开云体育

I know that one of the tests was my uncles. He was moved to R-S15510.

Thank you- Iain.? The Little Project has two of these initial returns, they happen to be brothers and they have landed on R-S18823, which is indeed under Z306 and U106.? My question will be whether

Hi folks, A quick note to say that overnight the first batch of Y-DNA haplogroups from Family Finder tests has entered the haplotree. Nearly 12,000 tests have been added to the haplotree in the last

Thank you Mike for this interesting feedback. R-M269 is not the only haplogroup affected by these differences. The cohabitation between bigY500 and 700 sometimes gives some curious results. In my

I asked FTDNA about your question and have a little more info on one issue. 1- "R- M269 (among others), the Y-DNA Haplotree indicates 97 equivalent SNPs, compared to 112 for Discover… Why these 15

Thanks Tom. We’ll have to wait and see how these haplogroup reports turn out. In theory, FTDNA could add lots of custom Y-SNPs to the microarray they use for the Family Finder test to give a more

Thanks Debbie.? I think it's worth remarking here that the FTDNA lab processes the MyHeritage autosomal tests. We asked at the conference, and they confirmed this, but explained MyHeritage then has

FTDNA have also advised group administrators of the following. On the website, we have temporarily blocked users from having the ability to download files that include matches and/or Chromosome

Here is the relevant text from the e-mail sent to FTDNA Group Administrators: Y-DNA Haplogroups for Family Finder Customers We are excited to begin releasing the long-awaited

Hi, This is indeed excellent news. We should in theory see the number of testers positive for certain R-U106 subclades increase quite significantly. I guess the available SNPs depend on the chip

Sorry folks. Didn't know where else to post this but its good news. "Big News!?FamilyTreeDNA?is delivering holiday gifts early! Y DNA?haplogroups are beginning to be delivered as a free benefit to

In addition, the deletion of FT354122 was not linked to the upgrade from a bigY500 test to a bigY700. This was, it seems to me, more linked to its detection on a certain number of aDNAs which did not

Hi Iain, Thank you for your reply. Yes, that’s what I observe in my match. Ultimately, when the number of bigY tests will have increased considerably, the number of resilient PVs should drop

Hi Ewenn, The private variants list is essentially stripped straight out of the VCF file, from what I can tell. Private variants will gradually get replaced with named SNPs, which will lead to changes

Hi John, Indeed, the cohabitation between bigY500 and bigY700 tests does not seem very ideal. Imagine if we had to move to a T2T reference and long reads tests... Coming back to the Private Variants

Hello Ewen <mutations can sometimes be deleted from the list of PVs associated with a kit, without this being reflected on the associated bigY match(es) If I am reading your post correctly, this is

Hi, all! Thank you, John and Iain, for the information you've shared with me!?? John - if I understand correctly, the X in the non matching variants column means the two kits have greater than 30

Hi Mary, Several answers have already been provided to you by other members, more competent than I am, and FTDNA should shed more light on the issue you are having with these kits. Therefore, what

Thanks John - that's what comes of not reading the original post carefully enough! :)

Hello Mary It is not often (in fact a first) that I can elucidate in respect of an Iain McDonald answer. An x in the NMV column always means more than 30 NMVs, and is only ever shown where you have