe TEK had a diferent reason? Jojn Byers
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
David,
Do you happen to have a multimeter that has an "OUTPUT" terminal, like the Simpson 260 or an old Radio Shack analog multimeter?? This is for measuring AC in the presence of DC.? It's basically just a (high-voltage) cap inside the meter that's in?series with the AC meter circuit.
Example Simpson:
If so, you can use it to quickly make a rough measurement of ripple on each big electrolytic cap.? I'm thinking there shouldn't be more than?about 2 or 3 volts AC across any one cap in the 7603's LV power supply.? Just measure right across each caps + and - terminals (with the red lead plugged to the meter's "OUTPUT" terminal).
If you don't have an analog meter like that,? you should be able to use like a 1 uF cap in series with a DMM set for AC measurements.? You'd want to use say a 250V cap to be on the safe side.? Someone please chime in here if that won't work (per a DMM having to high of a Z-in???).
Of course, using a scope is the better way, in my opinion, to check for ripple, since you can really "see" the ripple. But I just thought I'd mention this good-old analog meter method.
Jimmy
|
...measure about 70V. Or you should get about 71.5V on side of that resistor, referenced to ground.
Should've been: ...measure about 70V. Or you should get about 71.5V on ONE side of that resistor, referenced to ground.
|
David and Magnus,
I'm thinking Q872 and the other 2 transistors are OK. There's just not quite enough base current to turn on Q872, and the others. The collector of Q860 is only 2 volts. It should be about 52V when things are normal (+50V supply + drops of 3 transistors' B-E junctions).
R860 (680K ohms) may be open. David, can you measure the volts ACROSS that resistor. Based on your previous measurements of the +130V supply, you should measure about 70V. Or you should get about 71.5V on side of that resistor, referenced to ground. Inspect for cracked solder joints around that area. Also, wiht the scope OFF, measure R860 ohms.
Could also be C866 is shorted, but that would be extemely rare. To eliminate that, pull one side up temporalialy, and power up and re-measure R860 volts.
I'm thinking Q860 is OK.
We've getting close!!!
Jimmy
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "magnustoelle" <magnustoelle@...> wrote:
Hello David,
It's getting late over here now, so others may correct me - but I have read over your voltage measurements and it seems that Jimmy has hit the nail right on the head.
Q872 e = +0.7v c = + 64.6v b = +1.3v
--> So the V BE should turn it on, but the V CE readings show that it does not.
Checking the parts list is easy. Sphere shows here that Q872 is a 2N3923, TO39 NPN transistor. If you find any other 150V rated, mid-beta NPN transistor, I would try that to replace Q872...
Good Luck when searching your drawers for existing replacements.
Cheers,
Magnus
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
If it actually is something heating up a little and then shutting down, it can be found with freeze mist. I can't remember how many times I have fixed equipment this way with very little trouble shooting.
Michael
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "Ed Breya" <edbreya@...> wrote: Yes indeed, the 2220 is virtually identical to the 2230 in most respects - just a notch down to fill the price v. performance market position at the time. The 2200 series models share the same basic power supply topology, tweaked to get more power for the digital storage add-ons.
Your equipment appears to be very limited, but you do have a working DMM and a "working" scope available for a few minutes at a time. You can use it to look at its own supplies and other circuitry, at least up to the point of shutdown.
Before delving further into the supply, I recommend that you first check your line voltage to see if it's on the high side, or possibly has transients or surges that may be causing the scopes to self-protect. I don't recall if the 2220 has the "trigger view" feature, but if so, set up for line triggering, and activate that to see roughly what the line looks like. This is band limited, so won't show fast transients. You can also look at the line voltage directly and more accurately with a X10 probe tip to the hot side. DO NOT connect the ground clip to anything, or preferably, disconnect it from the probe whenever poking around line voltage.
As I recall, the scopes should run on any line voltage between the specified limits, with no range switching needed. If you have access to a variac or step-down transformer you can try running at lower line voltage. If not, you can try loading down the branch circuit with extra lighting and appliances to see if it drops significantly, or even try something wired temporarily in series, like a space heater, coffee pot, or a large incandescent lamp.
Some background info should help:
1. Were these scopes working and then stopped, or did you just get them, and they didn't work? It seems from your initial post that they both failed at the same time. If so, one big thing in common would be line voltage problems. Do both scopes exhibit the same symptoms?
2. Is the available run time always about the same before shutting down? Does recycling the power make it run for the same length of time, or does it need to cool down first?
If the shutdown timing is fairly predictable, it may be good to monitor the outputs closely and watch to see if they sag or rise just before shutdown. Also, watch the display closely for dimming or blooming - evidence of same on the high voltage.
Also, look at the 20 kHz AC waveforms on the secondaries, ahead of the output rectifiers to see if they are nice, rounded squarish waves, and see if that shape changes just before shutdown.
That's probably enough for now.
I agree with the suggestion to revisit the 2235. It may be easier to fix, or you may luck out and find it's problem - then you'll have one fully working scope - a big improvement.
Ed
--- In TekScopes@..., David <davidwhess@> wrote:
When I was searching for a replacement channel swtich, I found that a number of the 22xx series oscilloscopes have the same main board which has the power supply including the 2213A, 2215A, 2230, 2232, 2235, 2236 but not the 2213 or 2215. For the analog only models, the extra outputs which would go to the digital storage board are tied to ground to maintain bias on the channel switches. The 2220 is much rarer with no online service manual so I never checked it.
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:28:59 -0800, "tom jobe" <tomjobe@> wrote:
Hi Tan, Some one told me that the 2220 is the 60 MHz version of the 2230 100 MHz scope. If this is true, the 2230 manual might be your best bet. It is available from several places including:
Now that I hear about your experience level and what equipment you have on hand, I would fix the 2235 first as it has no top board limiting your access to the power supply (and almost everything else in the scope) while the scope is actually running.
You mention the need for an isolation transformer. You probably do not need an isolation transformer at this point, as its only value is to be able to "float" the scope so you can use another scope to look at the inverter side of the power supply. The inverter is already making the 43 VDC so what would you need to check anyway? I know the service manual calls for an isolation transformer (so I bought one) but my experience finds it to be fairly useless in the 22xx repair process. Also, once you "float" the scope the chassis of the scope is now at some elevated voltage, which is a little scary for an amateur like me.
You mentioned that Q908 was up on the heatsink but it isn't. Take a closer look as it only is involved in running the "gate" of Q9070. Q9070 is up on the heatsink. Q908 is a small transistor with minor currents through it, and Q9070 does the real work of creating the 43 VDC for the inverter.
If you ever decide to do the external injection of the 43 VDC, you need to disconnect Q9070, not Q908. tom jobe...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@> To: <TekScopes@...> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:37 PM Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Thank you Tom for taking the time to point out specifically the likely cause
of the problem.
I know it takes effort to go through the details and I really appreciate it.
Just to let you know where I come from, so that there is less to assume.
I am an electronics engineer from Singapore above 50 so very much familiar with vacuum and solid state electronics.
I do not have the schematics for 2220 so like you I am assuming it is quite
similar to 2235 which I have it downloaded.
I have both 2220 and 2235 and there appear to be quite similar though the PCB layout is slightly different.
I have complete understanding of how the power supply works.
Pre-regulator - PWM driving Q908 to produce +43V across TP940 and TP950
Final Regulator - DC-DC push-pull inverter through Q947 and Q946.
I have another scope 2235, unfortunately, it too went down at the same time,
so the only instrument I have is a multimeter.
Anyway, I do not have an isolation transformer so even with the 2235 working, I will need to get an isolation transformer before I could take any
measurement.
Any idea what VA rating is needed for the isolation transformer?
Based on the power needs, it appears to be at least 200VA.
Initially, I was asking about R907, not because I was suspecting the resistor but I intend to check the load current by putting an ammeter in series with the resistor.
For that to be useful I need to know what is expected. Like you. I am suspecting that the voltage at R907 has gone up after the set warms up thus
shutting down U930.
I will probably go with the cap changes you have recommended since I have some time during the Lunar New Year break.
Unfortunately, I do not have ESR meter, but I don't think that a big issue just replacing the caps.
I am aware of the direct 43Vdc injection, but thank you for telling me the detail that Q908 needs to be disconnected.
Unfortunately, I do not have a power supply with this voltage output. I only have a power supply of 18V max 2A. So I will have to hold off this approach.
One more thing which I did not mention earlier is that I detached the +5.2V
connection to the digital board (for the storage function of 2220) and behaviour remains unchanged.
Rgds,
Chor Ming
_____
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf
Of tom jobe Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:30 AM To: TekScopes Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
I saw your 2220 question the first time you posted it a few days ago, and I
did not have a nice short answer for you. Since you have not gotten the answer you were looking for, let me comment a bit on this. First off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service manual for it, and none of
the download sites I checked seem to have it either, including ArtekMedia.com having it for purchase. So I will assume it is similar to the
better 22xx's such as the 2235, at least around the power supply. I will also assume that you do have a service manual to work with. U930 monitors the voltage drop across R907, and in your case it probably thinks the current is too high after a few minutes, so it shuts down. I have worked on lots of 22xx scopes and I have not seen the value of R907 drift and cause this problem, but others have reported that as a possibility. Odds are, that this is not your problem. An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907 within the inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side of the main transformer. How you go about finding the problem depends on what equipment you have available, and what your testing preferences might be. If you don't have much to work with, just start changing components. In my experience the components in the right rear corner of the mainboard cause the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942 and C943. If you have
some decent soldering equipment you can change all three capacitors quickly
without removing the mainboard. If you have access to an ESR meter you could check all of the aluminum electrolytic capacitors in circuit. Most of the electrolytics give no trouble, especially the six(?) 840 uF caps in front of the heat sink for Q9070 (but you would want to check all of the electrolytic caps if you had an ESR meter handy). Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an external power source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If your power supply allowed you to adjust the current limit you could sneak up on it and just get the problem part(s) nice and warm. You will need to at least disconnect
Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP 950 from the bottom
or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two wires to the bottom side to make the 43 VDC connections. You can use the scope in its normal way when it
is powered with the external 43 VDC. The external 43 VDC idea came from a fine Tekscopes member named Hakan, many
years ago, and he has an excellent document you should read at:
A couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly available components you might use to replace some of the original Tektronix part numbers that often fail. I can send you that directly or you can find it in
the Tekscopes Message archive if you like. Another thing you might do is take resistance readings from chassis ground to each of the voltage test points before you get very far into this repair
(with the scope not connected to the mains of course!). There are lots of other ideas to add to this, but this should get you started. This will be a simple fix, so just take your time and understand what you are doing. tom jobe...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@ <mailto:jonray03%40singnet.com.sg> > To: <TekScopes@... <mailto:TekScopes%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:45 AM Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Has anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series scope power supply?
Behaviour
1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly and stay on for a
few
minutes
2. Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to on again and it
continues in this on/off mode
3. Pre-regulator out = 43V (between TP940 and TP950)
4. All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes are +8.6, -8.6,
+5.2, +100 are all ok.
What are likely problems before I start ripping the components from the circuit?
ttesenq@ <mailto:ttesenq%40tiscali.co.uk> suggested that it
could be the pre-regulator MOSFET
P9070.
I though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not look likely because electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit to fire up for
a few minutes
It is more likely a active component that weaken with increase temperature,
so ttesenq@ <mailto:ttesenq%40tiscali.co.uk> could be right.
This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components
Any other possible lead of similar experience.
|