开云体育

Hi Iain, Quick question regarding R-P312 vs R-U106 in Scandinavia. When you say P312 was more common than U106 among Vikings, are you referring specifically to Norwegians and Danes? I thought that at

Hi Alex, The "not the parent expected" possibility is remarkably common. Even in well-attested genealogies like those of medieval royal dynasties, the rate of unknown cuckoldry is about 1%, perhaps a

Nature paper from 2020. Dan

Hi Alex Great question and discussion. All I can add is with regard to "not the parent expected" and my advice is, don't jump to conclusions. My research includes a lot of "out in the sticks" farmers

Hi Roy, thanks for the reply and the welcome! I have autosomal files on MyHeritage as well. I also took a look at the Daly surname project on FamilyTreeDNA and there were a few other U106 Dalys out

Hey Iain, Thanks a lot for the welcome and your reply! I do hope the "not the parent expected" possibility isn't correct; it seems a little far-fetched to me as I come from a line of land-owning

Chalk, protected by a concrete walkway, beach and pier at the bottom and a promenade with fencing at top.

One DF98 was found among the headless Gladiators found in York dated to around 200 AD! Seven of the 80 were dna tested and six had local autosomal dna.

Depends what your cliff's made of. Over the past few centuries a lot of folk in coastal (erosion) East Gumblia woke up with their feet dangling over the North Sea.

Well, since we're using culturally appropriate greetings, let me say Bonjour-Hi! There is little that can be added to what Iain has covered below. However, speaking as the descendant of one of those

Hi Alex, Welcome to R-DF98! Our little haplogroup contains some of Europe's biggest names, but only a few percent of its population. From ancient DNA, we can be pretty certain it arose in the Unetice

Here are the original papers: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06923-7 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02303-6 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00072-1

It will help to have other corroborating sites but this is a new stake in the ground if the results hold...? This shouldn't be surprising actually - our historical perspective (including religious

Hey there, I recently tested for my haplogroups with LivingDNA and was fairly surprised by my yDNA result, namely U106>DF98. I haven't tested to get any further than that as I don't really fancy

Modern humans were already in northern Europe 45,000 years ago (and shortly after that in the British Isles) DNA from bones found in a cave in Germany has been identified as from Homo sapiens, showing

Scientists Are Racing to Unearth the Secrets of an Ancient Underwater World Historians and divers are trying to retrieve prehistoric clues from beneath the waves—but they have to act fast. Read in

Hi Iain, I had to chuckle when I read "patience" in your message. My grandfather used to say, "patience lad", because I was very impatient as a child and still impatient at times. I wanted to thank

Hi Wayne, Thanks for the great info. Best regards, Mike [email protected]> wrote:

Michael, What you need to consider is how your surname may have been Anglicized.? So if Sartor represents a potential geographic reference point would a previous generation in your line spell the

The path from the Mesolithic down to R-FT209276 is scattered with information, some of which we know fairly well, some of which we still have to guess at. We know that, between around 4500 BC and