开云体育I used Mach3 for several years on my Tormach PCNC770. When Tormach released PathPilot (which is mostly LinuxCNC) 3 years ago I converted. There is absolutely no comparison between the two types of control software. LinuxCNC hasn’t crashed or randomly done funny things over the last 3 years, the user interface is very attractive with clean elements instead of the gaudy default colours of Mach3, touch screen operation is a delight, the tool table works reliably, soft limits work, I can transfer files to my machine over Ethernet and even surf the net while running a job, the GCode dialect supports named variables and conditional execution which is great for hand written code but most importantly bugs are fixed with updated releases several times a year rather than being ignored. In summary, I would even consider going back to Mach3. ? From: mach1mach2cnc@... [mailto:mach1mach2cnc@...]
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2019 12:32 PM To: 'John Dammeyer' johnd@... [mach1mach2cnc] Subject: Re: [mach1mach2cnc] Returning to MACH3/4 from LinuxCNC ? ? Hi John - It's some years ago now but I gave it a good test but gave up. I'm not a programmer or software developer or any other sort of guru so failed to get it to work reliably. Unless you know Linux really well - forget it. It seems to have been written by some clever people but for specific instances and hardware and if your machine or method of working didn't exactly match you were on your own and expected to modify or amend to suit yourself. The GUI interfaces were mostly appallingly bad too. ? A quick look a few minutes ago shows nothing much appears to have changed in years LOL... ? Steve Blackmore
|