Exomes
For those of us here in America there is a new project where you might be able to get your exome sequenced with potentially the results being added to your medical record.? Still early as to whether
By
Wayne
·
#8496
·
|
Re: English Wills (Was: Is your EKA information accurate?)
Thank you Debbie - that looks like a terrific initiative. I have spent so many hours transcribing PCC wills. A first cut by AI would be a great help. Cheers Warren Searell
By
Warren Searell
·
#8495
·
|
Re: 23andMe ancestry test sale
Many of the objections? made by Kari Paul, reference 138 , can similarly apply to all genetic testing - not just 23andMe!! -- Kevin Terry
By
Kevin Terry
·
#8494
·
|
Re: 23andMe ancestry test sale
Is it a good idea to test with 23andMe right now? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/23andMe#Financial_problems
By
Jeremy Langton
·
#8493
·
|
Re: 23andMe ancestry test sale
The premium upgrade is required to search for haplogroup matches. All the same, I have found 23andme very useful for exploring my ancestry (including my R-L46 matches) and its autosomal breakdown to
By
Darius
·
#8492
·
|
Re: 23andMe ancestry test sale
You can search matches at 23andMe by haplogroup. I found a match at R1b-L1 that was born an Adams but was adopted by a family living close by. Jim ¡°Griz¡± Adams [email protected]> wrote:
By
Jim Adams
·
#8491
·
|
Re: 23andMe ancestry test sale
Roughly half of the 23andMe testers would be females, so that would cut the results in half. Plus, AFAIK there is no way to see all of your Y-DNA matches there, nor any way to search by Y-DNA
By
Raymond Wing
·
#8490
·
|
Re: 23andMe ancestry test sale
I am interested in haplogroup FGC13326. FamilytreeDNA have something over 1200 testers in this haplogroup. 23andMe's data base is more than 10 times the size of FamilytreeDNA. They provide the Y
By
Kevin Terry
·
#8489
·
|
Re: 23andMe ancestry test sale
Thanks. Sorry for showing off about the size of my.....tree. [email protected]> wrote:
By
Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...>
·
#8488
·
|
Re: 23andMe ancestry test sale
Piero, Don't feel bad. My results, which have been pretty consistent since 2015, changed drastically also. Germanic Europe went from 35% to 69%, England and NW Europe went from 36% to 17%, Scotland
By
ejsteele56@...
·
#8487
·
|
Re: 23andMe ancestry test sale
10,421. [email protected]> wrote:
By
Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...>
·
#8486
·
|
Re: 23andMe ancestry test sale
Yes, at Ancestry my Scotland component went from 46% to 17% in one leap, prompting an identity crisis! But Ancestry have a lot of members and trees, mine containing over 10,000 ancestors and
By
Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...>
·
#8485
·
|
Re: 23andMe ancestry test sale
It depends on what you are looking for with regards to DNA testing. If you are looking for cousins (roughly up to the fourth cousin level) then they are worth it. While they both give you a breakdown
By
Raymond Wing
·
#8484
·
|
23andMe ancestry test sale
Hi, I saw on the web that 23andMe have a sale. Ancestry test down from €109 to €79. Is it worth it? -- Kevin Terry
By
Kevin Terry
·
#8483
·
|
Re: Phylogeography: R-U106 basal clades
_>If this is correct our dates in Neustrelitz and Mecklenburg go back to Niklot (1090-1160) ancestor of the Lords and Dukes of Mecklenburg, one of the oldest German ruling houses, and reputed to be of
By
Belinda Dettmann
·
#8482
·
|
Re: Phylogeography: R-U106 basal clades
Hi Belinda, ? Globetrekker takes its dates from the underlying Discover system. The Discover dates have their issues, but overall they should be fairly trustworthy. ? That doesn't mean that they are
By
Iain
·
#8481
·
|
Re: Phylogeography: R-U106 basal clades
Hi Iain Thanks for your comments. I certainly don't trust Globetrekker as far as recent locations go, and I have always been convinced that our excursion (L2>>CTS4099etc) to England and back is
By
Belinda Dettmann
·
#8480
·
|
Re: Phylogeography: R-U106 basal clades
Hi Belinda, ? Short answer to your second question: don't trust Globetrekker, particularly for R-U106. Family Tree DNA acknowledge that it's in "beta", but it's really not comparable with
By
Iain
·
#8479
·
|
Re: Phylogeography: R-U106 basal clades
Hi Belinda I don't know how much reading you have done around what are known as the Northern Wars. I was aware it was complex, but until I have had to dig into it in detail specifically for the
By
Brian Swann
·
#8478
·
|
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
There is always the Journal of Genetic Genealogy, as a sort of halfway house between a blogpost and a formal scientific paper. It does have an editorial board, of course. But I can think of a few
By
Brian Swann
·
#8477
·
|