开云体育

Hi Alex, Welcome to R-DF98! Our little haplogroup contains some of Europe's biggest names, but only a few percent of its population. From ancient DNA, we can be pretty certain it arose in the Unetice

Here are the original papers: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06923-7 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02303-6 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00072-1

It will help to have other corroborating sites but this is a new stake in the ground if the results hold...? This shouldn't be surprising actually - our historical perspective (including religious

Hey there, I recently tested for my haplogroups with LivingDNA and was fairly surprised by my yDNA result, namely U106>DF98. I haven't tested to get any further than that as I don't really fancy

Modern humans were already in northern Europe 45,000 years ago (and shortly after that in the British Isles) DNA from bones found in a cave in Germany has been identified as from Homo sapiens, showing

Scientists Are Racing to Unearth the Secrets of an Ancient Underwater World Historians and divers are trying to retrieve prehistoric clues from beneath the waves—but they have to act fast. Read in

Hi Iain, I had to chuckle when I read "patience" in your message. My grandfather used to say, "patience lad", because I was very impatient as a child and still impatient at times. I wanted to thank

Hi Wayne, Thanks for the great info. Best regards, Mike [email protected]> wrote:

Michael, What you need to consider is how your surname may have been Anglicized.? So if Sartor represents a potential geographic reference point would a previous generation in your line spell the

The path from the Mesolithic down to R-FT209276 is scattered with information, some of which we know fairly well, some of which we still have to guess at. We know that, between around 4500 BC and

Hi Mike, The best thing here is probably simply patience until the final results are revealed. I appreciate that can be an impatient waiting game! As John mentioned, we have a tester with kit number

I've never heard the name Jacob Sartor before this. Does this mean he is an ancestor or just has the same haplogroup? [email protected]> wrote:

Thanks Vince :)

Mike, You can probably go ahead and join the R-U106 project at FTDNA. https://www.familytreedna.com/public/U106 <https://www.familytreedna.com/public/U106> If you go to the DNA Results page of that

Thank you John. [email protected]> wrote:

Hello Mike First looking at my own blocktree; A17384 is one of 11 equivalent SNPs in the R-BY79404 branch. FTDNA will always use the lead SNP, unless your result for that one failed QA, in which case

Hello everyone, I ordered my Big-Y about 9 weeks ago. I was supposed to get the first results (111) about now, but something went wrong in the lab. So, they needed to re-test the sample which takes a

Doc, Unetice; were we EHG in the Mesolithic?

& don’t let my idiosyncratic communication style discourage you; connect with me cousin; bridge the gap of science & history! Chapter 1: Pretentious Declaration of Information Not Useful to Most My

Wow, I’ve been waiting 29 years for this moment. Personalty I’ve always had an affinity with the Norman & Saxon culture but thought I was Celtic Irish. I’ve come to learn much since then; so