Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
Until the microprocessor comes up, LIN_REG_EN will be pulled up
to +12 by R101. Once it's up and initialized, it will be fed by
the microprocessor output from it's 3.3 volt supply.
Does that fit what's observed?
Paul -- AI7JR
On 8/29/23 11:54, Chris wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Nothing.? The Linear continues to
produce 3.3V relative to it's 'GND' pin. if the supply produced
by the SMPS is more then it provides nothing.? All this is
confused by D102 andD103 which prevent the linear getting a
voltage on its output which it can't cope with.
Chris, G5CTH
On 29/08/2023 19:40, Jonathan
Burchmore wrote:
What is the mechanism that reduces the voltage on LIN_REG_IN
during that half-way state from the supply voltage to 3.3V? ?It
seems to me that the supply voltage passes through Q103 &
Q105 (on the 5V board), then R101 on the 3v3 board and is
directly connected from there to PD7 on the processor.
Jonathan KN6LFB
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
Nothing.? The Linear continues to
produce 3.3V relative to it's 'GND' pin. if the supply produced by
the SMPS is more then it provides nothing.? All this is confused
by D102 andD103 which prevent the linear getting a voltage on its
output which it can't cope with.
Chris, G5CTH
On 29/08/2023 19:40, Jonathan Burchmore
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
What is the mechanism that reduces the voltage on LIN_REG_IN
during that half-way state from the supply voltage to 3.3V? ?It
seems to me that the supply voltage passes through Q103 & Q105
(on the 5V board), then R101 on the 3v3 board and is directly
connected from there to PD7 on the processor.
Jonathan KN6LFB
|
The QRPGuys SWR indicator uses an absorptive bridge in its design. I use it with my QMX. My problem is that I tend to band hop a lot and I often forget to switch it in for tuning. No problems yet, but one day...
-mike/w1mt
|
Evan's answer is correct but misleading
because this is not the sort of SWR bridge that QMX has.
QMX has a Stockton bridge and all it
does is measure the forward and reflected power (or voltage?), By
itself it does nothing to protect you.
If does provide information that can be
used to protect you but AFAIK this needs Hans to write firmware to
do this. It hasn't happened yet.
Chris, G5CTH
On 29/08/2023 19:42, Wayne Greene
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I have on of those QRPGuys SWR indicators. I've just not built it,
yet. I wonder if I should us that or find and absorptive bridge.
I'm planning to use a resonant linked dipole with the QDX when out
in the field.
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
I think there's some good argument (personal enrichment not least
among them!) for using discrete parts. I like it, Hans!
The thing I found difficult was that both PS boards must
be present (and working) to bring up the microprocessor. (The 3.3
volt supply is dependent on +12 from PCB1...) It would have been
nice to be able to bring up the 3.3 volt board, then the 5 volt.
I can see that would have caused a problem with how parts
might've been distributed between the two boards. And if the 3.3
volts is working, really the 5 volt should be too. So it might be
phantom advantage!
That I see, the two major design challenges have been:
- Clearance between Q103/Q104, leading to solder bridges and
other challenges as people reworked the board. (I know that was
the root cause of my problems, anyway!)
- The impact of rapid changes (e.g., voltage spikes) in input
voltage as power comes up on V_IN. Maybe the best fix for this
would be to wait until the input supply stabilizes for a bit,
before engaging the switching supplies?
In software, we used to call a unique, elegant, piece of code a
"Neat Hack", a sort of backhanded compliment to the coder.
Hans, this unit is a Neat Hack in the realm of electronic (and
software) engineering. Lots of promise here-- You Go Guy! ;-)
Paul -- AI7JR
On 8/29/23 03:12, Hans Summers wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I think that given all of
the people experiencing blown components due to power supply
issues (including myself), there is a case to be made for a
redesign of the power supply. Something like an
can replace 38 parts in the current design with 8, with
significantly better performance in every way. The frequency
of the part can be externally synchronized, but you can also
simply configure it for 2.2 MHz, where every harmonic is a
minimum of 400 kHz from any of the amateur bands covered by
the QMX.
Yes but...?
1. What about the eye-watering price? There are two
versions in stock at Digikey, LTM8078IY and LTM8078EY. The
price at 520-quantity?(1 tray) is $11.52 and $10.47 resp.
Plus taxes of course... for comparison, since I have the two
SMPS boards on the QRP Labs shop at $10?
I'm sure you can imagine that the parts costs are way way
less than one of these LTM8078; consider that the $10 price
also includes the 6-layer PCB, the two female header
connectors, SMD assembly factory costs, shipping, taxes,
other costs etc.?
2. One of the main reasons for using a discrete component
buck converter when the QDX Rev 3 PCB was designed, having
the discrete component buck converter for the PIN diode
forward bias generation, was that the global semiconductor
crisis was in full swing, and adding an unusual part to the
BOM seemed distinctly unattractive compared to a handful of
discrete parts which are much easier to find. The QMX design
inherited the buck converter from QDX. Whilst the global
semiconductor crisis has receded somewhat we are still
nowhere near back to the old days where you never ever
thought about availability because you never had to. Looking
at the available stock in Digikey (1050 of the EY and 3410
of the IY) isn't terribly encouraging in that regard.?
3. Being a BGA package, replacement would truly be beyond
the reach of most of us here...
4. We are getting through building a larger and larger
number of QMX now that the whole team are building them
here. Originally, while we still had a long list of QDX,
QCX-mini and QCX+ on the waiting list, only one (the most
experienced and accurate) team member was building them, in
order to build up experience of potential hazards. Of all
the QMX I have yet seen, other than the Q103/Q104 Drain
short (manufacturing problem) I have yet to see a failure
that is not attributable to shorts, damaged components or
other construction errors.?
73 Hans G0UPL
|
I have on of those QRPGuys SWR indicators. I've just not built it, yet. I wonder if I should us that or find and absorptive bridge. I'm planning to use a resonant linked dipole with the QDX when out in the field.
|
Although in the UK, Kanga Products make the excellent pocket transmatch as a kit but also as a complete built and tested unit. Not sure if postage to the US is viable, but worth asking.......
And my review in the RSGB Radcom magazine:
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
What is the mechanism that reduces the voltage on LIN_REG_IN during that half-way state from the supply voltage to 3.3V? ?It seems to me that the supply voltage passes through Q103 & Q105 (on the 5V board), then R101 on the 3v3 board and is directly connected from there to PD7 on the processor.
Jonathan KN6LFB
|
Hi Wayne,
An absorptive bridge uses resistors and a voltage measurement to measure SWR.? The way that it does this puts the worst SWR the TX sees at 2:1.? You need to switch the bridge out once the antenna is tuned.? All of the tuners like this have a toggle switch to do so.
An alternative is an SWR indicator based on the same resistor setup.? Here is one from QRPGuys:
You switch in the resistors until you have a good match, then switch the indicator to Operate.
73 Evan AC9TU
|
Wow! Thank you all for the responses. I'm thinking I'm going to give the TN0606 a try, and use some thermal grease. Thanks for that hint.
I'm about to expose my real lack of knowledge by asking what might be a dumb question. An SWR bridge provides a 50 ohm impedance to the radio while SWR is read? I that hos that works?
Thanks,
Wayne
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
On 29/08/2023 18:54, Jonathan Burchmore
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:58 AM, Kees T wrote:
You measured the right point. It just shows that the
78M33 3.3V VDD output is getting slapped around a little by
several 2.2uF Tantalums on the board vs having a couple of 47uF
Tantalums at the processor. Surprising that all those 2.2uF
Tantalums on the board are apparently able to hold the 3.3V
level for the full 250ms until the SMPS comes ON.
I don't think LIN_REG_EN is turning "off" at 80ms--I think what
we're seeing is the handoff from the initial supply voltage
(through PWR_ON?) to the 3.3v signal from the processor PD7 once
it has booted up sufficiently. ?I seem to recall Hans discussing
this in his FDIM presentation.
It seems to be in a half way state at that time, The linear
supply FET Q102 is on and so is Q110 which provides a load for the
SMPS. But Q111 is also on so the power can come from the linear or
the SMPS - or go into the SMPS and the 47R load.
Then when the SMPS pulls VDD above the 3V which the linear can
supply the SMPS takes over and LIN_REG_EN is pulled low.
Three state logic, on, half on and off.?
Chris, G5CTH
Jonathan KN6LFB
|
Re: QMX working FB then shorted out. Ideas?
I suppose it depends on how they failed... I have (had) mine in
sockets, so they're relatively easy to remove for troubleshooting.
Good Luck!
73, Paul -- AI7JR
On 8/28/23 17:03, Cliff wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks Paul. I realize that they may be blown, but from my
recollection they didn't continue shorted. Low power out was the
usual symptom IIRC. This is a complete short immediately on power
on.
Most likely culprits are going to be the
BS170's, and possibly IC503, from other reports.
Paul -- AI7JR
On 8/28/23 15:32, Cliff
wrote:
Well, guys, I'm up a creek it seems here. I'm an old guy, raised on Tubes, and don't really understand Mosfets and the schematics for the QMX are hard for me to follow.
Some suggestions to trace the issue here would be much appreciated.
I built this QMX about 3 1/2 months ago. It's been working FB with firmware 006 ever since. This morning I was using it and transmitted accidentally with no antenna attached. It's happened before with no consequences, but this time something shorted out big time. The power supply went into current limiting at 1 amp with the voltage dropped to 6 volts. Powered off with a BIG SIGH!
Opened it up and just a little smell of hot electronics, but not the usual burnt smell. Inspecting all the boards and nothing obviously burned.
Lowered the voltage to 7 volts and current limiting to 600 mA. Pushed the encoder to power up and nothing happens. Raised the power back to 12V and with one hand on the power off switch pushed the encoder. Current started climbing rapidly so power off quickly.
Tried to figure out the schematics and I get lost with all the plug numbers not being consistent between pages and some times I see multiple connector diagrams like JP101 and JP102 that seem identical as well as new to me symbols, etc. and Not really knowing how things work in the sequence I finally started this email.
Obviously something in the power up sequence has shorted, but how to trace it I'm totally at a loss.
Some help/ideas will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!!!
73,
Cliff, AE5ZA
|
This group may be able to help.
They were where I got the idea of using
the hamlib file from an older version.
It fixed it for me but you do need to
be a bit computer literate to be able to juggle files from
different versions. They think this is OK, maybe you can
demonstrate why it isn't :)
Chris, G5CTH
On 29/08/2023 18:50, Karl via groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Was successful today with WS (See picture) but not without hassle
I believe caused by Windows OS and not the radio. About the time I
think I have the turn on/connect/ enter sequence down pat
something seems different!
Trying to establish CAT over the usb cable is prone to
interference from what you have had CAT before. It's like there
are "leftovers" that interfere with the present task. When
shifting to fldigi from WSJT-X the same radio is generally a
breeze like with my mcHF clone. But going there with the QMX after
the mcHF.. forget about it! The CAT is incomplete with the QMX
since here, anyway, frequency is not automatic. Neither is band
switching with the computer.
--
73
Karl
KI4ZUQ
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:58 AM, Kees T wrote:
You measured the right point. It just shows that the 78M33 3.3V VDD output is getting slapped around a little by several 2.2uF Tantalums on the board vs having a couple of 47uF Tantalums at the processor. Surprising that all those 2.2uF Tantalums on the board are apparently able to hold the 3.3V level for the full 250ms until the SMPS comes ON.
I don't think LIN_REG_EN is turning "off" at 80ms--I think what we're seeing is the handoff from the initial supply voltage (through PWR_ON?) to the 3.3v signal from the processor PD7 once it has booted up sufficiently. ?I seem to recall Hans discussing this in his FDIM presentation. Jonathan KN6LFB
|
Was successful today with WS (See picture) but not without hassle I believe caused by Windows OS and not the radio. About the time I think I have the turn on/connect/ enter sequence down pat something seems different!
Trying to establish CAT over the usb cable is prone to interference from what you have had CAT before. It's like there are "leftovers" that interfere with the present task. When shifting to fldigi from WSJT-X the same radio is generally a breeze like with my mcHF clone. But going there with the QMX after the mcHF.. forget about it! The CAT is incomplete with the QMX since here, anyway, frequency is not automatic. Neither is band switching with the computer. -- 73 Karl KI4ZUQ
|
I used the ?QMX yesterday in what I call hybrid mode QMX TX, Web sdr for Rx works a treat if remaining on one frequency. ?Checked everything as far as I could but can't find any errors, even removed 401. Still completely deaf on all bands.
Paul DJ0CU G4ADF
|
Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:45 AM, Kees T wrote:
That tells me that if you power ON again about 1-2 seconds after powering OFF, the 5V VCC rail is still at about 1.7V. Question is does the subsequent Power ON try to drive VCC above 5V ?
No, it did not appear to do so. ?If you look at my original scope traces you can see that VCC starts right around 1V because I had been turning the QMX on and off as I adjusted the scope trying to get a good view of things and it had not completely bled down. Jonathan KN6LFB
|
Re: QMX working FB then shorted out. Ideas?
Found the part ok. $0.23 and shipping $7. <sigh>
Have to try to guess what other parts I many need to justify the shipping.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Well, Steven I owe you on this one. You called it right to the component. The short was on the 5V rail and the component was D108. That is sure a tiny little diode. Going to be fun to put a new one in.
Now the fun of trying to find a part number for that diode. The parts list only gives the specs, not a part number.
A thermal camera is hands down the best way to identify a shorted component. Turn on the power and look for the thing that glows. You can get one that attaches to your phone for about $2-300.
A multimeter in continuity mode is the second best way.
First order of business is to test for continuity from ground to each of the three voltage rails. The 2x4 and 2x3 headers that the power supply boards attach to are good places to do this.
To map the drawing of JP101-4 to the physical layout on the board, look at the board from the bottom side, i.e. the side with the microprocessor on it, with all of the through-hole components facing away from you. Turn the board until the antenna connector is pointing up, and the DC input jack is pointing down. The solder pads for the headers are now in the same orientation as they are in the schematic. But don't trust me on this, use your multimeter to verify ground (the body of the antenna connector is a convenient place to test this from) and Vin (use the center of the DC input jack) at minimum. This should be enough to make you confident.
If you are seeing a short from ground to either VCC (the +5 volt rail) or VDD (the +3.3 volt rail), try removing the associated power supply board and see if the short is still there. If the short went away when you removed the power supply board, the likely culprit is a failure of D108/9, or one of the tantalum capacitors C106/7. If the short persists with the power supplies removed, you have had a failure of one of the many ICs on your main board, and it's time to decide how you value your time, money, and energy. Be aware that even if you find and replace the failed component, the same event could have damaged other components without totally destroying them, and you could boot up your radio to find that still more work needs to be done. I had this realization after I managed to make my QMX boot again by removing IC403, and weighed the cost of buying and shipping a replacement IC in single digit quantity, and ended up just buying another QMX. Maybe I'll use the old one as a source of spare parts for the new one if I manage to fry that one too.
If the short you're finding is +12V to ground, again try to see whether the short is in the power supply board or in the main board. Luckily, not too many components are actually hooked up to +12V, at least in a way that makes them liable to short to ground.
Based on your symptoms: The board stays powered after releasing the encoder, which means the CPU is awake and putting voltage on the PWR_HOLD line, which means that the 3.3V rail is good. But no display, and the display runs on the 5V rail. So I would say the issue is somewhere on the 5V rail.
|
Re: QMX: Kit build trouble, a short between A & B for Step 17 of Section 2.9
According to the assembly manual it says "Finally, there should be NO connection between A and B. Hold one probe on any A point and the other probe on a B point. That should read infinite resistance (no continuity)." But my DMM measured 370 kilo Ohms between the ground (B) and the Q505/6. It is tricky to measure the resistance/continuity on such a tiny board.? ?
|
Re: QMX working FB then shorted out. Ideas?
Well, Steven I owe you on this one. You called it right to the component. The short was on the 5V rail and the component was D108. That is sure a tiny little diode. Going to be fun to put a new one in.
Now the fun of trying to find a part number for that diode. The parts list only gives the specs, not a part number.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
A thermal camera is hands down the best way to identify a shorted component. Turn on the power and look for the thing that glows. You can get one that attaches to your phone for about $2-300.
A multimeter in continuity mode is the second best way.
First order of business is to test for continuity from ground to each of the three voltage rails. The 2x4 and 2x3 headers that the power supply boards attach to are good places to do this.
To map the drawing of JP101-4 to the physical layout on the board, look at the board from the bottom side, i.e. the side with the microprocessor on it, with all of the through-hole components facing away from you. Turn the board until the antenna connector is pointing up, and the DC input jack is pointing down. The solder pads for the headers are now in the same orientation as they are in the schematic. But don't trust me on this, use your multimeter to verify ground (the body of the antenna connector is a convenient place to test this from) and Vin (use the center of the DC input jack) at minimum. This should be enough to make you confident.
If you are seeing a short from ground to either VCC (the +5 volt rail) or VDD (the +3.3 volt rail), try removing the associated power supply board and see if the short is still there. If the short went away when you removed the power supply board, the likely culprit is a failure of D108/9, or one of the tantalum capacitors C106/7. If the short persists with the power supplies removed, you have had a failure of one of the many ICs on your main board, and it's time to decide how you value your time, money, and energy. Be aware that even if you find and replace the failed component, the same event could have damaged other components without totally destroying them, and you could boot up your radio to find that still more work needs to be done. I had this realization after I managed to make my QMX boot again by removing IC403, and weighed the cost of buying and shipping a replacement IC in single digit quantity, and ended up just buying another QMX. Maybe I'll use the old one as a source of spare parts for the new one if I manage to fry that one too.
If the short you're finding is +12V to ground, again try to see whether the short is in the power supply board or in the main board. Luckily, not too many components are actually hooked up to +12V, at least in a way that makes them liable to short to ground.
Based on your symptoms: The board stays powered after releasing the encoder, which means the CPU is awake and putting voltage on the PWR_HOLD line, which means that the 3.3V rail is good. But no display, and the display runs on the 5V rail. So I would say the issue is somewhere on the 5V rail.
|