开云体育

Interesting that 2-3% is the probability that there would be zero SNP for over 7 generations. In my case, from MRCA (with my 7c1x with BigY results) to my grandfather is exactly 7 generations. Then,

Brian, I have a similar situation. My terminal haplogroup is FGC11677. I found a 4th cousin of my father whose common ancestor was my 5th great grandfather born in 1776. When his big y results posted,

There is a natural tendency within this group to generalise based on everyone's personal experiences - with a few exceptions, of course. When I began all this seriously, in early 2006, I read

Rich, My haplogroup is R-FTE39986 which goes back to 1450 ce. I got 6 matches, none on the BigY, just 111. I don't recognize any of the names, or if they have trees, none of the names in the trees.

Hi Mike- Can you elaborate a bit on this? Like, (1) how many GD:3 or closer Y111 matches do/did you have? So you’d like to find out who your 3rd great-great was. If that ancestor is MRCA with

How old does FTDNA say your haplogroup is? If it's on the order of 1000 or more years old, that isn't unusual, I think. Sent from Frontier Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:16 AM,

Hello, I received my BigY results yesterday and I am a bit disappointed and confused. I thought I would find my surname in the match results, but no joy. I got names that I've never heard of. I have a

Hi Martin It is almost certainly the pending BigY tester. Over the past year I managed 13 BigY tests and this came up a number of times because of failed tests. Most of my testers had old archive

There are advantages to not having Family Finder testers named on the Block Tree. While the distinction is slightly blurred by differing coverages and BigY-500 tests, etc., the people currently on the

Re RootsTech 2024: A kind request to anyone participating in person and meeting people from FTDNA: Could you please ask if there are plans to have more language versions? Recently I manged to locate

Hello fellow U106ers, I just received my BigY results and my haplogroup is R-FTE39986, which I'm told is a subgroup of R-M269. If anyone would like to look at my results you are very welcome to do so.

Family Finder, old National Geneographic and other SNP tests do in fact show up in the block tree. Not the names of the testers, but the total number of SNP tests. I wasn’t talking about their

As a fan of Alex Ws detailed presentations, I agree.

And while that's great for folks who want to know their BigY results but for those of us who have already purchased BigY we just wish to have all of the annotated results nearby referenced such that

Family Finder YDNA samples will appear in the discover pages but will not show up in the block tree page! One has to take the Big Y test to get into the block tree page.

Well, I'm still waiting for some ancient remains from a fellow situated below R-Z2265 and well into the ~800 year-long R-FGC396 block (give or take a couple of centuries), for actual evidence for or

I have the same thing. FGC11686 has split off from the FGC11685 block. Block tree shows no testers, discover shows 1. Its been split at FTDNA long enough to show up at SNP Finder and David Vance's SNP

Hi folks, This is an interesting result, especially since it breaks up the R-U106>A2150>BY69794 block. The connection to the Tumulus culture is important, as we have other R-U106 branches belonging to

Just to remind everyone, the small R-A2150 branch that Ewenn is discussing in conjunction with the LEU007 sample, is immediately below R-U106, and notably retains the ancestral DYS492 STR result =12,

Hi all, I attempted an analysis of LEU007, to check if it can really belongs to R-U106, and if possible to refine its haplogroup. LEU007 consists of several fastq files. I only analyzed the "YC1"