开云体育

Richard Lee: Sorry no. I have never ever seen any CMC 5 body not perfectly adjusted for minimum K2, by adjusting P1, for minimum distortion. BTW, passing by Schoeps home in Karlsruhe, Germany early

Sanaka: No. There was "~200mV" AC at this point without the capacitor. You must differentiate between AC and DC conditions. The DC voltage over this capacitor is 33.4 V DC in the original Schoeps

I have volunteered to moderate this new group. It is a transition from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MicDIYers/ which was wounded by large quantities of spam. I will hold an open period of "open

i aagree we need the new group. so here i am umashankar

i aagree we need the new group. so here i am umashankar

Haven't been posting, but I have been keeping up with the group. Got a couple projects in the works and I'll be sharing them soon.

Mac suggests that I shouldn't even bother with posting from the original group and making a mirror of those messages here. It would save me time if we did make a clean break. Let me know if anyone has

I recently ran across a microphone capsule that appears to keep its fet a few inches outside of the capsule. If there is no downside to that design I could see modifications of the inexpensive

Rich Peet wrote: EMI shielding effect in capsule for noisy environments? FET inputs are extremely sensitive. Indrek -- Indrek Rebane | Borthwick-Pignon Electronics Engineer | Tartu Science Park Phone:

iloccom wrote: This requires some kind of differential amplifier or transformer. ADI differential drivers are known to be quite good (SSM2142 for example, www.analog.com). Indrek -- Indrek Rebane |

I upploaded som photos of mics I've built. The most convinient place for this was the "Photo"-section. Could we post all photos here?

What is your dynamic experiment? Please describe. Thanks. Mac

That makes sense to me. I think it might be a good idea to just post a notice on the old page from time to time so that people can find this one easily. I suggest you make someone else and "owner" of

It's actually very simpel. After taking a look inside a few dynamic microphones, I bougt a dynamic capsule and wired the capsule between hot(2) and cold(3). It is a bit sensitive to mechanical noise.

In "Files"->"Schematics", I've upploaded a PDF describing how to connect a modified Panasonic capsule to a balanced input (or cabel). I've built it myself, but haven't got time for testing it. I will

(i.e., from We got it covered. Macrohenry is control for ownership and he has listed me as a moderator. We both have active the "delete group" key as well as other functions. If Mac wishes to add a

This is true, however I have customers that have been specifing that I make them ECM's with no FET's for years. In my customer's applications they are operating in strong RF fields (radar) and they

We make many kinds of ECM's It's time the WM-60/61 had some competition. If everyone can agree on what such a device ought to be, I'll run some, pass them out and you guys can see what you think.

If there is enough interest in having ECM manufacture a replacement for the WN60/61 capsule. Then how about manufacturing a capsule that could be used in a RF mic? The capsule would be the capacitor

mstrong82 wrote: Something with pre-amplifiers maybe? I have some Ole Wolff microphones on desk at moment and testing them for one rather specific applications. As I don't have panasonic WM60 in lab,