Re: [Owner] Re: [PhilosophicalM] Frida y F ive J une 7
Every time the weather is hot somewhere, it's reported as proof of human-induced "global warming" or, if it's cold it's human-induced "climate change." There is always bad weather somewhere. The
By
Ed Lomas
·
#2565
·
|
Re: [Owner] Re: [PhilosophicalM] Frida y F ive J une 7
There is no doubt in my mind that various political influences and personal biases are blended into the "scientific" priesthood of our culture, Ed. That is not only unsurprising, it is so very
By
Darrell King
·
#2564
·
|
Re: [Owner] Re: [PhilosophicalM] Frida y F ive J une 7
Oh yeah, "Repent! The end is near!" Nothing original about that, except that the message is secular this time, and instead of prophets and priests preaching it, it's scientists, whose opinions are
By
Ed Lomas
·
#2563
·
|
Re: Frida y F ive J une 7
That captures my broader feeling about the situation, David. Given the media reporting of a year of record temps. The metaphor of a fireball is especially apt when considering the wildfire news. D
By
Darrell King
·
#2562
·
|
Re: Frida y F ive J une 7
Then, the heavens tossed down the fireball and the lizards couldn't have done a thing to stop it. Now, the best and the brightest have proudly created their own fireball and they, too, can't do a
By
David Smith
·
#2561
·
|
Re: Frida y F ive J une 7
*1. What is the stupidest thing you have ever seen Google recommend?* I am drawing a blank. I know there have been moments, but my memory keeps delivering eBay searches within 50 miles that include
By
Darrell King
·
#2560
·
|
Re: Frida y F ive J une 7
1. What is the stupidist thing??you have ever seen Google recommend? To get rid of kidney stones - drink two liters of urine a day 2.? What us the worst law the US congress passed in? the 20th
By
mrvnchpmn
·
#2559
·
|
Re: Frida y F ive J une 7
1. What is the stupidist thing??you have ever seen Google recommend? 2.? What us the worst law the US congress passed in? the 20th century? 3.? Should the US allow Ukraine to use US supplied
By
mrvnchpmn
·
#2558
·
|
Re: Friday Five May 31
What evidence is there for falsification - except the statement of a? convicted perjurer.? The federal crimes are the interfering with the presidentail election. Sometimes I wonder how you? That's
By
mrvnchpmn
·
#2557
·
|
Re: Friday Five May 31
Marvin, That's pretty funny. Read New York law some time. Trump falsified business records to commit or conceal another crime. It has nothing to do with the Constitution nor with the jurisdiction of
By
a1thighmaster
·
#2556
·
|
Re: Friday Five May 31
Election law is federal - no state has jurisdiction in a federal election. Read the constitution some time! Marvin, Are you really asking what the felony is when it is well known that all 34 felony
By
mrvnchpmn
·
#2555
·
|
Re: [Owner] Re: [PhilosophicalM] Friday Five May 31
The only violation of election law would be under a federal statute - which is not trialble in a state court. Mavin
By
mrvnchpmn
·
#2554
·
|
Re: [Owner] Re: [PhilosophicalM] Friday Five May 31
A multi-billion dollar corporation's individual journal entries number in the thousands each month, and are not very detailed. I can't imagine a presidential election coming out differently over how
By
Ed Lomas
·
#2553
·
|
Re: [Owner] Re: [PhilosophicalM] Friday Five May 31
Ed, LOL! Nice try, but not correct. If falsifying business records were the only thing he'd been charged with then that is still a misdemeanor. Because the falsification was done in order to influence
By
a1thighmaster
·
#2552
·
|
Re: [Owner] Re: [PhilosophicalM] Friday Five May 31
Up until this year it was a misdemeanor. So an accountant entered blackmail payments to a prostitute under an ambiguous description, and the state went after the guy being blackmailed. Who was the
By
Ed Lomas
·
#2551
·
|
Re: Friday Five May 31
Marvin, Are you really asking what the felony is when it is well known that all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to cover up hush money payments to a porn star were done to influence
By
a1thighmaster
·
#2550
·
|
Re: Friday Five May 31
David, I'm sure there's no connection. It's all about Trump's bold flauting of state and federal law. We have checks and balances in our governmental systems that prevent interference between these
By
a1thighmaster
·
#2549
·
|
Re: Friday Five May 31
First - ;what is the alleged felony?? Second why was the trial brought by the same person who refused to charge him before?? Third why was the charge brought immediately after he declared his
By
mrvnchpmn
·
#2548
·
|
Re: Friday Five May 31
I've not followed the story at all closely, Celeste. But is it a coincidence that these legal attacks occurred all at once now and in a location hostile to Trump? Do you suspect no connection?
By
David Smith
·
#2547
·
|
Re: Friday Five May 31
David, That's not what Trump's trial was about really. It was about him paying to have his affair covered up so it wouldn't look bad to his supporters. He managed to commit felonies in order to do
By
a1thighmaster
·
#2546
·
|