开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Date

Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure

 

开云体育

Until the microprocessor comes up, LIN_REG_EN will be pulled up to +12 by R101. Once it's up and initialized, it will be fed by the microprocessor output from it's 3.3 volt supply.

Does that fit what's observed?

Paul -- AI7JR

On 8/29/23 11:54, Chris wrote:

Nothing.? The Linear continues to produce 3.3V relative to it's 'GND' pin. if the supply produced by the SMPS is more then it provides nothing.? All this is confused by D102 andD103 which prevent the linear getting a voltage on its output which it can't cope with.

Chris, G5CTH

On 29/08/2023 19:40, Jonathan Burchmore wrote:
What is the mechanism that reduces the voltage on LIN_REG_IN during that half-way state from the supply voltage to 3.3V? ?It seems to me that the supply voltage passes through Q103 & Q105 (on the 5V board), then R101 on the 3v3 board and is directly connected from there to PD7 on the processor.

Jonathan KN6LFB



Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure

 

开云体育

Nothing.? The Linear continues to produce 3.3V relative to it's 'GND' pin. if the supply produced by the SMPS is more then it provides nothing.? All this is confused by D102 andD103 which prevent the linear getting a voltage on its output which it can't cope with.

Chris, G5CTH

On 29/08/2023 19:40, Jonathan Burchmore wrote:

What is the mechanism that reduces the voltage on LIN_REG_IN during that half-way state from the supply voltage to 3.3V? ?It seems to me that the supply voltage passes through Q103 & Q105 (on the 5V board), then R101 on the 3v3 board and is directly connected from there to PD7 on the processor.

Jonathan KN6LFB



Re: BS170 Fail

 

The QRPGuys SWR indicator uses an absorptive bridge in its design. I use it with my QMX. My problem is that I tend to band hop a lot and I often forget to switch it in for tuning. No problems yet, but one day...

-mike/w1mt


Re: BS170 Fail

 

开云体育

Evan's answer is correct but misleading because this is not the sort of SWR bridge that QMX has.

QMX has a Stockton bridge and all it does is measure the forward and reflected power (or voltage?), By itself it does nothing to protect you.
If does provide information that can be used to protect you but AFAIK this needs Hans to write firmware to do this. It hasn't happened yet.

Chris, G5CTH

On 29/08/2023 19:42, Wayne Greene wrote:

I have on of those QRPGuys SWR indicators. I've just not built it, yet. I wonder if I should us that or find and absorptive bridge. I'm planning to use a resonant linked dipole with the QDX when out in the field.



Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure

 

开云体育

I think there's some good argument (personal enrichment not least among them!) for using discrete parts. I like it, Hans!

The thing I found difficult was that both PS boards must be present (and working) to bring up the microprocessor. (The 3.3 volt supply is dependent on +12 from PCB1...) It would have been nice to be able to bring up the 3.3 volt board, then the 5 volt.

I can see that would have caused a problem with how parts might've been distributed between the two boards. And if the 3.3 volts is working, really the 5 volt should be too. So it might be phantom advantage!

That I see, the two major design challenges have been:

  • Clearance between Q103/Q104, leading to solder bridges and other challenges as people reworked the board. (I know that was the root cause of my problems, anyway!)

  • The impact of rapid changes (e.g., voltage spikes) in input voltage as power comes up on V_IN. Maybe the best fix for this would be to wait until the input supply stabilizes for a bit, before engaging the switching supplies?

In software, we used to call a unique, elegant, piece of code a "Neat Hack", a sort of backhanded compliment to the coder.

Hans, this unit is a Neat Hack in the realm of electronic (and software) engineering. Lots of promise here-- You Go Guy! ;-)

Paul -- AI7JR


On 8/29/23 03:12, Hans Summers wrote:

Hello Stephan
?
I think that given all of the people experiencing blown components due to power supply issues (including myself), there is a case to be made for a redesign of the power supply. Something like an can replace 38 parts in the current design with 8, with significantly better performance in every way. The frequency of the part can be externally synchronized, but you can also simply configure it for 2.2 MHz, where every harmonic is a minimum of 400 kHz from any of the amateur bands covered by the QMX.

Yes but...?

1. What about the eye-watering price? There are two versions in stock at Digikey, LTM8078IY and LTM8078EY. The price at 520-quantity?(1 tray) is $11.52 and $10.47 resp. Plus taxes of course... for comparison, since I have the two SMPS boards on the QRP Labs shop at $10? I'm sure you can imagine that the parts costs are way way less than one of these LTM8078; consider that the $10 price also includes the 6-layer PCB, the two female header connectors, SMD assembly factory costs, shipping, taxes, other costs etc.?

2. One of the main reasons for using a discrete component buck converter when the QDX Rev 3 PCB was designed, having the discrete component buck converter for the PIN diode forward bias generation, was that the global semiconductor crisis was in full swing, and adding an unusual part to the BOM seemed distinctly unattractive compared to a handful of discrete parts which are much easier to find. The QMX design inherited the buck converter from QDX. Whilst the global semiconductor crisis has receded somewhat we are still nowhere near back to the old days where you never ever thought about availability because you never had to. Looking at the available stock in Digikey (1050 of the EY and 3410 of the IY) isn't terribly encouraging in that regard.?

3. Being a BGA package, replacement would truly be beyond the reach of most of us here...

4. We are getting through building a larger and larger number of QMX now that the whole team are building them here. Originally, while we still had a long list of QDX, QCX-mini and QCX+ on the waiting list, only one (the most experienced and accurate) team member was building them, in order to build up experience of potential hazards. Of all the QMX I have yet seen, other than the Q103/Q104 Drain short (manufacturing problem) I have yet to see a failure that is not attributable to shorts, damaged components or other construction errors.?

73 Hans G0UPL




Re: BS170 Fail

 

I have on of those QRPGuys SWR indicators. I've just not built it, yet. I wonder if I should us that or find and absorptive bridge. I'm planning to use a resonant linked dipole with the QDX when out in the field.


Re: QRP antenna tuner?

 

Although in the UK, Kanga Products make the excellent pocket transmatch as a kit but also as a complete built and tested unit. Not sure if postage to the US is viable, but worth asking.......



And my review in the RSGB Radcom magazine:



Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure

 

What is the mechanism that reduces the voltage on LIN_REG_IN during that half-way state from the supply voltage to 3.3V? ?It seems to me that the supply voltage passes through Q103 & Q105 (on the 5V board), then R101 on the 3v3 board and is directly connected from there to PD7 on the processor.

Jonathan KN6LFB


Re: BS170 Fail

 

Hi Wayne,

An absorptive bridge uses resistors and a voltage measurement to measure SWR.? The way that it does this puts the worst SWR the TX sees at 2:1.? You need to switch the bridge out once the antenna is tuned.? All of the tuners like this have a toggle switch to do so.

An alternative is an SWR indicator based on the same resistor setup.? Here is one from QRPGuys:


You switch in the resistors until you have a good match, then switch the indicator to Operate.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: BS170 Fail

 

Wow! Thank you all for the responses. I'm thinking I'm going to give the TN0606 a try, and use some thermal grease. Thanks for that hint.

I'm about to expose my real lack of knowledge by asking what might be a dumb question. An SWR bridge provides a 50 ohm impedance to the radio while SWR is read? I that hos that works?

Thanks,

Wayne


Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure

 

开云体育

On 29/08/2023 18:54, Jonathan Burchmore wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:58 AM, Kees T wrote:
You measured the right point. It just shows that the 78M33 3.3V VDD output is getting slapped around a little by several 2.2uF Tantalums on the board vs having a couple of 47uF Tantalums at the processor. Surprising that all those 2.2uF Tantalums on the board are apparently able to hold the 3.3V level for the full 250ms until the SMPS comes ON.
I don't think LIN_REG_EN is turning "off" at 80ms--I think what we're seeing is the handoff from the initial supply voltage (through PWR_ON?) to the 3.3v signal from the processor PD7 once it has booted up sufficiently. ?I seem to recall Hans discussing this in his FDIM presentation.

It seems to be in a half way state at that time, The linear supply FET Q102 is on and so is Q110 which provides a load for the SMPS. But Q111 is also on so the power can come from the linear or the SMPS - or go into the SMPS and the 47R load.

Then when the SMPS pulls VDD above the 3V which the linear can supply the SMPS takes over and LIN_REG_EN is pulled low.

Three state logic, on, half on and off.?

Chris, G5CTH


Jonathan KN6LFB



Re: QMX working FB then shorted out. Ideas?

 

开云体育

I suppose it depends on how they failed... I have (had) mine in sockets, so they're relatively easy to remove for troubleshooting.

Good Luck!
73, Paul -- AI7JR

On 8/28/23 17:03, Cliff wrote:

Thanks Paul. I realize that they may be blown, but from my recollection they didn't continue shorted. Low power out was the usual symptom IIRC. This is a complete short immediately on power on.

73,
Cliff, AE5ZA



On Aug 28, 2023, at 18:25, Paul - AI7JR <paul.hanchett@...> wrote:

Most likely culprits are going to be the BS170's, and possibly IC503, from other reports.

Paul -- AI7JR

On 8/28/23 15:32, Cliff wrote:
Well, guys, I'm up a creek it seems here. I'm an old guy, raised on Tubes, and don't really understand Mosfets and the schematics for the QMX are hard for me to follow.

Some suggestions to trace the issue here would be much appreciated.

I built this QMX about 3 1/2 months ago. It's been working FB with firmware 006 ever since. This morning I was using it and transmitted accidentally with no antenna attached. It's happened before with no consequences, but this time something shorted out big time. The power supply went into current limiting at 1 amp with the voltage dropped to 6 volts. Powered off with a BIG SIGH!

Opened it up and just a little smell of hot electronics, but not the usual burnt smell. Inspecting all the boards and nothing obviously burned.

Lowered the voltage to 7 volts and current limiting to 600 mA. Pushed the encoder to power up and nothing happens. Raised the power back to 12V and with one hand on the power off switch pushed the encoder. Current started climbing rapidly so power off quickly.

Tried to figure out the schematics and I get lost with all the plug numbers not being consistent between pages and some times I see multiple connector diagrams like JP101 and JP102 that seem identical as well as new to me symbols, etc. and Not really knowing how things work in the sequence I finally started this email.

Obviously something in the power up sequence has shorted, but how to trace it I'm totally at a loss.

Some help/ideas will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!!!

73,
Cliff, AE5ZA










Re: WSJT-X with QMX

 

开云体育

This group may be able to help.
Wsjt-x-improved-community mailing list
Wsjt-x-improved-community@...

They were where I got the idea of using the hamlib file from an older version.

It fixed it for me but you do need to be a bit computer literate to be able to juggle files from different versions. They think this is OK, maybe you can demonstrate why it isn't :)

Chris, G5CTH

On 29/08/2023 18:50, Karl via groups.io wrote:

Was successful today with WS (See picture) but not without hassle I believe caused by Windows OS and not the radio. About the time I think I have the turn on/connect/ enter sequence down pat something seems different!

Trying to establish CAT over the usb cable is prone to interference from what you have had CAT before. It's like there are "leftovers" that interfere with the present task. When shifting to fldigi from WSJT-X the same radio is generally a breeze like with my mcHF clone. But going there with the QMX after the mcHF.. forget about it! The CAT is incomplete with the QMX since here, anyway, frequency is not automatic. Neither is band switching with the computer.
--
73
Karl
KI4ZUQ



Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure

 

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:58 AM, Kees T wrote:
You measured the right point. It just shows that the 78M33 3.3V VDD output is getting slapped around a little by several 2.2uF Tantalums on the board vs having a couple of 47uF Tantalums at the processor. Surprising that all those 2.2uF Tantalums on the board are apparently able to hold the 3.3V level for the full 250ms until the SMPS comes ON.
I don't think LIN_REG_EN is turning "off" at 80ms--I think what we're seeing is the handoff from the initial supply voltage (through PWR_ON?) to the 3.3v signal from the processor PD7 once it has booted up sufficiently. ?I seem to recall Hans discussing this in his FDIM presentation.

Jonathan KN6LFB


Re: WSJT-X with QMX

 

Was successful today with WS (See picture) but not without hassle I believe caused by Windows OS and not the radio. About the time I think I have the turn on/connect/ enter sequence down pat something seems different!

Trying to establish CAT over the usb cable is prone to interference from what you have had CAT before. It's like there are "leftovers" that interfere with the present task. When shifting to fldigi from WSJT-X the same radio is generally a breeze like with my mcHF clone. But going there with the QMX after the mcHF.. forget about it! The CAT is incomplete with the QMX since here, anyway, frequency is not automatic. Neither is band switching with the computer.
--
73
Karl
KI4ZUQ


Re: No receive QMX

 

I used the ?QMX yesterday in what I call hybrid mode QMX TX, Web sdr for Rx works a treat if remaining on one frequency. ?Checked everything as far as I could but can't find any errors, even removed 401. Still completely deaf on all bands.

Paul DJ0CU G4ADF


Re: QMX - smoke - another C107/Q108 failure

 

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:45 AM, Kees T wrote:
That tells me that if you power ON again about 1-2 seconds after powering OFF, the 5V VCC rail is still at about 1.7V. Question is does the subsequent Power ON try to drive VCC above 5V ?
No, it did not appear to do so. ?If you look at my original scope traces you can see that VCC starts right around 1V because I had been turning the QMX on and off as I adjusted the scope trying to get a good view of things and it had not completely bled down.

Jonathan KN6LFB


Re: QMX working FB then shorted out. Ideas?

 

开云体育

Found the part ok. $0.23 and shipping $7. <sigh>

Have to try to guess what other parts I many need to justify the shipping.

73,
Cliff, AE5ZA



On Aug 29, 2023, at 11:43, Cliff <ae5zaham@...> wrote:

Well, Steven I owe you on this one. You called it right to the component. The short was on the 5V rail and the component was D108. That is sure a tiny little diode. Going to be fun to put a new one in.

Now the fun of trying to find a part number for that diode. The parts list only gives the specs, not a part number.

73,
Cliff, AE5ZA



On Aug 29, 2023, at 01:24, Stephan Ahonen KE0WVA <stephan.ahonen@...> wrote:

A thermal camera is hands down the best way to identify a shorted component. Turn on the power and look for the thing that glows. You can get one that attaches to your phone for about $2-300.

A multimeter in continuity mode is the second best way.

First order of business is to test for continuity from ground to each of the three voltage rails. The 2x4 and 2x3 headers that the power supply boards attach to are good places to do this.

To map the drawing of JP101-4 to the physical layout on the board, look at the board from the bottom side, i.e. the side with the microprocessor on it, with all of the through-hole components facing away from you. Turn the board until the antenna connector is pointing up, and the DC input jack is pointing down. The solder pads for the headers are now in the same orientation as they are in the schematic. But don't trust me on this, use your multimeter to verify ground (the body of the antenna connector is a convenient place to test this from) and Vin (use the center of the DC input jack) at minimum. This should be enough to make you confident.

If you are seeing a short from ground to either VCC (the +5 volt rail) or VDD (the +3.3 volt rail), try removing the associated power supply board and see if the short is still there. If the short went away when you removed the power supply board, the likely culprit is a failure of D108/9, or one of the tantalum capacitors C106/7. If the short persists with the power supplies removed, you have had a failure of one of the many ICs on your main board, and it's time to decide how you value your time, money, and energy. Be aware that even if you find and replace the failed component, the same event could have damaged other components without totally destroying them, and you could boot up your radio to find that still more work needs to be done. I had this realization after I managed to make my QMX boot again by removing IC403, and weighed the cost of buying and shipping a replacement IC in single digit quantity, and ended up just buying another QMX. Maybe I'll use the old one as a source of spare parts for the new one if I manage to fry that one too.

If the short you're finding is +12V to ground, again try to see whether the short is in the power supply board or in the main board. Luckily, not too many components are actually hooked up to +12V, at least in a way that makes them liable to short to ground.

Based on your symptoms: The board stays powered after releasing the encoder, which means the CPU is awake and putting voltage on the PWR_HOLD line, which means that the 3.3V rail is good. But no display, and the display runs on the 5V rail. So I would say the issue is somewhere on the 5V rail.




Re: QMX: Kit build trouble, a short between A & B for Step 17 of Section 2.9

 

According to the assembly manual it says "Finally, there should be NO connection between A and B. Hold one probe on any A point and the other probe on a B point. That should read infinite resistance (no continuity)." But my DMM measured 370 kilo Ohms between the ground (B) and the Q505/6. It is tricky to measure the resistance/continuity on such a tiny board.?
?


Re: QMX working FB then shorted out. Ideas?

 

开云体育

Well, Steven I owe you on this one. You called it right to the component. The short was on the 5V rail and the component was D108. That is sure a tiny little diode. Going to be fun to put a new one in.

Now the fun of trying to find a part number for that diode. The parts list only gives the specs, not a part number.

73,
Cliff, AE5ZA



On Aug 29, 2023, at 01:24, Stephan Ahonen KE0WVA <stephan.ahonen@...> wrote:

A thermal camera is hands down the best way to identify a shorted component. Turn on the power and look for the thing that glows. You can get one that attaches to your phone for about $2-300.

A multimeter in continuity mode is the second best way.

First order of business is to test for continuity from ground to each of the three voltage rails. The 2x4 and 2x3 headers that the power supply boards attach to are good places to do this.

To map the drawing of JP101-4 to the physical layout on the board, look at the board from the bottom side, i.e. the side with the microprocessor on it, with all of the through-hole components facing away from you. Turn the board until the antenna connector is pointing up, and the DC input jack is pointing down. The solder pads for the headers are now in the same orientation as they are in the schematic. But don't trust me on this, use your multimeter to verify ground (the body of the antenna connector is a convenient place to test this from) and Vin (use the center of the DC input jack) at minimum. This should be enough to make you confident.

If you are seeing a short from ground to either VCC (the +5 volt rail) or VDD (the +3.3 volt rail), try removing the associated power supply board and see if the short is still there. If the short went away when you removed the power supply board, the likely culprit is a failure of D108/9, or one of the tantalum capacitors C106/7. If the short persists with the power supplies removed, you have had a failure of one of the many ICs on your main board, and it's time to decide how you value your time, money, and energy. Be aware that even if you find and replace the failed component, the same event could have damaged other components without totally destroying them, and you could boot up your radio to find that still more work needs to be done. I had this realization after I managed to make my QMX boot again by removing IC403, and weighed the cost of buying and shipping a replacement IC in single digit quantity, and ended up just buying another QMX. Maybe I'll use the old one as a source of spare parts for the new one if I manage to fry that one too.

If the short you're finding is +12V to ground, again try to see whether the short is in the power supply board or in the main board. Luckily, not too many components are actually hooked up to +12V, at least in a way that makes them liable to short to ground.

Based on your symptoms: The board stays powered after releasing the encoder, which means the CPU is awake and putting voltage on the PWR_HOLD line, which means that the 3.3V rail is good. But no display, and the display runs on the 5V rail. So I would say the issue is somewhere on the 5V rail.