¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: Name associated with a haplogroup
Hi Wayne, Thanks for the great info. Best regards, Mike [email protected]> wrote:
By Michael Primm · #7754 ·
Re: Name associated with a haplogroup
Michael, What you need to consider is how your surname may have been Anglicized.? So if Sartor represents a potential geographic reference point would a previous generation in your line spell the
By Wayne · #7753 ·
Re: Information Regarding FT209276
The path from the Mesolithic down to R-FT209276 is scattered with information, some of which we know fairly well, some of which we still have to guess at. We know that, between around 4500 BC and
By Iain · #7752 ·
Re: Name associated with a haplogroup
Hi Mike, The best thing here is probably simply patience until the final results are revealed. I appreciate that can be an impatient waiting game! As John mentioned, we have a tester with kit number
By Iain · #7751 ·
Re: Name associated with a haplogroup
I've never heard the name Jacob Sartor before this. Does this mean he is an ancestor or just has the same haplogroup? [email protected]> wrote:
By Michael Primm · #7750 ·
Re: Name associated with a haplogroup
Thanks Vince :)
By Michael Primm · #7749 ·
Re: Name associated with a haplogroup
Mike, You can probably go ahead and join the R-U106 project at FTDNA. https://www.familytreedna.com/public/U106 <https://www.familytreedna.com/public/U106> If you go to the DNA Results page of that
By vineviz · #7748 ·
Re: Name associated with a haplogroup
Thank you John. [email protected]> wrote:
By Michael Primm · #7747 ·
Re: Name associated with a haplogroup
Hello Mike First looking at my own blocktree; A17384 is one of 11 equivalent SNPs in the R-BY79404 branch. FTDNA will always use the lead SNP, unless your result for that one failed QA, in which case
By John T · #7746 ·
Name associated with a haplogroup
Hello everyone, I ordered my Big-Y about 9 weeks ago. I was supposed to get the first results (111) about now, but something went wrong in the lab. So, they needed to re-test the sample which takes a
By Michael Primm · #7745 ·
Re: Information Regarding FT209276
Doc, Unetice; were we EHG in the Mesolithic?
By man · #7744 ·
Re: Information Regarding FT209276
& don¡¯t let my idiosyncratic communication style discourage you; connect with me cousin; bridge the gap of science & history! Chapter 1: Pretentious Declaration of Information Not Useful to Most My
Re: Information Regarding FT209276
Wow, I¡¯ve been waiting 29 years for this moment. Personalty I¡¯ve always had an affinity with the Norman & Saxon culture but thought I was Celtic Irish. I¡¯ve come to learn much since then; so
By man · #7741 ·
Re: Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
Despite my facile comment I think this subject fascinating. Thanks Iain. wrote:
By Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...> · #7740 ·
Re: Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
I went for a walk over some of those deposits this morning. The effects on my particular part of eastern Scotland were very mild. The tsunami came from the north and it's not until you reach Shetland
By Iain · #7739 ·
Re: Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
Maybe this is the origin of the story later told by Plato and learned from priests in Ancient Egypt that relates to the destruction of Atlantis ¡°beyond the pillars of Hercules¡± (Gibraltar).
By Dan D. · #7738 ·
Re: Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
The original research paper that this news item is based on is here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jqs.3586 The newspaper headline is clearly meant to attract attention rather than
By Mike Tryon · #7737 ·
Re: Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
Fortunately I live on the top of a cliff.
By Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...> · #7736 ·
Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/mega-tsunami-stone-age-britain-b2483031.html Dan D.
By Dan D. · #7735 ·
Re: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06865-0
Hi Rob, BAM files of these aDNA are available in the European Nucleotide Archives (ENA) database: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB64656 Among these aDNAs, NEO752 was yet analyzed by FTDNA
By Ewenn · #7734 ·