开云体育

Agreed. Thanks very much Stefano for your efforts, and for sharing them. The extended bass response was eye-opening. Without doing the math, I had hoped that selecting 2.2uF instead of 5 uF when I

Thanks for doing this Stefano. - /ss files/PUI AOM5024 Frequency response etc.pdf </g/MicBuilders/files/ss%20files/PUI%20AOM5024%20Frequency%20response%20etc.pdf> It confirms

The following files and folders have been uploaded to the Files area of the [email protected] group. * /ss files/PUI AOM5024 Frequency response etc.pdf (

LOL. I wouldn't call it "disagreeing". ;-) I'm still trying to figure out exactly why I am seeing what I am. Which is that Pin 3 goes negative with my P48 mics with how I am wiring them. My OPA mics

cx_b, are you using the latest *28nov23 version of SimpleP48.pdf* in my Files? This should be *consistent throughout*... and tallies with Henry Spragens & Rick Wilkinson and some others.? If you

Possibly dumb question (and, sotrry, off-topic): what (dis)advantage of a FET-lejss view emlectret and circuit? And what r?eplaces the FET functionally?g hgjj Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Androidj8

Kennjava: Kennjava: https://web.archive.org/web/20091202031043/http://www.soundfirst.com/xlr.html In 1950, Ampex adopted a pin-2-return, pin-3-positive convention for the wiring of the XL type

Too many unknowns here. What "louder sounds" were you recording, what device were you recording with, what were your settings, what does the the recorded waveform look like? The AOM5024 has a pretty

Is there any reason why I would notice a different result, using the same capsules and values specified here? I used the "Basic 2wires", which I believe is the same as the "Simple P48" - and what I

lol Mouser sells them… I’m looking at the JFE150 But need to design a carrier board for it Best Regards, Jules Ryckebusch

Thanks. Follow-up question: has anyone pillaged a AOM-5024 to use its FET on other (FETless) electrets, like the TSB160A or TSB165A? Given the price and scarcity of the better FETs, is this a

Hi all, in case anyone else was wondering what JFET is inside the capsule: It is the Panasonic DSK3J02 (marking "3U"). Best regards, Nils

I agree the AOM5024 seems to have no problem with low frequencies. I record frogs and birds with a P48 pair on a Zoom F3. The rumble from traffic, planes and wind is very pronounced. I use a lot of

My experience doing mostly vanilla field, nature and soundscape recordings with small electret omni capsules (I have both Primo EM172 and AOM-5024 capsules) is that they capture more than enough LF

Thanks, Scott, I'll take that as a "don't worry about it". -John

A few inches from a peacock would be considered “loud”. Thanks, -Scott Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse my brevity.

Stefano wrote "Unless you are recording loud things: [use] regular SP48.... As to what qualifies as "loud", if you're not sure if your sounds will be too loud, describe them and group members can

Hi C, the file you mentioned is the fruit of a tedious but interesting work, needed to verify some options we were discussing at that time, so no explanations, just measurements. I totally agree with

That's correct. I was making the point that all the mics have pretty similar responses. Note that even comparing the LF response only, the regular SP48 is only down less than 2dB at 30Hz... I don't

Hi Casey - I am talking about the low frequency response rather than the whole response - but my understanding is that the graphs on Page 4 refer to "V1" through "V5", which are all Simple P48. On