开云体育

Thank you Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 15:52 To: [email protected] Subject: [R1b-CTS4466-Plus] Confirm Membership email

Confirmed! Cheers, Rob O'Leary

Am I to answer this? What did I miss?

Confirmed Timothy Erwin

confirmed Regards Shane McBride me@...

Confirmed. Thank you. Sent from my itty bitty iPhone keyboard

Acknowledged receipt and I am a member. Thanks! Roy E. Walker 906045 R-FT41075 On the go, sent from my iPhone

Lucas: You said, in part, in your 5 March 2021 post to our groups.io: “If you have done BigY already then you will have a list of private variants. To know just how long ago you diverged from your

Hello, Ed. Lucas could not be aware that you only tested the R1b-CTS4466 SNP Pack yourself, so testing Evan will give you more data than you have at the moment. The results will certainly confirm

Ed, I think you may have misunderstood how Big Y works. Testing descendants is never recommended, as you NEVER learn anything new from that. It won't confirm what you are hoping to achieve, as it

great to get this heads up. I upgraded my son Evan's kit from 67 to BigY. This will show whether A1133 is truly my terminal SNP, once his Big Y data is compiled. Thanks. Ed Smith (aka

Hello cousins! If you were thinking about upgrading to the Big Y 700, there is a discount until March 7th if you use the promo code

Hello, Ed. If I may interject, not directly related to the discussion as such, is that for privacy reasons (GDPR in Europe) we should not post anyone’s given names. You can always post the kit

Hi, As I had recently had my results back from 23andMe I thought I’d share them in case they were of interest. A couple of years ago I upgraded my Y-DNA with FTDNA to what was the Big-Y test at

Ed, Try this link: http://scaledinnovation.com/gg/snpTracker.html Play around with the SNP age tool. It gives an estimate of SNP ages and has other tools as well. Although I'm glad I did the Big

Lucas and Rusty thanks! All this makes sense, and it’s time for the BigY kit. ? Looking at my FT SNP positive (green) variant detail I see that L270 and FT43021 are presumed positive, while Z16518,

Ed, 23andMe uses a chip programmed with a handful of ancient and semi-ancient SNPs that the DNA sample is compared with. The ones that are positive "light up" and they look for the most recent

Ed, Z16521 is simply upstream (read that as earlier in time) of A1133. Not sure how 23 and me does it, but it is basically the same result. They've just not dug as deeply as FTDNA testing dug. As

Today I received my 23&Me reports and just digging in. What's interesting is the Haplogroup is different from my A1133 FTDNA result after SNP Pack 2 testing below CTS4466. My 23&Me result is Z16521,