开云体育

Hi Mike, By R-194282, I presume you mean R-BY194284? I don't know what searching you've done for your 3*great-grandfather's ancestry. I'm expecting you've already looked for records on Scotland's

Hi Noah, I'm not sure about R-P312 in Scandinavia - it's a little outside my realm of knowledge. Certainly R-P312 seems to have travelled west before R-U106, so got a foothold on the Atlantic Coasts

Hello CHristiaan, I will definitely take a look at this talk. Incidentally, you may find my 2017 essay on the same topic, titled Reflections on the demographic prehistory of Europe, at the following

Interesting lecture about the genetic history of Europe by Johannes Krause (Max-Planck institute Leipzig) https://youtu.be/mWTVx3Cx6Zc?si=QPNFsSGjtQfb2vmJ

Hi Tom - quick question, do you mean to say "geological" or "geographical" place for this genetic cluster? leake

Hi All, After hanging out with the?R-FGC910 branches for the last four years, through my Gleave surname and very small surname project, I decided to test my mother's paternal line and luckily managed

I'm not sure the solidness of this question. However, in the Little Surname DNA Project we have a fair-sized group of men with surname Little/Lyttle and fall under U106 > L1 > A680 ...? This was Leo

Thank you for the clarification Iain. Do you think that most of the elevated P312 in Norway/Denmark vis-à-vis Sweden can be attributed to increased Bell Beaker influence in those areas? Best, Noah

A Big Y test would be the best way for you to learn about your Y line. Its not that expensive!

Hi Noah, I wasn't intending to say that R-P312 was more or less common than R-U106 per se, merely that I + R1a + R-P312 represents most Viking Y-DNA, while R-U106 is only a small fraction. Indeed,

Hi Iain, Quick question regarding R-P312 vs R-U106 in Scandinavia. When you say P312 was more common than U106 among Vikings, are you referring specifically to Norwegians and Danes? I thought that at

Hi Alex, The "not the parent expected" possibility is remarkably common. Even in well-attested genealogies like those of medieval royal dynasties, the rate of unknown cuckoldry is about 1%, perhaps a

Nature paper from 2020. Dan

Hi Alex Great question and discussion. All I can add is with regard to "not the parent expected" and my advice is, don't jump to conclusions. My research includes a lot of "out in the sticks" farmers

Hi Roy, thanks for the reply and the welcome! I have autosomal files on MyHeritage as well. I also took a look at the Daly surname project on FamilyTreeDNA and there were a few other U106 Dalys out

Hey Iain, Thanks a lot for the welcome and your reply! I do hope the "not the parent expected" possibility isn't correct; it seems a little far-fetched to me as I come from a line of land-owning

Chalk, protected by a concrete walkway, beach and pier at the bottom and a promenade with fencing at top.

One DF98 was found among the headless Gladiators found in York dated to around 200 AD! Seven of the 80 were dna tested and six had local autosomal dna.

Depends what your cliff's made of. Over the past few centuries a lot of folk in coastal (erosion) East Gumblia woke up with their feet dangling over the North Sea.

Well, since we're using culturally appropriate greetings, let me say Bonjour-Hi! There is little that can be added to what Iain has covered below. However, speaking as the descendant of one of those