开云体育

Hello CB There has always been a significant difference in SNP tested men in the Public Haplotree compared with the Discover Haplotree Reports. That difference is now 11,281 more in Discover, but a

The public tree shows 4,474 for Z156 and the discover reports show 4,516. It seems like it is going to be a long slow process if there are 750,000 male FF testers.!!!!! Only 5 of my 629 M269? 25

Back in April of this year I posted this introduction to the group: "I'm new to this group (just got BigY results and I'm U106) and wondering about possible mutual benefits between the Tryon surname

I did the Genographic 2.0 test in 2016, and imported the results into FTDNA in the same year. Genographic reported my haplogroup as Z160, now dated 2170 BCE (95% confidence interval: 2816-1610 BCE).

In general one needn’t worry about FTDNA/MH transfers as FTDNA processed all of them and the SNP overlap is very high. Some people like their MH ethnic origins %, but many people would place them at

Hi, FTDNA Discover has just been updated with new data from FF/Y-SNP testers (7018 subclades, equivalent to the Y-DNA haplotree data from December 8, 2023). Attached is a link to a European map by

That is very interesting. If the rate of false positives "child-only matches" is so high then I also wonder how it affects the ethnic origin estimated in MH, although for my mother the estimate

MyHeritage have a database of 7.7 million whereas FTDNA’s Family Finder database is only about 1.5 million so you would expect many more matches at MyHeritage though I’m sure you’re right that

Thank you very much Debbie. That really clarifies a lot and explains why I have 2x more matches in MH compared to FTDNA, although MH is a bit more popular in Poland, I think, also because of the

Hello Centropol MyHeritage use a complicated process using imputation and stitching to compensate for the low overlap of markers on the different chips. The process is described in this blog post:

Hello Debbie, Could you please elaborate more on the below? I do not have any close matches on MH, except my direct family which I asked to test, but plenty of remote ones and I was wondering how I

Thank you very much! Cheers! Damir

Thanks, Iain & Ewenn. I’ll look for any updates that may appear. John

Hello Damir FF SNPs can be seen in the project pages, just as with any other test. https://www.familytreedna.com/public/U106?iframe=ysnp If they all have Y12 or more STRs, haplogroups can be seen in

Hi John, I think Iain has fully answered your questions. In addition, on your R-S15309 branch, downstream of R-Z18, only these two testers have appeared since the date given by Iain. If we go back 1

GAP admins can keep track of their updated FF Y matches by looking at the Received Lab Results which now reports ‘Prediction’ under Lab Procedure To Damir. I believe you can only see them via the

Where can I see this new Y-dna results? It just appears on dashboard where FF DNA Results are shown? An icon appears or do we need to find it elsewhere? I got my final haplogropu on Yseq, so looking

Hi John, You can check the results whenever you like here: https://www.familytreedna.com/public/y-dna-haplotree/R;name=R-S9509 Click on the three dots on the right-hand side and choose one of the

Hi Ewenn, Can you check your data for R-S9509? There's been no change in that clade for at least 5 years as I manage both of the bigY kits. (Unless the change is due to some FF result that I cannot

Hi Jason, What you're referring to is nothing to do with the test itself. There was a short period where Family Tree DNA predicted groups for Y-STR tests with better resolution than just R-M269.