开云体育

Ed,

Why do you keep posting information that's not relevant to current climate change on our planet?

Aloha,
Celeste

On 2/19/2024 12:07 PM, Ed Lomas wrote:

From Wikipedia article on the Las Global Period (LGP):

The LGP is part of a larger sequence of glacial and??periods known as the??which started around 2,588,000 years ago and is ongoing.?The definition of the??as beginning 2.58 million years ago (Mya) is based on the formation of the?. The??began to form earlier, at about 34 Mya, in the mid-?(). The term??is used to include this early phase.?The previous ice age, the?, which ended about 128,000 years ago, was more severe than the Last Glacial Period in some areas such as Britain, but less severe in others.

During this last glacial period, alternating episodes of glacier advance, and retreat occurred. Within the last glacial period, the??was between 26,000 and 20,000 years BP. While the general pattern of global cooling and glacier advance was similar, local differences in the development of glacier advance and retreat make comparing the details from continent to continent difficult (see picture of ice core data below for differences). Around 12,800 years ago, the?, the most recent glacial epoch, began, a coda to the preceding 100,000-year glacial period. Its end about 11,550 years ago marked the beginning of the?, the current??.

From the point of view of human?, the LGP falls in the?and early??periods. When the??event started,??was confined to lower latitudes and used tools comparable to those used by?in western and central??and by??and??in Asia.?

(Incidentally, the ice cap on Mars waxes and wanes even faster than ours.)

On Monday, February 19, 2024, Celeste wrote:

Jim,

No, there's no ad hominem in what I wrote. I did not attack you nor insult you. The vast majority of climatologists are pretty sure about climate change. So I don't see any need to be in denial about it. Is it that you just don't want to change any of your behavior to save yourself and others?

On 2/19/2024 11:14 AM, jimntempe wrote:

Your last sentence is veiled ad hominem.

We cannot possibly know with any certainty whether what's happening now is caused by man.? What we do know is that the temperature record has been "adjusted" to produce the desired answer.? Using only the climate alarmist folks OWN prior work the amount of "adjustment to get the desired answer" can be seen.? They have raised prior cold temperature data to create the narrative they push.? They have lowered the medieval warm period data for the same reason.? In many cases they simply cut off the data at whatever past point works best to show a rising trend.






Celeste wrote:

Ed, Blah blah blah blah. That's all been looked at and it has nothing to do with fossil fuel burning, which is what has been happening for the last 100 or so years. The average global temperature has already risen and we have the capability to prevent the impending disasters that continued temperature rise would cause. Interesting to see that you care so little about your fellow humans.