Re: Possible New Place to Fish for Matches----SURPRISE result
|
Ed,
Z16521 is simply upstream (read that as earlier in time) of A1133.? Not sure how 23 and me does it, but it is basically the same result.? They've just not dug as deeply as FTDNA testing dug.? As far as 12 markers are concerned, not really close enough to make a difference in Y matching.? You need to be at least 67 to begin showing viable possibilities (in my humble and untrained opinion).
Today I received my 23&Me reports and just digging in.
What's interesting is the Haplogroup is different from my A1133 FTDNA result after SNP Pack 2 testing below CTS4466. ?
My 23&Me result is Z16521, which I understand is coincident with L270.
My only Y match of Z16521 is Rexford Raye Bartlett GD1 at 12 markers. ? Curiously this surname is of Norman origin in Sussex, England. ? ?My maternal grandfather's line is Ford/Foorde from Sussex, with traceable family tree to the 15th century.
23&Me says I may be depended from Niall of the Nine Hostages. ? What I see in my FT matches is SW Munster, Beara and Kenmare vicinity homelands at least in more recent centuries.
Thoughts on the 23 & Me haplogroup difference?
|
