Re: BS170 Fail
The QRPGuys SWR indicator uses an absorptive bridge in its design. I use it with my QMX. My problem is that I tend to band hop a lot and I often forget to switch it in for tuning. No problems yet, but
By
mike/w1mt
·
#108767
·
|
Re: BS170 Fail
Evan's answer is correct but misleading because this is not the sort of SWR bridge that QMX has.
QMX has a Stockton bridge and all it does is measure the forward and reflected power (or voltage?), By
By
Chris, G5CTH
·
#108766
·
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
I think there's some good argument (personal enrichment not least among them!) for using discrete parts. I like it, Hans!
The thing I found difficult was that /both/ PS boards must be present (and
By
Paul - AI7JR
·
#108765
·
|
Re: BS170 Fail
I have on of those QRPGuys SWR indicators. I've just not built it, yet. I wonder if I should us that or find and absorptive bridge. I'm planning to use a resonant linked dipole with the QDX when out
By
Wayne KB4DSF
·
#108764
·
|
Re: QRP antenna tuner?
Although in the UK, Kanga Products make the excellent pocket transmatch as a kit but also as a complete built and tested unit. Not sure if postage to the US is viable, but worth
By
Daimon Tilley
·
#108763
·
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
What is the mechanism that reduces the voltage on LIN_REG_IN during that half-way state from the supply voltage to 3.3V? ?It seems to me that the supply voltage passes through Q103 & Q105 (on the 5V
By
Jonathan Burchmore
·
#108762
·
|
Re: BS170 Fail
Hi Wayne,
An absorptive bridge uses resistors and a voltage measurement to measure SWR.? The way that it does this puts the worst SWR the TX sees at 2:1.? You need to switch the bridge out once the
By
Evan Hand
·
#108761
·
|
Re: BS170 Fail
Wow! Thank you all for the responses. I'm thinking I'm going to give the TN0606 a try, and use some thermal grease. Thanks for that hint.
I'm about to expose my real lack of knowledge by asking what
By
Wayne KB4DSF
·
#108760
·
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
It seems to be in a half way state at that time, The linear supply FET Q102 is on and so is Q110 which provides a load for the SMPS. But Q111 is also on so the power can come from the linear or t
By
Chris, G5CTH
·
#108759
·
|
Re: QMX working FB then shorted out. Ideas?
I suppose it depends on how they failed... I have (had) mine in sockets, so they're relatively easy to remove for troubleshooting.
Good Luck!
73, Paul -- AI7JR
By
Paul - AI7JR
·
#108758
·
|
Re: WSJT-X with QMX
This group may be able to help.
Wsjt-x-improved-community mailing list
Wsjt-x-improved-community@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-x-improved-community
They were
By
Chris, G5CTH
·
#108757
·
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
I don't think LIN_REG_EN is turning "off" at 80ms--I think what we're seeing is the handoff from the initial supply voltage (through PWR_ON?) to the 3.3v signal from the processor PD7 once it has
By
Jonathan Burchmore
·
#108756
·
|
Re: WSJT-X with QMX
Was successful today with WS (See picture) but not without hassle I believe caused by Windows OS and not the radio. About the time I think I have the turn on/connect/ enter sequence down pat something
By
Karl
·
#108755
·
|
Re: No receive QMX
I used the ?QMX yesterday in what I call hybrid mode QMX TX, Web sdr for Rx works a treat if remaining on one frequency. ?Checked everything as far as I could but can't find any errors, even removed
By
Paul Harrison
·
#108754
·
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
No, it did not appear to do so. ?If you look at my original scope traces you can see that VCC starts right around 1V because I had been turning the QMX on and off as I adjusted the scope trying to
By
Jonathan Burchmore
·
#108753
·
|
Re: QMX working FB then shorted out. Ideas?
Found the part ok. $0.23 and shipping $7. <sigh>
Have to try to guess what other parts I many need to justify the shipping.
73,
Cliff, AE5ZA
By
Cliff
·
#108752
·
|
Re: QMX: Kit build trouble, a short between A & B for Step 17 of Section 2.9
According to the assembly manual it says "Finally, there should be NO connection between A and B. Hold one probe on any A point and the other probe on a B point. That should read infinite resistance
By
Chris AG6CK
·
#108749
·
|
Re: QMX working FB then shorted out. Ideas?
Well, Steven I owe you on this one. You called it right to the component. The short was on the 5V rail and the component was D108. That is sure a tiny little diode. Going to be fun to put a new one
By
Cliff
·
#108748
·
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
It's possible I measured the wrong thing? ?I measured it from what I thought was pin 3 of the 3v3 SMPS board. ?The middle pin on the top.
Jonathan KN6LFB
By
Jonathan Burchmore
·
#108747
·
|
Re: BS170 Fail
Hi Wayne,
To answer question 3… there is a better transistor for replacing the
BS170’s - TN0606. The data sheet can be found
By
Tony Scaminaci
·
#108746
·
|