开云体育

Yahoo groups are closing on December 14th. All content will be deleted. If you want to backup the posts, photos & files from this group you can use a program called PG Offline. It has a 14

Hi John, It's not that they are discontinued, just that I'm behind in manufacturing. :( As you would know, you need to use a rail to rail opamp to get as close to the rails as possible. 0.2V is

I see that Peter Homann's web site lists his Digispeed controllers as sold out. https://www.homanndesigns.com/ I have one of the DC-06 controllers for step/dir but want to use a PWM to 0-10V

I'm using a CNC4PC M16D board and I'm confused on now to set up the AMT103 encoder and the correct pokeys assigned pins. I'm getting very clean A, B & Index pulses from the Encoder but only see True

Any faults on older systems are hardware or operator related, mostly the latter.? See http://www.helmancnc.com/fanuc-cnc-controls-naming-conventions/

Hmm. My comments didn't stand out like I thought they would. I'll highlight them now by removing the '>' See below.

See below. Sent: September-23-19 7:26 PM To: mach1mach2cnc@... Subject: RE: [mach1mach2cnc] Returning to MACH3/4 from LinuxCNC A few points of clarification: Again, I have no

A few points of clarification: Again, I have no personal knowledge of FANUC products but I find it very hard to believe that there are no unsquashed bugs even after years of usage. I’m curious

Fanuc 21 firmware has been out since 2010 ish - any was just a development due to hardware changes of software/firmware that had been out for many years.? Bugs were eradicated years ago and there has

I have no experience with Fanuc 21 controllers but I’ve never encountered any bug free software after over fifty years of computer usage. Congratulations! I’m sure that you understand why

John Stevenson and I did look at Pathpilot when it first came out. At the same time we obtained a couple of stand alone panel mounted clone Fanuc 21 style lathe controllers. It took me little longer

You didn’t include details of your problem but I suspect that a fix didn’t require changes to the code but merely a small tweak to the HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) file that defines how

I used Mach3 for several years on my Tormach PCNC770. When Tormach released PathPilot (which is mostly LinuxCNC) 3 years ago I converted. There is absolutely no comparison between the two types of

I too had run EMC for a while but I ran into a problem with one of the inputs/outputs that was opposite of what a G540 could use. I went on the EMC forum and posted my problem. I mentioned that it

Hi John - It's some years ago now but I gave it a good test but gave up. I'm not a programmer or software developer or any other sort of guru so failed to get it to work reliably. Unless you know

Anyone on this group who tried LinuxCNC for a while and then returned to using MACHx? If so, could you list the reasons why? Thanks John

Hi Folks, Do anyone have User Manual for this obsolete program? Or any manual? I'll appreciate a lot to get it on my email mrpeja

Yes I am running win 7 32 bits. So I have tried restoring the pc to an earlier date 7-24-19 hoping that would fix the issue. But it didn't. . I went ahead and installed the version of mach3 with the

I see that you said you had a 32 bit CPU. Does that mean that you are running a 32 bit version of Windows7? The parallel port will definitely not run with a 64 bit OS.

No joy! It works fine with the UC100 but reboots with the parallel port. Dan