开云体育

Hi Shane, Yes, indeed, it is entirely possible to check the status of an aDNA sample for SNPs of known downstream clades of R-FGC17460. This can be done from the BAM file (hg19 or hg38?), or by

Ewenn,Thanks for the heads up on the new paper. I've already read most of it. It's pretty cool to read about a burial that is part of my paternal lineage. If I understand correctly, KO015 also had the

Thanks Ewen, it is really interesting. I saw yesterday evening the update done by FTDNA on discover tree, adding Koksijde 15 downstream R-FGC17460 (

Hi Bertram, all, A new paper concerning this study and these aDNAs was recently published:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/medical/ancient-dna-traces-multiple-sclerosis-origins-to-5-000-year-old-migrations/ar-AA1mVKJR Dan D

" Apparently, the number of BigY tests processed by FTDNA has been a surprisingly constant *47* tests per day for the last three years." BigY testing had a nice uptick last "month". June 5? 111,760

An interesting article raising ethical concerns about the early days of the Human Genome Project: https://www.statnews.com/2024/07/09/human-genome-project-untold-story-how-si

A new preprint: "Resolving the source of branch length variation in the Y chromosome phylogeny" https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.05.602100v1/ Debbie Kennett

I’d quibble with the use of the term “descendants” in the title. The deceased may be collateral relatives of GW, but GW has no documented descendants…

Interesting,Through my paper trail, George Steptoe Washington, nephew, is my 4th cousin five times removed through my Dabney/Maupin connection. I think MANY, MANY are descended from some of those

Possibly of wider DNA interest to American members - DNA Study IDs Descendants of George Washington from Unmarked Remains, Findings to Aid Service Member IDs Going Back to World War II

It's been very interesting to look at the STR frequencies. I have over 5000 matches at Y12 but only a few at Y37 (other than several known Y 5th cousins).? ?I've wondered why the steep decline and

Way back in ancient DNA times DYF371X results did appear to support some branching under Z326.? Overlaying DYF371X results on top of the current branch structure would be an interesting exercise.? I

Thank you, Martin, for sharing this. I went through and put in my own STRs, found those values where my numbers were not common, and finally compared those results with a my BigY matches using the

Thanks Martin. And I’m glad you included the ZERO counts. On my leg of U106, we our all DYS425=0, which evidently formed about 1500BCE with Z326 haplogroup. But that ZERO itself doesn’t tell the

I needed a project to re-teach myself Excel.? ?I used to be pretty good at Excel but that was 15 years ago and I have not really touched it for the last 10 years. For my re-teaching

Hi Robert,I have found when working with autosomal, that it is much easier to sort matches that come from my mother (over 5000 matches) and father (over 7000 matches) rather than using my own dna

[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Wayne - I was lumping STRs in with structural variants, since I think the applicability will be the same. Sure, we should be able to get the "original 111" without a separate test, but

On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 09:57 PM, Iain wrote: thank you for your reply, we are far away from creating a complete T2T or De Novo Genome Assembly. There is currently not a single company in the world