开云体育

Thank you for the reminders, David. Truth that change is nonstop and nothing lasts. There are some who work to preserve wildlife, DNA, mankind, Gaia, a country or a culture. What seems traumatically

I expect the boil and I am prepared to be cooked. Having said that, and now admitting my powerlessness to extricate myself with an athletic leap, I prepare for increasing heat best I can and try to

// I guess I have little confidence that the constant arguing will lead to change. // Change is constant. ? As Taoiseach, I had to deal with the painfully slow process whereby the Irish Republican

// it has become blaringly obvious after witnessing endless hours of tedious discussion and argument that humanity is not favoring the adoption of new behaviors. After years (decades?) of argument,

// I have seen and heard enough over the past few years to believe that the accumulation of social stressors is pushing society in a direction of increasing unrest and decreasing crisis coping. While

So which of these dreadful disasters are worthy of note? :) I am freshly retired and have lived in an RV we built ourselves for about two years now, traveling the Continental U.S. My fundamental

Especially here, Ed, I would hope we could apply rational and trained thought to avoid this trap! Excellent point. D

I hear you, Celeste (well, I *read* you!) I guess I have little confidence that the constant arguing will lead to change. The bulk of the human swarm is too busy starving and dealing with such

Exactly, Marvin. As is probably apparent now, the biggest surprise for me is that people spend so much time arguing the point in social interactions as opposed to considering coping skills for it. Or

Agreed, Marvin. Not new and possibly not due to human behavior (or perhaps we do contribute in some way?), but certainly worth some practical evaluation. After all, who wants to ruin the wine supply

Perfect example to illustrate the point I just posted, Ed. Thank you. You may be right and I would feel silly debating that point even if I were convinced otherwise. The evidence is suggestive but not

Agreed, Anabel. I am more the practical focus kind of student than the theoretical exploration kind. For my purposes, it suffices to study whether the weather patterns will have any significant impact

uniformitarianism wrote:

Ed, Why do you keep posting information that's not relevant to current climate change on our planet? Aloha, Celeste

Marvin, It takes one comment to know another? Now that makes no sense at all. Aloha, Celeste

Hey, people... this is the kind of thing that makes me just skip reading... Please, cut it out. Slds Anabel Pérez Bemporat Despachante de AduanaLic. Comercio Internacional? Capacitadora en Aduanas y

Takes on e to know one Jim, Your comments are also pretty silly. Aloha, Celeste

From Wikipedia article on the Las Global Period (LGP): The LGP is part of a larger sequence of glacial and interglacial <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interglacial> periods known as the Quaternary

Jim, No, there's no ad hominem in what I wrote. I did not attack you nor insult you. The vast majority of climatologists are pretty sure about climate change. So I don't see any need to be in denial

Your last sentence is veiled ad hominem. We cannot possibly know with any certainty whether what's happening now is caused by man.? What we do know is that the temperature record has been "adjusted"